WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Regulatory Program.
Advertisements

Maryland Department of the Environment Restoration and Regulation Discussion Presented by: Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Department of the Environment.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
BUILDING STRONG ® Mitigation in a Modern World or 33 CFR 332 and You Presented by Jayson M Hudson To the Texas Association of Environmental Professionals.
David K. Paylor Director, Department of Environmental Quality May 27, 2014 VEDP Lunch & Learn Environmental Permitting 101.
Subcontracts Subcontractor or Vendor How do you know?
Modified Charleston Method (MCM)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
Utah Watershed Coordinating Council Conservation Planning Workshop Navigating the Corps’ Permitting Process July 20, 2011 Jason Gipson Chief, Utah/Nevada.
Wetlands and Waterways Permits Patti Caswell Statewide Wetlands/Permits Program Coordinator Geo-Environmental, ODOT.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
Wetland Banking Basics Doug Van Werden. Definition Wetlands Wetlands are lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table.
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
Environmental Consultants BMI Environmental Services, LLC AN OVERVIEW OF THE WETLANDS REGULATORY PROCESS AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPOSED OCEAN SPRINGS HIGH.
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.
1 Wetland Regulatory Programs Department of Natural Resources Legislative Audit Bureau July 2007.
Oregon Jobs and Transportation Act Section 18 CETAS Director’s Meeting Action Items.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Coordinating U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Permits with Species Conservation Plans November 16,
Governor’s Executive Order: Supporting and Strengthening the State’s Wetland Policy 6 th Annual Wetlands Conference January 30, 2013 Dave Weirens,
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
WETLANDS and LOCAL PROGRAMS Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
August 2,  404 Assumption Review  Project Schedule Review  Summary of Stakeholder Outreach Meetings  Status of Assumption Effort  Statutory.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Local Government Section Welcome Marty Andersen ODOT Local Government Section 355 Capitol Street NE, Rm. 326 Salem, Oregon Ph:
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Overview of the 401 WQC Process. Main Topics Relationship between Clean Water Act Sections 404 and 401 State permitting processes Specifics of Kentucky’s.
Wetlands and Waterways Permits Ken Franklin Statewide Permits Program Coordinator Geo-Environmental, ODOT.
Ohio Wetland Real Estate Issues. Definition Definition Federal Regulations Federal Regulations Permits Permits Solutions Solutions Legal Statues Legal.
WETLANDS, PERMITS, AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Project Inspectors Conference Wilsonville, Oregon Presentation by: Oregon Department of Transportation Environmental.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
JWMP Update Draft Report Bosworth Botanical Consulting Team.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Document Preparation WETLANDS BEST PRACTICES 33 rd Annual Airports Conference Marie.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service “Helping people help the land"
Environmental Commitments/Tracking. Environmental Commitments Federal Agencies Shall –Use all practicable means consistent with the requirements of.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mobile District Nationwide Permit Overview Cindy House-Pearson Chief, Inland.
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
Managing 6(f) Conversions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Greenville, SC September 8-11, 2015.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency November 10, 2011 Update on Current Levee Construction Projects and on the Southport Sacramento River Levee Early.
Iron Range Tourism Bureau April 25, 2013 Hwy 53 Update.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
AGENCY ROLES Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals July 2016 LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL 1.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Overview of Everything You Need to Know About Mitigation.
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Land Use and Zoning Committee Special Workshop
Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Planning Instruments
Joint Army-EPA Mitigation Rule
Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals Effective August 2018
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Presentation transcript:

WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation

Resource Description What are Wetlands? Why are Wetlands important to the public? Why are Wetlands important to ODOT?

What is a wetland? A wetland is a water resource that has three characteristics: Wetland hydrology - Water that is present in depths less than 6 ft., or soils are saturated, for 10 days or more during the growing season for the prevalent vegetation; Hydric soils - Soils with physical and chemical characteristics that are associated with lack of oxygen in the soil; Hydrophytic vegetation - Vegetation uniquely suited for growing in water or saturated soil conditions

Why are Wetlands Important to the Public? Wetlands perform functions that are uniquely valuable, and cannot be replicated once lost or affected, except by other wetlands.

Wetland Functions...

Wetland Functions...

Wetland Functions...

Wetland Functions...

Wetland Functions...

Why are Wetland Resources important to ODOT? Federal and State regulations protect wetlands Wetlands are frequently viewed as valuable resources by the public Wetlands can help offset water quality concerns related to transportation projects Information about wetland resource laws and regulations can be found on the Environmental Services website - FOR MORE INFO...

Federal and State Regulations FEDERAL STATE OF OREGON Clean Water ActFill and Removal Law Regulatory authority through Regulatory authority the Environmental Protection through the Division of Agency State Lands Implementation Implementation Army Corps of Engineers Division of State Lands Section 404 Permit Fill and Removal Permit

Permits and Minimum Thresholds Division of State Lands 50 cu. yds. of fill in regulatory wetland or within state waterway Army Corps of Engineers (404 Permit) No minimum threshold for fill in regulatory wetland

Army Corps of Engineers Permits Army Corps of Engineers (404 Permit) Individual Permit: For projects with more than 0.5 ac of fill - Allow at least 3 months for public review General Authorization: For projects with less than 0.5 ac of fill; Nationwide Permit: For projects with very small amounts of impacts to wetlands - Can act as FEDERAL NEXUS for ESA issues

Local Regulations Statewide Planning Goals County Comprehensive Plans City Comprehensive Plans Special Districts - such as the Columbia River National Scenic Area

What does this mean for transportation projects? The potential affects of transportation projects on protected water resources must be identified and considered in developing new projects, or in maintaining existing transportation facilities. If protected water resources are identified as being potentially affected by a transportation project or related activities, then regulations must be followed and federal and state permits obtained.

How are transportation projects affected? If wetlands will be impacted by a highway/transportation project or activity, it may affect: Project design Project development timelines Project development costs Construction costs Maintenance budgets

“Water Resource” Permits and Their Requirements: Section 404 Permit DSL Permit Both permits require that: First:Wetland resources must be avoided if at all possible; Second: Unavoidable impacts must be minimized; Third: Impacted wetland values must be replaced, usually through mitigation.

Permit Requirements Avoidance and Minimization Measures: –Alignment modification/adjustment –Use of bridges, retaining walls, steepened slopes for project – Limits of construction/fenced project wetland areas

Permit Requirements Replacement of lost or affected wetland values by: –Restoration of pre-existing wetlands –Construction of new wetlands –Enhancement of existing wetlands

Statutory Requirements for Wetland Mitigation: Ranked preference for mitigation options: –On-site, in-kind –On-site, out-of-kind –Off-site, in-kind (in-basin) –Off-site, out-of-kind (In-basin) –In-Basin Mitigation Bank –In-Basin Payment-to-Provide –Payment-in-Lieu

Wetland Mitigation Project Design Phase: 1.Review mitigation possibilities 2.Determine appropriate mitigation approach

Wetland Mitigation There are four commonly used mitigation strategies: Construction of a mitigation wetland; Payment to another project to expand an existing wetland project; Purchase of wetland credits in an approved mitigation bank. Payment to the Division of State Lands wetland mitigation fund

Wetland Mitigation Construction: Wetland mitigation by construction means that a new wetland will be constructed to replace functions that are lost or affected by construction of a transportation project or by transportation-related activities.

Wetland Mitigation Construction: Construction requires: Selection and purchase of a site; Production of construction documents; Extensive involvement during construction to ensure implementation; Five years of post-construction monitoring; In-perpetuity post-construction maintenance.

Wetland Mitigation by Payment-to-Provide: This option mitigates for wetland loss by ODOT making a payment to a wetland project, generally not sponsored by ODOT, that will create wetlands similar to those affected by transportation activities. This option can be used only if the preferred wetland mitigation options are not available.

Wetland Mitigation by Payment-to-Provide: This option requires: Identifying an appropriate project that is being constructed in an acceptable timeframe; Determining the monetary value of the lost/affected wetlands, usually by a formula based on construction costs, and reserving the money in the contract; Developing legal agreements with the project sponsors; and Making the monetary payment to the sponsor.

Wetland Mitigation by Mitigation Banking Credit: This mitigation option satisfies wetland mitigation requirements by purchasing wetland credits from an approved wetland mitigation bank in an acceptable location. “Acceptable location” means the mitigation bank is within a reasonable distance of the wetland impact area.

Wetland Mitigation by Mitigation Banking Credit: This option requires: Locating an acceptable mitigation bank; Determining the monetary value of the lost/affected wetlands, usually by a formula based on construction costs, and reserving the money in the contract; Developing an agreement for purchase of the credits with the bank owner; Making the payment.

Wetland Mitigation by Payment-In-Lieu: This mitigation option allows payment tied to the cost to replace the functions of the affected wetland, generally based on construction costs. The payment is made to the Division of State Lands for their discretionary use in wetland projects. This option is only allowed for small impacts, or by special authorization of the Director of the Division of State Lands.

Wetland Mitigation by Payment-In-Lieu: This option requires: Determining the monetary value of the lost/affected wetlands, usually by a formula based on construction costs, and reserving the money in the contract; Making the payment.

Wetland Mitigation: Additional Considerations Federal and State regulations require that our wetland mitigation obligation be met for every project that affects protected wetlands. ODOT is responsible for documenting the success of our own mitigation efforts, and for the success of the wetland mitigation projects it has made financial commitments to.

Conclusions: Wetlands are valuable resources protected by both federal and state laws. Compliance with these laws requires a substantial investment of ODOT resources. ODOT has a variety of options available to satisfy federal and state mitigation requirements. Each project requires evaluation of the best mitigation option, taking into consideration the potential costs of each, including long-term responsibility.