-Care 2008- CERN 2-5 December 2008 Giancarlo Gatti Phin activities at LNF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PPLN Frequency- Doubling Project Diana Parno Hall A Parity Collaboration Meeting May 17, 2007.
Advertisements

Photoinjector Lasers for Ultra-Bright Electron Sources
Approaches for the generation of femtosecond x-ray pulses Zhirong Huang (SLAC)
P.M. Paul, L.Vigroux, G. Riboulet, F.Falcoz. 2 Main Limitation in High gain Amplifier: Gain Narrowing Ti:Sa Pockels cell FWHM
Philippe Hering October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe.
1 Injector Lasers Overview Sasha Gilevich, SLAC April 29, 2004 Drive Laser Specifications Challenges System Description Laser Procurement R&D Effort UV.
Bill White Drive Laser April 16, Drive Laser Commissioning Experience Reminder of requirements on Drive Laser.
SLAC XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing Workshop 1 Current status of the FERMI project (slides provided by Rene Bakker) Photoinjector laser system.
Stefan Simrock 3 rd LC School, Oak Brook, IL, USA, 2008, Radio Frequency Systems 1 Timing and Synchronization S. Simrock and Axel Winter DESY, Hamburg,
Simulation studies of the e-beams for Renkai Li and Juhao Wu 5/20/2014 ALD Review.
Recent developments for the LCLS injector Feng Zhou SLAC Other contributors: Brachmann, Decker, Ding, Emma, Gilevich, Huang, Iverson, Loos, Raubenheimer,
Laser pulse shaping for high- brightness photoinjector Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.
Siegfried Schreiber, DESY The TTF Laser System Laser Material Properties Conclusion? Issues on Longitudinal Photoinjector.
30. Nov I.Will, G. Klemz, Max Born Institute: Optical sampling system Optical sampling system for detailed measurement of the longitudinal pulse.
New Electron Beam Test Facility EBTF at Daresbury Laboratory B.L. Militsyn on behalf of the ASTeC team Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Science.
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003 Accelerator Overview Goals for proposal Description of technical components: injector, linac, compressors, etc.
The UCLA PEGASUS Plane-Wave Transformer Photoinjector G. Travish, G. Andonian, P. Frigola, S. Reiche, J. Rosenzweig, and S. Telfer UCLA Department of Physics.
Palaiseau - FRANCE Spatio-Temporal Chirped Pulse Amplification for Avoiding Spectral Modifications in Ultra-Short Petawatt Lasers C. Radier1,2, F. Giambruno1,3,
Linac e+ source for ILC, CLIC, SuperB, … Vitaly Yakimenko, Igor Pogorelsky November 17, 2008 BNL.
CTF3 photo injector laser status CERN 17 July 2009 CLIC meeting.
W.S. Graves1 Seeding for Fully Coherent Beams William S. Graves MIT-Bates Presented at MIT x-ray laser user program review July 1, 2003.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
R&D Towards X-ray Free Electron Laser Li Hua Yu Brookhaven National Laboratory 1/23/2004.
C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.
Lasers and RF-Timing Franz X. Kaertner
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
Pulse Shaping with MIIPS SASS 8/22/2012 David Nicholson.
Advancement in photo-injector laser: Second Amplifier & Harmonic Generation M. Petrarca CERN M. Martyanov, G. Luchinin, V. Lozhkarev Institute of Applied.
3D Laser pulse shaping for photoinjector applications Yuelin Li Accelerator Systems Division and X-ray Science Division Argonne National Laboratory
Phto-injector laser chain NEWS Massimo Petrarca & Marta Divall.
Field enhancement coefficient  determination methods: dark current and Schottky enabled photo-emissions Wei Gai ANL CERN RF Breakdown Meeting May 6, 2010.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Brian Sheehy Laser and Timing.
Workshop for advanced THz and Compton X-ray generation
Drive Laser Introduction ‘ir’ master oscillator power amplifier chain (MOPA) uses standard chirped pulse amplification scheme (CPA) third harmonic generation.
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Brian Sheehy R&D ERL Laser and laser light transport Brian Sheehy February 17-18, 2010 Laser and Laser Light Transport.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
RF low level control & synchronization A. Gallo, M. Bellaveglia, L. Cacciotti SPARC review committee – ENEA Frascati – 16/11/2005.
An H- stripping laser using commercial, diode-pumped Nd:YAG amplifiers Russell Wilcox Laser Stripping Workshop, April 11, 2011.
X-band Based FEL proposal
R. Losito CERN-AB-ATBCARE Steering committee 13/09/06 PHIN R. Losito CERN – AB/ATB 13/09/2006.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
DECam Spectrophotometric Calibration DECam calibration workshop, TAMU April 20 th, 2009 Jean-Philippe Rheault, Texas A&M University.
LASER SYSTEM STATUS G.Gatti, A. Ghigo, C.Vicario, P.Musumeci, M. Petrarca, S. Cialdi, D. Filippetto REVIEW COMMITTEE 16/11/05.
Status of the SPARC laser and “dazzler” experiments
Status of SPARC synchronization system and possible upgrades
SPARC Review Committee
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Summary of SPARC first-phase operations
Drive-Laser Commissioning Status and Plans
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Gu Qiang For the project team
Two color FEL experiment
Principle of Mode Locking
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
LASER SYSTEM STATUS G.Gatti , A. Ghigo , C.Vicario , P.Musumeci ,
Status of FEL Physics Research Worldwide  Claudio Pellegrini, UCLA April 23, 2002 Review of Basic FEL physical properties and definition of important.
Drive Laser Facility Layout Drive Laser Architecture Technical Issues
INJECTOR (WBS 1.2.1) Jym Clendenin, SLAC April 23, 2002
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
Drive Laser Commissioning Status
LCLS Injector Laser System Paul R. Bolton, SLAC April 24, 2002
Injector Drive Laser Update
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Injector Drive Laser Technical Status
Presentation transcript:

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Giancarlo Gatti Phin activities at LNF

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Outline SPARC project overview SPARC drive laser system IR shaper comparison for flat top laser pulse IR/UV-pulse shaping Laser to RF synchronization schemes Trasverse shaping considerations Conclusive remarks 2

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 : MiUR Strategic Research Programs Goals: High brightness linac to drive advanced FEL experiments And further experiments

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 SPARC commissioning phase 1: low energy e-beam characterization 4

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Sparc phase 2 After gun commissioning in 2006: -Commissioning of downstream linac in progress. -Variable gap undulators installed and ready..... Last minute breaking news: First beam inside undulators

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Photocathode drive laser Demands: Solutions: Emittance minimization Flexibility (Long./Trasv.) Stable reliable operation High current (100 A) from Cu cathode Synchronization rf laser < 1ps rms stable laser performance 6 High energy laser ( uJ) pulses at 266 nm Uniform time and and transverse laser profile: 6-12 ps duration, rise time, 2 mm hard edge

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 SPARC laser system: topology Ti:Sa laser composed by: 12 nm bandwidth oscillator IR pulse shaper CPA amplifiers third harmonic generator UV stretcher (used as shaper) Transport to the cathode 7 Proc. PAC 2007 TUPMN040 time shaper

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 SPARC laser system oscillator pumps amplifiers Harmonics generator UV stretcher Pulse shaper 8 The laser delivers 5-12 ps, 100  J pulses at 266 nm with a rep. rate of 10 Hz. Energy jitter (5% rms), pointing stability (<50  m) and synchronization respect to the RF (<2ps rms) Several subsystems have been integrated: IR pulse shaper, tranverse unifom pulse selection and imaging system to the cathode.

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Laser temporal pulse shaping M. Petrarca S. Cialdi C. Vicario Outline: -IR shaper comparison (a.o. Filter, LCM) -Overall system performances -UV shaper

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Tests of two IR pulse shapers 10 Dazzler Half-waveplate Dazzler Half - wave plate From oscillator Into amplifier Telescopes Phase mask Lens Gratin g From oscillator Into amplifier 60 cm 15 cm DAZZLER LC-SLM

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 IR programmable pulse shapers 11 DAZZLER LC-SLM Fast mode Slow mode Acoustic grating Acousto-optic interaction in a TeO 2 crystal

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 The UV time profiles the two shapers: DAZZLER LC-SLM 12 Rise and fall time ~ 2.6 psRise and fall time ~ 2.1 ps Opt. Lett. 31, 19 (2006) LC-SLMDAZZLER The spectral shape after the UV stretcher is very similar to the temporal profile

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 IR shapers Features: DAZZLER LC-SLM Compact Easy alignment Simultaneously phase & amplitude modulation Losses within 50% Resolution = 0.3 nm Slow optimization Not-compact Not easy alignment Phase only modulation Losses within 50% Resolution<0.1 nm Fast optimization 13

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 THG distortions: main limitation for fast rise time A large enough pulse width (≥0.6 ps) is needed to preserve the square spectrum throughout the THG IR pulse length [ps] Measured (solid) and simulated (dots) harmonics spectra C. Vicario et al, Opt. Lett, 31,2006, 2885 The UV spectral shape as function of the input IR pulse length

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 UV pulse shaper The UV stretcher was designed to perform several tasks 1. Lengthen the laser pulse proportional to bandwith up to 20 ps. 2. In the Fourier plane an amplitude filter, such as an iris, can be applied to cut the tails of an almost square spectrum produced bu the DAZZLER or LC-SLM, the obtained spectrum profile is transferred into the time profile by the stretcher 3. A on-line spectrometer is integrated Appl. Opt. 46, 22 (2007) 4959

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Picture of the UV shaper 16 Spectrom CCD Focusing lenses Filter plane input output Grating pair

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Cross-correlated UV profile 1 17 Simulation experiment Simulation experiment FWHM 10 ps: experim. vs simulation FWHM 15 ps rise time 1.5 ps

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Measured UV profile 2 for several pulse length 18 UV shaper allows for fast rise time despite of different chirp factors in the stretcher

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Shaping without the IR filter  When a proper sharp cut is applied to the natural UV Gaussian laser spectrum, a flat top profile in time can be produced.  Results are comparable to the two stages pulse shaping.  Price to pay 20% higher energy losses  Cheaper and simpler respect to the other IR pulse shapers  The rise and fall time are reduced to ~1.5 ps (limited by the bandwidth) 19

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 No IR shapers: simulations 20 spectra Time shape IR shapeNo IR shape

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Experimental results 21 Appl. Opt. 46, 22 (2007) Spectra No-cut Time Measured (red) and Simulated (black) Cut applied

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Exotic applications: UV multipeaks generation With a grid in the fourier plane we obtained 4 peaks pulse (FEL microbunching enhancement) 22

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Laser to RF synchronization M. Bellaveglia, S. Gallo, C. Vicario

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Synchronize the laser and RF Laser to RF synchronization is needed to have photoinjector optimal and stable operation Photoelectron gun phase < 1 deg rms for emittance compensation Velocity bunching, pulse compression and laser acceleration demands for a tighter specification (100 fs) Laser oscillator Cavity length control Pulse selection amplification THG+ stretcher Laser to the cathode Measure Δf Master clock RF chain

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Phase noise at oscillator level Measurements set up and results 350 fs rms

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 UV time jitter: measure at 10 Hz  wave reference Active feedback RF phase shifter Time of arrival jitter estimated with the RF deflector is 390 fs 0.67 ps rms over 6 hours Pill box cavity HV Photo diode mixer Laser Phase noise detection acquisition

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Toward next step: Laser-driven RF To reduce the time jitter we can synthesize the RF frequency from a photodiode excited by the oscillator pulses.To reduce the time jitter we can synthesize the RF frequency from a photodiode excited by the oscillator pulses. The value measured can be affected by the apparatus resolution, shortly more detailed characterizationThe value measured can be affected by the apparatus resolution, shortly more detailed characterization This technique is applicable to lock for 1 laser systemThis technique is applicable to lock for 1 laser system All-optical synchronization system and clock distribution to go at sub 100 fs levelAll-optical synchronization system and clock distribution to go at sub 100 fs level

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Sparc P1 highlights B=6*10 13 A/m*rad First ever emittance oscillation Square laser at the cathode PRL 99, (2007) Opt. Lett. 31, (2006) 2885 Appl. Opt. 46, 22 (2007) 4959 REV. SC. INSTR. 77, PRST- AB 11, (2008)

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 E:beam experimental results The flat top pulse shape allowed the observation of the double- minimum emittance evolution at SPARC (only predicted by the theory) °RF phase 0.45 mmrms spot size 5, 1.5 psDuration, rise time 5.5 MeVenergy‏ 100 Acurrent PRL 99, (2007) UV LASER

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Gaussian vs flat beam:comparison 30

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Recent advances: Trasverse shaping Main demands: -Squared beam -Power efficiency Final choice: Telescope system to map Gaussian into flat top Pros: above 70% efficiency (up to 95%) Cons: exact matching of TEM 00 gaussian alignment stability filtering cuts real efficiency 2 kinds of commercial refractive Systems probed.

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 OUTPUT BEAM INPUT BEAM Our choice: No spatial filter

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Trasportation up to cathode Shape is preserved through relay imaging trasport (10 mt.)

-Care CERN 2-5 December 2008 Conclusions Extensive development on laser pulse shaping has been done at LNF-SPARC within the PHIN collaborationExtensive development on laser pulse shaping has been done at LNF-SPARC within the PHIN collaboration ▫The two stages pulse shaping for 1.5 ps rise time ▫Demonstration of UV-only pulse shaping ▫Work on faster rise time and reduced losses Sub ps synchronization with upgrade at < 200 fs has been demonstratedSub ps synchronization with upgrade at < 200 fs has been demonstrated E-beam results encouraging the search of flat top pulse, definitive comparison at higher energyE-beam results encouraging the search of flat top pulse, definitive comparison at higher energy Complete shaping in the next future when charge issues will be overcome.Complete shaping in the next future when charge issues will be overcome. 34