RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is Progress Monitoring?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Responsiveness to Instruction North Carolina Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model Session 1/4.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Understanding Types of Assessment within an RTI Framework.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Selecting Evidence-based Practices.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
National Center on Response to Intervention TRAINING OF TRAINERS Response to Intervention Implementer Series.
National Center on Response to Intervention Sara Prewett, The National Center on RTI The University of Kansas RTI Scheduling.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
RTI Implementer Series Module 3: Multi-Level Prevention System
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
The Role of Assessment in Response to Intervention Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
ICSD District RtI Committee Agenda 3/13/12 3:45- Review of Our Norms and today’s agenda 4:00- Defining RtI and screening tool criteria 4:30- Begin review.
CEDS 2005 ANNUAL CONFERENCE Educational Assessment: Looking Forward, Reaching Further November 17, 2005 When Assessment Isn’t Enough: Understanding Student.
1 Progress Monitoring in a Response to Intervention World: Helping Classrooms to Implement Best Practices Jacki Bootel Rebecca Holland-Coviello Silvia.
SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION
RTI Implementer Series Module 2: Progress Monitoring
Addressing the Needs of Students with Reading Difficulties through Supplemental Interventions Course Enhancement Module: Reading K–5, Part 4 H325A
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-based Reading Instruction Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
1 Curriculum Based Measures Improving Student Outcomes through Progress Monitoring.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
LIGHTS, CAMERA …. ACADEMIC DATA at the Elementary Level Cammie Neal and Jennifer Schau Forsyth County Schools.
National Center on Response to Intervention OSPI & National Center on Response to Intervention November 1, 2011 Implementer Series Module 3: Multi-level.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Webinar 1: Overview. 1. Overview  Link to SLD Rule  Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)  Systems of Assessment 2. Introduction to Tiers  Tier 1:
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Response to Intervention: Core Components and Resources Related to Implementation Marie Fisher March 3, 2012.
National Center on Response to Intervention Using CBM in a Response to Intervention Framework Other Ways to use Curriculum Based Measurement Data.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Series Module 2: Progress Monitoring.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 RTI: Instructional Process and Evaluation Component Louis.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
2008 Student Progress Monitoring & Data-Based Instruction in Special Education Introduction to Using CBM for Progress Monitoring.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
Progress Monitoring Elementary Intervention Coaches November 22, 2011.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
THE DATA DRIVEN CLASSROOM Kim Baumgartner, M.A. Disability Services Coordinator for Mid Florida Community Services Head Start.
Department of Curriculum and Instruction Considerations for Choosing Mathematics Progress Monitoring Measures from K-12 Anne Foegen, Ph.D. Pursuing the.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Dial-in: Passcode: RTI/Multi-Tiered Models of Intervention PLC Movement Between Tiers of Intervention & Implications for Special.
OSEP Project Director’s Conference August 1, 2016 Carol Quirk
RTI: Response To Instruction
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Richard Edwards Elementary School
Castle/Kahuku Complex Area Support Team (CAST)
Presentation transcript:

RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is Progress Monitoring? National Center on Response to Intervention

RTI Implementer Series Overview Introduction Screening Progress Monitoring Multi-level Prevention System Defining the Essential Components What Is RTI? What Is Screening? What Is Progress Monitoring? What Is a Multi-level Prevention System? Assessment and Data-based Decision Making Understanding Types of Assessment within an RTI Framework Using Screening Data for Decision Making Using Progress Monitoring Data for Decision Making IDEA and Multi-level Prevention System Establishing Processes Implementing RTI Establishing a Screening Process Selecting Evidence-based Practices

Session Agenda Overview of the purpose and focus of progress monitoring Overview and examples of types of assessments Demonstration of the progress monitoring tools chart and information available Overview of the timeframe when progress monitoring typically occurs

Upon completion of this training, participants will be able to: Discuss the importance of progress monitoring Understand different kinds of assessments and their uses Use the Progress Monitoring Tools Chart to learn about progress monitoring tools

Vocabulary Handout Word Prediction Final Meaning Picture/Sketch/Example Primary prevention level The bottom of the pyramid that represents instruction given to students without learning problems Instruction delivered to all students using research-based curricula and differentiation in the general education classroom. Incorporates universal screening, continuous progress monitoring, and outcome measures or summative assessments. Primary prevention

Essential Components of RTI

What is Progress Monitoring?

Why Progress Monitoring? Progress monitoring research has been conducted over the past 30 years Research has demonstrated that when teachers use progress monitoring for instructional decision making: Students learn more Teacher decision making improves Students are more aware of their performance

Progress Monitoring PURPOSE: monitor students’ response to primary, secondary, or tertiary instruction to estimate rates of improvement, identify students who are not demonstrating adequate progress, and compare the efficacy of different forms of instruction FOCUS: students identified through screening as at risk for poor learning outcomes TOOLS: brief assessments that are valid, reliable, and evidence based TIMEFRAME: students are assessed at regular intervals (e.g., weekly, biweekly, or monthly)

Purpose of Progress Monitoring Allows practitioners to… Estimate rates of improvement Identify students who are not demonstrating adequate progress Compare the efficacy of different forms of instruction in order to design more effective, individualized instruction

Estimate Rates of Improvement .3 WRC 6 WRC

Identify Students Not Making Adequate Progress Flat Scores: Increasing Scores: X goal line trend line X goal line trend line X X X X X X

Compare Efficacy of Interventions Growth by Intervention Type Words Read Correctly

Progress Monitoring Answers the Questions Are students making progress at an acceptable rate? Are students meeting short- and long-term performance goals? Does the instruction or intervention need to be adjusted or changed?

Specific Learning Disability Eligibility Criteria Related to Progress Monitoring To ensure that underachievement in a child suspected of having a specific learning disability is not due to lack of appropriate instruction in reading or math, the group must consider, as part of the evaluation described in 34 CFR 300.304 through 300.306: Data that demonstrate that prior to, or as a part of, the referral process, the child was provided appropriate instruction in regular education settings, delivered by qualified personnel; and Data-based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement at reasonable intervals, reflecting formal assessment of student progress during instruction, which was provided to the child’s parents. (www.idea.ed.gov)

Focus of Progress Monitoring Typically includes students identified as at risk for poor learning outcomes

Progress Monitoring Tools Progress monitoring tools are— brief assessments reliable, valid, and evidence based repeated measures that capture student learning measures of age-appropriate outcomes Different progress monitoring tools may be used to assess different outcome measures

Review: Types of Assessments When? Why? Summative After Assessment of Learning Diagnostic Before Identify skill strengths and weakness Formative During Assessment for Learning Type When? Why? Summative After Assessment of Learning Diagnostic Before Identify skill deficits Formative During Assessment for Learning

Formative Assessments PURPOSE: Tells us how well students are responding to instruction Administered during instruction Typically administered to all students during benchmarking and some students for progress monitoring

Common Formative Assessments Mastery Measurement General Outcome Measures vs. 10 8 6 4 2 WEEKS Multidigit Addition Multidigit Subtraction 12 14 Multiplication Facts Number of problems correct in 5 minutes

Mastery Measurement Describes mastery of a series of short-term instructional objectives To implement Mastery Measurement, the teacher: Determines a sensible instructional sequence for the school year Designs criterion-referenced testing procedures to match each step in that instructional sequence

Mastery Measure: Multidigit Addition Assessment

General Outcome Measures (GOM) A GOM is a measure that reflects overall competence in the annual curriculum. Describes individual student’s growth and development over time (both “current status” and “rate of development”). Provides a decision-making model for designing and evaluating interventions. Is used for individuals and groups of students.

GOM Example: CBM Curriculum-Based Measure (CBM) a General Outcome Measure (GOM) of a student’s performance in either basic academic skills or content knowledge CBM tools available in basic skills and core subject areas grades K-8 (e.g., DIBELS, AIMSweb)

CBM Math Example Random numerals within problems (considering specifications of problem types) Random placement of problem types on page

CBM Passage Reading Fluency Student copy 26

NCRTI Progress Monitoring Tools Chart www.rti4success.org

Process for Using the Tools Chart Gather a team Determine your needs Determine your priorities Familiarize yourself with the content and language of the chart Review the ratings and implementation data Ask for more information

1. Gather a Team Who should be involved in selecting a progress monitoring tool? What types of expertise and what perspectives should be involved in selecting a tool?

2. Determine Your Needs For what skills or set of skills do you need a progress monitoring tool? What population will you progress monitor (grades, subgroups)? When and how frequently will progress monitoring occur? Who will conduct the progress monitoring and what is their knowledge and skill level? What kind of training do staff need and who will provide it? What materials will you need (computer, paper and pencil)? How much funding will you need?

3. Determine Your Priorities Is it a tool that can be purchased for a reasonable cost? Is it a tool that does not take long to administer and score? Is it a tool that offers ready access to training and technical support for staff? Is it a tool that meets the highest standards for technical rigor?

4. Familiarize Yourself with the Content and Language of the Chart General Outcome Measures Mastery Measures 32

Select Reading or Math to limit the tools to the subject of interest Select Elementary or Secondary School to select the grade level of interest

Comparing Tools limit your search by selecting tools that appear to fit your needs

Comparing Tools And compare them side by side

NCRTI Progress Monitoring Tools Chart General Outcome Measures Technical Rigor Across the top you can see the technical rigor standards listed for General Outcome Measures. NCRTI Progress Monitoring Tools Chart General Outcome Measures

General Outcome Measures: Technical Rigor Technical Rigor Standards: Sensitive to Student Improvement Reliability of the Performance Level Score End-of-Year Benchmarks Reliability of the Slope Rates of Improvement Specified Validity of the Performance Level Score Norms Disaggregated for Diverse Populations Predictive Validity of the Slope of Improvement Disaggregated Reliability and Validity Data Alternate Forms

NCRTI Progress Monitoring Tool Chart Technical Rigor NCRTI Progress Monitoring Tool Chart Mastery Measures

Mastery Measures: Technical Rigor Technical Rigor Standards: Skill Sequence Sensitivity to Student Improvement Reliability Validity Pass/Fail Decision Disaggregated Reliability and Validity Data

Implementation Requirements Cost of tool Training required to implement tool Level of expertise required to administer tool Training and technical support offered How are scores reported

5. Review the Ratings and Implementation Data Look for tools that conducted studies with outcome measures and samples similar to your population and outcome of interest Determine if tools are appropriate for certain subgroups (e.g., ELLs) Click on any rating bubble to view data

Example of Data

6. Ask for More Information

The NCRTI Progress Monitoring Tools Chart Users Guide

Timeframe for Progress Monitoring Throughout instruction at regular intervals (e.g., weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) Teachers use student data to quantify short- and long-term goals that will meet end-of-year goals 46

Need More Information? National Center on Response to Intervention www.rti4success.org RTI Action Network www.rtinetwork.org IDEA Partnership www.ideapartnership.org

National Center on Response to Intervention This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs Grant No. H326E070004 Grace Zamora Durán and Tina Diamond served as the OSEP project officers. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this publication is intended or should be inferred. This product is public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: www.rti4success.org.