Citizens Review Panels Blake Jones Program Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CITIZEN REVIEW PANEL Theresa Costello, MA Director National Resource Center for Child Protective Services.
Advertisements

1 Strategies for addressing challenges around Termination of Parental Rights. Presenters: Bill Stanton, Consultant, ICF Consulting Mary Coogan, Esq. Advocates.
Child Protective Services Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance May 30, 2007.
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Working Across Systems to Improve Outcomes for Young Children Sheryl Dicker, J.D. Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Family and Social Medicine, Albert.
 Clarence H. Carter, Director, Department of Economic Security Edward B. Truman, Special Counsel, Arizona Attorney General’s Office 1.
Education Outcome Measures for Courts Child Welfare Agency’s Perspective on the Need for Education Outcome Measures Kathleen McNaught ABA Center on Children.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
The mission of the Office of the Child Advocate for the Protection of Children (“OCA”) continues to be legislatively mandated. The OCA has responsibility.
The mission of the Office of the Child Advocate for the Protection of Children (“OCA”) continues to be legislatively mandated. The OCA has responsibility.
How can Juvenile Courts Better Address the Needs of Child Maltreatment Victims with Disabilities who are in Foster Care? Howard Davidson ABA Center on.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 CHILD PROTECTION IN THE UNITED STATES Norma Threadgill-Goldson, Ph.D., MSW Eastern.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
Understanding DCBS Custody & Medical Consent for Services Todd MeadeDebbie Acker, RN CPS Specialist Nurse Service Administrator Child Safety BranchMedical.
Overview of the School Health Program By Dr. O.O. Sekoni A presentation given at the training workshop on Improving Child Health in Ibadan Primary Schools.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
ALASKA CITIZEN REVIEW PANEL BIA Providers’ Conference Anchorage, AK December 2, 2014 CRP’s work and how you can help.
1 Collaboration between the Child Protection and Early Intervention Systems: CAPTA in Ohio.
The New Scottish Teacher Education Professional Standards and the Development of the Professional Update System Tom Hamilton Director of Education and.
Child Abuse: Preventive and Reactive Interventions.
Investigation and case planning Your responsibilities under the Children Act 1989 Brayne & Carr: Law for Social Workers: 10e Chapter 9.
North Carolina’s Community Child Protection Teams Enhancing the Program “Rather to be than seem” Phyllis B. Fulton, CCPT Coordinator.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee III-4.
1 CAPTA Provision on Referrals to IDEA Part C National Early Childhood Conference December 12, 2005 Catherine M. Nolan.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Keeping Your Panels Afloat History and Best Practices Blake L. Jones, PhD Kentucky Citizen Review Panels Anita Keyes Minnesota Citizen Review Panels The.
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the rights of neglected and abused children. I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the.
Citizen Participation in Public Child Welfare: A Multi-State Study of Citizens Review Panel Members’ Perceptions of Effectiveness Blake L. Jones, MSW,
Recruiting and Retaining Good Citizen Review Panel members The South Dakota Perspective.
1 Family Resources and Supports Institute 2012 One Door: Early Start and Prevention Resource and Referral Services (PRRS) Susan Roddy, PRRS Director Sherry.
Department of Human Services
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Preventing and Responding to Child Abuse Presented by the Children and Family Violence Committee of the Domestic Violence Council Welcome!
Alaska’s Citizen Review Panel. Presentation Outline Citizen Review Panel - Brief overview Panel’s activities since 2002 This year’s goals Your participation.
Citizen Review Panels for Child Protective Services Blake L. Jones, Ph.D. University of Kentucky College of Social Work.
1 Statewide Screening Collaborative July 30, 2013 Prevention Resource and Referral Services (PRRS) Susan Roddy, PRRS Project Director.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Administration for Children and Families Children’s Bureau Fostering Connections Implementation Support & Resources CAPTA 2010 – Highlights.
Pathways to Safety (DR) In Monterey County A Community-Based Early Intervention Initiative.
A.J. (Tony) Brandenburg August 21, 2015 TCAP Tribal Court Conference Protecting Indian Children (760)
NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Employee Training: Requirements for Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse, Child Neglect, and Sexual Offenses on School Premises Involving Students
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
National State Auditors Association
Office of Children's Services
Alaska Citizen Review Panel
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
Confidentiality and Interagency Sharing of Juvenile Information
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
Alaska’s Citizen Review Panel
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
House Human Services Committee
Alaska Citizen Review Panel
Presentation transcript:

Citizens Review Panels Blake Jones Program Coordinator

Overview Objectives  Review history leading up to the federal requirement  Detail what the federal legislation requires  Review Kentucky’s response to date  Focus on the roles and responsibilities of CRP members

1974 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act Requires submission of a state plan detailing compliance in order to obtain state child abuse and neglect grant, including: – Child abuse and neglect reporting system – Provision of protective services – Confidentiality

National Climate Moves from focus on Reunification to Safety  Concern over child fatalities in open cases, children “languishing” in foster care, children returned to unsafe home environments  A call across the country for increased accountability in the child protection system  Federal statutory change came in 2 waves: – 1996 CAPTA reauthorization – 1997 adoption and safe families act

1996 CAPTA Reauthorization  Public disclosure in cases resulting in a fatality or near fatality  Mechanisms to ensure that the State does not require reunification of a child with a parent who has been found guilty of killing another child or felony assault resulting in serious bodily injury to a child  Conviction of these crimes is a ground for TPR of surviving children

1996 CAPTA Reauthorization  Expedited TPR for “abandoned infants”  And… Establishment of Citizen Review Panels!

Establishment of Citizen Review Panels (by July 1999)  3 panels per state (some only need one)  Each panel has the responsibility to review compliance of state and local CPS agencies with respect to: – state CAPTA plan – Other criteria the panel considers important, which may include coordination with foster care and adoption programs and review of child fatalities and near fatalities

Requirements for Citizen Review Panels  Composed of volunteer members that – are broadly representative of the community in which they are operating – include individuals with expertise in the prevention and treatment of CA/N – Include DCBS liaison  Meet at least quarterly  Examine policies and procedures and, where appropriate, specific cases of both state and local agencies  Maintain confidentiality  Prepare an annual report (by 12/31)

CPS Standards Subject to Review  Reporting procedures  Screening and investigation  Child safety steps  Immunity for good faith reporting  Confidentiality of records  Public disclosure in fatalities and near fatalities  Expedited TPR  Cooperation of law enforcement, courts and state CPS agencies  Expungement of records available to public  Appointment of guardians ad litem  Appeal of findings  Provisions not requiring reunification in certain cases

Panel Can Examine Any of the Following Parts of the CPS System  Intake and initial screening  Investigation or assessment  Case determination  Service planing, implementation, and monitoring  Case closure  Crisis intervention; Emergency placement; Family stabilization  Coordination of services  Staff qualifications, training and workload

Examples of Approaches and Sources of Information  In-depth review of a small number of cases  Broader review of cases  Analysis of statewide data systems  Review of agency policy and procedures  Surveys  Quality assurance reviews  Focus groups or interviews of staff, consumers, service providers, mandated reporters, foster parents, others  Others?

Kentucky Framework July, 2000: UK signs contract with Cabinet to hire coordinator

Six Active Panels  Lexington  Louisville  Mayfield  Gateway/Buffalo Trace  Statewide CRP  Big Sandy

Examples of What Panels Have Done Jefferson: Case Reviews, Surveys, Focus Groups Mayfield: Surveys of Workers Fayette: Focus Groups with DCBS staff and community

Unique Opportunity  Unbiased citizen input  Citizens can be advocates (i.e., With legislators)  “Community partners”

My Role  Provide logistical and technical support  Assist with training  Assist with recruiting  Assist with strategic planning  Act as liaison with Cabinet, other panels  Stay in touch with other states

Your Role  Attend meetings  Remain unbiased in your evaluation  Assist with planning, then “keep group on track”  Some work in between monthly meetings  Maintain confidentiality

What is available to you?  Me Money for regional training/workshops  Quarterly newsletter  Annual Recognition Dinner in Frankfort

Never doubt that a small, dedicated group of citizens can make a difference. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has….. ~ Margaret Mead