Project Detailed Business Case

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I MPLEMENTING ACT ON THE METHODOLOGY FOR THE COST - BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF MAJOR PROJECTS Expert Group Meeting, 26 September 2013.
Advertisements

Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Mikko AJ Ramstedt Senior Project Adviser Financial Partnerships Unit
© The Treasury 1 Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Overview.
Division of Economic Statistics and Advice SCAF WORKSHOP ON INVESTMENT APPRAISAL – CURRENT POLICY AND PRACTICE IN MOD 9 FEBRUARY 2010 NEIL V DAVIES, JOHN.
Indicative Business Case
ICS 442 Software Project Management
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 12 Chapter The Capital Budgeting Decision McGraw-Hill Ryerson©2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Prepared by P Chua April.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported LicenseCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY). Project Management.
© The Treasury 1 Capital Asset Management Better Business Cases 2011 ½-day Training Sessions (business case examples depending on agency’s requirements)
Need to Invest Investment Objectives and Case for Change Determine Potential Value for Money Strategic Case: Economic Case: Financial Case: Affordability.
Capital Budgeting Decide how to invest money so that its value is maximized.
Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Foundation Course
FDM11 Capital investment apprasal 3 Capital investment appraisal 3.
PROJECT EVALUATION. Introduction Evaluation  comparing a proposed project with alternatives and deciding whether to proceed with it Normally carried.
Strategic Business Planning for Commercial Producers.
Strategic Business Planning for Commercial Producers Investment Analysis: What Investments Should I Make?
Public Private Partnership- Identification, Viability and Implementation Prof. Yashvir Tyagi Prof. Yashvir Tyagi Department of Economics Department of.
Cost Analysis of Military Training Marcel C. Smit SAS-095 workshop on Cost-Benefit Analysis of Military Training Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5-6 June 2012.
CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND FINANCIAL RISK Chapter 10.
Chapter 5 Initiating and Planning Systems Development Projects
Indicative Business Case
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
BUSINESS CASE Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Ignacio Zozaya Boeing Research & Technology Europe CAATS II Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Introduction ► This slide deck provides a suggested framework for the financial evaluation of an investment project. When evaluating any such project,
New Procurement & Delivery Arrangements for the Schools’ Estate Presentation to Strategic Advisory Group 18 April 2005.
Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative VfM Criteria Owain Ellis 12 June 2008.
© The Treasury 1 Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Overview 2012 August 2012.
University of Sunderland CIFM02 Unit 3 COMM02 Project Evaluation Unit 3.
RTI,Chennai Learning Objective Given the concepts of Decision Analysis, Option Pricing and Investment Decisions, the trainee will be able to audit the.
© The Treasury 1 Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Foundation Course.
Agenda Welcome and ground rules Context: Capital Asset Management
Selecting a Minimum Attractive Rate of Return Chapter 15 Mechanical Engineering 431 Engineering Economics.
Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Overview
1 ECGD3110 Systems Engineering & Economy. 2 Lecture 1 Introduction to Engineering Economics.
1 Better Business Cases Practitioner Course Module Two: The Preferred Solution 10 October 2013.
1 Investment Appraisal PPP Concepts and Terminology (1) John Plumb.
Better Business Cases Detailed 2012
Chapter 10 Choices Involving Time Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Selecting and Designing Concession / PPP Projects Martin Darcy.
Chapter 14 Capital Budgeting Cost Accounting Foundations and Evolutions Kinney, Prather, Raiborn.
Strategies for IT Adoption in the Building Industry © 2002 Prof. C.M. Eastman & Dr. R. Sacks Economic Evaluation of IT Impacts.
THE PROJECT CYCLE By Dr. Peter Quartey (ISSER, Univ. of Ghana)
Need to Invest Investment Objectives and Case for Change Programme Option Identification and Assessment Analysis Strategic Case: Economic Case: Financial.
Capital Budgeting Decide how to invest money so that its value is maximized.
1 ARENA Workshop Renewables for Industrial Processes.
1 Cost-Benefit Analysis Public Economics Minda DC. Eduarte.
Investment decision making
Portfolio Committee on Science & Technology Workshop 02 March 2011 Chief Director – Economic Services, Public Finance.
© The Treasury 1 Better Business Cases Investing for change Seminar August 2012.
‘Real Options’ Framework to Assess Public Research Investments Nicholas S. Vonortas Center for International Science and Technology Policy & Department.
Presentation to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport Assessment, Approval, Public Sector Benchmark and Procurement of PPPs 23rd September 2003.
SESSION 3 Tuesday – Writing the Business Case.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Cost benefit analysis. Social costs Social costs are the costs of economic activity to society as a whole Social costs = private costs + external costs.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Ensuring Good Quality PPP Projects Martin Darcy Regional Workshop.
Quality Control in Preparing and Managing PPP Projects
Scottish Capital Investment Manual
Budget and Medium Term Financial Strategy
EWG Study Tour, Galway, 18/09/2006
SESSION 3a Tuesday 12– Risk Allocation.
Route 2: Strategy Document Template (Powerpoint format)
Project Initiation.
HCS 385 RANK Lessons in Excellence-- hcs385rank.com.
Eileen Roden Chalk House Training and Consultancy
Foundation Course objectives
Costing and Finance P R Upadhyay.
Stakeholder Engagement
Business Cases Writing a business case, while time-consuming, is not complicated – but getting it wrong can be costly and frustrating. At a time when the.
Presentation transcript:

Project Detailed Business Case Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Project Detailed Business Case Programme Strategic Assessment Programme Business Case Project Strategic Assessment Indicative Business Case Detailed Business Case Implementation Business Case Project Strategic Assessment Single Stage Business Case

Project Detailed Business Case Purpose Revisit the case for change and the preferred way forward Determine the preferred option that optimises value for money Outline the potential deal and assess affordability Outline a plan for delivering the proposed project

Project Detailed Business Case Strategic Strategic Case (Revisit) Action 9: Revisit the indicative business case Review the case for change and consider changes since the indicative business case was developed. This revisits the strategic and economic cases for change. Strategic case: -Note the changes made to the underlying assumptions in the indicative business case. -This could be due to conditions made as part of IBC, external stakeholders influencing the direction of the proposal, and/or other elements changing during the time elapsed since stage 1 approval . Economic case: -Review and refine earlier work on the long-list and the preferred way forward. -If there have been any changes in the underlying assumptions since the initial options assessment, consider whether any of the short-list options are: •likely to fail to deliver the investment objectives and critical success factors •likely not to deliver sufficient benefits •clearly impractical or unfeasible •clearly inferior to another option •likely to violate any of the constraints •clearly too risky. •All changes made to underlying assumptions should be noted within the opening section of the economic case.

Project Detailed Business Case Economic Project Detailed Business Case Economic case Action 10: Economic assessment of the short-listed options or preferred alternative procurement option Action 11: Intangible benefits and costs Action 12: Risk and uncertainty Action 13: Preferred option and undertake sensitivity analysis Complete the risk assessment: -This is the overall process of risk identification, risk analysis/risk evaluation. -Review the risks identified in action 5. -Use AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 and ISO/IEC 31010 for further guidance. -Tailor the extent of risk analysis to the relative size, impacts and risks Complete the quantitative risk analysis: -This ensures risks, and their financial impact, are explicit to decision-makers. -Financial and non-financial impacts must also be considered. -Once the risk is known, contingency amounts can be identified. -Quantitative risk analysis includes detailed sensitivity analysis and analysing the likely effect of scenarios. -It involves assessing each probability & modeling how the total project will turn out. -This will produce an estimated probability distribution of likely total costs. --The risk modelling process involves - building the models, including distributions for uncertain inputs, simulating outcome distributions, generating outcome graphs and tables, and reviewing and revision as necessary. -This should only be performed by an accredited expert. Stakeholders do the economic case thinking together in one or more two hour workshops led by a facilitator.

Analysis of the short-listed options Economic Analysis of the short-listed options Option 1: Do Nothing Option 2: Do Minimum Option 3: Preferred Minus Option 4: Preferred Way Forward Option 5: Preferred Plus Appraisal Period (years) 20 Capital Costs ($m) 0.0 22.5 23.9 31.6 45.7 Whole of Life Costs ($m) 14.4 24.2 49.7 70.7 90.9 Cost-Benefit Analysis of monetary costs and benefits at the Public Sector Discount Rate Present Value of Benefits ($m) 2 25 75 115 126 Present Value of Costs ($m) 7 23 40 52 73 Benefit Cost ratio 0.3:1 1.1:1 1.9:1 2.2:1 1.7:1 Net Present Value (NPV, $m) (5) 35 63 53 Multi-Criteria Analysis ranking of intangible costs and benefits (if any) Criteria 1 1 3 5 Criteria 2 4 Criteria 3 Preferred option Yes

Project Detailed Business Case Commercial case – Preparing for the Potential Deal Action 14: Procurement strategy Action 15: Service requirements Action 16: Risk allocation Action 17: Payment mechanisms Action 18: Contractual and other issues Financial case – Ascertaining Affordability and Funding Requirements Action 19: The financial costing model Commercial Financial

Project Detailed Business Case Management case – Planning for Successful Delivery Action 20: Project management planning Action 21: Change management planning Action 22: Benefits management planning Action 23: Risk management planning Action 24: Post-project evaluation planning Management

Detailed Business Case: In summary Detailed Business Case: Revisit the case for change and the preferred way forward Determine the preferred option that optimises value for money Outline the potential deal and assess affordability Outline a plan for delivering the proposed project