Natural Disasters and Tax Deductible Reserves Kevin McCarty Florida Department of Insurance CAS Ratemaking Seminar March 11 & 12, 1999.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 U. S. Risk-Based Capital Requirements and Their Context Alfred W. Gross Virginia Commissioner of Insurance National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Advertisements

October 29,  Fiscal Risks identified and quantified in Mexico: ◦ Budgetary impact of fluctuations in key assumed macro-economic variables ◦ Long-term.
1 PROVISIONS FOR PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (MIS-35) Seminar on Ratemaking Nashville, TNRuss Bingham March 11-12, 1999Hartford Financial Services.
SAP Accounting. Statutory Accounting Insurers produce financial statement prescribed by NAIC Filed with insurance department of regulators Based on Statutory.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
©2009, The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Fifteen Insurance Companies.
Lecture No. 3 Insurance and Risk.
Assignment Ten Reinsurance.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR ENTERPRISES AND INDIVIDUALS Chapter 6 The Insurance Solution and Institutions.
Chapter 2 Insurance and Risk.
1 Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Jeffrey S. Bragg.
Reserve Variability Modeling: Correlation 2007 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar San Diego, California September 10-11, 2007 Mark R. Shapland, FCAS, ASA, MAAA.
8-1 Statutory Accounting 1.NAIC Annual Statement Blank 2.Differences between Statutory Accounting and GAAP admitted and non-admitted assets valuation of.
Risk Mitigation and the Role of Reinsurance John Finston Deputy Commissioner for Corporate and Regulatory Affairs California Department of Insurance ©
Insurance Fundamentals for Policymakers. Four assignments: Insurance Principles Insurance Coverages: Property and Casualty Insurance Coverages: Life and.
Should There Be A National Reinsurance Catastrophe Pool ? May 8, 2006 Mary Z. Seidel Reinsurance Association of America.
Insurance Regulators and Catastrophic Risk Session IX Financing the Risks of Natural Disasters World bank - June 2003.
Insurance Companies Chapter 2
 Hannover Re in Azerbaijan  Proportional vs. non-proportional  CAT XL Treaty  Multi-line combined per Risk / per Event XL Treaty Reinsurance Solutions.
Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Copyright (c) 2006 Standard.
Disaster Risk Financing Global Approaches 11 August 2010 Reed Bouchelle, New Delhi.
Regulation of Catastrophe Risk in Colombia: Country Experience MSc. Jairo Alberto Pérez Muñoz Director of Insurance Supervision Colombian Banking Superintendency.
Earthquake Insurance for California Renters & Homeowners Presented to the Bay Area Earthquake Alliance Daniel P. Marshall, III General Counsel California.
Advancements in Territorial Ratemaking Allocating Cost of Catastrophe Exposure May 2006 CAS Spring Meeting Stephen Fiete.
Insurance Company: Functions Chapter 7. Insurance related functions Ratemaking Production Underwriting Loss adjustment Investment Reinsurance Accounting,
Risk Financing The Principles of Utilizing Insurance Resources Peter Wang
 CAS Spring Meeting Solvency Models Compared June 19, 2007.
1 Practical ERM Midwestern Actuarial Forum Fall 2005 Meeting Chris Suchar, FCAS.
Ratemaking: An ERM Function CAS Ratemaking Seminar March 13 & 14, 2006 Russ Bingham, Hartford Curt Parker, Grange Mutual John Kollar, ISO.
Florida Property Insurance Markets Economic and Financial Update Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President Insurance Information Institute  110 William.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36 Discussion of Implementation Considerations.
1 CAS Ratemaking Seminar New Orleans, LA State – Specific Issues in Personal Lines March 11, 2005.
2009 Annual results 24 March © Lloyd’s2009 Annual Results Presentation highlights Record financial results Solid financial position Equitas.
26 November 2002 Stephen Lowe Terrorism Risk Act of 2002 Briefing for Consultants.
SWAN Captive Risk Financing – A Structured Approach 38th Annual OESAI Conference 25 August 2015.
Tax Deductible, Pre-Event Catastrophe Reserves Kay Cleary Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 13, 1999.
The Ins & Outs Of Self-Insurance Southwest Actuarial Forum December 4, 2007 Ed Costner, ACAS, MAAA Casualty Actuarial Consultants, Inc.
Florida Catastrophic Storm Risk Management Center.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 2 The Insurance Mechanism.
Insurance and Risk 2-1. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 2-2 Agenda Definition and Basic Characteristics of Insurance Requirements.
Spring 2002 CAS Meeting Modeling Capital Adequacy Matthew C. Mosher, FCAS Group Vice President Property/Casualty Ratings May 21, 2002.
American Risk and Insurance Association Annual Meeting Jay Fishman Chairman & Chief Executive Officer The Travelers Companies, Inc. August 6, 2007.
Catastrophe risks and property insurance Roumen Galabinov.
1 Economic Benefits of Integrated Risk Products Lawrence A. Berger Swiss Re New Markets CAS Financial Risk Management Seminar Denver, CO, April 12, 1999.
2007 CAS Ratemaking Seminar SPE-3 Actuarial Analysis of Catastrophes & Terrorism for Commercial Insurance Rimma Maasbach - ISO.
Spring 2004 CAGNY Meeting How do Rating Agencies Determine Insurance Company Ratings John Andre Vice President Property/Casualty Ratings June 3, 2004.
Finance 431: Property-Liability Insurance Lecture 20: Catastrophes.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education. All rights reserved FINANCIAL OPERATIONS OF PRIVATE INSURERS Chapter 26.
2004 Hurricane Season Recap and Observations May 2005 CAS Meeting.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Insurance Company Operations.
Ratemaking for Multi-Peril Crop Insurance CAS Seminar on RatemakingThomas Worth, Ph.D. Concurrent Session COM-7Senior Actuary Philadelphia, PA Research.
Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.7-2 Agenda Property and Casualty Insurers Life.
CAS Annual Meeting EMERGING ISSUES IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE THE ROLE OF THE ACTUARY IN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE MARKETS November 16, 2004 Richard B. Lord, FCAS.
Paul Budde, Ph. D., ACAS, MAAA Senior Vice President Using Catastrophe Models for Pricing: The Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund CAS Special Interest.
Homeowners Insurance Profitability- Is the P&C industry taking the right actions and have we learned anything? Randall E. Brubaker, FCAS Aon Re Services,
Cabinet Presentation State of the Florida Homeowners’ Insurance Market June 26,
Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) of 2002 Casualty Actuaries of Greater New York June 11, 2003 Samir Shah, FSA, FRM, MAAA.
Florida Insurance Conference on Financial Reporting September 14, 2011 Florida P&C Guaranty Funds.
September 2011 State Board of Administration Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Proposed 2012 Legislation.
Regional Reinsurance Pooling: experiences in The Americas ICP 13: Reinsurance and Other Forms of Risk Transfer. Mike Kreidler Washington State Insurance.
Actuarial role/ contributions/ challenges in Reinsurance
Insurance Profitability
Financial Operations of Private Insurers
The Financial Services Industry: Insurance Companies
PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (FIN-28)
Catastrophe Modeling Personal Lines Perspective
Pre-Event Catastrophe Reserves An Update
Florida Property Insurance Markets Economic and Financial Update
Catastrophes Insurable vs. Non-Insurable Catastrophes
Presentation transcript:

Natural Disasters and Tax Deductible Reserves Kevin McCarty Florida Department of Insurance CAS Ratemaking Seminar March 11 & 12, 1999

1/500 Year Insured Losses Estimated by Risk Management Solutions, ISO Sources: U.S. Geological Survey, Uniform Building Codes, Council of State Governments $66 Billion Earthquake San Francisco $71 Billion Earthquake Los Angeles $101 Billion Earthquake New Madrid Region $22 Billion Hurricane Houston-Galveston $21 Billion Hurricane Northeast Region $17 Billion Hurricane Southeast Region $76 Billion Hurricane Florida Region

3 Current Tax, Accounting Rules Rules   GAAP and Insurance Statutory Accounting   Reserves for future catastrophes not allowed   Internal Revenue Code:   Event must have occurred to be deductible

4 Drawbacks to Current Tax and Accounting   Do Not Allow Insurers To Establish Reserves for Future Catastrophes   Current Tax Law:   Transfers Policyholder Risk Capital to Government   Increases Cost of Insurance   Can Reduce Availability, Especially in Rate Constrained States   Current Accounting Rules:   Transfer Cat Premiums to Surplus Prematurely   Mask Need for Capital Retention

5 How Other Major Industrial Countries Deal With The Issue   Most major industrialized countries allow or require insurers to establish reserves for future catastrophic exposures.   Each country has its own rules for setting up and drawing down such reserves, but all have reserves that are tax deductible.

6 NAIC Tax-Deductible Cat Reserve Key Characteristics Reserve Requirements Tax-Deductible Statutory Liability Cover Mega-Cats Mandatory   Tax Deductibility a Precondition   Required Statutory Liability   Cover U.S. Exposures   Apply to Catastrophe-Prone Lines   Offset Qualified Losses from Specified “Named” Perils   Focus on High Impact Events

7 Purposes of Tax-Deductible Catastrophe Reserve   Retain Cat Premiums to Cover Long-Term Exposures   Better Provision Insurers to Deal With Mega-Cats   Assure Consumers, Regulators That Cat Portion of Rates will be Available for Intended Purpose   Prevent Premature Allocation of Policyholder Risk Capital:   To Federal Government Through Taxes   To Surplus for Distribution to Owners or to Cover Other Risks   Augment (Not Displace) Other Funding Sources

NAIC Tax-Deductible Cat Reserve Covered Lines & Perils _____ Perils______   Wind   Earthquake/Fire Following   Tsunami   Fire   Flood   Hail   Snow, Ice, Freezing   Volcanic Eruption ____Covered Lines_____   Fire   Allied Lines   Earthquake   Homeowners M/P   Farmowners M/P   Commercial M/P   Private Passenger Auto P/D   Commercial Auto P/D

9 NAIC Tax-Deductible Cat Reserve Eligible Insurers   Any Entity Required to File a NAIC Property Casualty Annual Statement Blank   Exceptions:   Insurers Taxed on Investment Income (Premium less than $1.2 M)   Insurers Not Subject to Federal Taxation (Premium less than $350K)   Unless Commissioner Requires

NAIC Cat Reserve Annual Additions   Grow Industry Reserve Gradually   $2B Per Year Based on 1996 Premium Levels By-State, By-Line Cat Exposure Factors X Insurer Direct Plus Assumed Less Ceded Premium ( ) X Ratio of Premiums Less Ceded Excess to Premiums = Insurer Annual Reserve Addition   Subject to:   Cap (20 X Current Year’s Accumulation)   Rolloff, if Not Used After 40 Years   Allocate to Insurers Based on Relative Catastrophe Exposure and Premiums

NAIC Cat Reserve Exposure Factors Based on Insured Losses from for Covered Lines Which Exceeded PCS Cat Losses AL AK AR AZ Etc. Fire Allied Etc. …... PPAuto

12   Losses   Loss Adjustment Expenses   Assessments, surcharges and other liabilities attributable to a qualifying catastrophe   Net of reinsurance, subrogation/salvage NAIC Cat Reserve Qualifying Losses

NAIC Cat Reserve Drawdown Criteria Catastrophe Declared by PCS Results From Named Peril >$10B Industry Cat; Insurer’s Losses Exceed 20% Insurer Cap Insurer’s Annual Cat Losses Exceed 40% Insurer Cap or Insurer’s Annual Cat Losses Exceed 15% Insurer Surplus or Release Reserve to Extent of Net Excess Losses Yes Release Also Required If: Yes Reserve Exceeds Insurer Cap Yes Regulator Requires to Forestall Insolvency Addition Not Used After 40 Yrs.

14   Benefits:   More Explicit Recognition of Cat Exposures   More Accountability (Less “Transparency” of Risk)   More Dedicated Capital to Cover Cat Risks (Pre-Event)   More Industry Stability, Fewer Insolvencies/Assessments   More U.S. Based Reinsurance   More Availability of Catastrophe Insurance   Less State, Federal Disaster Assistance for Insurable Losses   More Local Economic Stability, Growth   Costs:   Less Tax Revenue From Insurers NAIC Cat Reserves Benefits and Costs NAIC Cat Reserves Benefits and Costs NAIC Cat Reserves Benefits and Costs NAIC Cat Reserves Benefits and Costs

15 Considerations in Evaluation   Federal Budget Scoring Federal Budget Scoring   “Dynamic” Benefits: “Dynamic” Benefits:   Insurers’ Risk Bearing Capacity/Desire Insurers’ Risk Bearing Capacity/Desire   Insurance Industry Solvency after Mega-Catastrophe Insurance Industry Solvency after Mega-Catastrophe   Availability, Affordability of Catastrophe Insurance Availability, Affordability of Catastrophe Insurance   Consumer Insurance Choices Consumer Insurance Choices   Reinsurance, Capital Markets Reinsurance, Capital Markets   Local, State, National Economies Local, State, National Economies   Federal, State Disaster Assistance Federal, State Disaster Assistance   NAIC Survey, Analysis

16 Tax-Deductible Cat Reserves Tough Questions   Is Tax Deduction Achievable/Advisable?   Public Policy Imperatives vs. Budget Impact   Will NAIC Keep Tax Deduction as Precondition for Accounting Change?   Will It Improve   Industry Solvency?   Catastrophe Insurance Markets?   How Will It Be Coordinated With   State, Federal-based Initiatives?   Reinsurance, Capital Markets?   Other Initiatives?

17 Tax-Deductible Cat Reserves NAIC Development Timeline   Evaluate and CommentMarch ‘99   Make Appropriate RevisionsJuly ‘99   Conditional NAIC AdoptionFall ‘99   Federal Tax Consideration 1999   Final NAIC AdoptionAfter Tax Deduction