THE FUSION PROCESS OF LIDAR AND MAP DATA TO GENERATE 3D CITY AND LANDSCAPE MODELS SANDER OUDE ELBERINK GEOSPATIAL WORLD FORUM 16 MAY 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Three-Step Database Design
Advertisements

February 19 th 2008 Developing a vario-scale IMGeo using the constrained tGAP structure MSc thesis presentation Arjen Hofman.
Oracle Spatial and Mapviewer Problems From Real World Applications.
what is VA? advantages tools a b c what is VA? advantages tools fully integrated architectural plug-in for Rhino 4 powerful feature-based editor to create.
3D Cities Modeling the Real World to Solve Real World Problems.
1Copyright © 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | ArcGIS 3D Analyst - Lidar Applications Clayton Crawford.
Digital terrain analyses – DEM principles DEM data structure Lines – contour map Raster – altitude matrix Vector – TIN/Triangular irregular network Vector.
Digital Terrain Model (DTM)
Raster Based GIS Analysis
Spatial Information Systems (SIS)
Topographic Mapping Honors Earth Science Parkland High School.
Workshop on Earth Observation for Urban Planning and Management, 20 th November 2006, HK 1 Zhilin Li & Kourosh Khoshelham Dept of Land Surveying & Geo-Informatics.
Friso Penninga TU Delft Sander Oude Elberink ITC Enschede 3D Topography.
WFM 6202: Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Management
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
Problem proposed by StereoCarto, S.L.
Using ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 3D Analyst T I N
GI Systems and Science January 23, Points to Cover  What is spatial data modeling?  Entity definition  Topology  Spatial data models Raster.
Esri International User Conference | San Diego, CA Technical Workshops | Lidar Solutions in ArcGIS Clayton Crawford July 2011.
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
Accessing LIDAR GIS day 2012 Larry Theller ABE Purdue University.
Slope and Aspect Calculated from a grid of elevations (a digital elevation model) Slope and aspect are calculated at each point in the grid, by comparing.
Civil and Environmental Engineering Applications.
Parcel Data Models for the Geodatabase
European Spatial Data Research – Enhancing our 3D-abilities; lessons learned from the EuroSDR 3D Spatial Interest Group Martin Salzmann,
Procedural Terrain with Stochastic Trees. WITH MAX MORRIS, CORY GAGEL, MARK WOULFE.
Lidar and GIS Applications and Examples
Algorithms for Triangulations of a 3D Point Set Géza Kós Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences Budapest, Kende u
Major parts of ArcGIS ArcView -Basic mapping, editing and Analysis tools ArcEditor -all of ArcView plus Adds ability to deal with topological and network.
ADVANCED LIDAR WORKSHOP March 15, 2012 Curtis Copeland G.I.S. Coordinator City of Branson.
Intro. To GIS Lecture 9 Terrain Analysis April 24 th, 2013.
REFERENCE SURFACE LTJG Anthony Klemm and Prof. Shachak Pe’eri LAB 3.
National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Vegetation Mapping An Interagency Approach The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the USDA Forest Service Mark Rosenberg: Research.
Martin Salzmann Cadastre, Land Registry and Mapping Agency of the Netherlands (Kadaster) PCC Conference, Riga, May 12-13, 2015 Evolution of the Quality.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Creating Watersheds, Stream Networks and Hydrologically Conditioned DEMS Steve Kopp Dean Djokic.
Quality issues in Spatial Databases M. Mostafavi, G. Edwards, R. Jeansoulin CRG & GEOIDE & REVIGIS Victoria, May 2003.
Presented By Dr. Mohsen Alardhi College of Technological Studies, Kuwait April 19 th,2009.
Generation of a Digital Elevation Model using high resolution satellite images By Mr. Yottanut Paluang FoS: RS&GIS.
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION Adding the Third Dimension to a Topographic Database Using Airborne Laser Scanner.
Arc Hydro River Here is what I was thinking at the start of this meeting Aquatic Biology River Network Channel Shape Flooding Geography Applications.
CHAPTER 4 ENVIRONMENTS THROUGH MAPS. Learning Outcomes You Will Learn : that maps are graphical representations of the Earth that maps have varied uses.
ENC EDITOR.
3D LANDSCAPE MODELLING SANDER OUDE ELBERINK. FACULTY OF GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION Copyright Gerard Kuster.
Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)Constructing Grid DEMConstructing Contour Map Constructing TIN DEM Grid DEM Quality Metric A Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Module 2.8 Overview and status of evolving technologies REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module 2.8 Overview.
Lidar and GIS: Applications and Examples
Aim: Full House Grid: 9 Grid Play: Calculate answer & cross it off
Presentations Computer Vision Research Lab
Physical Structure of GDB
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
National Water Model (Provided by NOAA)
LUCAS Land Cover in the Netherlands
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2017
Aim: Full House Grid: 9 Grid Play: Calculate answer & cross it off
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2018
Interpolation - applications
Assignment Description:
Spatial interpolation
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2013
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2012
Spatial Databases: Digital Terrain Model
Contouring Examples Start with imaginary landscape, then select 40 points at random off it Examples of: Hand contouring Triangulation-based contouring.
Creating Surfaces with 3D Analyst
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Spatial Databases: Digital Terrain Model
3D model of TUDelft Our experience
Green urban areas Assessing the proximity of green areas for the population of major cities By Hugo Poelman – Veerle Martens.
Presentation transcript:

THE FUSION PROCESS OF LIDAR AND MAP DATA TO GENERATE 3D CITY AND LANDSCAPE MODELS SANDER OUDE ELBERINK GEOSPATIAL WORLD FORUM 16 MAY 2013

 Generation of nationwide 3D city and landscape models using national datasets:  1:1.000, BGT, fused with AHN-2 (~8 p/m^2)  1:10.000, TOP10, fused with AHN-2 (~8 p/m^2)  Fusion process  Research questions  Hydrocity (1:1.000)  3DIMGeo (1:1.000)  3DTOP10NL (1:10.000) 2

EXAMPLE IN FIGURES 3

BUILDINGS 4

 Which lidar points have to be used to transfer the height to an object?  How to use the semantics of the map data?  How to assign a height to a point, boundary or surface?  What is the quality of that height?  How to deal with noise in both the map and lidar data? THE QUESTIONS 5

FUSING MAP AND LASER DATA 6

 Transfer height from selected points to map point  In general resulting in at least 2 heights per map point.  What to do with the differences?  Semantics between classes SELECT LASER POINTS PER MAP POINT, PER POLYGON

 See also presentation of Mark Kroon Neo  Aim was to keep small relative height differences  (but not the ones caused by ‘noise’)  Curbstones  Boundary between 2 infrastructural polygons (road, sidewalk).  Function of object in addition to class label HYDROCITY PRODUCE 3D MODEL FOR HYDROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS 8

 Per object: height, infiltration capacity, surface roughness  Interpolated to grid for run off modelling HYDROCITY OBJECT BASED 9

 As a product of 3D Pilot, start of 3D SIG NL (see presentation of Jantien Stoter).  Based on IMGeo, CityGML standards.  Workbench in FME, in cooperation with con terra GmbH (Christian Dahmen).  LoD0, LoD1 and LoD2. 3DIMGEO 1:

 Use FME to (summary)  Read and validate source data: CityGML 2D IMGeo + LiDAR (AHN-2)  'Point-On-Polygon' operation (assign laser data to polygons)  Run + manage the complete workflow -> Single User Interface  Use '3D IMGeo tools' developed by U Twente to:  Prepare map data and laser data for the 3D reconstruction.  Assign height to the map boundaries for a LoD0 terrain description.  Assign a height description inside the 3D polygons. Results are TIN surfaces at LoD0.  Calculate LoD1 or ‘LoD2’ buildings and forest  Use FME again to write result data: CityGML 3D IMGeo FME - 3DIMGEO TOOLS - FME 11

12

 1:  Fused with AHN-2 (~8 p/m^2) 3DTOP10NL 13

 TOP10NL: topographic representation, geometric accuracy 2 m  AHN-2: geometric 3D representation, geom acc < 0.5 m, 8-10 p/m 2  Aim for selecting ‘correct’ points  Do we need all laser points? IMPLICATIONS OF FUSION

Class Lidar data taken from 3D Representation type / Semantic constraint Initial height of object points on boundary Surface description WaterGroundHorizontal plane All object points are set to average height Determined by triangulation of boundary object points RoadsGroundLocally planar Each object point is determined by height of local fitted plane Determined by triangulation of boundary object points TerrainGroundMay vary locally Each object point is determined by height of local fitted plane Lidar points are inserted inside polygon, followed by constrained triangulation BuildingsNon-groundHorizontal plane, LoD 1 All object points are set to average height Determined by triangulation of boundary points ForestNon-groundMay vary locally Each object point is determined by height of local fitted plane Lidar points are inserted inside polygon, followed by constrained triangulation RULES TO CALCULATE OBJECT HEIGHT 17

RULES TO COMBINE HEIGHT OF NEIGHBOURING POLYGONS 18 WaterRoadTerrainBuildingForest Water Both keep own height Both own height, create additional polygon below road Take water height Both keep own height, create wall in-between Road Average if close in height Take road height Both keep own height, create wall in-between Terrain Take average of both heights Both keep own height, create wall in-between Building Both keep own height Forest Both keep own height

19

 Which lidar points have to be used to transfer the height to an object?  Depends on the object.  How to use the semantics of the map data?  Depends on the map/application.  How to assign a height to a point, boundary or surface?  Depends on the object.  What is the quality of that height?  Depends on the workflow.  How to deal with noise in both the map and lidar data?  Deal with it. THE QUESTIONS AND THE FRUSTRATING ANSWERS 20

 Kadaster will go for 3DTOP10NL  3D IMGeo tools are open (since April 2013) and integrated into FME  Nice link between Geo practice and research NEAR FUTURE 21

MORE INFO 22