Action Planning Guidance Illinois Public Health Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SMART OBJECTIVES Healthy Kids Learn Better Institute.
Advertisements

The concepts/mechanisms/tools for developing a Joint Programme: Critical issues and UNDG Joint Programme Guidance and formats.
Theory of Change, Impact Monitoring, and Most Significant Change EWB-UK Away Weekend – March 23, 2013.
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Towards a Global Nutrition Cluster Advocacy Strategy
Creating an Action Plan Jennifer Woodward, MD, MPH Kansas Health Institute.
Setting Goals and Objectives
Developing a Logic Model
Dennis McBride, Ph.D. The Washington Institute (253) Goal Driven Logic Models.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Refining Idea Maps Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt.
Action Writing Action Statements Writing action statements is the first step in the second (action) stage of the public health nutrition (PHN) intervention.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Development.
A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Refining Idea Maps Diabetes Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt Knowlton,
System Office Performance Management
UN Women Humanitarian Action Strategy Background  Crises are not gender-neutral; women, girls, boys and men of all ages - are affected differently.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Healthy North Carolina 2020 and EBS/EBI 101 Joanne Rinker MS, RD, CDE, LDN Center for Healthy North Carolina Director of Training and Technical Assistance.
Workplace Wellness Peer Group Goal Setting REVIEW
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.
A Tool to Monitor Local Level SPF SIG Activities
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
Evaluating REACH Funded Projects Using the REACH Theory of Change.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 3: Set Performance Goals Toolkit 3A: Set Energy Performance.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Preparing for the Main Event Using Logic Models as a Tool for Collaboratives Brenda M. Joly Leslie M. Beitsch August 6, 2008.
UNDP-GEF Adaptation 0 0 Impact of National Communications on Process of Integrating Climate Change into National Development Policies UNFCCC Workshop on.
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
New York Institute of Technology HEALTH CHECKS “AN INNOVATIVE GRASS ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH ACTION PLAN TO BUILD CAPACITY AND IMPACT COMMUNITY- DRIVEN OUTCOMES”.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco Professor of Pediatrics and Health Policy, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent.
Julie R. Morales Butler Institute for Families University of Denver.
Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center July HNDECA and ECCS Evaluation Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director North Dakota State Data.
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community.
Nancy L. Weaver, PhD, MPH Department of Community Health School of Public Health Saint Louis University 16 July 2010 LOGIC MODEL FUNDAMENTALS.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Developing and Using Criteria and Processes to Set Priorities.
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
Katherine Perdomo Alanna Pugliese CATEGORIES OF EVALUATION.
Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24,
The P Process Strategic Design
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation
Outcomes Thinking* Christine Jost Linking Knowledge with Action Research Theme KMC4CRP2 workshop, Addis Ababa, 4 December 2013 * Drawing from the presentation.
October 2015 STRATEGIC PLANNING Prepared by: Strategic Cancer Initiatives Aboriginal Health & Community Wellness Department of Health and Social Services.
A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR IMPROVING RACIAL & ETHNIC MINORITY HEALTH & ELIMINATING RACIAL & ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES Garth N. Graham, MD, MPH, Valerie.
Planning for Effective Health Promotion Evaluation Bernie Marshall School of Health and Social Development Deakin University
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Presented by: Carmen D’Agostino and Dan Gutwein CPOD “If you don’t set goals, you can’t regret not reaching them.” Yogi Berra.
Case Name Student’s name Literature Review Provide a basic overview of the research and/or conceptual literature related to this case. Specifically, describe.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
What is Advocacy? ]thepressuregroup[.
Health Education THeories
Developing & Refining a Theory of Action
Continuous Improvement Plan (CIP)
Successful Measuring: Outputs, Outcomes & Logic Models
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
VMOSA: Developing Strategic and Action Plans
EVALUATION RESEARCH These are those types of research that evaluate the impact of social interventions. Motivated by the desire of social scientist to.
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Troubleshooting Logic Models
DCEC & Getting to Impact
DCEC & Getting to Impact
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Presentation transcript:

Action Planning Guidance Illinois Public Health Institute

Priorities were selected based on having a picture of what is… Scope of the problem Impact of the problem Most vulnerable populations Why it is important to address to achieve vision What else is going on to address this issue? Understand and define the current status 2 Refer to the reports with data related to Priority Issue. In some cases, more work on understanding the problem may be necessary. Illinois Public Health Institute

Action planning to address priorities begins with the end in mind… 3 Current Status of the Priority Issue Vision for the Future with Improvements Related to the Priority Issue What changes need to occur to achieve Vision? Illinois Public Heath Institute

Desired Changes = Goals/Objectives/Outcomes What awareness must be created and with whom? What knowledge or skill must be increased and by whom? What behaviors must change? How and by whom? How must the environment change? What policies must be changed and/or adopted? What types of system changes are needed? How does health status need to change? 4 Illinois Public Health Institute

Long-Term 5 years or greaterChanges in health status, systems Intermediate Usually 3-5 years Changes in skill, behavior, policy and some system changes Changes in risk factors Short - Term Usually 1-2 years Changes in awareness, knowledge, and attitudes Changes in direct and indirect contributing factors 5 Levels of Goals/Objectives/Outcomes Illinois Public Health Institute

Begin with the end in mind… Long –TermIntermediateShort-Term IntermediateShort-Term 6 Illinois Public Health Institute

SMART Objectives 7 Specific – specify what is to be achieved, by how much, and by when Measurable – make sure that the objective can be measured (i.e., data is or will be available to measure progress) Achievable - set objectives that are feasible for the agency Relevant - align objectives with the mission and vision of the agency Time-oriented - establish a timeframe for achieving the objective Measure of change, in what, by whom, by when Degree of Change + Type of Change + Area of Change + Target Population + Time Frame Illinois Public Health Institute

Long-Term or Outcome Objectives 5 years or greater Look to HP 2020 Objectives for guidance on establishing measures Describes the type and degree of change needed to get closer to the vision Only occur after short-term and intermediate objectives are achieved. 8 Illinois Public Health Institute

Intermediate of Impact Objectives Usually 3-5 years Change in a direct determinant or reduction in a risk factor. – Risk factors are direct causes and determinants which based on scientific evidence or theory, are though to influence directly the level of a specific strategic issue/health problem. Only occur after related short-term objectives are achieved. 9 Illinois Public Health Institute

Short-Term Objectives Usually 1-2 years The result of one or more programs or interventions. Changes in contributing factors – Direct contributing factors – a scientifically established factor that directly affects the level of a risk factor – Indirect contributing factors – community-specific factor that directly affects the level of the direct contributing factor 10 Illinois Public Health Institute

What can be done to create the necessary changes? What are the existing resources, assets and strengths for this work? Who is already engaged in this work? What are they doing to address this issue? Can we partner? Who else needs to be engaged in this work? What are the barriers? How can the barriers be overcome? What has worked elsewhere (other communities, states etc.)? What are the evidence-based approaches to create the change defined? 11 Illinois Public Health Institute

Only AFTER we are clear about the changes needed… Identify programs, strategies and interventions to create the desired changes (or achieve objectives). Evidence-based strategies – Strategies to address contributing factors and risk factors to achieve impact and ultimately outcome objectives. At least one proven intervention strategy should be defined for each impact objective. 12 Illinois Public Health Institute

Relationship, Strategy, Alignment… 13 Long –TermIntermediate Short-Term Evidence-based Interventions Short-Term Evidence-based Interventions Intermediate Short-Term Evidence-based Interventions Illinois Public Health Institute

We seek alignment of activities and action plans… 14 Alignment makes us stronger. Align with other initiatives going on with the public health department, other organizations in the community and at the state and national level. Illinois Public Health Institute

See Worksheet Illinois Public Health Institute

Exploring Issues Worksheet Step 1: Turn the strategic issue into a question. Step 2: Identify existing efforts to address this issue – What else is going on in the community to address this issue? Who else needs to be at the table as we plan and move forward? Step 3: Exploring Issues, Factors and Root Causes – What is contributing to this issue in our communities or making it a bigger issue? Be sure to look at the data. – Health Problem Analysis worksheet – 5 Why’s See Worksheet Illinois Public Health Institute

Digging Deeper into Priority Issues What are the underlying causes and factors? Risk factors are direct causes and determinants which based on scientific evidence or theory, are though to influence directly the level of a specific strategic issue/health problem. Direct contributing factors – a scientifically established factor that directly affects the level of a risk factor Indirect contributing factors – community-specific factor that directly affects the level of the direct contributing factor See Worksheet Illinois Public Health Institute

See Worksheet Illinois Public Health Institute