NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin. Spooner (WI37) Perkistown (WI35) Trout Lake (WI36) Popple River (WI09) Potawatomi (WI10) Suring (WI25) Lake Dubay (WI28)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UPDATE ON DAQS AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENTS & MERCURY STUDIES NC DENR/DAQ Mercury/CO 2 Workshop Raleigh, NC April 19, 2004 Steve Schliesser Todd Crawford NC.
Advertisements

Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.
Contaminated Fish: The Mercury Connection. Natural Sources: Occurs naturally in soils, sediments, and rocks Volcanic eruptions Wildfires Man-Made Sources:
Wisconsin Frog and Toad Survey: Updated Website for Rori Paloski, Tara Bergeson Wisconsin Department of.
Workshop Periodic Assessments of Conservation.
SOURCES AND FLUX OF NUTRIENTS IN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN: MONITORING, MODELING, & RESEARCH NEEDS Donald A. Goolsby, U.S. Geological Survey.
NADP Passive Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN) Melissa Puchalski, US EPA, CAMD Mark Rhodes, NADP Program Office Chris Lehmann, NADP Central Analytical.
Perspectives in Designing and Operating a Regional Ammonia Monitoring Network Gary Lear USEPA Clean Air Markets Division.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 6, 2011.
What Goes Up Does Come Down How Air Pollution Affects our Natural Resources Christopher Lehmann Director, Central Analytical Laboratory National Atmospheric.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 13, 2011.
Ozone transport network Guoxun Tian CS 790G Fall 2010.
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
The Visibility Information Exchange Web System (VIEWS): An Approach to Air Quality Data Management and Presentation In a broader sense, VIEWS facilitates.
Monitoring Chemical Climate Change in America The Case for Ammonia V. Bowersox, C. Lehmann, B. Larson Acknowledge – R. Claybrooke NADP Program Office.
Mercury in Fish. Where Does Mercury Come From? Natural Sources: Soils and rocks Wildfires Man-Made Sources: Burning coal and medical waste Manufacturing.
Introduction to Air Pollution John Atkinson and Dr. Mark Rood Environmental Engineering and Science Program Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
Eighteen Years of Acid Wet Deposition at Mt. Mansfield Goals & Objectives One goal of the VMC is to understand the sources, mechanisms, and effects of.
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
Mercury Deposition Network – Mercury Analytical Laboratory Bob Brunette and David Gay National Atmospheric Deposition Program Mercury Deposition Network.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
Continuous measurements of the atmospheric concentrations of Reactive Gaseous Mercury (RGM), Fine Particulate Mercury (FPM) and Gaseous Elemental Mercury.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
What Goes Up Does Come Down How Air Pollution Affects our Natural Resources Christopher Lehmann Director, Central Analytical Laboratory National Atmospheric.
How Clean is Clean? Jane Rothert and Chris Lehmann National Atmospheric Deposition Program, Central Analytical Laboratory, Illinois State Water Survey.
O. Russell Bullock, Jr. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division (in partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Ecosystem implications of long- term changes in precipitation chemistry LTER Science Council 14 May 2015 Steve Hamilton, Merryl Alber Charley Driscoll,
Drought Response Plan Clarke County, Virginia Saving Water/Saving Money: Water Conservation in the Shenandoah Valley March 11, 2009 Alison Teetor Natural.
Session 853 Extending Organizational Capacity & Capability to Evaluate Federal Environmental Research Programs Research Contributions to Outcomes & Accountability.
Why do we Measure Precipitation Chemistry? Christopher Lehmann CAL Director 2007 Field Operations Training Course.
Re-suspension of the radioactive fallout after the Fukushima accident: Risk of internal dose during the first week and the first two months M. Yamauchi,
Mercury Concentrations, Precipitation, and Mercury Wet Deposition in the Great Lakes Region, by Martin Risch 1, David Gay 2, Kathleen Fowler.
Sulfate Ion Wet Deposition
Ammonium Ion Wet Deposition
Acid Rain.
Slide 1 Galveston Bay Atmospheric Deposition Study Anil K. Katamreddy CE 394K.3 GIS in Water Resources Fall 2003 University of Texas at Austin.
Physical and chemical factors controlling mercury and methylmercury concentrations in stream water Mark E. Brigham and Dennis A. Wentz 5 th National Monitoring.
 Great Lakes Areas of Concern  U.S. urban areas (pink shading)  Large U.S./Canadian 2005 point sources of mercury Type of Emissions Source coal-fired.
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Data Management for the Mississippi River Luigi Marini September.
Strategies For Linking Atmospheric Deposition Networks to the National Water Quality Monitoring Network Mark Nilles Office of Water Quality U.S. Geological.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
Update on the NADP Atmospheric Mercury Initiative Developing a new coordinated and collaborative approach to atmospheric mercury monitoring A Briefing.
Water Quality Monitoring of the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer System in Iowa and Illinois U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National.
Air Quality and Seney National Wildlife Refuge Jill Webster June 14, 2007.
NADP-Compatible Wet Chemistry Sampler Data Analysis, Telluride, CO Mark Williams Kim Raby University of Colorado Institute of Arctic and Alpine.
29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM TRENDS OF ATMOSPHERIC HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE EMEP COUNTRIES.
NOAA’s Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico Region January 17,
NESCAUM MAC Meeting May 16 and 17, 2006 Newport, RI Mercury Trends Network (MTN) Is it MDN? Is it NADP? Is it USDA? Is it BLM? Is it F&WS Is it NPS? Is.
Approach in developing PnET-BGC model inputs for Smoky Mountains
Acid Rain Monitoring Update: NY’s Monitoring Program Federal Legislation EPA “Pilot” Monitoring Program DAR Management Meeting Albany, NY September 11-13,
Table 1. Linkages between emissions of SO2 and NOx and important environmental issues From: Acidic Deposition in the Northeastern.
in the Neversink River Basin, New York
Measurement Model Fusion for Acid Deposition Bob Vet, Elton Chan, Chul-Un Ro, Mike Shaw Bratts Lake, SK Bratts Lake, SK.
A very brief introduction
Western regional air partnership western states air resources council
Mercury in Fish.
Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D.
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
Wabanaki Tribes live at the mouth of the Country’s Tailpipe.
Nitrate Ion Concentrations
25+ Years of Acid Deposition Monitoring in Vermont
AOPC-23, Darmstadt, Germany, March 6-9, 2018
Nitrate Ion Concentrations
A very brief introduction
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
Trend analysis of sulphur and nitrogen species in air and precipitation in Sweden Martin Ferm
Presentation transcript:

NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Spooner (WI37) Perkistown (WI35) Trout Lake (WI36) Popple River (WI09) Potawatomi (WI10) Suring (WI25) Lake Dubay (WI28) Horicon Marsh (WI07) Active NADP Monitoring Sites in Wisconsin Lake Geneva (WI99) Devil’s Lake (WI31) Milwaukee (WI22) Wildcat Mountain (WI98)

Sulfate Ion Wet Deposition Trends 3-year running annual average (1985 – 2010)

Nitrate Ion Wet Deposition Trends 3-year running annual average (1985 – 2010)

Ammonium Ion Wet Deposition Trends 3-year running annual average (1985 – 2010)

Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN) Average Ammonia Concentration, 2012

Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) 2012 Average Mercury Concentration in Precipitation

Data Requests by Site (2010 – 2012) NADP Site Total WI WI WI WI WI WI WI WI WI WI WI WI WI WI Multiple WI Sites Total

Data Use Descriptions for Wisconsin NADP Sites (2010 – 2012)

Graphic generated at How Do Individuals use Data from Wisconsin NADP Sites? Graphic represents aggregate of responses from 452 individuals who provided free-text description at time of data download. The size of each word is proportional to its frequency of appearance in the response.

NTN Bromide in Precipitation Fall 2011 NAPD Joint Sub-Committee Report, Slide ‹#› Now a routine analyte of both NTN and AIRMoN Maps produced for 2012 Included in the 2012 Map Summary

oth New With MDN Great Lakes Atmospheric Mercury Network 9 new MDN sites (2 continuous funding)

Journal Articles & Reports Using NADP Data – 88 journal articles in 2007 – 125 journal articles in 2008 – 147 journal articles/reports in 2009 – 148 journal articles/reports in 2010 – 172 journal articles/reports in 2011 – 166 journal articles/reports in 2012! Fall 2011 NAPD State of the Network

NADP Publications Featuring Wisconsin Data

Other Publications Featuring Wisconsin NADP Data

Other NADP Studies Utilizing Wisconsin Sites

Active NADP/NTN Sites during the April 1986 Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Explosion

Response of the NADP to the Fukushima Dai-ichi Disaster: Value of Long-Term Monitoring for Post-Disaster Assessments Christopher Lehmann National Atmospheric Deposition Program Greg Wetherbee U.S. Geological Survey

137 Cs

NOAA HYSPLIT Back Trajectories from 35 NADP sites at 5,000 meter altitude March 22-April 5, JAPAN N. AMERICA

ES&T, March 6, 2012

USGS Open-File Report

For more information, see or