RIT Middle States Self-study 2017 Working Group Kick-off Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Advertisements

PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
UMR’s Accreditation Self-Study. The Value of Accreditation  Institutional Reputation  Standard of Quality  Vehicle for Self Improvement  Transferability.
The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.
Collaborative Implementation Project. Collaborative Implementation Project InstitutionState Bard CollegeNY Bryant & Stratton CollegeNY Dominican College.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Dr. Mark Sanchez, Liz Estrella, Tony Anderson, Dr. Romero Jalomo
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
A Report on Progress toward the Strategic Goals Presented to the Valencia District Board of Trustees on behalf of the College Planning Council.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
Developing the Self-Study Document Using Integrated Assessment Briefs Millersville University of Pennsylvania Presented by: Dr. Thomas Burns, Associate.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN OCTOBER MASFAA: TIME TO REFOCUS Midwest Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators The following is a presentation prepared.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Accreditation in a Multi-College District Accreditation Institute Academic Senate for California Community Colleges February 11, 2012, 1:00-2:00pm John.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
MIDDLE STATES COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION: REACCREDITATION D ECENNIAL S ELF -S TUDY P ROCESS A CADEMIC S ENATE S EPTEMBER 17, 2015 Anne Wahl Michael.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Progress Toward University Goals for Equity, Inclusion, and Diversity Report to the Faculty Senate February 13, 2014.
CCC: Where Teaching and Learning Transform Lives, Putting Together the Self- Study Puzzle Corning Community College August 24, 2012.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
Review, Reflection, and Renewal MSCHE and NJCU Decennial Self-Study SELF-STUDY FALL 2009 SITE VISIT SPRING 2010.
Self-Study Report in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Final Discussion and Approval Academic Senate Executive Committee June 13 and 20, 2011.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
UW-Platteville Vision UW-Platteville will be recognized as the leading student-focused university for its success in achieving excellence, creating opportunities,
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
Self-Study 2010: Review, Reflect, and Renew. The Accrediting Process  A means of self-regulation  Intended to strengthen and sustain the quality higher.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
2018 Institution Self Evaluation Report (ISER) Joanne Whitaker and Sunny Pai Co-Chairs for ISER September 12, 2016.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
2016 GOVERNANCE GROUP UPDATE
IT Governance Planning Overview
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Evergreen Valley College Accreditation Update October 20, 2014
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

RIT Middle States Self-study 2017 Working Group Kick-off Meeting May 19, 2015

Agenda 12:45pm Meengle (meet & mingle) 1:00pm Welcome Dr. William Destler 1:15pm MSCHE Overview & CIP Dr. Christine Licata 1:30pm Self-Study and Working Groups Dr. Michael Laver & Dr. Anne Wahl 2:00pm Working Group Breakout Sessions 2:30pm Working Group Reports 3:00pm Adjourn

Decennial Evaluation 10 years after last Self-Study (2007-2017) Two major components: Comprehensive Institutional Self-Study Report External evaluation team visit (6-8) Major focus: Does RIT meet accreditation standards? Outcome: “Gold Standard”: Seal of approval for programs and operations Qualified to offer degrees and grant financial aid

Accreditation standards Recently revised (2014) Moved from 14 Standards to 7 Standards Modified emphasis from compliance to: Reflection and improvement Assessment and continuous improvement Student learning and student experience Outcomes Effective: 2017-2018

Getting ready for the decennial evaluation RIT Invited to Participate in Collaborative Implementation Project (CIP) 15 Partner institutions Unique opportunity RIT’s “CIP” Team Michael Laver, Self-Study Co-Chair Anne Wahl, Self-Study Co-Chair Christine Licata, RIT’s Accreditation Liaison Officer

The Revised Standards I: Mission and Goals II: Ethics and Integrity III: Design and Delivery of Student Learning Experience IV: Support of the Student Experience V: Educational Effectiveness & Assessment VI: Planning Resources & Institutional Improvement VII: Governance, Leadership & Administration “VIII”: Compliance and Requirements of Affiliation

RIT organizational structure

Self-Study Progress Steering Committee Karen Barrows Secretary to the Institute, and Chief of Staff, Office of the President Bob Finnerty Chief Communications Officer, University News Joan Graham Assistant Vice President, Institutional Research and Policy Studies Paula Grcevic Professor, National Technical Institute for the Deaf Clyde Hull Associate Professor, Saunders College of Business Bridget Hurley Student Government Representative Sandra Johnson Senior Vice President for Student Affairs Michael Laver Associate Professor, College of Liberal Arts, Co-chair Christine Licata Senior Associate Provost, Academic Affairs Ed Lincoln Assistant Vice President, Enrollment Management & Career Services Kevin McDonald Vice Pres/Associate Provost for Diversity & Inclusion, Office of the President Yin Pan Associate Professor, Golisano College of Computing and Information Sciences Austin Sierra Student Government Representative Thomas Smith Professor, School of Chemistry & Materials Science, College of Science Kim Sowers Director, ITS Project Management Office Greg VanLaeken Business Manager & Analyst for Global Programs Anne Wahl Assistant Provost for Assessment & Accreditation, Co-chair Charlene Reagan Senior Staff Assistant, Accreditation

Self-Study Progress Working Groups – You! 1 Working Group for each of the 7 Standards. Working Group 8 works exclusively on the Requirements of Affiliation. Each member of the Working Group was formally invited to participate. Very intentional about including a good balance of faculty and staff from diverse functions and backgrounds Each working group has a designated chair. 

Working Group Involvement Timeline Self-Study Design Draft Input/Feedback on Draft MSCHE Self-Study Preparation Visit: Dr. Sean McKitrick Finalize Self-Study Design SC & WG Gather Data and Evidence Compile 1st Self-Study Draft Consult with RIT Community Revise Self-Study Draft Constituent Input Self-Study Finalized External Evaluation Team Visit MSCHE Final Accreditation Action January 20, 2015: May 13, 2015: September 2015 – June 2016 Working Group Involvement June 2016 January 2017 March/April 2017: June 2017:

Self-Study Design MSCHE Prescribes Most Design Elements Flexibility on: Intended Outcomes Research Questions Approval received for Self-Study Design from Middle States Coordinate with RIT’s Strategic Plan Implementation May 13, 2015

Next Steps Working Group Charges Implement the Design and Writing the Self-Study Report Working Group Charges The Working Groups will engage in a process of open inquiry related to the Standard to develop their respective sections of the Self-Study Report. The process of open inquiry includes: analyzing documents, reviewing institutional processes and procedures, determining if the Standard is met, advancing priorities in RIT’s new Strategic Plan, identifying institutional strengths, and making recommendations for improvement. To assist the Working Group, the SC will provide a timeline, guidelines, and the report template. In addition, SC members are designated as liaisons to specific Working Groups.

Working Groups: Roles & Responsibilities Know Thy Standard “Standards of Accreditation and Requirements of Affiliation” Know Thy “Research Questions” Self Study Design Know Thy “Documentation Roadmap” Self-Study Design; Taskstream

Working Groups: Roles & Responsibilities Writest Thou a Report – 5 sections An overview of the group’s charge, defining the scope of its tasks and responsibilities in relation to its assigned Standard Discussion of the connection of the group’s charge with those of other groups, and if any collaboration between groups that took place Analytical discussion of the data reviewed and the inquiry undertaken, and the group’s conclusions, including strengths and challenges Explanation of how the group’s conclusions related to the assigned Standard Recommendations for ongoing institutional improvement

Chairs’ Roles & Responsibilities Set regular meeting dates over the summer for all of next year Outlook Calendar! Ensure that everyone is conversant with the materials Self-Study Design, MSCHE Materials, Documentation Roadmap Training for Taskstream (Chairs and members) A workspace for each Working Group Organize work flow for team Determine division of labor, timeline and processes Communicate progress and challenges Check in and consult with Standard Liaison

Working Group Resources Folder Contents Middle States Website: Standard Liaison Co-chairs

Working Group Resources Administrative Support Staff for Working Groups Stephanie Rankin Working Groups 1 - 4 Charlene Reagan Working Groups 5 - 8 Additional MSCHE Project Support Staff Taskstream

Working Group Resources Each Working Group will have its own Workspace in Taskstream (RIT’s Assessment Management System)

Working Group Resources Training for Working Groups will take place early fall Standard Workspace Working Group Members General Information for Working Group Documentation Roadmap (documents, policies, procedures, etc.) Working Group Report Template GOAL: ONE STOP SHOP FOR WORKING GROUPS Grace Rubin – Assessment Management System Coordinator

Working Group Breakout Sessions Get To Know Each Other - Introductions Initial Opportunities and Challenges Identify Questions from Working Group

WHAT’S NEXT FOR WORKING GROUPS? Read and Review (summer) (Standard, Self-Study Design & Documentation Roadmap) Chair will be Planning (summer) WG Meetings (September 2015) WG Formal Mid-Reports (mid-January 2016) First Full Draft (June 2016)

Thank You for your “extra tiger effort” to serve on the MSCHE Self-Study 2017 project! Happy Summer!