Topic 9.4 is an extension of Topic 4. Essential idea: Resolution places an absolute limit on the extent to which an optical or other system can separate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A: Wave Phenomena A.5 Resolution. Resolution Resolution refers to the ability to distinguish two objects that are close together. E.g. Two distant stars.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35 Diffraction and Polarization.
Lecture 16 Diffraction Chp. 37
Cutnell/Johnson Physics 7th edition
The waves spread out from the opening!
4/13/2017 5:04 PM Diffraction © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be.
 In our analysis of the double slit interference in Waves we assumed that both slits act as point sources.  From the previous figure we see that the.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Diffraction and Polarization.
Topic 11.3 Diffraction.
Lecture 41: WED 29 APR Physics 2102 Jonathan Dowling Ch. 36: Diffraction.
Diffraction of Light Waves
Diffraction Physics 202 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 24.
Interference & Diffraction
Physics 1402: Lecture 35 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: graded soon … »solutions –Homework 09: Wednesday December 9 Optics –Diffraction »Introduction.
Diffraction Physics 202 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 26.
Diffraction Physics 202 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 26.
Optical Instruments Chapter 25.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
Chapter 25:Optical Instruments Cameras Homework assignment : Read Chap.25, Sample exercises : 4,21,24,41,43  Principle of a camera ss’ D Intensity of.
Example: What is the ratio of the irradiances at the central peak maximum to the first of the secondary maxima?
Diffraction vs. Interference
Topic 9.2 is an extension of Topic 4.4. Both single and the double-slit diffraction were considered in 4.4. Essential idea: Single-slit diffraction occurs.
Chapter 25 Optical Instruments.
Wave Optics.
Diffraction: single slit How can we explain the pattern from light going through a single slit? w screen L x.
Chapter 36 In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing through a single.
Lecture 29 Physics 2102 Jonathan Dowling Ch. 36: Diffraction.
Chapter 36 Diffraction In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing.
Principal maxima become sharper Increases the contrast between the principal maxima and the subsidiary maxima GRATINGS: Why Add More Slits?
Resolution. Resolution: Refers to the sharpness and clarity of an image. The term is most often used to describe monitors, printers, and bit- mapped graphic.
Review For Waves Test Page 1 v = f f = 1/T = 720. x10 -9 m, v = c = 3.00 x 10 8 m/s f = 4.17E+14 Hz T = 1/f = 2.4E-15 s 4.17E+14 Hz, 2.4E-15 s W What.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
Physics 1C Lecture 27B.
The waves spread out from the opening!
Diffraction – The bending of a wave around a barrier, such as an obstacle or the edges of an opening.
Wave superposition If two waves are in the same place at the same time they superpose. This means that their amplitudes add together vectorially Positively.
Sketch the variation with angle of diffraction of the relative intensity of light emitted by two point sources that has been diffracted at a single.
1 Fraunhofer Diffraction: Single, multiple slit(s) & Circular aperture Fri. Nov. 22, 2002.
DIFFRACTION Shrishail Kamble.
Option A - Wave Phenomena Standing Waves, Resonance, Doppler Effect, Diffraction, Resolution, Polarization.
Topic 11  11.4: Resolution. Double Slit  In our analysis of the double slit interference in Waves we assumed that both slits act as point sources.
Physics 1202: Lecture 26 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Friday Nov. 6… –Chap. 18, 19, 20, and 21 No HW for this week (midterm)No HW for this.
Resolution Extracted from a resource to College Physics by Serway and Faughn Chap 25.
11: Wave Phenomena 11.4 Resolution. Resolution Resolution refers to the ability to distinguish two objects that are close together. E.g. Two distant stars.
Student of the Week. Essential Idea:  Resolution places an absolute limit on the extent to which an optical or other system can separate images of.
Young’s Double Slit Contents: Interference Diffraction Young’s Double Slit Angle Distance Single slit Rayleigh Criterion.
Rayleigh Criterion Contents: Diffraction patterns The Rayleigh criterion.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
Young's double-slit experiment
Diffraction and Coherence 16-2 and CAN WAVES BEND AROUND CORNERS? ·Can you hear me when I stand around the corner and yell? ·What about light? Think.
 Resolution.  The astronomers tell us that many of the stars that we observe with the naked eye are in fact binary stars  That is, what we see as a.
11.1 – Standing/ Stationary Waves
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Wave superposition If two waves are in the same place at the same time they superpose. This means that their amplitudes add together vectorially Positively.
Topic : Resolution.
Wave Phenomena Resolution
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution
Chapter 36 In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing through a single.
Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.2 – Single-slit diffraction
The Rayleigh criterion
Example: 633 nm laser light is passed through a narrow slit and a diffraction pattern is observed on a screen 6.0 m away. The distance on the screen.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Devil physics The baddest class on campus IB Physics
Devil physics The baddest class on campus IB Physics
Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution
Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.2 – Single-slit diffraction
Fraunhofer diffraction from Circular apertures:
The waves spread out from the opening!
Presentation transcript:

Topic 9.4 is an extension of Topic 4. Essential idea: Resolution places an absolute limit on the extent to which an optical or other system can separate images of objects. Nature of science: Improved technology: The Rayleigh criterion is the limit of resolution. Continuing advancement in technology such as large diameter dishes or lenses or the use of smaller wavelength lasers pushes the limits of what we can resolve. Understandings: The size of a diffracting aperture The resolution of simple monochromatic two-source systems Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

Applications and skills: Solving problems involving the Rayleigh criterion for light emitted by two sources diffracted at a single slit Resolvance of diffraction gratings Guidance: Proof of the diffraction grating resolvance equation is not required Data booklet reference:  = 1.22 / b R = /  = mN Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

International-mindedness: Satellite use for commercial and political purposes is dictated by the resolution capabilities of the satellite Theory of knowledge: The resolution limits set by Dawes and Rayleigh are capable of being surpassed by the construction of high quality telescopes. Are we capable of breaking other limits of scientific knowledge with our advancing technology? Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

Utilization: An optical or other reception system must be able to resolve the intended images. This has implications for satellite transmissions, radio astronomy and many other applications in physics and technology (see Physics option C) Storage media such as compact discs (and their variants) and CCD sensors rely on resolution limits to store and reproduce media accurately Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

Aims: Aim 3: this sub-topic helps bridge the gap between wave theory and real-life applications Aim 8: the need for communication between national communities via satellites raises the awareness of the social and economic implications of technology Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

EXAMPLE: Observe the animation of the headlights located about a meter apart on an approaching jeep. Describe qualitatively what you see. SOLUTION:  At first the two headlights appear to be one light source.  The image begins to split as the vehicle approaches.  Finally the two headlights are resolved. The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems  Two distant objects that are close together will look like one object if they are far enough away. central max 1 st min Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution diffraction pattern of each source

EXAMPLE: List NOT RESOLVED, JUST RESOLVED, RESOLVED, WELL-RESOLVED. The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems  The following example shows different degrees of resolution of the headlights of the last slide. A B C D E F central max 1 st min A B C D E F Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems  Two sources are just resolved using an aperture if the following is true: the first minimum of the diffraction pattern of one of the sources falls on the central maximum of the diffraction pattern of the other source.  This criterion yields the following two formulas for minimal angular separation:  This definition is known as Raleigh’s criterion. central max 1 st min Rayleigh criterion for SQUARE apertures  = / b b b (  in rad) Rayleigh criterion for CIRCULAR apertures  = 1.22 / b (  in rad) b Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

PRACTICE: A car’s headlights ( = 530 nm) are 0.75 m apart. At what maximum distance can they just be resolved by the human eye (diameter = 2.5 mm)? SOLUTION: Use  = 1.22 / b since pupil is circular.  = 1.22 / b = 1.22(530  ) / =  rad.  From the sketch  = 0.75 / D so that D = 0.75 /  = 0.75 /  = 2.9 km. The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems 0.75 m  D Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution Rayleigh criterion for SQUARE apertures  = / b b b (  in rad) Rayleigh criterion for CIRCULAR apertures  = 1.22 / b (  in rad) b

FYI  Note that we usually cancel the units (in this case light years). Don’t convert prematurely! PRACTICE: A 68-meter diameter radio telescope is receiving radio signals of 2.0 GHz from two stars that are 75 light years (ly) away and separated by ly. (a) Can the telescope resolve the images of the two stars? SOLUTION:  = c / f = 3.00  10 8 / 2.0  10 9 = 0.15 m.  For the telescope  = 1.22 / b = 1.22(0.15) / 68 = rad.  For the stars  = / 75 = rad. The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems  75 NO. The angular separation of the stars is too small for the telescope to resolve. Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

FYI  Radio telescopes are commonly grouped together in what are called radio arrays. PRACTICE: A 68-meter diameter radio telescope is receiving radio signals of 2.0 GHz from two stars that are 75 light years (ly) away and separated by ly. (b) If another identical radio telescope is located 350 m away and it can be used in concert with the first one to create a single telescope having an effective diameter of 350 m, can the pair resolve the two stars? SOLUTION: We need   / 75 = rad.  = c / f = 3  10 8 / 2.0  10 9 = 0.15 m (as before).  For the new telescope  = 1.22 / b = 1.22(0.15) / 350 = rad. The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution YES.

PRACTICE: List two ways to increase the resolution (decrease  ) of an optical device. SOLUTION:  Method 1: Increase b, the diameter. Thus, the 200-inch telescope on Mt. Palomar will have a better resolution than a 2-inch diameter home-sized telescope.  Method 2: Decrease the wavelength. Thus, an electron microscope has better resolution than an optical microscope. The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution Rayleigh criterion for CIRCULAR apertures  = 1.22 / b (  in rad) b

Palomar Observatory – 200 inch detector

PRACTICE: An electron microscope (EM) uses electrons which have been accelerated under a p.d. of 750 V. Explain why the EM has better resolution than the light microscope. SOLUTION: Use = h / p and eV = (1/2)mv 2.  From eV = (1/2)mv 2 we get v 2 = 2eV / m = 2  1.6   750 / 9.11  v = 1.6  10 7 ms -1.  From = h / p = h / mv we get = 6.63  / (9.11   1.6  10 7 ) = 4.5  m (0.045 nm).  Since the electron’s wavelength is much smaller than that of visible light (350 nm – 750 nm) its resolution is times better. The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

 FYI. The single slit is our aperture.  Note that the peak of one matches the 1 st minimum of the other. Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems

 For the woman’s round pupils:  = 1.22 / b  We want D: 1.2  = D  = = 1.2 / D D = 1.2 / = 7500 m (7.5 km).  = 1.22  400  / = 1.6  rad. Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems

 = 2.3  10 6 / 4.5  = 5.1  rad.  For an eye to see this angular separation:  = 1.22 / b b = 1.22 /  = 500  / 5.1  = 1.2 m.  This eye diameter is way too big.  Thus the human eye will perceive Pluto only as a point source of light.  Pluto’s angular separation at the equator is Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems

 Use  = 1.22 / b ( or  = / b since we are looking only for the ORDER ):  = 1.22(0.06) / 120 = 6  rad.  = 0.06 / 120 = 5  rad. Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution The resolution of monochromatic two-source systems

Resolvance of diffraction gratings  Consider the intensity patterns for multiple-slit interference.  Two pattern characteristics are apparent: (1)The more slits, the higher the intensity of the primary maxima. (2)The more slits, the narrower the primary maxima. Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution

FYI  Resolvance is essentially a measure of how well a diffraction grating can separate two wavelengths. Resolvance of diffraction gratings  If we think of a diffraction grating as having hundreds of slits, we can imagine that the widths of the primary maxima are very small, indeed.  And using the Raleigh criterion on these primary maxima, we see that the resolution for a grating will be proportional to the number of lines.  The resolvance R of a diffraction grating is defined as the ratio of the average of two wavelengths to their difference . Thus Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution R = /  resolvance of a diffraction grating

Resolvance of diffraction gratings  As we pointed out on the previous slide, grating resolution is proportional to N, the total lines illuminated by the incident beam of light.  Observing the diffraction pattern for white light, we see that a natural consequence of diffraction is the spreading out of the pattern for higher orders. This amounts to a natural separation of wavelengths that increases with order.  Without proof, we state that the resolvance R for each order of diffraction m is given by R = Nm, where N is the total number of slits illuminated by the beam. (In light of the above points this should be reasonable.) Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution R = /  = Nm resolvance of a diffraction grating n = 0 n = 1 n = 2

EXAMPLE: Two lines of the sodium emission spectrum are visible, having wavelengths of nm and nm. A diffraction grating is illuminated with a beam of this light having a width of mm. (a)What is the resolvance of this grating? SOLUTION:  = ( ) / 2 = nm. Thus R = /  = / (589.6 – 589.0) = Resolvance of diffraction gratings Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution R = /  = Nm resolvance of a diffraction grating

EXAMPLE: Two lines of the sodium emission spectrum are visible, having wavelengths of nm and nm. A diffraction grating is illuminated with a beam of this light having a width of mm. (b) Find the minimum number of lines under the beam needed for the resolvance of the order 2 spectrum. SOLUTION: Use R = Nm where m = 2 and R = N = R / m = / 2 = Resolvance of diffraction gratings Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution R = /  = Nm resolvance of a diffraction grating

EXAMPLE: Two lines of the sodium emission spectrum are visible, having wavelengths of nm and nm. A diffraction grating is illuminated with a beam of this light having a width of mm. (c) Find the minimum number of lines per mm needed in this particular diffraction grating. SOLUTION: Lines per mm = lines / mm = Resolvance of diffraction gratings Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution R = /  = Nm resolvance of a diffraction grating

PRACTICE: A beam of light having an average wavelength of nm is incident on a 1.50-cm wide diffraction grating having 500. lines per mm. Calculate the smallest difference in wavelength that can be resolved in the third order and find the resolvance of the grating. SOLUTION:  Use /  = Nm where m = 3 and = nm  N is the number of lines in the incident beam. Thus N = (500 mm -1 )(15.0 mm) =  From /  = Nm we get  = / Nm = nm / 7500  3 = nm.  From R = Nm we get R = Nm = 7500  3 = Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution Resolvance of diffraction gratings

PRACTICE: CDs and DVDs consist of very tiny pits and peaks that represent zeros and ones (binary). These pits are detected by laser light. Explain why DVDs can hold more information than CDs. SOLUTION:  With the advent of lasers having higher frequencies, smaller pits can be resolved.  A DVD player must have a laser of higher frequency (smaller wavelength) than a CD player. DIGITAL INFORMATION STORAGE light pickup (laser) motion of “groove” Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution Resolvance of diffraction gratings

EXAMPLE: Here is a comparison of the different laser frequencies and wavelengths used today. Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution Resolvance of diffraction gratings