Roadblocks This is a seizure with little or no individualized suspicion; thus, the 4A question is when are such seizures “reasonable?”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEARCH AND SEIZURE The 4 th. Disclaimer Mr Koepping is NOT an attorney. This discussion is for the purpose of explaining general constitutional principles.
Advertisements

Terry v. Ohio and NY City Stop and Frisk Policy
1 Chapter 11 Evidence is Admissible if Obtained During an Administrative Function Under the “Special Needs” of Government Evidence is Admissible if Obtained.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11th Edition
Chapter Eight – Motor Vehicle Stops, Searches and Inventories Rolando V. del Carmen.
Chapter 3 FOURTH AMENDMENT
Criminal Justice Process: the investigation – Chp 12 Arrest – Suspect taken into custody 4 th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their.
Policing within the Law
POLICE LAW & SOCIETY What are the distinct characteristics of police in U.S. society? Police play multiple roles Law prescribes parameters of police practice.
Police and the Rule of Law Chapter 7 In Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
Mainstream and Crosscurrents, Second Edition Chapter 6 Policing and the Law.
Chapter Five – Stop and Frisk and Stationhouse Detention Rolando V. del Carmen.
Street Law Fourth Amendment Rights
Cops, Cars, and the Constitution
1 Spring 2010 Road Show Training Maine Chiefs of Police Association LEGAL ISSUES RELATED TO VEHICLE STOPS Brian MacMaster Office of the Attorney General.
Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4. CJ140-02A – Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4: The Fourth Amendment CJ140-02A– Class 4 Part 1.
Chapter 11 “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCH & SEIZURE ISSUES
Arrest © Probable Cause Terry Stop is not necessarily an unreasonable seizure An Arrest occurs when the subject submits or PO takes actual physical control.
Search and Seizure The Fourth Amendment. Unit 5 Wrap Up Midterm Essay Exam Midterm Essay Exam Any questions? Any questions? Grades should be completed.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
Plain View Doctrine  Allows a police officer to seize evidence found in “plain view” during a search without a warrant. Also, when officers are carrying.
The Fourth Amendment Protects the people’s right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.
The Bill of Rights The First Fundamental Changes of the Constitution.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure. The 4 th Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against.
Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and other Evidence Obtaining Physical and other Evidence.
Criminal Justice-- Investigations Chapter 12—Due Process Rights of Suspects under 4 th & 5 th Amendments.
Chapter Six: Arrests, Use of Force, and Responses to Terrorism Rolando V. del Carmen.
LS100 Eight Skills Prof. Jane McElligott.  A Miranda Warning is a statement police must read to a suspect prior to interrogation of the suspect once.
Chapter 4 Stop and Frisk. Introduction  Terry v. Ohio  reasonable suspicion  field interrogations are essential for investigating and detecting street.
Kaplan University Constitutional Law Josephine Kerr January 6, 2011.
Unit 6 Seminar Rule of Law: Expounding the Constitution 4 th -5 th -6 th Amendments.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System Chapter 6: Police and the Constitution.
Unit 1: Constitutional Interpretation and the Bill of Rights.
Do Now: 1.When can an officer stop and frisk a person? Analyze the data on pg. 135 of your textbook. 2.What happens after charges are brought against an.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Six: Warrantless Arrests and Searches This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
4 th Amendment: Search and Seizure. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects personal privacy, and every citizen's right to be free from.
Rights & the Constitution. Fourth Amendment Intended to limit overzealous behavior by the police Search and seizure Probable Cause –Standard for legal.
 The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
Navarette v. California Argued January 21, Fourth Amendment Text The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
1 Searches Chapter 2. 2 Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment strikes a balance between  individual liberties and  The rights of society. It forbids.
EMLYN A. RICKETTS, ESQ. Criminal Procedure: The Investigative Phase.
Chapter 05: Temporary Detentions LawTech Custom Publishing, Inc. Copyright 2010.
You remember the 4th Amendment, don’t you?  “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause. By the end of this presentation you should be able to understand; ◦Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ◦How.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation The criminal justice process includes everything that happens to a person from the moment of arrest, through.
Criminal Investigation: Laws of Arrest, Search and Seizure Chapter 12 Law and Government.
CJ I / Critical Thinking 3/13/16 Why do you think it is important that law enforcement agencies have limited authority? What do you think are the key benefits.
Is there a state action? (i.e. search by police, not private party) Is the search conducted by a state or federal actor? 4 th amendment doesn’t apply to.
 Being a US citizen  Be at least 21 years of age  Have a high school diploma or equivalent  Possess a valid drivers license  Have no prior convictions.
Chapter 4 Searches Hess 4-1. Introduction Supreme Court defined a search as “a governmental infringement of a legitimate expectation of privacy” Investigators.
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 5 Automobile Searches: exceptions to the warrant requirement Criminal Justice.
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 3 Arrests Criminal Justice Procedure 8 th Edition.
Limiting the Right of Search
Rights of the Accused Precedents in these cases are key: What does the majority opinion say? (Most criminal cases do not go to trial – most end with a.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Rodriguez v. U.S. Can police extend a traffic stop for a dog sniff?
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Intro to American Law.
The Fourth Amendment Protects the people’s right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Criminal Procedure: Theory and Practice, 2d.
CRJ325 Criminal Procedure
Florida v. Jardines.
4th amendment By: KEila Aguilar.
Authority to Detain and Arrest; Use of Force
Search & Seizure The act of taking possession of this property.
Tips of Crimes.
Arrest.
Presentation transcript:

Roadblocks This is a seizure with little or no individualized suspicion; thus, the 4A question is when are such seizures “reasonable?”

A roadblock of which the purpose is to get drunk drivers off the roads is constitutional Michigan v. Sitz (1990) –Why? Because the state’s interest in getting drunk drivers off the roads >intrusion on motorists [= balancing test]  Roadblock advances that interest  The intrusion is brief, limited  The roadblock is systematic; does not rely on police discretion about whom to stop

Roadblock for the purpose of general crime control is unconstitutional Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000) (re drug interdiction) –Why? Apparently because to investigate whether a particular individual is involved in criminal activity requires at least some individualized suspicion.  Remember that stopping a car = fourth amendment “seizure” –Terry: seizure requires reasonable suspicion

 The Mode of Analysis for Roadblock: –Purpose Analysis and –Balancing Test

Purpose analysis Ordinarily OK [Individualized suspicion not required] Not OK Getting drunk drivers off the road General crime detection Checking for illegal aliens at fixed Border Patrol checkpoints Drug Interdiction Systematic and total license checks Random stops for driver’s license check

Apprehending specific indicted persons or specific fugitives Checking for illegal aliens with a roving border patrol stop Checking for kidnapped person Dealing with dangerous or exigent circumstances

Balancing Test [from Brown v. Texas, 1979] The purpose for having the roadblock & the degree to which the seizure advances that purpose V. The severity of the interference with individual liberty

Factors to consider in balancing  To assess the severity of the intrusion on the individual’s fourth amendment right not to be unreasonably seized, consider: –The degree of police discretion about whom to stop [Stopping everyone versus random] –The degree of surprise and “suddenness” of the roadblock to the motorist –Length of delay –Clarity of identity of it as a police roadblock –Training and experience of the officers –Day or night –Public safety factor