2008 Farm Bill: Livestock and M-COOL Geoff Benson Dept. of Agricultural & Resource Economics NC State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Country-of-Origin Labeling Overview of the Interim Final Rule Updated Oct. 10, 2008 Overview of the Interim Final Rule Updated Oct. 10, 2008.
Advertisements

Economic Implications of the AUS-FTA for U.S. Dairy Markets and Policy Presentation by Joseph Balagtas at the Silverado Symposium on Agricultural Policy.
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) and the Cattle Industry Derrell S. Peel Livestock Marketing Specialist Oklahoma State University.
An Overview of Mandatory COOL (Country of Origin Labeling) Derrell S. Peel Livestock Marketing Specialist Oklahoma State University.
Country of Origin Labeling Agricultural Marketing Service.
Who Will Regulate my Food Business? John E. Rushing, Ph.D. Department of Food Science NCSU.
Provisions of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (FAIR Act of 1996) Also referred to Freedom to Farm Developed by: Joe L. Outlaw.
Country of Origin Labeling, Final Rule 2013: Labeling Provisions for Muscle Cut Covered Commodities National Chicken Council Webinar Wednesday, June 12,
Regulation 1169/2011 (FIR) – state of play Marina Valverde Food Policy Committee Brussels, 17 October 2012.
YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES Youth Livestock.
The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 Dairy Provisions Ed Jesse Extension Dairy Marketing Specialist UW-Madison.
Marketing and Regulatory Programs Country of Origin Labeling Finfish & Shellfish.
Ag Policy, Lecture 11 Knutson, Penn, & Flinchbaugh, Chapter 7 & 5 Dairy Programs Livestock Impact Supply & Demand for Trade.
Traceability The ability to trace and follow a food, feed, or food producing animal or substance intended to be or expected to be incorporated into a food.
Milk Price Support Program Authorized by 1933 Act and made permanent by 1949 Act Secretary of Ag directed to support the price of manufacturing grade milk.
Overview of Title XI: Livestock Four C’s for Livestock Bradley D. Lubben Extension Public Policy Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Free Trade? Despite policy reforms enacted as a result of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, global dairy markets remain among the most protected.
Matthew Loke Hawaii Department of Agriculture Agricultural Development Division February 24, 2009 COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING (COOL) CTAHR Agricultural.
Marketing Milk Processing Dairy Products Unit 1. Introduction  Dairy farmers produce milk to sell it for a profit  Management helps reduce costs of.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2007 Lecture # 15a.
Outlook for the U.S. Dairy Sector in 2012 Milton Madison Farm Service Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture Presented at the 2012 USDA Outlook Forum Washington,
Kenneth C. Clayton Associate Administrator Agricultural Marketing Service U.S. Department of Agriculture OPPORTUNITIES FOR ECONOMISTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL.
Econ 339X, Spring 2010 ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Marketing and Regulatory Programs Country of Origin Labeling Barry L. Carpenter Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program Barry L. Carpenter Deputy.
Grains: Trends in U.S. Per Capita Availability and Intake Jean Buzby and Judy Putnam Economic Research Service.
1 Farm and Risk Management Team Cooperative Extension – Ag and Natural Resources Dairy Price Risk Management: Session 3 – Milk Pricing Fundamentals Last.
Implementing rules regarding Article 26 (3) of Regulation 1169/2011 (pig, sheep, goat and poultry meats) Working Group on the Regulation 1169/2011 on the.
Farm Bill/Dairy Policy February 26, 2014 Dairy Gross Margin, LLC Dr. Scott Brown Agricultural Markets and Policy Division of Applied.
The Dairy Situation and Policy Responses in the United States Presented at an Agricultural Economics Workshop Brussels, September 29, 2009 Daniel A. Sumner,
The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 General Overview Crop Program Changes Dairy Provisions.
‘Impacts of Country of Origin Labeling on North American Beef Trade’ Prepared for the Organized Symposium: ‘Impacts of Country-of-Origin Labeling on North.
International Policy Live in a global economy where: –Interdependence means that any policy decisions made by one country has a impact on the U.S. –Many.
The 2007 Farm Bill: Status Quo or Status Shifted? Bradley D. Lubben Extension Public Policy Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln Ag econ information.
An Overview of Milk Pricing Under Federal Orders (Milk Pricing 101) July 8, 2003 Brian W. Gould Senior Research Scientist Wisconsin Center for Dairy Research.
The Dairy Subtitle of the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of Farm Bill Education Conference Brian W. Gould Associate Professor Department of.
The Dairy Farmer Margin Protection Program USDA’s Safety Net For Producers: 2016 Enrollment Update 1.
WHAT ARE THE COMMON FUNCTIONS OF LIVESTOCK IN TODAY’S SOCIETY?
Key National and Trade Marketing Organizations AEC 317 December 3, 2014.
Econ 337, Spring 2013 ECON 337: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Associate Professor Lee Schulz Assistant Professor
Market Vertical Coordination  Communication and distribution  Historically relied upon price signals »Markets and spot negotiation  Moving toward non-market.
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) and the Beef Industry March 13, 2003.
The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 General Overview Crop Programs Dairy Provisions.
SH, Feb Emerging Roles for Food Labels Dr. Shida Henneberry Professor of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University Nanjing.
Country of Origin Labeling
Country of Origin Labeling National Fisheries Institute September 29, 2015.
1 Why National Organic Standards? Consumers wanted a more transparent and responsive supply chain.  Concerns about the environment  Certain food attributes.
Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: Fed Cattle Market Implications Ted Schroeder Professor, Agricultural Economics Kansas State University
Christopher Wolf Michigan State University May 10, 2012.
By: Shelby Stauffer. The Labeling law that requires all retailers, supermarkets and grocery stores to notify customers on the origin of certain foods.
Dairy Policy in the 2007 Farm Bill Ed Jesse UW-Madison/Extension.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 15.
The Dairy Farmer Margin Protection Program USDA’s Safety Net For Producers: 2017 Enrollment Update 1.
What can I sell at a farmers market
Livestock and meat industry
Agricultural Marketing
Market Facilitation Program
Market Facilitation Program
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Implementing rules regarding Article 26 (3) of Regulation 1169/2011 (pig, sheep, goat and poultry meats) Working Group on the Regulation 1169/2011 on.
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Who Will Regulate my Food Business?
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2007 Lecture # 13.
Agricultural Marketing
AGEC 4703 Lesson 5b Larry D. Sanders Fall 2005
Presentation transcript:

2008 Farm Bill: Livestock and M-COOL Geoff Benson Dept. of Agricultural & Resource Economics NC State University

2008 Farm Bill 22GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

2008 Farm Bill Dairy Provisions Program areas  Price support program  Milk Income Loss Contracts (MILC)  Federal milk marketing orders  Mandatory price reporting  Forward pricing contracts  Dairy Export Incentive Program  Dairy promotion and research  Dairy Indemnity Program 33GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

Price Support Proposals Program was changed to directly set dairy product prices at existing levels -- No “farm milk” support price.  Cheese: $1.13 per pound for block cheese, $1.10 for barrel cheese  Butter: $1.05 per pound  Nonfat Dry Milk Powder: $0.80 per pound  Price s may be reduced if CCC purchases become excessive Effectively leaves the level of support unchanged but dramatically reduces the estimated WTO producer subsidy equivalents calculated for the program This is a very low producer safety net relative to current cost of production 4GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

MILC Proposals Continues the program through 9/30/2012 Payments = (Actual Milk Price – Trigger) X Payment Rate%  Trigger price: Modified by adding a feed cost adjuster. Base is a Class I price of $16.94/cwt in the Boston market. The base price is increases by the same percentage as the increase in estimated feed cost above $7.35/cwt through 8/31/12 and $9.50 thereafter  Payment rate: Remained at 34% initially but increases to 45% from 10/1/08 thru 8/31/12, then it reverts to 34%  Payment cap: Maintained at 2.4 million pounds initially but increases it to mil. lb from 10/1/08 through 8/31/12, after which it reverts to 2.4 million 5GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

666

Federal Milk Market Orders GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU7

Federal Orders Orders  Classify milk according to use (I = fluid, II = soft product, III = cheese, IV = butter & powder)  Establish monthly minimum producer prices for each class that are derived form wholesale product prices  Pay producers under pooling arrangements  Audit processors Widespread dissatisfaction with how FOs are “working” and the time it takes to get changes made 8GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

Federal Milk Marketing Orders Secretary to issue rules to speed up the amendment process within 60 days of farm bill passage Federal Order Review Commission  To conduct a comprehensive review of milk marketing options -- both Federal Orders and non-Federal order systems  14 appointed members  Report back within 2 years 9GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

Forward Pricing Contracts A substitute for federal order pricing Establishes a permanent program until 9/30/2012 Participation is voluntary – if you opt out, federal order pricing applies Applies to producers, Coops and Associations of Coops GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU10

2008 Farm Bill 11 GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

Livestock Provisions Program areas  Country of origin labeling (COOL)  Mandatory price reporting, evaluation and education programs  Forward pricing contracts for hogs & poultry  State-inspected meat & poultry processing plant rules  Livestock health and disease initiatives  Food Safety  Study bio-energy from livestock 12 GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

Country of Origin Labeling 2002 Farm Bill created a COOL program Implementation was delayed until September 30 th, 2008 except for fish 2008 version applies to the following :  Muscle cuts of beef, pork, goat, and lamb  Ground beef, pork, goat, and lamb  Poultry, whole and parts  Peanuts, pecans and macadamia nuts  “Perishable agricultural commodities” – fresh fruits, vegetables, herbs  Fish and shellfish (implemented 4/4/2005) 13GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

COOL Retailers must clearly label or provide signage for covered products For covered meats there are four labels:  U.S. Origin (Born, raised and slaughtered in the US)  Multiple Countries of Origin that include the United States (list all)  Imported Direct for Slaughter (Both countries)  Imported meat (Country of origin) 14GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

COOL Exemptions:  Foodservice sales  Small retailers’ sales. Defined as less than $230,000 of perishable product sales per year  Processed meats. Defined as “substantially changed in character or combined with other products”. The rules of the Tariff Act of 1930 may apply, however. 15GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

COOL 16GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU Photo courtesy of Nate Jaeger, NCBA

Scope of M-COOL ItemBeef 1 Pork 1 Poultry 2 US Production, MMT US Consumption, MMT Exports, MMT Imports, MMT Imports, % of consumption11.8%5.3%9.5% GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU17 1 Carcass weight. 2 Ready to cook weight

Scope of M-COOL Pork:  ~60% processed & 40% fresh  ~80% consumed at home, 40% is fresh = 33% falls under M-COOL Beef:  ~75% fresh & 25% processed  ~65% consumed at home, 75% is fresh = 50% falls under M-COOL Source: ERS, USDA reports GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU18

M-COOL For covered livestock products, the packer, processor or importer provides labeling information to the retailer Producers in the supply chain with “first hand knowledge” can provide an affidavit to the buyer to certify the country of origin of an animal US producers are not required to undertake additional record keeping other than “records maintained in the course of the normal conduct of the business” 19GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU

Summary Dairy  Continues to be subject to heavy government intervention through farm bill and other legislation but the impact on prices, price volatility and industry trends likely is limited Other livestock  Little intervention in prices and incomes through farm bill provisions  Mostly concerned with market power and price transparency issues  M-COOL is a major new initiative GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU20

Geoff Benson Phone: Fax: Web page: faculty/benson/benson.html 21 GEOFF BENSON, ARE, NCSU