Analysis of Factorial Designs Statistical Analysis of 2x2 Designs Statistical Analysis of kxk Designs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complex Experimental Designs
Advertisements

ANCOVA Workings of ANOVA & ANCOVA ANCOVA, Semi-Partial correlations, statistical control Using model plotting to think about ANCOVA & Statistical control.
Factorial Designs Passer Chapter 9
Kxk BG Factorial Designs expanding the 2x2 design reasons for larger designs statistical analysis of kxk BG factorial designs using LSD for kxk factorial.
ANOVA & Pairwise Comparisons
Factorial Hypotheses Some review & practice Identifying main effect and interaction RH: Explicit factorial RH: “Blending” interaction and main effect RH:
3-way Factorial Designs Expanding factorial designs Effects in a 3-way design Causal Interpretations of 3-way factorial effects Defining a 3-way interaction.
Analytic Comparisons & Trend Analyses Analytic Comparisons –Simple comparisons –Complex comparisons –Trend Analyses Errors & Confusions when interpreting.
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Conceptual Review Conceptual Formula, Sig Testing Calculating in SPSS
Multiple Group X² Designs & Follow-up Analyses X² for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons & RH Testing Alpha inflation Effect sizes for k-group.
Factorial Designs: Research Hypotheses & Describing Results Research Hypotheses of Factorial Designs Inspecting tables to describe factorial data patterns.
Multiple Group X² Designs & Follow-up Analyses X² for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons & RH Testing Alpha inflation Effect sizes for k-group.
ANCOVA Workings of ANOVA & ANCOVA ANCOVA, Semi-Partial correlations, statistical control Using model plotting to think about ANCOVA & Statistical control.
Factorial ANOVA 2-Way ANOVA, 3-Way ANOVA, etc.. Factorial ANOVA One-Way ANOVA = ANOVA with one IV with 1+ levels and one DV One-Way ANOVA = ANOVA with.
Analyses of K-Group Designs : Analytic Comparisons & Trend Analyses Analytic Comparisons –Simple comparisons –Complex comparisons –Trend Analyses Errors.
Describing Factorial Effects Kinds of means & kinds of effects Inspecting tables to describe factorial data patterns Inspecting line graphs to describe.
Statistical Analysis of Factorial Designs z Review of Interactions z Kinds of Factorial Designs z Causal Interpretability of Factorial Designs z The F-tests.
Multivariate Analyses & Programmatic Research Re-introduction to Programmatic research Factorial designs  “It Depends” Examples of Factorial Designs Selecting.
3-way Factorial Designs Expanding factorial designs Effects in a 3-way design Defining a 3-way interaction BG & WG comparisons Experimental & Non-experimental.
Multivariate Analyses & Programmatic Research Re-introduction to Multivariate research Re-introduction to Programmatic research Factorial designs  “It.
Introduction to Multivariate Research & Factorial Designs
Chapter 10 - Part 1 Factorial Experiments.
Analyses of K-Group Designs : Omnibus F & Pairwise Comparisons ANOVA for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons and RH Testing Alpha inflation.
2x2 ANOVA BG & MG Models Kinds of Factorial Designs ANOVA for BG, MG & WG designs Causal Interpretation of Factorial Results.
Review of Factorial Designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial results for a 2x2 factorial designs Descriptive &
K-group ANOVA & Pairwise Comparisons ANOVA for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons and RH Testing Alpha inflation & Correction LSD & HSD procedures.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Factorial Designs More than one Independent Variable: Each IV is referred to as a Factor All Levels of Each IV represented in the Other IV.
2-Way ANOVA, 3-Way ANOVA, etc.
2x2 BG Factorial Designs Definition and advantage of factorial research designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial.
Intro to Parametric Statistics, Assumptions & Degrees of Freedom Some terms we will need Normal Distributions Degrees of freedom Z-values of individual.
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Fall 2013 Thursday, November 21 Review for Exam #4.
Chapter 14Prepared by Samantha Gaies, M.A.1 Chapter 14: Two-Way ANOVA Let’s begin by reviewing one-way ANOVA. Try this example… Does motivation level affect.
WG ANOVA Analysis of Variance for Within- groups or Repeated measures Between Groups and Within-Groups ANOVA WG ANOVA & WG t-tests When to use each Similarities.
Analyses of K-Group Designs : Omnibus F & Follow-up Analyses ANOVA for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons, alpha inflation & correction Alpha.
Types of validity we will study for the Next Exam... internal validity -- causal interpretability external validity -- generalizability statistical conclusion.
Analysis of Variance (Two Factors). Two Factor Analysis of Variance Main effect The effect of a single factor when any other factor is ignored. Example.
Designs. Single-factor designs: Between-subjects.
Describing Factorial Effects Kinds of means & kinds of effects Inspecting tables to describe factorial data patterns Inspecting line graphs to describe.
Reintroduction to Factorial Designs (re-)Introduction to factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial results Understanding main effects Research Hypotheses.
Intro to Factorial Designs The importance of “conditional” & non-additive effects The structure, variables and effects of a factorial design 5 terms necessary.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
Difference Between Means Test (“t” statistic) Analysis of Variance (“F” statistic)
Regression Models w/ 2 Categorical Variables Sources of data for this model Variations of this model Definition and advantage of factorial research designs.
Remember You were asked to determine the effects of both college major (psychology, sociology, and biology) and gender (male and female) on class attendance.
Regression Models w/ 2 Quant Variables Sources of data for this model Variations of this model Main effects version of the model –Interpreting the regression.
Advanced Meta-Analyses Heterogeneity Analyses Fixed & Random Efffects models Single-variable Fixed Effects Model – “Q” Wilson Macro for Fixed Efffects.
Basic Analysis of Factorial Designs The F-tests of a Factorial ANOVA Using LSD to describe the pattern of an interaction.
Regression Models w/ 2-group & Quant Variables Sources of data for this model Variations of this model Main effects version of the model –Interpreting.
Factorial Designs: Programmatic Research, RH: Testing & Causal Inference Applications of Factorial designs in Programmatic Research Research Hypotheses.
Mixed ANOVA Models combining between and within. Mixed ANOVA models We have examined One-way and Factorial designs that use: We have examined One-way.
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Fifteen Inferential Tests of Significance III: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with Multiple Independent.
Introduction to “Kinds” of 2-way Factorial Designs Incorporating within-groups comparisons ANOVA for BG, MG & WG designs Applying LSD mmd to kxk designs.
Kxkxk 3-way Factorial Designs kxkxk 3-way designs, effects & causality 3-way interactions describing effects and checking if they are. “descriptive” or.
Handout Eight: Two-Way Between- Subjects Design with Interaction- Assumptions, & Analyses EPSE 592 Experimental Designs and Analysis in Educational Research.
Other Ways of Thinking About Interactions Ways of Describing Interactions other than “Simple Effects” Interactions as “other kinds of” cell mean difference.
3-way Designs defining 2-way & 3-way interactions all the effects conditional and unconditional effects orthogonality, collinearity & the like kxkxk kxkxq.
ANCOVA Workings of ANOVA & ANCOVA ANCOVA, partial correlations & multiple regression Using model plotting to think about ANCOVA & Statistical control Homogeneity.
Factorial BG ANOVA Psy 420 Ainsworth. Topics in Factorial Designs Factorial? Crossing and Nesting Assumptions Analysis Traditional and Regression Approaches.
Effect Sizes & Power Analyses for k-group Designs Effect Size Estimates for k-group ANOVA designs Power Analysis for k-group ANOVA designs Effect Size.
SPSS Homework SPSS Homework 12.1 Practice Data from exercise ) Use linear contrasts to compare 5 days vs 20 and 35 days 2) Imagine you.
Practice Participants were asked about their current romantic relationship (dating, married, or cohabitating) and the number of children they have (none,
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
Two Way ANOVAs Factorial Designs.
Interactions & Simple Effects finding the differences
Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests Linear Contrasts Orthogonal Contrasts Trend Analysis Bonferroni t Fisher Least Significance.
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
Exercise 1 Use Transform  Compute variable to calculate weight lost by each person Calculate the overall mean weight lost Calculate the means and standard.
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Factorial Designs Statistical Analysis of 2x2 Designs Statistical Analysis of kxk Designs

Statistical Analysis of a 2x2 Design Task Presentation (a) SE of Presentation Paper Computer for Easy Tasks Task Difficulty (b) Easy Hard SE for Presentation for Hard Tasks Presentation Difficulty Interaction Main Effect Main Effect Effect F Presentation F Dificulty F Interaction 65 vs vs. 50 SE Easy vs. SE Hard

In a 2x2 Design, the Main effects F-tests are sufficient to tell us about the relationship of each IV to the DV… since each main effect involves the comparison of two marginal means -- the corresponding significance test tells us what we need to know… whether or not those two marginal means are “significantly different” Don’t forget to examine the means to see if a significant difference is in the hypothesized direction !!! Statistical Analyses Necessary to Describe Main Effects of a 2x2 Design

However, the F-test of the interaction only tells us whether or not there is a “statistically significant” interaction… it does not tell use the pattern of that interaction to determine the pattern of the interaction we have to compare the simple effects to describe each simple effect, we must be able to compare the cell means we need to know how much of a cell mean difference is “statistically significant” Statistical Analyses Necessary to Describe the Interaction of a 2x2 Design

Using LSD to Compare cell means to describe the simple effects of a 2x2 Factorial design LSD can be used to determine how large of a cell mean difference is required to treat it as a “statistically significant mean difference” Will need to know three values to use the computator df error -- look on the printout or use N – 4 MS error – look on the printout n = N / 4 -- use the decimal value – do not round to the nearest whole number! Remember – only use the lsdmmd to compare cell means. Marginal means are compared using the man effect F-tests.

What statistic is used for which factorial effects???? There will be 4 statistics 1.F Age 2.F Gender 3.F Int 4.LSD mmd Age 5 10 Gender Male Female This design as 7 “effects” 1.Main effect of age 2.Main effect of gender 3.Interaction of age & gender 4.SE of age for males 5.SE of age for females 6.SE of gender for 5 yr olds 7.SE of gender for 10 yr olds

Effect Sizes for 2x2 BG Factorial designs For Main Effects & Interaction (each w/ df=1) r =  [ F / (F + df error )] For Main Effects & Simple Effects d = (M 1 - M 2 ) /  Mserror d² r =  d² + 4 ( This is an “approximation formula” )

“Larger” Factorial Designs The simplest factorial design is a 2x2, which can be expanded in two ways: 1) Adding conditions to one, the other, or both IVs

In a kxk Design, the Main effects F-tests are sufficient to tell us about the relationship of each IV to the DV only for 2-condition main effects… since a 2-condition main effect involves the comparison of two marginal means -- the corresponding F-test tells us what we need to know – the two marginal means are different however, for a k-condition main effect, the F-test only tells us that there is a pattern of significant differences among the marginal means, but doesn’t tell us which means are significantly different for a k-condition main effect we need to use an LSDmmd to determine which pairs of marginal means are significantly different Statistical Analyses Necessary to Describe Main Effects of a kxk Design

As with the 2x2 design, the interaction F-test for a kxk design only tells us whether or not there is a “statistically significant” interaction… it does not tell use the pattern of that interaction we need to use an LSDmmd to determine which pairs of cell means are significantly different Be sure you are using the correct “n” when you compute LSDmmd n = N / #conditions in that effect Statistical Analyses Necessary to Describe the Interaction of a kxk Design

Effect Sizes for kxk BG Factorial designs For Main Effects & Interaction (each w/ df=1) r =  [ F / (F + df error )] For specific comparisons among marginal or cell means d = (M 1 - M 2 ) /  Mserror d² r =  d² + 4 ( This is an “approximation formula” )

What statistic is used for which factorial effects???? There will be 5 statistics 1.F Gender 2.F Age 3.Age LSD mmd (n=N/3) 4.F Int 5.Int LSD mmd (n = N/6) Age Gender Male Female 15 “Effects” in this study 1.Main effect of gender 2.Main effect of age 3.5 vs. 10 marginals 4.5 vs. 15 marginals 5.10 vs. 15 marginals 6.Interaction of age & gender 7.5 vs. 10 yr old males 8.5 vs. 15 yr old males 9.10 vs. 15 yr old males 10.5 vs. 10 yr old females 11.5 vs. 15 yr old females vs. 15 yr old females 13.male vs. female 5 yr olds 14.male vs. female 10 yr olds 15.male vs. female 15 yr olds

Back to  100 males and 100 females completed the task, either under instructions to work quickly, work accurately, to work as quickly as possible without making unnecessary errors or no instructions. Instruction Quick Accurate Both None Gender Male Female For the interaction p =.03 will we need an LSD mmd to compare cell means? why or why not? what will separate model “n” be? For the main effect of instruction p =.02 will we need an LSD mmd to compare marginal means? why or why not? what will separate model “n” be? will we need an LSDmmd to compare cell means? why or why not? what will separate model “n” be? For the main effect of gender p =.02 will we need an LSD mmd to compare marginal means? why or why not? what will separate model “n” be? will we need an LSDmmd to compare cell means? why or why not? what will separate model “n” be? Yep! sig. Int & k = 8 ! 200 / 8 = 25 Yep! sig. ME & k = 4 ! 200 / 4 = 50 Nope – k = 2 ! Yep! sig. Int ! 200 / 8 = 25 Yep! sig. Int ! 200 / 8 = 25