Natural Disasters and Tax Deductible Reserves Kevin McCarty Florida Department of Insurance CAS Ratemaking Seminar March 11 & 12, 1999
1/500 Year Insured Losses Estimated by Risk Management Solutions, ISO Sources: U.S. Geological Survey, Uniform Building Codes, Council of State Governments $66 Billion Earthquake San Francisco $71 Billion Earthquake Los Angeles $101 Billion Earthquake New Madrid Region $22 Billion Hurricane Houston-Galveston $21 Billion Hurricane Northeast Region $17 Billion Hurricane Southeast Region $76 Billion Hurricane Florida Region
3 Current Tax, Accounting Rules Rules GAAP and Insurance Statutory Accounting Reserves for future catastrophes not allowed Internal Revenue Code: Event must have occurred to be deductible
4 Drawbacks to Current Tax and Accounting Do Not Allow Insurers To Establish Reserves for Future Catastrophes Current Tax Law: Transfers Policyholder Risk Capital to Government Increases Cost of Insurance Can Reduce Availability, Especially in Rate Constrained States Current Accounting Rules: Transfer Cat Premiums to Surplus Prematurely Mask Need for Capital Retention
5 How Other Major Industrial Countries Deal With The Issue Most major industrialized countries allow or require insurers to establish reserves for future catastrophic exposures. Each country has its own rules for setting up and drawing down such reserves, but all have reserves that are tax deductible.
6 NAIC Tax-Deductible Cat Reserve Key Characteristics Reserve Requirements Tax-Deductible Statutory Liability Cover Mega-Cats Mandatory Tax Deductibility a Precondition Required Statutory Liability Cover U.S. Exposures Apply to Catastrophe-Prone Lines Offset Qualified Losses from Specified “Named” Perils Focus on High Impact Events
7 Purposes of Tax-Deductible Catastrophe Reserve Retain Cat Premiums to Cover Long-Term Exposures Better Provision Insurers to Deal With Mega-Cats Assure Consumers, Regulators That Cat Portion of Rates will be Available for Intended Purpose Prevent Premature Allocation of Policyholder Risk Capital: To Federal Government Through Taxes To Surplus for Distribution to Owners or to Cover Other Risks Augment (Not Displace) Other Funding Sources
NAIC Tax-Deductible Cat Reserve Covered Lines & Perils _____ Perils______ Wind Earthquake/Fire Following Tsunami Fire Flood Hail Snow, Ice, Freezing Volcanic Eruption ____Covered Lines_____ Fire Allied Lines Earthquake Homeowners M/P Farmowners M/P Commercial M/P Private Passenger Auto P/D Commercial Auto P/D
9 NAIC Tax-Deductible Cat Reserve Eligible Insurers Any Entity Required to File a NAIC Property Casualty Annual Statement Blank Exceptions: Insurers Taxed on Investment Income (Premium less than $1.2 M) Insurers Not Subject to Federal Taxation (Premium less than $350K) Unless Commissioner Requires
NAIC Cat Reserve Annual Additions Grow Industry Reserve Gradually $2B Per Year Based on 1996 Premium Levels By-State, By-Line Cat Exposure Factors X Insurer Direct Plus Assumed Less Ceded Premium ( ) X Ratio of Premiums Less Ceded Excess to Premiums = Insurer Annual Reserve Addition Subject to: Cap (20 X Current Year’s Accumulation) Rolloff, if Not Used After 40 Years Allocate to Insurers Based on Relative Catastrophe Exposure and Premiums
NAIC Cat Reserve Exposure Factors Based on Insured Losses from for Covered Lines Which Exceeded PCS Cat Losses AL AK AR AZ Etc. Fire Allied Etc. …... PPAuto
12 Losses Loss Adjustment Expenses Assessments, surcharges and other liabilities attributable to a qualifying catastrophe Net of reinsurance, subrogation/salvage NAIC Cat Reserve Qualifying Losses
NAIC Cat Reserve Drawdown Criteria Catastrophe Declared by PCS Results From Named Peril >$10B Industry Cat; Insurer’s Losses Exceed 20% Insurer Cap Insurer’s Annual Cat Losses Exceed 40% Insurer Cap or Insurer’s Annual Cat Losses Exceed 15% Insurer Surplus or Release Reserve to Extent of Net Excess Losses Yes Release Also Required If: Yes Reserve Exceeds Insurer Cap Yes Regulator Requires to Forestall Insolvency Addition Not Used After 40 Yrs.
14 Benefits: More Explicit Recognition of Cat Exposures More Accountability (Less “Transparency” of Risk) More Dedicated Capital to Cover Cat Risks (Pre-Event) More Industry Stability, Fewer Insolvencies/Assessments More U.S. Based Reinsurance More Availability of Catastrophe Insurance Less State, Federal Disaster Assistance for Insurable Losses More Local Economic Stability, Growth Costs: Less Tax Revenue From Insurers NAIC Cat Reserves Benefits and Costs NAIC Cat Reserves Benefits and Costs NAIC Cat Reserves Benefits and Costs NAIC Cat Reserves Benefits and Costs
15 Considerations in Evaluation Federal Budget Scoring Federal Budget Scoring “Dynamic” Benefits: “Dynamic” Benefits: Insurers’ Risk Bearing Capacity/Desire Insurers’ Risk Bearing Capacity/Desire Insurance Industry Solvency after Mega-Catastrophe Insurance Industry Solvency after Mega-Catastrophe Availability, Affordability of Catastrophe Insurance Availability, Affordability of Catastrophe Insurance Consumer Insurance Choices Consumer Insurance Choices Reinsurance, Capital Markets Reinsurance, Capital Markets Local, State, National Economies Local, State, National Economies Federal, State Disaster Assistance Federal, State Disaster Assistance NAIC Survey, Analysis
16 Tax-Deductible Cat Reserves Tough Questions Is Tax Deduction Achievable/Advisable? Public Policy Imperatives vs. Budget Impact Will NAIC Keep Tax Deduction as Precondition for Accounting Change? Will It Improve Industry Solvency? Catastrophe Insurance Markets? How Will It Be Coordinated With State, Federal-based Initiatives? Reinsurance, Capital Markets? Other Initiatives?
17 Tax-Deductible Cat Reserves NAIC Development Timeline Evaluate and CommentMarch ‘99 Make Appropriate RevisionsJuly ‘99 Conditional NAIC AdoptionFall ‘99 Federal Tax Consideration 1999 Final NAIC AdoptionAfter Tax Deduction