1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Campus Improvement Plans
Carol Swingle, Facilitator
English Language Learners Directors’ Meeting Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
1 Comprehensive Needs Assessment and Planning School Improvement Conference November 26, 2007.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Michigan’s School Improvement Process Model Plan Study Gather Data Do Student Achievement.
MAS/FPS Conference Traverse City November 11, 2007.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Title II-A Webinar Series: Professional Development Planning Teresa A. Burgess Coordinator Title II-A Idaho State Department of Education
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Spring Directors’ Meeting Department of Education Update May 9, 2008.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
School Improvement Planning With ASSIST 1. What is ASSIST? 2  ASSIST = Adaptive System of School Improvement Support Tools  Partner = AdvancED  Web-based.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
1 Technology Review NCA CASI / MDE Spring School Improvement Conference Apr. 8, 2008 Albert Mayo (AdvancED,
1 School Improvement Planning and your Title I, Part A Programs
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees August 24, 2015.
Overview of Indiana’s Alternate Assessment October 2014 Karen Stein, IDOE.
Michigan School Improvement Framework. The Vision… Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic, Resource Teacher.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Analyze Data.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
School Improvement “Proper Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance” February 2010 Detroit Public Schools Diane Fleming, Regional Superintendent Arveneda.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Office of Title I & Section 31a Compliance Welcome! Title I, Part A (Title I) Program and Budget Planning March
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Heavy/Industrial Equipment Maintenance Technologies Release of Standards MDE – Office of Career and Technical Education and Michigan Center for.
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Continuous Improvement Planning with the eCIP Tool
Schoolwide Programs.
LEA Planning Cycle.
Presentation transcript:

1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008

School /District Comprehensive Needs Assessment School/District Standard Assessment Report School and District Improvement Plans ISD/RESA Improvement Plan ISD/RESA Comprehensive Needs Assessment ISD/RESA Standard Assessment Report EdYES! Report Consolidated Application StudentAchievementStudentAchievement 40 Indicators Self Assessment Student Data System Data System Data Student Profile Student Data System Data System Data Student Profile MDENCA

3 MDE Comprehensive Needs Assessment Student Data System Data Summative Student Test Data Formative Student Test Data Non-Academic Student Data Stakeholder Perception School Demographics Teaching for Learning Leadership Personnel Professional Learning Parent and Community Data Management Challenges (green sheets) Challenges (Green sheets)

4 School Improvement Planning ISD/RESA Template

5 Format of Template  Mirrors the design of both the School and District improvement templates  Includes the required elements that are unique to the ISD/RESA

6 Federal Requirements 1. Achievement goals for special populations (Title I, Parts A, C, or D) 2. At lease one goal in each of the four content areas (ELA, Math, Science, and Social Studies) 3. Objectives and Strategies to accomplish the stated goals 4. Include Stakeholder involvement

7 Federal requirements… 5. Contain monitoring assessments that provide formative information to guide additional support 6. Strategies to provide support for High Priority Schools

8 State Requirements 1. Stakeholder involvement in development, monitoring and evaluation of plan 2. Strategies to assist districts in improving student academic learning 3. Plan for professional development that is aligned with stated achievement goals 4. Strategies to help districts integrate applied academics, and career and employability skills into curricular areas

9 State Requirements …. 5. Strategies to include structured, on-the- job training 6. Collaboration strategies with community agencies to support learning 7. Long-range cost containment measures 8. Recommendations for consolidation or enhancement of interdistrict cooperation 9. Evaluation methods

10 Contents – Section I  Completed during the CNA analysis: Content Area Content Area Goal Status Goal Status Student Goal Statement Student Goal Statement Gap/Need Statement Gap/Need Statement Contributing Cause for the Gap Contributing Cause for the Gap Data sources Data sources

11 Contents – Section II  Completed during the Comprehensive Needs Assessment analysis: System Practices that were identified as challenges and were aligned to specific goal areas System Practices that were identified as challenges and were aligned to specific goal areas

12 Contents - Section III  Section III is the plan to address Section I & II: Objective Statement Objective Statement Multiple measures Multiple measures Strategy statements Strategy statements Activity statements Activity statements Person Responsible Person Responsible Timeline for activity Timeline for activity Resources needed Resources needed Monitoring Plan Monitoring Plan Evidence of Success Evidence of Success Other Required Information Other Required Information Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Additional Assurances Required Additional Assurances Required

13 Common Vocabulary Goal Statements Objective Statements Strategy Statements Action Steps

14 Goal Statements  Linked to identified Student Academic Learning Needs  States broadly the area of focus and that all students will become successful learners  Based on a careful analysis of data  Defines the priority area for an improvement plan

15 Objective Statement  Linked to the goal  Identifies the knowledge, skills, outcomes and results that are measurable, observable and quantifiable  States: Who, will be able to do what, by when, as measured by what?

16 Strategy Statements  Linked to the objective  Specific, planned, research-based programs and/or instructional activities  Focus on maximizing each student’s growth and individual success  Done to/or with students to develop a specific result

17 Action Steps  Linked to strategies  Specific steps that include: Action Steps Action Steps Staff responsible Staff responsible Timeline Timeline Resources Needed Resources Needed Monitoring Plan for activity Monitoring Plan for activity Evidence of Activity Success Evidence of Activity Success

18 Table Activity #1 Review the CNA tool: Identify areas that might need clarification Identify areas that might need clarification Identify any information that you think is missing Identify any information that you think is missing Discuss how this tool might be used in your work Discuss how this tool might be used in your work Other comments/suggestions Other comments/suggestions

19 Table Activity # 2 Review the SIP tool: Identify areas that might need clarification Identify areas that might need clarification Identify any information that you think is missing Identify any information that you think is missing Discuss how this tool might be used in your work Discuss how this tool might be used in your work Other comments/suggestions Other comments/suggestions

20 Upcoming Events MDE/NCA Joint conference : Teaching for Learning April 7 th & 8 th, 2008 Lansing Center Lansing, Michigan Pre-Conference April 6 th, 2008 Review of available MDE/NCA school improvement tools

21 Contact Information Betty Underwood, Interim Director Office of School Improvement Linda Forward, Supervisor Office of School Improvement Linda Kent, Project Coordinator Office of School Improvement Diane Joslin-Gould, Project Consultant Office of School Improvement