1 Virtual Worlds: Which Type is Right for Your Institution? Donald J. Welch, Ph.D. Merit Network Michael Macedonia, Ph.D. Forterra Systems Copyright Donald.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Money? Try Vision. Academic Issues and the Uses of Technology in Financially Tight Times Susanne Woods – SAC, 2002 Copyright Susanne Woods, This.
Advertisements

What Students Say About Emerging Practices and Learning Technology Anthony Potoczniak - Rice University Sarah E. Smith - North Carolina State University.
An Integrated Approach to Computer and Information Literacy Linda Ehley Alverno College Associate Professor CS EDUCAUSE 2003 Copyright – Linda Ehley 2003.
© Scordias & Morris, 2005 Virtual Classroom Visits: Using Video Conferencing Technology to Enhance Teacher Education Dr. Margaret Scordias Pamela B. Morris,
While You Were Out: How Students are Transforming Information and What it Means for Publishing Kate Wittenberg The Electronic Publishing Initiative at.
Making Sense out of the Information Security and Privacy Alphabet Soup in terms of Data Access A pragmatic, collaborative approach to promulgating campus-wide.
© Copyright Computer Lab Solutions All rights reserved. Do you need usage information about your computer labs? Copyright Computer Lab Solutions.
Classroom Integration of a Student Computer Initiative David J. Wright Dir. Curriculum Innovation and E-Learning Karen Bull Dir. Operations, Educational.
Using Value Disciplines in Organizational Change Peter D. Nordgren University of Wisconsin-Superior Educause Midwest Regional Conference March 13 th, 2007.
Supporting and Hosting Web- Based Learning Systems Educause 2001 Charlene Douglas – Director Kathryn Gomm - Training Manager Sharon McCarrager – Accessibility.
Copyright 2006 Copyright Seán O’Donnell This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Ubiquitous Distributed Learning and Global Citizenship Michael Sperling, Associate Provost for Interdisciplinary, Distributed and Global Learning Fairleigh.
© 2008 Somerville ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: A “BACK TO BASICS” APPROACH Mary M. Somerville, MA, MLS, PhD Associate Library Dean San José State University.
Carolyn Awalt University of Texas at El Paso Paul Resta
Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.
Faculty Conceptions and Misconceptions of Hybrid Education Courses Helen C. Wittmann, Ed.D. Elsa-Sofia Morote, Ed.D. Thomas Kelly, Ph.D.
Interactive Learning: Teaching Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with WebCT By: Andrew Clark University of Arizona Department of Geography and Regional.
1 sm Using E-Business Solutions to Meet Management Challenges: Interoperability & Flexibility Bring Success to the Implementation of Specialized Components.
3/20/20071 IT Strategy and Leadership in Higher Education: Two Case Studies Case 1: Roberts Wesleyan College. Presented by Pradeep (Peter) Saxena, CIO.
In An Online Course Using Wimba Voice Software Dr. Mary Jane Clerkin Berkeley College Coordinator of Online Faculty Support Raising the Level of Interaction.
Embedded Librarian Program: Librarians and Faculty Partnering to Serve Online Students NERCOMP Annual Conference Innovation and Reliability: Finding the.
Moving Your Paperwork Online Western Washington University E-Sign Web Forms Copyright Western Washington University, This work is the intellectual.
The 2007 Horizon Report: Six Technologies to Watch ELI 2007 Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA.
Open Your Eyes: Open Architecture, Open Source, Open Projects Mid-Atlantic Educause January 12, 2005 Copyright Patricia Gertz This work is the intellectual.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
Haute Software: Juggling Open Source and Vendor Software Jeshua Pacifici, Manager, Learning Systems Kim Gausepohl, Assistant Manager, Online Course Systems.
Learning technology center Preparing Faculty and Students for Hybrid Courses Copyright Alan Aycock, Carla Garnham & Robert Kaleta, This work is the.
Copyright © 2003, Scott Higgins and Marianne Hollis Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for.
The Influence of Intellectual Property Rights Over Distance Education Jonathan Alger University of Michigan April 17, 2002 Copyright Jonathan Alger, 2002.
Sharing Information and Controlling Content: Continuing Challenges for Higher Education Susanna Frederick Fischer Assistant Professor Columbus School of.
Examining the Partnership for the 21 st Century with a Spotlight on Technology and Humor Copyright [Peter M. Jonas] [2008]. This work is the intellectual.
Preparing for and Teaching Hybrid Courses Midwest EDUCAUSE March 25, 2003 Mary Sudzina, Ph.D. University of Dayton Robert Kaleta, Ph.D. & Carla Garnham.
Information Technology Services 1 Copyright Copyright Marc Wallman and Theresa Semmens, This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission.
Copyright Jack Chambers, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial,
Copyright Michael White and Sandra Thompson, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 National Findings June 26, 2013 Speak Up Findings & Trends: Informing the changing role of educators 9.
Lowering the Technology Barrier: Assigning Collaborative Web Projects Scott E. Siddall Denison University Copyright Scott E. Siddall, This work is.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Rethinking Campus and Classroom Design William J. Mitchell NLII 2004 September 9, 2004 Copyright William Mitchell, This work is the intellectual.
Copyright 2002 UT System The Ever-Changing Courseware Landscape Migration Strategies and Lessons Learned Copyright Michael Anderson and Rob Robinson, 2001.
Considerations and Concerns When Moving from Commercial to Sakai Jeshua Pacifici, GEDI Assistant Director and Learning Systems Consultant.
Copyright David A. Cox This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial,
Effective Distribution of Academically Licensed Software ©2008 Brent West. This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted.
1 Presenters: Lucretia Parham Sara Connor Armstrong Atlantic State University October 30, :45 – 12:35 Copyright Sara Connor and Lucretia Parham,
EDUCAUSE 2006 Electronic Portfolios, A Perfect Solution to Assessment in an Online English Composition Course Dr. Mary Jane Clerkin Copyright Dr. Mary.
Integration is Critical for Success Curriculum Course Delivery Ongoing Support Instructor & Learner.
A Cat-Herding Tale Forging a Single Course Management System for a Decentralized Institution Copyright Abdul Shibli, 2004.This work is the intellectual.
A Strategy for Moving from Commercial to an Open Source Environment Jeshua Pacifici, GEDI Assistant Director and Learning Systems Consultant.
1 Top 10 Challenges of the Academic Technology Community John P. Campbell & Dennis A. Trinkle EDUCAUSE Live! Monday, May 21, :00-2:00 PM Copyright.
What’s Happening at Internet2 Renee Woodten Frost Associate Director Middleware and Security 8 March 2005.
1 Collaborative Services Donald J. Welch Ph.D. Merit Network.
Legal Issues in the “E-Learning Business” Jonathan Alger University of Michigan October 29, 2001 Copyright Jonathan Alger This work is the intellectual.
Quickly Establishing A Workable IT Security Program EDUCAUSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference January 10-12, 2006 Copyright Robert E. Neale This.
Authors: Victoria F. Sarkisian, Linguistic Coordinator at the Academic Learning Center Austin C. Schilling, Senior Consultant at IBM In collaboration with:
Top 10 Challenges of the Academic Technology Community Veronica Diaz, John Campbell, Dennis Trinkle Wednesday, October 24, :50 p.m. - 4:40 p.m.
Systemic Progress in Teaching and Learning Common Elements that Support Campus-Wide Innovation Copyright Andrea Nixon, A. Michael Berman, Christine Haile,
A Path to the Community Cloud Making Above Campuses Services a Reality
Educause/Internet 2 Computer and Network Security Task Force
Malia Crouse Regis University January 22, 2009
Educause Learning Initiatives (ELI) January 20-22, 2009
Ed Barboni, Senior Advisor, Council of Independent Colleges
Project for OnLine Instructional Support (POLIS)
Collaborative Services
myIS.neu.edu – presentation screen shots accompany:
Signet Privilege Management
© Mike Reese This work is the intellectual property of the author
An App A Day Copyright Tina Oestreich and Brian Yuhnke This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material.
EDUCAUSE Networking 2002 Washington, D.C. April 17, 2002
Signet Privilege Management
Terry Coatta VP Development, Silicon Chalk
Presentation transcript:

1 Virtual Worlds: Which Type is Right for Your Institution? Donald J. Welch, Ph.D. Merit Network Michael Macedonia, Ph.D. Forterra Systems Copyright Donald Welch This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.

2 Agenda l Introduction l Comparison considerations l Effectiveness l Domain specificity l K-12 cooperation l Content l Usability l Technical l Reliability l Performance l Integration l Business l Behavior l Control l Perceptions l Cost l Intellectual Property l Summary

3 Introduction l Future of Virtual Worlds in Education l Web → Course Management Systems l Wireless l In 2003 I was on the cover of Communications Week for our classroom wireless network <5 years ago l Distance Learning l Parallels with the Web and wireless l Early adopters l From “justify” to “why don’t we have it” l Real value

4 Introduction l The way young people “Gamers” like to learn l Inquiry based education l Trial and error l Contributory l Social

5 Introduction l VWs enable learning that we won’t be able to practically do any other way l First do the same things with new technology l Then do new things l It will be mainstream: Sometime l 2 years? l 10 years? l Decisions in the near future will have a major impact l Investment of scarce resources l Failures

6 Description of virtual worlds Multi-FunctionSingle-Function Public Private Second LIfe ActiveWorlds There World of Warcraft Everquest Link Trainer UCT Forterra Open Virtual Worlds Beyond

7 Comparison Considerations Educational Effectiveness

8 Domain Specificity l Entertainment l Business l General Purpose l Education l Chemistry l History l Engineering l Scale l Interface l Physics l Communication l Collaboration l Virtual Travel

9 Domain Specificity l Enterprises are looking for value l Enterprises are looking for stability vs. limited functionality l Entertainment will trade Wow for stability l Is a virtual world the best metaphor for everything in the domain l Web pages l Flash l Video l Text l VTC l Optimized for 1 st person shooter l Teamwork and communication l Optimized for creativity l Flexibility

10 Content l Most of the education occurring in virtual worlds today is not any different than what can be done with other online tools l This will change with new content, increased functionality, and new paradigms l How will we get a critical mass of content? l Ability to share? l Commercialization? l Who will set the standards? l OpenSource? l Commercial providers? l Collaborations?

11 Usability l Access for the disabled l Usability – ability to master complex interfaces l Different audience for UI than games l Gamers vs. Professors vs. Non- Traditional Students l Can’t be a barrier for those who don’t or can’t game l Optimized for education l Simple interface (based on other experiences?) l Integration with other online systems l Segregation and control

12 Comparison Considerations Technical

13 Reliability l Uptime requirements for educational use are different than for commercial use l Classes that depend on it l Students have tight schedules l Lots of dials that can be turned to balance stability l New Functionality l Maintenance windows l Infrastructure investment

14 Performance l Performance l Educational VW may take more performance and may be enabled by a high performance campus network l Public VWs have to work for the lowest common-denominator l Will the VW engine have enough investment to keep up with performance needs? l Hardware l Software l Bandwidth

15 Integration l Sharing of pedagogy l Sharing of objects and environments l Environments that can be used l Environments that can be aggregated l Environments that can be modified l Movement between virtual worlds l Image l Interface l Abilities l Assets

16 Business Considerations Comparison Considerations

17 Cost l Before the effectiveness has been developed/proven l After it is mainstream l In what will the university invest? l Infrastructure l Content creation l Risk

18 Privacy l Ability to Evaluate and Assess Students l Immediate feedback is valuable but who will know about it? l Classroom is controlled l Good practice l Ethics l FERPA l Evaluation must be secure l Who can observe the evaluation l What resources can be brought into the evaluation

19 Behavior l Theft, fraud, exploitation of the vulnerable l Stealing of virtual valuables l What virtual assets can be brought into an educational setting? l Inappropriate behavior l What is appropriate behavior in an educational setting? l Protection from outsiders l Control of insiders l Increasingly lawsuits in the real world based on virtual world actions l Perceptions l Advertising l Social network convergence

20 K12 Integration l Many higher education institutions increasingly have programs with K-12 students l When virtual worlds are part of the program are the behavior and privacy standards appropriate for high school students? l This may be harder in VWs than with current educational technology

21 Control l University image l Great learning environment l High-tech, cutting edge l Advertising/commercial activities l Image of educators and students l Both have different roles l Are there new roles? l Trade-offs between new functions and stability l Trade-offs between scalability and stability l Government involvement l Taxes l Regulations l Privacy l Funding

22 Intellectual Property l Piracy l Significant investments in object creation, content creation, pedagogy l How do we assign credit and ownership? l How does a university keep control of its core product? l Some universities are comfortable putting course content into the public domain l What about inquiry-based learning where students learn from each other – the professor is less important?

23 Integration with other systems l Learning specific environments l Blackboard, SAKAI, etc. l Education Specific Environments l Banner, etc.

24 Summary l Virtual Worlds are coming to education l Critical decisions will need to be made as it unfolds l Important considerations include l Effectiveness l Technical l Business l Wrong decisions can l Slow adoption l Cause problems for the institution l Cut off promising potential l Cause unnecessary cost

25 Answers?