School Improvement: Tier I, Tier II, Tier II and More! Partnerships for Results: Strategies for Educational Improvement KU/KSDE Lawrence, Kansas June 11,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Advertisements

Restructuring Plans Glenbrook Middle School Bel Air Elementary School Rio Vista Elementary School Shore Acres Elementary School Mt. Diablo Unified School.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
1 Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
EVALUATION FINDINGS AND STATE SUCCESS STORIES AUGUST 30, CDC Field Triage Decision Scheme Implementation Project.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
Kansas Learning Network State Board of Education June 13, 2012.
Kansas Learning Network: A Progress Report Presented to Kansas State Board of Education October 11, 2011 Brad Neuenswander, Deputy Commissioner Colleen.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
SLAM! CHARTER MIDDLE/HIGH 604 NORTHWEST 12 AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA MR. ALFONSO J. OTERO Title I Annual Parent Meeting.
Statewide System of Support 9/11/20151 ESEA Flexibility Waiver March 22, 2012.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
School Improvement Grants (SIG) Overview Adapted from LACOE Intervention for for Persistently Lowest- Achieving Schools 1.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
IMPLEMENTING THE SIG REQUIREMENTS 1.  Students who attend a State’s persistently lowest- achieving schools deserve better options and can’t afford to.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Macomb County Support for Priority & Focus Schools Judith P. Pritchett, PhD Chief Academic Officer Macomb Intermediate School District
Supporting the Improvement of Washington Districts and Schools.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
School Achievement and Progress List Conference Call with Superintendents March 29, 2010.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
School Improvement Overview September 17-18, 2015 Tyson Carter School Improvement Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 We Can Do Better: Becca Walawender, Deputy Division Director,
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What’s New in North Carolina?
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.
AB Miller High School Community Meeting April 13, 2010.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Confidential 1 Regional Achievement Center 3 Essex and Hudson Counties School Improvement Plan April 2013.
Title I 1003(g) School Improvement Grants Presented by: WVDE Title I Staff March 9, 2010.
Implementation Drivers: Selection The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H323A However,
1 SEC State Collaborative Meeting San Diego February 10-12, 2008 Idaho’s PRINCIPAL ACADEMY of LEADERSHIP and the SEC Peter Kavouras Curt Rathburn.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Nebraska Department of Education State of the Schools Report October 21, :00 a.m.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
S CHOOL I MPROVEMENT G RANTS An Overview of Fiscal Year (FY) DRAFT.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Michele Hayes, Kansas Learning Network Director
January 2010 Marilyn Peterson Data and Federal Programs
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
KEEP2 Debriefing February 4, 2016
Inaugural Meeting - September 14, 2012
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Annual Title I Meeting & Curriculum Night
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Presentation transcript:

School Improvement: Tier I, Tier II, Tier II and More! Partnerships for Results: Strategies for Educational Improvement KU/KSDE Lawrence, Kansas June 11, 2010 Dr. Julie Ford, Director of Title Programs and Services Team, KSDE Dr. Connie Wehmeyer, Cross & Joftus Consultant KSDE

Presentation Overview Overview of the Kansas System of District and School Support (So you are a school or district are on improvement…now what!) Rules Change! (So now in DC we do it this way!) Tier I, Tier II Schools ($$$$$) Grants! Grants! Grants! (So these are your opportunities!) Short history of the Kansas Learning Network (KLN) and Description of Components of the KLN (This is what we can do to help you!) Voices from the field KSDE

Overview of the Kansas System of District and School Support -Brochure (So you are a school or district are on improvement!) KSDE

So how are we doing? (2010 School Year) –16 Title I Districts in Kansas (-1) –5 are “On Improvement” 4 are on Year 1 1 is on Year 2 –11 are on “Corrective Action” 3 are in Year 3 4 are in Year 4 1 is in Year 5 3 are in Year 6 –2 made AYP in area of improvement in 2009 –10 districts do not have a school on improvement –32 Title I schools in Kansas (-1) 29 are schools from districts on improvement 3 are schools that are on improvement but are not from districts on improvement 6 schools made AYP in area of improvement in 2009 KSDE 4

Rules Change (So now in DC we do it this way!) January, 2010 KSDE 5

Tier I 5% or 5 of Lowest Achieving Schools on Current List Different Calculation – 3 years Students Proficient in Reading and Math New Rules as of January 15, 2010 Title I eligible elementary schools that are no higher achieving than the highest achieving school that meets the earlier criteria in the definition of “persistently lowest-achieving schools” and that are: 1.In the bottom 20% of all schools in the State based on proficiency rates; 2.Or have not made AYP for two consecutive years. Funding up to $2,000,000 per year (Competitive Grant) *Other schools are Tier III schools and will be eligible for limited school improvement grants KSDE

Tier II 5% of Lowest Achieving Schools of High Schools (270 eligible) Different Calculation – 3 years Students Proficient in Reading and Math New Rules as of January 15, 2010 Title I eligible secondary schools that are no higher achieving than the highest-achieving school that meets the previous criteria in the definition of “persistently lowest-achieving schools” or high schools that have had a graduation rate of less than 60% over a number of years and that are –In the bottom 20% of all schools in the State based on proficiency rates; or –Have not made AYP for two consecutive years. Funding up to $2,000,000 per year (Competitive Grant) KSDE

Tier I and Tier II Schools Must Adopt One of Four Models: School Improvement Model 1.Turnaround Model 2.Transformation Model (MTSS!) 3.Restart Model (Charter) 4.Close/Consolidate Model KSDE

Grants! Grants! Grants! 1003 (g) Tier I, Tier II, Tier III Schools ARRA and School Improvement Resources $22,638, (a) School, District,and Subgroup Issues $6,992, KSDE

Short history of the Kansas Learning Network (KLN) and Components of KLN KSDE This is what we can do to help you!

Kansas Learning Network 11

History of KLN KSDE agrees to pilot Network for the school year: June 2008 Pilot with 5 districts begins: Oct 2008 Services provided to 5 districts during Presentation to Board; request made to add 12 more districts and 32 schools: June 2009 Network meetings for three district cohorts: Sept 2009, Feb 2010, June 2010 Implementation coaches recruited, trained, placed, and monthly meetings in all 32 schools: Oct 2009 – May 2010 Needs analyses of 12 new districts complete: Dec 2009 TA with districts and schools: ongoing Assistance with School Improvement Grants: April – May

Goals of the KLN Improve school and district quality as measured by student outcomes. Foster a sustainable continuous improvement process at the school, district, and state levels. 13

KLN Participants (08-09, 09-10, 10-11) KSDE Garden City Kansas City Topeka Turner (off improvement…leaving Network!) Wichita 14

KLN Participants: New Cohorts (09-10, 10-11) Cohort 2Cohort 3 -Goodland -Haysville -Liberal -Mullinville -Ulysses -Coffeyville -Iola -Leavenworth -Morris County -Ottawa -Parsons -Peabody-Burns 15

Components of the KLN Network Meetings Collaboration, Communication, Pressure, and Support District Needs Analyses School Visits (Implementation Coaches) Targeted Technical Assistance Guided by District Facilitators 16

Implementation coach assigned to each school: Support development and implementation of SIP Provide coaching to principal Provide support to staff around the Kansas System of School and District Support Work effectively with key stakeholders Provide expertise in reading/math, MTSS, special pops, curriculum, assessment, and instruction Assist in the identification of technical assistance 17

Voices from the Field Preliminary, student achievement appears to be heading in the right direction Feedback from participants is very positive. –Interviews with KLN participants, June 3-4, 2010 at the last Network meeting of the year. KSDE 18