Biological Reviews JOELLE L. GEHRING, Ph.D. Federal Communications Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laws & Regulations pertaining to Endangered Species in Wisconsin.
Advertisements

Signed on December 1973 and provides for the conservation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or significant portion of their.
Endangered Species Conservation Banking
Analysis of Dike 14 CDF to Public Greenspace. Who owns Dike 14? State of Ohio holds Dike 14 as a public trust land Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority.
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
MISSION: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.
Wildlife Considerations in Financing Wind Power Albuquerque, New Mexico July 2007 Penny Jennings Eckert, Ph.D.
WETLAND REGULATORY PROGRAM Role of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Beyond Fish and the Federal ESA Chris Maguire Terrestrial Biology Program Coordinator Oregon Department of Transportation Local Government Environmental.
Major Federal & State Approvals Environmental Business Council of New England Land-Based Wind Energy May 29, 2008 Ruth H. Silman, Esq.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
May 17 th,  Overview of endangered species regulations  Purpose of Habitat Conservation Plans  Review Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan.
USDA Forest Service Agency Mission and Habitat Management
THE ACTS What you need to know about MBTA, BGEPA, & ESA.
Legal Issues Affecting Wind Energy Federal Nexus: Public Lands. On public land, Federal funding, Federal permit, Federal power grid. On public land, Federal.
Natural Resource Reviews Threatened or Endangered Species Natural AreasWetlands.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Assessing Project Related Impacts to Migratory Birds.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Sept 18, 2008CVEN 4838/5838Slide #1 Lecture 8 Regulatory Processes.
Antenna Structure Registration Environmental Notice Process Form 854 Antenna Structure Registration Environmental Notice Process The Commission’s Antenna.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA) Larsen Schlachter Per. 3.
Biological Opinions & Endangered Species Act Consultation – A “How To” Guide for Working with Agencies on ESA Issues MATTHEW A. LOVE Partner- Seattle,
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS PERMITTING FOR UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA ENDANGERED.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Karl Morgan JUNE 2013 Karl Morgan JUNE 2013.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 By Tristan Armstrong.
Fish and Wildlife : Regulatory Framework and Challenges Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP Hydrovision 2008 Ocean/Tidal/Stream Power Track 7D “Environmental.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Emerging T&E Issues L. Peter Boice Conservation Team Leader 23 March 2003.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
71-95 GHz Registration A Streamlined Approach to Licensing.
TOWARDS A COMMON GOAL Coordinating actions under the Clean Water Act (FWPCA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
DOE Environmental Protection Program WORKSHOP MIGRATORY BIRD PROTECTION LEE BANICKI (202)
Biological Reviews, FAA Tower Lighting, and Northern Long-eared Bats JOELLE L. GEHRING, Ph.D. Federal Communications Commission.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
Endangered Species Act (Section 7) Consultation In Federal Land Management Agencies American Chemical Society National Meeting Boston, Mass. August 2015.
California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review Sacramento, California April 5, 2016.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Migratory Bird Conservation for Federal.
Draft Environmental Assessment Report for Bradley International Airport October 2016
Barriers and Challenges to Developing Renewable Energy Projects
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA
Finding the Law: Primary & Secondary Sources in Print
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming
Presentation transcript:

Biological Reviews JOELLE L. GEHRING, Ph.D. Federal Communications Commission

Biological Review Considerations Wetlands Threatened and Endangered Species Migratory birds Bald Eagles and Golden Eagles

Biological Review Considerations Located in: Wilderness Area, Wildlife Preserve, Floodplain, or Wetland? –If no, provide documentation (maps, etc.) –If yes, provide appropriate approvals, permits, or grants

The Value of Wetlands Flood controlFlood control Water quality -transform nutrients & pollutantsWater quality -transform nutrients & pollutants Diversity of wetland plants, wildlife and ecosystemsDiversity of wetland plants, wildlife and ecosystems Recreation (hunting, fishing, bird watching)Recreation (hunting, fishing, bird watching) Natural heritageNatural heritage USACE

Wetlands Wetlands’ ecological value is recognized in international law (RAMSAR), federal and state law, Executive Orders, programs, and local policies and regulations. –Clean Water Act, Section 404 regulates dredging and filling of wetlands –US Army Corps of Engineers –Permits and/or other authorization may be required

Wetlands If the proposed facility would be located in a wetland, provide a copy of the permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permitting the construction of the proposed antenna structure and a U.S. Army Corps map. If not in wetland, indicate in application materials and maintain maps for your records.

Biological Review Considerations Wetlands Threatened and Endangered Species Migratory birds Bald Eagles and Golden Eagles

Threatened & Endangered Species Section (a)(3) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1307(a)(3), requires applicants, licensees, & tower owners to consider the impact of proposed facilities under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §1531 et seq. Applicants must determine whether any proposed facilities may affect listed, threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats, or are likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats. Applicants are also required to notify the FCC & file an environmental assessment if any of these conditions exist.

Plants and animals Determine if T&E species at your proposed facility site Threatened & Endangered Species

Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) –USFWS tool –Provides species lists, critical habitat designations – Threatened & Endangered Species

Threatened and Endangered Species

If listed or proposed threatened or endangered species or designated or proposed critical habitats are present in the county or counties where the “action” is located and would not be affected by the proposed antenna structure: –Explain how the applicant determined that there would be no effect and provide the materials (with citations) that formed the basis for this determination (e.g., maps or lists from relevant FWS databases.) Threatened & Endangered Species

If the proposed antenna structure may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, listed or proposed threatened or endangered species or designated or proposed critical habitats in the action area: –Provide a letter from FWS concurring with the applicant’s informal biological assessment. If any measures are proposed to mitigate any effects on species or habitats, the assessment must outline those measures with FWS concurrence. –e.g., Indiana bat Threatened & Endangered Species

If present and if the proposed antenna structure may affect, and is likely to adversely affect, listed or proposed threatened or endangered species or listed or proposed designated critical habitats in the action area –Prepare a formal biological assessment as outlined in 50 C.F.R. § et seq. The applicant should provide the formal biological assessment to the FCC for formal consultation with the FWS. Threatened & Endangered Species

Protected species not present –Relevant documentation (e.g., IPaC) Protected species present, but not affected –Determination by USFWS or qualified biologist Not likely to Adversely Affect protected species –USFWS concurrence Likely to Adversely Affect protected species –USFWS incidental take statement Threatened & Endangered Species

Biological Review Considerations Wetlands Threatened and Endangered Species Migratory birds Bald Eagles and Golden Eagles

Estimated 4 million – 50 million bird fatalities at communication towers annually in U.S. Almost all are considered violations of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Detected Bird Mortality Most frequently detected –Songbirds Vireos Warblers Thrushes Sparrows –Shorebirds –Waterfowl I. Jeklin G. Beaton

Variables Related to Bird Collisions Weather Location in the landscape Tower support systems Tower heights Tower lighting systems

Towers with guy wires result in higher levels of avian mortality than towers without guy wires.

Taller towers result in higher levels of avian mortality than shorter towers.

Steady-burning lights on towers result in higher levels of avian mortality than flashing lights.

L-865L-864 L-864 and L % reduction in fatalities via elimination of non-flashing lights

L-865 flashing white NO non-flashing

L-864 flashing red L-810 non-flashing red

L-864 flashing red L-810 non-flashing red

L-864 flashing red L-810 non-flashing red

Option to extinguish non-flashing lights from towers >350 ft. AGL which reduces tower lighting costs

new and existing towers

To extinguish or eliminate the L-810 tower lights/side-markers on an existing registered tower, or to request use of flashing red lights only on a proposed new tower, you must take the following steps: –File a Marking and Lighting study electronically with the FAA on Form , Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration ( requesting the elimination or omission of steady- burning lights (L-810). Designate structure type: "Deviation from Red Obstruction Light Standards". Lighting Deviation Process

Once the FAA has approved the request and assigned a FAA Study Number, submit an online eSupport request ( asking the FCC to verify that our records of this FAA Study Number reflect the FAA-approved bird lighting deviation. Lighting Deviation Process

After receiving an FCC record confirming that the FAA study has been updated, file Form 854 with the FCC via the ASR System. For an existing registered tower, select “MD – Modification”, update the Lighting to “Option 3 – Other”, and provide a description (Ex: Style E w/ Red Light Deviation). The FCC will typically approve the application and modify the registration within 24 hours. For a proposed new tower enter the Lighting as “Option 3 – Other,” and provide a description. FCC approval for a proposed tower is subject to the procedures and time periods described at process-registration-antenna-structures-overview. process-registration-antenna-structures-overview Lighting Deviation Process

When the lighting change for an existing tower has been granted by the FCC via ASR, the steady-burning, side-marker, L-810 tower lights can be extinguished. This is typically accomplished in the tower transmission building and does not ordinarily require climbing the tower. For new towers, once the registration is granted, simply construct the tower without installing L-810 lights. Lighting Deviation Process

Towers > 450 ft. (137 m) AGL –Prepare an Environmental Assessment including a section specifically addressing potential migratory bird impacts and efforts to reduce those impacts (e.g., tower lights, building lights, bird flight diverters) –Seek comment from the FWS on migratory birds –No red-steady lights –Motion-detector lighting on out buildings recommended Migratory Birds

Towers ft. ( m) AGL –No red-steady lights and motion- detector lighting on out buildings recommended Migratory Birds

Biological Review Considerations Wetlands Threatened and Endangered Species Migratory birds Bald Eagles and Golden Eagles

Eagles and other Raptors Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA), MBTA, and some state protection Number of nests on towers is increasing. Contact USFWS & state natural resource agency before construction or maintenance activities on towers with nests. May require permits. Nest exclusion devices can be used. Raptors can become entangled in antenna wires or twine used as nesting material. Minimize excess wires, securely attach wires to tower, and shrink wrap or tape wires together to reduce the risk of entanglement. Contact state natural resources protection agency & USFWS if bird entanglement occurs. ©ingridtaylar

For more information contact: