Policy Characteristics and Best Practices Kimberly Bonner, Esq. And Kimberly B. Kelley, Ph.D. University of Maryland University College Center for Intellectual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conflict of Interest in Assignment of Course Material FA
Advertisements

Copyright Policy Copyright Cathy O’Bryan This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
While You Were Out: How Students are Transforming Information and What it Means for Publishing Kate Wittenberg The Electronic Publishing Initiative at.
Copyright and Intellectual Property: Considerations for Israeli Higher Education Claudine SchWeber, Ph.D. Office of Distance Education and Lifelong Learning.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute 1 Providing Technology Orientation for New Faculty and Staff Copyright © 2005 Worcester Polytechnic Institute This work.
1 Developing and implementing successful intellectual property policies for online courses Veronica Diaz, PhD Instructional Technology Manager, Adjunct.
Purdue University Calumet Enrollment Services Center Integrated Service Delivery In-person and on the Web Beth Pellicciotti Assistant Vice Chancellor Academic.
Copyright Law: Fall 2006 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of October 11, 2006 OWNERSHIP: WORKS FOR HIRE, JOINT WORKS.
Negotiating with Publishers to Keep Your Copyright Insert Date Insert Instructors’ Names / Titles The following slides are based on the work of the UCLA.
History 2002 – Director of research and sponsored program develops IP policy Fall 2002 – Referral to review the policy February 2003 – Faculty affairs.
Copyright Law Boston College Law School January 30, 2003 Initial Ownership.
Intellectual Property in the Digital Age Series “Don’t I Own My Own Work?” Negotiating to Keep Your Copyright Intellectual Property in the Digital Age:
Policy On Intellectual Property. Differences With Senate Approved Version Format and structure Definition page is added Consolidates copyright and patent.
FERPA Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act Presented by Bridget Blanshan Interim AVP for Student Affairs & Dean of Students Ext
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 18, 2008 Copyright – Ownership, Duration.
Ownership of Intellectual Property: Textbooks and Inventions Frank Lancaster UT Office of the General Counsel Presented at The University of Tennessee.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
"Cyberspace Education: Challenges and Opportunities" Presented by: Bob Diveley Manager of Administrative Systems Columbus State University Copyright Bob.
IP Management at Massey 1.national collaborative infrastructure.
Report Submitted by the 2014 Intellectual Property Task Force INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICIES.
Faculty and Student Expectations for Students’ Information Technology and Information Literacy Knowledge & Skills: One Institution’s Assessment Linfield.
Center for Instructional Technology James Madison University Strategies for Transitioning to the Age of Digital Media Sarah E. Cheverton James Madison.
Putting the We in… We are Penn State! Copyright [Carol Findley, Lisa Dibert] [2003]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
The Influence of Intellectual Property Rights Over Distance Education Jonathan Alger University of Michigan April 17, 2002 Copyright Jonathan Alger, 2002.
Sharing Information and Controlling Content: Continuing Challenges for Higher Education Susanna Frederick Fischer Assistant Professor Columbus School of.
Catalyst Portfolio Tool Copyright Tom Lewis, This work is the intellectual property.
NERCOMP Managing Campus Affiliates Managing Campus Affiliates Faculty? Student? Faculty? Student? Staff? Criss Laidlaw Director of Administrative.
1 Copyright & Other Legal Issues. 2 WHAT IS COPYRIGHT? Copyright is the form of protection provided by the laws of the United States to authors of “original.
1/17/07 1SCC-SSM Supporting Academic Needs: A Strategic Customer Care Sustainable Support Model Educause Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference 2007 Paul Halpine.
Research Week: Copyright, Commercialisation and IP Research Week: Copyright, Commercialisation and IP  opyright for postgraduate students and researchers.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Office of Information Technology Balancing Technology and Privacy – the Directory Conundrum January 2007 Copyright Barbara Hope and Lori Kasamatsu 2007.
Marjorie Forster, Assistant Vice President, Research and Global Health Initiatives, University of Maryland Baltimore M. Jeremy Trybulski, Consultant, formerly.
November 15, :30-300pm. Blackboard Update Blackboard Update Combining of Tickets – Only for cross-listed classes this spring Combining of Tickets.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R Managing the legal issues: practical steps for handling copyright, IP and other legal issues Kylie.
THE ROLE OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND AGREEMENTS IN DETERMINING OWNERSHIP OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN FACULTY CREATED WORKS. Faculty Created.
Proposed Revisions Copyright Policy WSU Intellectual Property Committee.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
Safeguarding Research Data Policy and Implementation Challenges Miguel Soldi February 24, 2006 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM.
The Quest for Copyright Understanding Miguel Guhlin
Creation of Copyrighted Materials Policy (Revision of Current Policy) AUGUST 2015.
OER, IPR, and the Law The Good, The Bad and The Ugly? 20 October 2009.
In the Distance Learning Environment Who Owns What ???
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
1 Effective Incident Response Presented by Greg Hedrick, Manager of Security Services Copyright Purdue University This work is the intellectual property.
VA Connecticut Research and Education Foundation
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
EDUCAUSE 2003 Copyright Toshiyuki Urata 2003 This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Legal Issues in the “E-Learning Business” Jonathan Alger University of Michigan October 29, 2001 Copyright Jonathan Alger This work is the intellectual.
Policies for Success on the New Learning Object Frontier Veronica Diaz, University of Arizona Patricia McGee, The University of Texas at San Antonio Copyright.
Copyright Law: Fall 2008 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of October 8, 2008 – Joint Works.
Copyright Donna Min Shiroma School Library Services Advanced Technology Research Branch Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Student Support © September.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
COUNTING NEW FORMS OF SCHOLARSHIP TOWARD TENURE AND PROMOTION Peter Angelos and Linda Deneen University of Minnesota Duluth October 2010 This work is the.
Chief Information Officer Effectiveness in Higher Education Wayne Brown, Ph.D. Copyright Wayne Brown This work is the intellectual property of the.
© Scottsdale Community College Leveraging the Power of E-Learning Taking your course to a higher level Presented by Sidne Tate Director, Instructional.
Policy Development Governing Board Online Training Module.
Teaching & the TEACH Act Paul Royster Coordinator of Scholarly Communications, UNL Libraries November 20, 2015.
Wanted: The Right Content and The Content Rights Putting Knowledge to Work: Building an Institutional Repository for Your Campus California Polytechnic.
UTS Library 2016 workshop Copyright for Researchers
Dr. Bill Vicars Lifeprint.com
Dr. Bill Vicars Lifeprint.com
Project for OnLine Instructional Support (POLIS)
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
myIS.neu.edu – presentation screen shots accompany:
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
EDUCAUSE Networking 2002 Washington, D.C. April 17, 2002
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Collective Bargaining
Presentation transcript:

Policy Characteristics and Best Practices Kimberly Bonner, Esq. And Kimberly B. Kelley, Ph.D. University of Maryland University College Center for Intellectual Property ( Copyright Kim Bonner and Kim Kelley (2002). This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author. Copyright Ownership and Digital Course Materials:

2 Views With Courseware Ownership American Association of University Professors states: “the academic exception should ordinarily apply to the development of courseware for use in programs of distance education.” See American Association of Universities states: “the university…own[s] the intellectual property that is created at the university by faculty [and] research staff…with substantial aid of its facilities or its financial support.” See ( tml). tml

3 Issues in the Online Environment: The Faculty: –revenue –control –academic freedom (unpopular, edit suggestions) –quality –loss of professional respect The Administration: –up front costs (unusually expensive, like patents?) –support staff = team approach –repeated use rights –what happens when the faculty leaves?

4 AA Author is generally the owner in copyright law pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 201(b) Exception is to this approach is work made for hire. In that case, the employer is considered the author “unless the parties expressly agreed otherwise in a written instrument signed by them…” 17 U.S.C. 201(b) Legal Framework

5 Policy Justification Historic policy justifications behind the Academic Exception –Inconsequential Commercial Value –Employability –Prior Work –Uniqueness –Anarchy –Incongruity »See Holmes and Levin, 2000 BYU Educ &L.J. 165, 186

6 The Academic Exception to the “Work for Hire” Doctrine Work held not to be a work made for hire. Context has been academic books, articles, professor’s notes (traditional scholarly works).

7 Legal Precedents Weinstein v. University of Illinois, 811 F2d 1091 (7 th Cir. 1987) Hays v. Sony Corporation of America, 847 F.2d 412 (7 th Cir. 1988) CCNV v. Reid (490 U.S. 730 (1989) Cases are few, not definitive Academic Exception is not codified in Copyright Act of 1976

8 The Continuum Academic exception Contracts Explicitly stated in policy Below threshold in use of resources Unrelated to job responsibilities Work for hire contracts above threshold in use of resources explicitly stated in policy

9 Courseware Ownership Study Institutions selected based on their distance education enrollments (>2000) in Peterson’s Guide to Distance Learning Programs institutions surveyed. Included 2 and 4 year institutions 86% response rate

10 Purpose of Courseware Study To: Determine types of policies Identify separate or subordinate policies Identify exemplary policies, per respondents Investigate role of collective bargaining Examine use of contracts

11 Findings: One overarching policy typical 29% had no policy on intellectual policy Separate or subordinate policies rare Most policies current, but inadequate for courseware issues Collective bargaining is rare 48% indicated they rely on contracts Student ownership issues handled inconsistently

12 One Policy vs. Multiple Policies One policy –Ease of use for faculty, staff, students –Provide a single, unified document –Simply merge courseware into already existing copyright policies dealing with teaching materials Two or three policies –Specialized expertise can be utilized –More options in each policy with regard to sharing rights –Each policy can be specific and shorter than unified document –More work to develop, more maintenance required –Ensure coordination of separate policies

13 Conclusions: Contracts used to clarify ownership Courseware often subsumed under teaching works Exemplary policies (as identified by respondents) consistently recognize the academic exception Specialty policies, while rare, are quite valuable

14 Why Do We Need Policies? In absence of clear legal framework, need clarity for institutions and their faculty Define whether, when, and how the academic exception is applied Decide who is the “default” owner Lessen likelihood of litigation Encourage creativity and experimentation

15 Summary: Three Possibilities University ownership model: If any university resources are used, university owns the copyright. Or, university claims all work as a work for hire. Shared ownership model: each party has certain rights, responsibilities, and benefits. Faculty ownership model: ownership defaults to the faculty and university rights are carefully prescribed.

16 Exemplary Policies University of Kansas University of Alabama University of Washington University of Massachusetts For other excellent examples, see Portal article in your handouts

17 Examples of Ownership Univ. of Kansas: Mediated Courseware: –Self-initiated mediated courseware. When employees develop mediated courseware without specific direction by the institution, unless otherwise agreed, the ownership of the courseware shall remain with the employee. –Institution-directed mediated courseware. When the institution specifically directs the creation of mediated courseware by assigning one or more employees to develop the mediated courseware and supplies them with materials and time to develop the mediated courseware, the resulting mediated courseware belongs to the institution and the institution shall have the right to revise it and decide who will utilize the mediated courseware in instruction. The institution may specifically agree to share revenues and control rights with the employee.

18 University of Alabama –Materials produced by faculty and employees of the University shall be the exclusive property of the faculty member or employee, so far as copyright is concerned. It shall be the responsibility of the faculty member or employee to copyright appropriate material. University assistance, such as released time, research or secretarial assistance, the purchase of particular materials, etc., must be acknowledged appropriately. –In the event that extraordinary assistance (assistance exceeding usual department or area policy) is provided by the University, a division of royalty may be required. When extraordinary assistance is provided, it is the responsibility of the department chairperson or area head to notify the faculty member in writing that the assistance to be provided exceeds usual policy. The faculty member or employee is responsible for negotiating any division of royalty with the Office for Academic Affairs prior to signing a contract.

19 Options Does not have to be “all or nothing.” The online environment requires new thinking about ownership. Institutions and their faculty need to avoid past mistakes. Need to debate and discuss to find solutions. Need to update, revise, and/or establish policies acceptable to all. Need to consider the creator’s and the institution’s needs.