Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Steve Wilson SRF Consulting Group, Inc. MnDOT Collar County Travel Demand Model.
GIS and Transportation Planning
GIS at PSRC GIS data collection & travel demand modeling ESRM 250 February 4, 2010.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Implementing the FHWA Quick Response Freight Model in the Twin Cities Steve Wilson and Jonathan Ehrlich SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF Consulting Group,
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
First home-interview survey (1944). Gravity model Where do the trips produced in TAZ 3 go? ? ? ? ?
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Vehicles and Movement of Light and Heavy Vehicles Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand.
Multimodal Concurrency: Response to 2005 Legislative Session Briefing for House Local Government Committee November 30, 2006 King Cushman Puget Sound Regional.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Norman W. Garrick CTUP. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Transportation Planning and Modeling Transportation planning is a field involved with the evaluation, assessment, design and siting of transportation facilities.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
THE TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS OF A TERRORIST ATTACK ON SEATTLE’S HIGHWAY NETWORK Chang-Hee Christine Bae (University of Washington) Larry Blain (Puget.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
May 10, 2011 Life-cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Alternatives for Accommodating Heavy Truck Traffic in the Las Vegas Roadway Network Dr. Alexander Paz,
ODOT Freight Modeling Presented to the Ohio Conference on Freight Toledo, OH September 18, 2007 By Gregory Giaimo, PE Ohio Department of Transportation.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Anne Goodchild | Andrea Gagliano | Maura Rowell October 10, 2013 Examining Carrier Transportation Characteristics along the Supply Chain.
The Use of EMME/2 by Transek – an Overview “Fantasy and imagination is the limit” by Göran Tegnér Transek Consultants, Solna, Sweden Presentation for the.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Income-Based Work Trip Stratification within the Puget Sound Regional Council Travel Model Framework 20 th International Emme Users’ Conference Montreal,
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
1 Potential User Benefits and Costs of Rising Fuel Prices in the Puget Sound Region TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 By Maren Outwater.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
Preliminary Evaluation of Cellular Origin- Destination Data as a Basis for Forecasting Non-Resident Travel 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal 2004 Review and Progress Report.
Florida’s First Eco-Sustainable City. 80,000+ Residential Units 10 million s.f. Non-Residential 20 Schools International Clean Technology Center Multi-Modal.
Model Validation of Transit Ridership at the Corridor and Transit Route Level by Mark Charnews October 19, 2006.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Dr. Roger Roess UPDATE January 11, 2015 Mode Definitions in the HCM.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Transportation Demand Analysis
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Trip Generation I Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
Sequential Transportation Modeling Process
Presentation transcript:

Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling

Puget Sound Regional Council’s travel model Forecast future travel patterns and conditions within the four counties (King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish) of the Puget Sound region Represents the state of the art for regional travel modeling Analyze the likely impacts of travel forecasts on the region’s transportation infrastructure and environment Interacts directly with the land use model (UrbanSim), and it is the primary source of input data for the air quality (EPA Moves) and benefit-cost analysis (BCA) tools * Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) is the Seattle region’s MPO

Modeling Framework

Seven basic components Household vehicle availability Person trip generation Trip distribution Mode choice (passenger travel) Time of day Trucks Vehicle trip assignment

Commercial and Passenger Handled Separately Truck trips are generated, distributed, and then assigned to specific routes. There is no truck mode choice model as all travel is assumed to occur via the truck mode. Uses TAZ-level employment data provided by UrbanSim to estimate truck trip generation. The truck model converts trucks to passenger car equivalents (PCE) prior to route assignment. – accounts for the fact that large trucks occupy more space on roadways than do passenger cars – important for representing the contribution of truck travel to congestion and overall travel speeds. – light trucks represent 1.0 PCE; medium trucks represent 1.5 PCEs and; heavy trucks represent 2.0 PCEs.

Basic unit: TAZ Transportation Analysis Zone 938 in 4 county region Estimate truck trips at the TAZ level based on employment in that zone

5 time periods 1) AM Peak Period (6:00 am to 9:00 am); 2) Mid-Day (9:00 am to 3:00 pm); 3) PM Peak Period (3:00 pm to 6:00 pm); 4) Evening (6:00 pm to 10:00 pm); 5) Night (10:00 pm to 6:00 am).

Three truck types Light Trucks – Four or more tires, two axles and weighing less than 16,000 pounds – commercial vehicles such as taxis, rental cars, school buses, ambulances, etc Medium Trucks – Six or more tires, two to four axles, and weighing between 16,000 and 52,000 pounds Heavy Trucks – Double- or triple-unit, having 5 or more axles, and weighing more than 52,000 pounds

Trips estimated from employment Confidentiality issues result in generally underestimated total employment Certain kinds of manufacturing that are not included in the PSRC land use model (primarily construction and resources employment) – Ag/forestry/fishing – Mining – Construction – Manufacturing – products – Manufacturing – equipment – Communication, transportation, utility – Wholesale – Retail – Financial, real estate, service (fires) – Government – Education

Trip rates Attraction and production both estimated from employment using different factors Only change due to changes in employment – Not transportation system performance – No elasticity of demand with respect to travel cost Special generators – Ports and warehousing districts – Survey based

External trips Generated and/or destined for outside the region 1997 TRANSEARCH data SFTA data

Validation The FASTruck model was validated system wide based on a limited set of truck counts for medium and heavy trucks. Light-truck travel was validated on a system wide basis to ensure that the assignments of these trucks did not significantly affect the assignments of passenger cars. The existing FASTruck model does include all non-personal-use vehicles.

Trip destination Gravity model approach – Closer TAZes attract more trips – Different for each truck class Estimated from consultant report SFTA survey Distributed over the day – From PSRC screenline counts from trucks

Network Traffic assignment with equilibrium assumption Congestion effects captured with link performance functions Only the highway network is used – Recall zone to zone travel Trucks assigned along with all other traffic – All vehicles on same link travel same speed – Reduce truck speeds by 25%