London Metropolitan University Financial Benchmarking Project 2009/10 23rd March 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNESCO INSTITUTE for STATISTICS The Conceptual Framework of the UIS Data on Finance A short introduction to the definitions underlying the Questionnaire.
Advertisements

CURRICULUM REFORM STEERING GROUP FINANCE PRESENTATION 10 th APRIL 2008.
November 11, 2003 All You Ever Wanted to Know About Financial Statements Statement of Cash Flows All You Ever Wanted to Know About Financial Statements.
Operating Budget Overview Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009 Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009.
Financial Statement Analysis
Scottish Funding Council Funding of colleges in Scotland May 2011.
Comparative student and staff numbers. Total student numbers (fte)
CITY OF MONROE FISCAL YEAR BUDGET PRESENTATION EDWARD SELL, FINANCE DIRECTOR.
The Vote Formula Imperial College’s Resource Allocation Methodology Carole Hobden Planning April 2010.
Messiah College Institutional Planning & Finance May 30, 2007 Understanding Higher Ed Finance.
Court 10 December 2010 Financial Statements for the year ended 31 st July 2010.
Council 23 rd November 2007 Financial Statements for the year ended 31 st July 2007.
20/06/20151 Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2006.
Directorate of Facilities Management Keith Lilley Director of Facilities Management Council 3 rd March 2006.
Copyright ©2004, South-Western College Publishing International Economics By Robert J. Carbaugh 9th Edition Chapter 10: The Balance of Payments.
AGEC 489/689 Spring 2009 Detailed View of Financial Statement Linkages Slide Show #3.
Financial Outlook 2013/14 Tom Wale - PRAS Helen Knight - Finance.
Copyright © by 2000 Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-1 Chapter 6 Depository Institution Performance.
CAFR Analysis Amanda Grieco December 2,  Incorporated in 1857  Located in the northeastern part of the state  Top growth area in the state 
FINANCIAL CONCEPTS ALL CHARTER BOARD MEMBERS NEED TO KNOW JOHN TARVIN SESSION 5 - TUE, JULY 2, :15 – 3:30.
University of Colorado Denver Service Centers Policy Summary.
Chapter 5 Proprietorships and Partnerships 1 Chapter 5 Proprietorships and Partnerships ©2008 Thomson/South-Western.
The University of Texas at San Antonio FY10 Annual Financial Report Highlights January, 2011.
X100©2008 KEAW L15 X100 Introduction to Business Finance Professor Kenneth EA Wendeln Financial Analysis & Ratios Financial Analysis & Ratios.
South Derbyshire Changing for the Better Budget 2010/11 Area Forum Presentation.
Budget Briefing 2011/12 Catherine Whalley - PRAS Stephen Purbrick - Finance.
The Statement of Cash Flows Presentations for Chapter 14 by Glenn Owen.
Financial Briefing Sonoma State University November 21, 2013 Presented by Laurence Furukawa-Schlereth CFO and Vice President for Administration and Finance,
Analysing college and university finances UCU training Stephen Court UCU senior research officer.
Financials Start up Cost Source of Funds EquityLoans $20K$25K $45K Operational costs Fixed$43,085$113,700$281,840 Variable$29,570$163,220$460,975.
Budget 2013/14 and Business Plan Town Hall March 7, 2013 ANNUAL BUDGET 2013/14.
1. 2 Implementation of Grants on a Full Economic Cost Basis John Wand.
Benchmarking Academic Enterprise Robert Belsole M.D. Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs.
Financial Ratio Analysis
Merger of Mass Turnpike and Mass Highways January 22, 2004.
Campus Forum: Resource Allocation at UKZN in 2008 Glen Barnes Director, Management Information (for the Budget Working Group)
Cost of Capital Professor Ronald Miolla. Agenda 1) What is Cost of Capital? 2) How to compute Cost of Capital. 3) Cost of debt. 4) Cost of equity.
Th 9 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc Foundations of Financial Management E D I T I O N N I N T H Irwin/McGraw-Hill Block Hirt 2 C H A P T E R TWO.
1 Analysis on Items of Financial Statement 1.Analysis on Items of Balance Sheet (1)Trade Receivables (2)Stock asset (3)Fixed asset and investment asset.
Improvement Programme Techniques. Content Context KPIs and Managing risk Understanding your cost base VfM Quick Benchmarking Lean and Rapid Process Design.
Group II Presentation on Products, Services & Delivery Channels.
No Interest Credit Plan. OUTLINE o CANEX Credit Plan overview o Usage statistics o Financial impact on CANEX o Estimated cost to CFCF o Overall financial.
April 2013 Waverley CAB-information for discussion with Waverley Borough Council.
Share Options Dave Mouncey. Share Option The right to receive a share in the future, usually with the price set at the date right is granted.
The University of Texas at San Antonio FY 09 Annual Financial Report Highlights January, 2010.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
SAN JACINTO COLLEGE DISTRICT BUDGET HEARING AUGUST 3, 2009 PROPOSED BUDGET
Income generation and marketing Frances Norton Wellcome Library.
FY15 Financial Results By Dr. Marilyn Fowle’ November 12, 2015.
City of Pitt Meadows Taxation 101– Townhall Meeting February 4, 2016.
Overview of financial performance 2014/15 Bob Scruton Chair of the Finance and Resources Committee 22 nd January 2016.
FY PROPOSED BUDGET  A "Target Level" expenditure base was established for all departments six- months’ worth of operations (July 1, 2016 – December.
Copyright ©2005, Thomson/South-Western International Economics By Robert J. Carbaugh 10th Edition Chapter 10: The Balance of Payments.
New and Growing Sponsors Programme Jennifer Jewitt FCCA CPFA The Education Alliance (formally the Hunsley Trust)
Nottinghamshire County Council Trading Services Review: Summary presentation.
CITY OF HAPEVILLE FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009.
Draft 1 – 2016/2017 Biennial Capital & Operating Budgets July 2016.
Financial and Capital Highlights Fiscal Year Second Quarter Charles Turner, Director of Finance
Cultivating Innovative SMEs into Business Giant: the SME Supporting Program in Shanghai Shanghai Torch Hi-tech Industry Development Center July 2008.
Insert Title Tribal Education Benchmarking FE Total Financial Benchmarking financial benchmarking curriculum efficiency curriculum benchmarking learner.
1 Havering Council Summary Statement of Accounts Draft accounts – subject to audit.
CASH FLOW STATEMENT  design to provide information about the change in an enterprise’s cash and cash equivalents.
Barrhead Housing Association Ltd
Havering Council Budget & Council Tax 2016/17
John Carroll University Faculty Forum
Farm Business Analysis
San Jacinto College District Budget Hearing August 3, 2009
City of Richmond, California FY Draft Budget
A SUMMARY OF UNIVERSITY FUNDING & EXPENDITURE 2016/17
Proposed 2018 Budget Truth In Taxation Hearing December 5, 2017
Presentation transcript:

London Metropolitan University Financial Benchmarking Project 2009/10 23rd March 2011

Agenda  Methodology  Summary  Results

Methodology

Tribal Functional Model 25% Teaching Administration 25% Research Support 20% Admissions 30% Purchasing Mrs Jones was a Faculty Administrator for the whole year. Her role was split as follows: Overall University Associated ActivitiesCapital & FinancingIncomparable Faculties Teaching Activity Research & Enterprise Activity Support Human Resources & Staff Training Library Services IT Services Student Services Registry Services Finance Marketing Corporate Administration Facilities Estates Principal Activities

Selection of Comparisons London Group Wider Group

Summary

 Overall Teaching Income - £1.2m higher;  Overall Pay Costs - £0.2m higher;  Non-pay Costs - £1.7m lower.  Overall Income - £8.7m lower;  Pay costs - £3.6m higher;  £3.6m higher subsidy.  Overall Income - £13.1m lower;  Overall Costs - £11.7m lower;  Overall Contribution - £1.4m lower.  £2.5m lower net cost. Teaching Research & Enterprise Associated Activities Capital & Financing Support Areas  Library - £0.5m lower;  IT Services - £1.0m lower;  Student Services - £1.9m higher;  Registry - £2.5m lower;  Finance - £0.3m higher;  HR & Staff Training – in-line;  Marketing - £0.7m lower;  Corporate Admin - £0.1m lower;  Facilities - £0.9m lower;  Estates - £4.7m higher.

2009/10 Results

Overall Financial Situation 9 Principal Activities includes Teaching, Research & Enterprise, Business Development, Library Services, IT Services, Student Services, Registry, Finance, HR & Staff Training, Marketing, Corporate Administration, Facilities & Estates. Associated Activities includes Catering, Residences, Crèche, Nursery, Shops, Franchising / Licensing, Students Union, Sports, Widening Participation, Other Funding Council Grants, Lettings and Other Associated Activities. Capital & Financing includes Inherited Liabilities, Interest Income, Debt Servicing Charges, Depreciation and Bad Debts. Incomparable includes, for example, sale of assets, restructuring costs, FRS17 pensions, etc. Principal Activities Contribution £1.8 million Capital & Financing Net Cost £1.4 million Associated Activities Contribution £3.6 million Incomparable Net Cost £2.9 million

Principal Activities TEACHING RESEARCH & ENTERPRISE REGISTRY MARKETING ESTATES FACILITIES LIBRARY SERVICES IT SERVICES STUDENT SERVICES ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES INCOMPARABLE ITEMS FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES & STAFF TRAINING CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL & FINANCING

Principal Activities Year on Year 11

Principal Activities Detail 12 Compared to London Group:  Academic costs - £3.3m lower;  Support costs - £4.2m higher;  Pay costs - £1.9m lower;  Non-pay costs - £2.8m higher;  Hence surplus - £0.9m lower. Compared to London Group:  Academic costs - £3.3m lower;  Support costs - £4.2m higher;  Pay costs - £1.9m lower;  Non-pay costs - £2.8m higher;  Hence surplus - £0.9m lower.

Teaching TEACHING RESEARCH & ENTERPRISE REGISTRY MARKETING ESTATES FACILITIES LIBRARY SERVICES IT SERVICES STUDENT SERVICES ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES INCOMPARABLE ITEMS FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES & STAFF TRAINING CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL & FINANCING

Teaching Contribution Year On Year 14

Teaching Contribution - £ per Weighted FTE Student 15 Compared to London Group:  Income - £1.2m higher, higher % Overseas Fees;  Pay costs - £233,000 higher; Delivery – 11.4 FTEs higher, 2.0% higher av. pay levels; Support – 26.6 FTEs lower,7.6% lower av. pay levels;  Non-pay costs - £1.7m lower;  Hence contribution - £2.6m higher. Compared to London Group:  Income - £1.2m higher, higher % Overseas Fees;  Pay costs - £233,000 higher; Delivery – 11.4 FTEs higher, 2.0% higher av. pay levels; Support – 26.6 FTEs lower,7.6% lower av. pay levels;  Non-pay costs - £1.7m lower;  Hence contribution - £2.6m higher.

Research & Enterprise TEACHING RESEARCH & ENTERPRISE REGISTRY MARKETING ESTATES FACILITIES LIBRARY SERVICES IT SERVICES STUDENT SERVICES ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES INCOMPARABLE ITEMS FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES & STAFF TRAINING CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL & FINANCING

Research & Enterprise Activity Year On Year 17

Research & Enterprise Activity 18 Compared to London Group:  Volume of activity - £8.7m lower;  Pay costs - £3.6m higher;  Non-pay costs – in-line;  Hence, subsidy - £3.6m higher. Compared to London Group:  Volume of activity - £8.7m lower;  Pay costs - £3.6m higher;  Non-pay costs – in-line;  Hence, subsidy - £3.6m higher.

Faculty Analysis - Teaching

Teaching Income per Weighted FTE Student 20

Teaching Costs per Weighted FTE Student 21

Teaching Contribution % 22

Support Services TEACHING RESEARCH & ENTERPRISE REGISTRY MARKETING ESTATES FACILITIES LIBRARY SERVICES IT SERVICES STUDENT SERVICES ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES INCOMPARABLE ITEMS FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES & STAFF TRAINING CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL & FINANCING

Support Costs – Year On Year 24

Support Costs 25

Library Services Costs Year On Year 26

Library Services Costs 27 Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £497,000 lower;  Pay costs - £409,000 lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 7.8 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 4.4% lower;  Non-pay costs - £143,000 lower;  Income – £55,000 lower. Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £497,000 lower;  Pay costs - £409,000 lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 7.8 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 4.4% lower;  Non-pay costs - £143,000 lower;  Income – £55,000 lower.

IT Services Costs Year On Year 28

IT Services Costs 29 Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £980,000 lower;  Pay costs - £479,000 higher, due to:  Staff numbers – 18.9 FTEs higher;  Pay levels – 7.5% lower;  Non-pay costs - £1.5m lower;  Income – £56,000 lower. Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £980,000 lower;  Pay costs - £479,000 higher, due to:  Staff numbers – 18.9 FTEs higher;  Pay levels – 7.5% lower;  Non-pay costs - £1.5m lower;  Income – £56,000 lower.

Student Services Costs Year On Year 30

Student Services Costs 31 Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £1.9m higher;  Pay costs - £397,000 higher, due to:  Staff numbers – 10.7 FTEs higher;  Pay levels – 2.1% lower;  Non-pay costs - £1.1m higher;  Income – £366,000 lower. Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £1.9m higher;  Pay costs - £397,000 higher, due to:  Staff numbers – 10.7 FTEs higher;  Pay levels – 2.1% lower;  Non-pay costs - £1.1m higher;  Income – £366,000 lower.

Registry Costs Year On Year 32

Registry Costs 33 Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £2.5m lower;  Pay costs - £2.0m lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 39.4 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 8.8% lower;  Non-pay costs - £461,000 lower;  Income – £34,000 higher. Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £2.5m lower;  Pay costs - £2.0m lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 39.4 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 8.8% lower;  Non-pay costs - £461,000 lower;  Income – £34,000 higher.

Finance Costs Year On Year 34

Finance Costs 35 Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £266,000 higher;  Pay costs - £44,000 higher, due to:  Staff numbers – 4.5 FTEs higher;  Pay levels – 5.2% lower;  Non-pay costs - £174,000 higher;  Income – £49,000 lower. Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £266,000 higher;  Pay costs - £44,000 higher, due to:  Staff numbers – 4.5 FTEs higher;  Pay levels – 5.2% lower;  Non-pay costs - £174,000 higher;  Income – £49,000 lower.

Human Resources & Staff Training Costs Year On Year 36

Human Resources & Staff Training Costs 37 Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £60,000 higher;  Pay costs - £535,000 higher, due to:  Staff numbers – 9.4 FTEs higher;  Pay levels – 3.4% higher;  Non-pay costs - £477,000 lower;  Income – in-line. Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £60,000 higher;  Pay costs - £535,000 higher, due to:  Staff numbers – 9.4 FTEs higher;  Pay levels – 3.4% higher;  Non-pay costs - £477,000 lower;  Income – in-line.

Marketing Costs Year On Year 38

Marketing Costs 39 Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £702,000 lower;  Pay costs - £167,000 lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 6.1 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 3.1% higher;  Non-pay costs - £552,000 lower;  Income – £18,000 lower. Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £702,000 lower;  Pay costs - £167,000 lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 6.1 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 3.1% higher;  Non-pay costs - £552,000 lower;  Income – £18,000 lower.

Corporate Administration Costs Year On Year 40

Corporate Administration Costs 41 Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £113,000 lower;  Pay costs - £636,000 lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 12.4 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 12.5% higher;  Non-pay costs - £501,000 higher;  Income – £23,000 lower. Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £113,000 lower;  Pay costs - £636,000 lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 12.4 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 12.5% higher;  Non-pay costs - £501,000 higher;  Income – £23,000 lower.

Facilities Costs Year On Year 42

Facilities Costs 43 Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £908,000 lower;  Pay costs - £188,000 lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 5.1 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 4.8% lower;  Non-pay costs - £633,000 lower;  Income – £87,000 higher. Compared to London Group:  Overall costs - £908,000 lower;  Pay costs - £188,000 lower, due to:  Staff numbers – 5.1 FTEs lower;  Pay levels – 4.8% lower;  Non-pay costs - £633,000 lower;  Income – £87,000 higher.

Estates Costs Year On Year 44

Estates Costs 45 Compared to Benchmark:  Overall costs - £4.7 m higher;  Lower running costs per sqm;  More sqm. Compared to Benchmark:  Overall costs - £4.7 m higher;  Lower running costs per sqm;  More sqm.

Owned Estates Costs 46

Owned Estates Non-Pay Costs 47

Associated Activities TEACHING RESEARCH & ENTERPRISE REGISTRY MARKETING ESTATES FACILITIES LIBRARY SERVICES IT SERVICES STUDENT SERVICES ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES INCOMPARABLE ITEMS FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES & STAFF TRAINING CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL & FINANCING

Associated Activities – Year On Year 49

Associated Activities - Volume 50 Compared to London Group:  Income - £13.1m lower;  Costs - £11.7m lower;  Hence, contribution £1.4m lower. Compared to London Group:  Income - £13.1m lower;  Costs - £11.7m lower;  Hence, contribution £1.4m lower.

Associated Activities - Contribution 51

Capital & Financing 52 Compared to Benchmark:  £2.5m lower burden. Compared to Benchmark:  £2.5m lower burden.

Summary

 Overall Teaching Income - £1.2m higher;  Overall Pay Costs - £0.2m higher;  Non-pay Costs - £1.7m lower.  Overall Income - £8.7m lower;  Pay costs - £3.6m higher;  £3.6m higher subsidy.  Overall Income - £13.1m lower;  Overall Costs - £11.7m lower;  Overall Contribution - £1.4m lower.  £2.5m lower net cost. Teaching Research & Enterprise Associated Activities Capital & Financing Support Areas  Library - £0.5m lower;  IT Services - £1.0m lower;  Student Services - £1.9m higher;  Registry - £2.5m lower;  Finance - £0.3m higher;  HR & Staff Training – in-line;  Marketing - £0.7m lower;  Corporate Admin - £0.1m lower;  Facilities - £0.9m lower;  Estates - £4.7m higher.

Support Areas – Cost Summary

Support Areas – Staff Numbers Summary

Support Areas – Average Pay Levels

Next Steps?