Currently cohabiting: Relationship attitudes and intentions Dr Ernestina Coast.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender differences in well-being in older age James Nazroo and Anne McMunn UCL
Advertisements

Cross Sectional Designs
Dagmar Kutsar and Kairi Kasearu University of Tartu, Estonia ISCI 3rd International Conference, York July, 2011.
Education and entitlement to household income. A gendered longitudinal analysis of British couples Jerome De Henau and Susan Himmelweit IAFFE annual conference,
Life course influences in later life Understanding impact of life course events on health and well-being is vital for effective policy development. Institute.
Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes and intentions in the BHPS. Ernestina Coast.
Assets and debts in couples Karen Rowlingson, Professor of Social Policy Director of Centre on Household Assets and Savings Management.
Family Diversity An online learning resource from
GCSE Sociology Research Methods.
Separation and intergenerational family obligations. Evidence from the Netherlands (and Flanders) 8th meeting of the European Network for the Sociological.
Sociology 1201 Marital separation and divorce Is marriage: 1. a voluntary contract that can be ended by either partner; 2. a lifetime commitment “til death.
Chapter 7 Marriage, Intimacy, Expectations, and the Fully Functioning Person.
Lesson objective The aim of this lesson is to use words and pictures to help you understand how attitudes towards marriage and family life have changed.
Cohabitation Family Sociology
1 Using survey data to research family relationships Angela Dale University of Manchester.
What is an Opinion Survey or Poll?
Marriage, Intimate Relationships and Society Contemporary Marriage and Intimate Relationships ( )
SAME-SEX PARENTS IN HUNGARY: LEGAL SITUATION AND POLITICAL DEBATES Tamás Dombos Háttér Support Society for LGBT People in Hungary.
FORGOTTEN MARRIAGES? MEASURING THE RELIABILITY OF RETROSPECTIVE MARRIAGE HISTORIES March 20, 2012 INED – Quality and Comparability of Demographic Data.
1 T.M. Maleva O.V. Sinyavskaya Is it possible to raise fertility level in Russia? Results of new empirical studies “Family in the Stream of Changes: Demographic.
I want to test a wound treatment or educational program but I have no funding or resources, How do I do it? Implementing & evaluating wound research conducted.
Chapter 4 Dating and Cohabitation
SIT008 – Research Design in Practice Week 5 Luke Sloan Cross-Sectional & Longitudinal Designs Week 5 Luke Sloan Cross-Sectional & Longitudinal Designs.
Centre for Market and Public Organisation Understanding the effect of public policy on fertility Mike Brewer (Institute for Fiscal Studies) Anita Ratcliffe.
U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Marriage and Cohabitation Data in the National Longitudinal Surveys Alison Aughinbaugh NLS Summer Workshop 2007.
Linking lives through time Living alone and mental health: a longitudinal study Zhiqiang Feng, Peteke Feijten, Paul Boyle Longitudinal Studies.
Social Institutions “The Family”. So, what exactly is a family? The Debate over Family Definitions: a group of people related by either blood, marriage,
AFGHANISTAN CULTURE. WHAT IS CULTURE? Take a second to write down what your definition of the following terms?  Culture  Tradition  Religion  Customs.
Complete the survey. To define marriage To describe trends in marriage To contrast legal and religious ideas of marriage Introduction to Marriage.
Marriage and the Family. cohabitation a)Nuns living in one house b)Living together without being married c)Marrying more than one person at a time.
( 1 of 14 ) Chapter 11 Families and Intimate Relationships.
What Makes Them Give? 2012 Stelter Donor Insight Report Latest Stelter Study finds influences and activities that yield planned gifts.
Family Types Child Development.
Grade 12 Family Studies Choosing to Parent. The Childfree Alternative Historically, being childless and married was stigmatized. Are you sick? Is there.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Being Single Preview.
Chapter 7, Being Single, Living Alone, Cohabitating and Other Options Singles: their Increasing Numbers Changing attitudes toward Marriage and single hood.
The Family Life Cycle. Family Life Cycle Young adulthood: People live on own, marry, and bear/rear children Middle adulthood: children leave home, parental.
Chapter 9 Unmarried Lives: Singlehood and Cohabitation: Worksheet page 1 Oh to be Single, Footloose and Fancy Free! Mark which of the following statements.
Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes and intentions in the BHPS. Ernestina Coast.
A framework for analyses into the dynamics of relationships within the family, the generations and the genders; on the basis of GGP data Jenny Gierveld.
Money and Myths: attitudes to financial settlements for separating cohabitants Anne Barlow University of Exeter.
Chapter 12 Family Life. Marital Status 96% in USA marry, at least once Reason for decreased number of married in later life? –Widowhood Fewer than two.
The donor’s future role in the child’s life MCK Fertility Centre Views of candidate parents & donors A. Brewaeys, M. Brewaeys E. de Reus
Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes and intentions in the BHPS. Ernestina Coast.
We are learning to … give reasons for our views..
Family Sociology Cohabitation.
Chapter 16, The Family The Nature of Families Perspectives on the Family Dynamics of Mate Selection and Marriage.
What is Development? Systematic changes and continuities –In the individual –Between conception and death “Womb to Tomb” Three broad domains –Physical,
Woman At Work More than half of all married woman work, giving greater independence to women. Not a blame, but possible reason for increasing number of.
Adoption. jackman-on-adoption-in-australia-its-almost-like-they- try-to-put-you-off
Differentials in desires and realisation: 1st, 2nd and 3rd child Marion Burkimsher.
EXPLORING MARRIAGES AND FAMILY, 2ND EDITION Karen Seccombe
Ms. Park – SHDHS Individual Family Society.  The social sciences are not concerned with ‘absolute truth,’ and do not pretend to be.  All disciplines.
Verb Moods Identifying and writing them correctly.
1 Fertility Intentions in France and Russia Laurence Charton Marc Bloch University Strasbourg - France Sergey Surkov IIPS Moscow - Russia.
So You Think You’ve Made a Change? Developing Indicators and Selecting Measurement Tools Chad Higgins, Ph.D. Allison Nichols, Ed.D.
Background A Change in Tradition Steady decline of marriage in the U.S. Increasing number of cohabiting unmarried couples - In 2000, 4.9 million opposite-sex.
Unit 6. The purposes of the research are to study 1.)________ and to investigate 2.) ___________. The subjects consist of 120 women from A)__________.
Family ELL Warm Up Read the sentence and decide whether or not you agree or disagree with the statement. Afterwards, check with your group members.
Marriage vs. Common Law Common law relationship refers to an intimate relationship between two people who are not legally married. The term “common-law”
Marriage and family Aim: to identify social trends concerning cohabitation, sex and marriage.
Family and household structure Part 2
Starter #1: The Mating Game!
Family breakdown - Divorce
Family pt. 2.
Pre-reading Survey The Scarlet Letter.
Issues of love in marriage
Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes and intentions in the BHPS. Ernestina Coast.
Marriage and the Family
Presentation transcript:

Currently cohabiting: Relationship attitudes and intentions Dr Ernestina Coast

Cohabitation  Fuzzy  Timing  Heterogeneous  Post-marriage (pre- and post-divorce)  Pre-marriage  Post widowhood  Evolving

 Good large-scale descriptive data on incidence and trends  Representative attitudinal surveys  Empirical gap: cohabitees  emerging qualitative research  survey data relationship intentions and attitudes  longitudinal data – collected while subjective state exists  systematic empirical investigation of social change

British Household Panel Survey (BHPS)  Annual since 1991  Approx. 5,000 households  Full interview with new partners

1991: Wave 11992: Wave 2 Full marriage & cohabitation history Annual status updates 1998: Wave 8 Relationship questions Annual status updates 2003: Wave 13 Relationship questions repeat Annual status updates 2006 Wave 16

? Cohabitation converted to marriage? Cohabitation persisted? Cohabitation ceased? Child born? Relationship: attitudes intentions 1998 Couples = Couples = 333

Analysis  Wave 13 (2003)  Treat as cross-sectional  Never-married aged under 35  Individuals and linked couples

Questions  “We are interested in why you and your partner have chosen to live together rather than being married. Do you think there are any advantages in living as a couple, rather than being married?” If “Yes”  “What do you think are the advantages of living as a couple?”

Questions  “Do you think there are any disadvantages in living as a couple, rather than being married?” If “Yes”  “What do you think are the disadvantages of living as a couple?”

Interview influence  BHPS reports presence of others during interview  Analysis shows no significant effect of other’s presence on responses.

Cohabitation an advantage over marriage  Men32%  Women 35%  Parent28%  Childless37%  Sig p<0.05 for both men and women  Majority no positive advantage

Why an advantage? ParentChildless MenWomenMenWomen Trial marriage No legal ties Personal independe nce Financial advantage Other

Cohabitation a disadvantage over marriage  Men18%  Women 22%  Parent22%  Childless20%  Majority no definite disadvantage

Why a disadvantage? ParentChildless MenWomenMenWomen Financial insecurity No legal status Effect on children Lack of commitme nt Social stigma

Comparing couples Man Woman AdvantageNo advantage Advantage1815 No advantage2245

Comparing couples Man Woman DisadvantageNo disadvantage Disadvantage610 No disadvantage 1767

Question: Future intentions  “Obviously you cannot say for certain what will happen, but could you please look at this card and read out the number of the statement which you feel applies most closely to your current relationship?

Showcard  1Planning to marry  2Probably get married at some point  3Probably just keep living together without marrying  4Have not really thought about the future  5Other (specify)  6Don’t know

Marriage expectations MenWomen Planning to/ probably will marry 7173 Continue to live together 1718 DK/ No thought to future / Other 129

Marriage expectations: couples Women Men Planning to/ will marry CohabitDK/No thought to future Planning to/ will marry 6093 Cohabit5105 DK/ No thought to future 422

Marriage expectations: women MotherChildless Planning to/ probably will marry 6073 Continue to live together 2916 DK/ No thought to future / Other 11

Supplementary Question  “Even though you have no plans to marry at the moment, can you please look at this card and tell me how likely it is that you will ever get married to anyone in the future?”

Showcard  1Very likely  2Likely  3Unlikely  4Very unlikely  5Don’t know

Marriage expectations: women MotherChildless Very likely08 Likely2633 Unlikely4833 Very unlikely2215 Do not know411

Interrogating the questions  Grounded in reality  Take account of circumstances rather than an expression of abstract desire  Supplementary question on marriage expectation moves from current relationship to any future hypothetical relationship

Interrogating the answers  Intentions uncertain and subject to change  Question understanding  Companionship response  Childless mention children

 Cohabitation  Which couples achieve their relationship intentions?  How persistent are relationship intentions?  Non-resident partnerships Future directions