Philosophy of Mathematics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Social Scientific Method An Introduction to Social Science Research Methodology.
Advertisements

Why We Do Research Chapter 1. Ordinary Versus Systematic Biased Question: A question that leads to a specific response or excludes a certain group Nonscientific.
Lesson 4: Gather Evidence & Handle It Correctly. Gather all the relevant Scriptural evidence on any Biblical subject. – There is a difference between.
Chapter 4 Understanding research philosophies and approaches
Mathematics in the MYP.
Post-Positivist Perspectives on Theory Development
Hume on Taste Hume's account of judgments of taste parallels his discussion of judgments or moral right and wrong.  Both accounts use the internal/external.
Philosophy 120 Symbolic Logic I H. Hamner Hill CSTL-CLA.SEMO.EDU/HHILL/PL120.
What Mathematics Knowledge is Needed for Teaching Mathematics?
Bell Ringer What are the Iliad and the Odyssey about?
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Which Came First? The Philosophy, the History, or the Mathematics? Martin E Flashman Department of Mathematics Humboldt State University Arcata, CA
The Square Root of 2, p, and the King of France: Ontological and Epistemological Issues Encountered (and Ignored) in Introductory Mathematics Courses Martin.
Number and Operations Standard Instructional programs from prekindergarten through grade 12 should enable all students to— Understand numbers Understand.
THE TRANSITION FROM ARITHMETIC TO ALGEBRA: WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE DO NOT KNOW (Some ways of asking questions about this transition)‏
1. Introduction Which rules to describe Form and Function Type versus Token 2 Discourse Grammar Appreciation.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Mathematics and TOK Exploring the Areas of Knowlege.
Chapter 12 Common Sense and Anglo- American Philosophy.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Mathematics the Preschool Way
Positivism -v- Pragmatism. MMUBS Mres Epistemology, session 4, slide-1 Positivism -v- Pragmatism Is knowledge composed of a correct.
Wheeler Lower School Mathematics Program Grades 4-5 Goals: 1.For all students to become mathematically proficient 2.To prepare students for success in.
Looking at the Roots of Philosophy
Epistemology Revision
TaK “This was one of the great events of my life, as dazzling as first love. I had not imagined that there was anything so delicious in the world” Bertrand.
Unit 1 Learning Objectives Experience a science lesson that integrates CA CCSS speaking/listening, writing and reading with science content Identify Literacy.
‘Pure Mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas’ Einstein ‘Maths is like love, a simple idea but it can get very complicated.’ Unknown ‘The.
Positivism -v- Pragmatism. MMUBS Mres Epistemology, session 4, slide-1 Positivism -v- Pragmatism Is knowledge composed of a correct.
HZB301 Philosophy Room 158 Mr. Baker.
2 + 2 = 4 Your mother loves you. Death is a part of life. The sky is blue.
An Introduction to Chapter 9: Geometric Figures
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Issues for research design Questions to think about as you begin your research (adapted from Hart 1998, page 86)
Introduction to Research
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
LOGIC AND ONTOLOGY Both logic and ontology are important areas of philosophy covering large, diverse, and active research projects. These two areas overlap.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
CER and Annotating Text District Learning Day August 6, 2015.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2004 University of Pittsburgh 1 Principles of Learning: Accountable Talk SM Accountability to the Learning Community.
Insights About the Grade 1 Learning Expectations in the CCSS Topic #1: The meaning of the equal sign Presented by the Office of Curriculum, Instruction.
CONCEPTUALIZING AND ACTUALIZING THE NEW CURRICULUM Peter Liljedahl.
One Form of Argument… “Argument” in NGSS In science, the production of knowledge is dependent on a process of reasoning from evidence that requires a.
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
THE NEW CURRICULUM MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic.
What Place Does Philosophy Have in Teaching Mathematics? Preliminary report. Martin E Flashman Department of Mathematics Humboldt State University Arcata,
MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic to explore, make connections,
Building Blocks of Scientific Research Chapter 5 References:  Business Research (Duane Davis)  Business Research Methods (Cooper/Schindler) Resource.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Line and Angle Relationships 1 1 Chapter.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
Plenary 1. What’s important about the Math we Teach? A Focus on Big Ideas Marian Small
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
The philosophy of Ayn Rand…. Objectivism Ayn Rand is quoted as saying, “I had to originate a philosophical framework of my own, because my basic view.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
The impact of digital tools on students' learning of geometry
What is Mathematics? The science (or art?) that deals with numbers, quantities, shapes, patterns and measurement An abstract symbolic communication system.
EDUCATIONAL & CURRICULUM Philosophy
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
Philosophy of Mathematics 1: Geometry
Philosophy of Education
Jez Echevarría 6th September 2013
Describe this object: Does it help describe it further by saying it exists?
What is a Theory of Human Nature?
Greek Philosophers Chapter 5-2.
What processes do scientists use when they perform scientific investigations? Chapter Introduction.
Students proficient in this standard What do the Standards for Mathematical Practice mean in the context of the Conceptual Category: Geometry?
An example of the “axiomatic approach” from geometry
Presentation transcript:

Philosophy of Mathematics

References Benacerraf, P., "Mathematical Truth", in The Philosophy of Mathematics, Hart, W.D., (Ed.), (1996), Oxford University Press, New York, p. 14-30. Coffa, J.A., The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station, (1991), Cambridge University Press, New York. Davis, P.J., & Hersh, R., The Mathematical Experience, (1990), Penguin Books, Toronto. Hart, W.D., (Ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics, (1996), Oxford University Press, New York. Shapiro, Stewart, Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology, (2000), Oxford University Press

Dieudonné characterizes the mathematician as follows: we believe in the reality of mathematics, but of course when philosophers attack us with their paradoxes we rush to hide behind formalism and say "mathematics is just a combination of meaningless symbols" . . . Finally we are left in peace to go back to our mathematics, with the feeling each mathematician has that he is working on something real. (Dieudonné in Davis and Hersh, [1981], p. 321)

Davis and Hersh, also, describe mathematician as: the typical mathematician is a [realist] on weekdays and a formalist on Sundays. That is, when he is doing mathematics he is convinced that he is dealing with an objective reality . . . But then, when challenged to give a philosophical account of this reality, he finds it easiest to pretend that he does not believe in it after all. (Davis and Hersh, [1981], p.321)

As Coffa notes, [t]he semantic tradition consisted of those who believed in the a priori but not in the constitutive powers of the mind . . . the root of all idealist confusion lay in misunderstandings concerning matters of meaning. Semanticists are easily detected: They devote an uncommon amount of attention to concepts, propositions, and senses . . . (Coffa, [1991], p.1)

All these authors were questioning about what objects mentioned in mathematical statements exist, about what mathematical statements we can know, about what mathematical statements are true or false.

mathematical practice and philosophical theorizing Stewart responds to the concern: ‘philosophy-first’ the principles of mathematics receive their authority, if any, from philosophy. Because we need a philosophical account of what mathematics is about; only then can we determine what qualifies as correct mathematical reasoning.

‘philosophy-last’ holds that mathematics is an autonomous science that doesn’t need to borrow its authority from other disciplines. On this view, philosophers have no right to legislate mathematical practice but must always accept mathematicians’ own judgment.

What Place Does Philosophy Have in Teaching Mathematics?

What is Mathematics? B. Russell Mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true. Bertrand Russell, Mysticism and Logic (1917) ch. 4

What is Philosophy of Mathematics? Ontology for Mathematics: “Being” Ontology studies the nature of the objects of mathematics. It is the claim that mathematical objects exist independently of their linguistic expression. “What we are talking about.” What is a number? What is a point? line? What is a set? In what sense do these objects exist?

What is Philosophy of Mathematics? Epistemology for Mathematics: “Knowing” Epistemology studies the acquisition of knowledge of the truth of a mathematical statement. “whether what we are saying is true.” Does knowledge come from experience and evidence? Does knowledge come from argument and proof? Is knowledge relative or absolute?

Platonism Platonism: is one of the main theories in the philosophy of mathematics, and is one the major explanations of what mathematics really is.  The question it attempts to answer is whether mathematical truth has an independent existence do: mathematicians discover mathematical truths that are, in some sense, out there to be found, or do they invent or create them? The answer to this question will determine the very way in which mathematician will look at his or her subject, and it is also part of the question of whether mathematics is a science or an art, or even possibly a game. The Platonist position, based (as the name implies) on ideas in the works of Plato, is that mathematical truth is discovered.  The idea is that mathematics consists of absolute truths, which were a prior (needing no other foundation, but being inescapable consequences of logical deduction). This position was reiterated by Kant in the 18th century, particularly with respect to Euclidean geometry.

What is Philosophy of Mathematics? According to Plato, knowledge is a subset of that which is both true and believed

What is Philosophy of Mathematics? Formalism / Deductivism- is a school of thought that all work in mathematics should be reduced to manipulations of sentences of symbolic logic, using standard rules.  It was the logical outcome of the 19th-century search for greater rigor in mathematics.  Programmes were established to reduce the whole of known mathematics to set theory (which seemed to be among the most generally useful branches of the science).  First attempts to do this included those of Bertrand Russell and A.N. Whitehead in Principia Mathematica (1910), and the later Hilbert Programme.

Semantic is a discipline concerned with inquiry into the meaning of symbols, and especially linguistic meaning. Semantics in this sense is often contrasted with syntax, which deals with structures, and pragmatics, which deals with the use of symbols in their relation to speakers, listeners and social context.

Roles for Philosophy in Teaching and Learning For the Teacher/Mentor (T/M) Awareness of issues can alert the T/M to excessively authoritarian approaches. Alternative philosophical views can allow the T/M to use and/or develop alternatives to traditional approaches. Philosophical issues can illuminate the value of and need for developing a variety of mathematical tools for “solving problems”.

Roles for Philosophy in Teaching and Learning For the Student/Learner (S/L) Helps the S/L understand the context, goals, and objectives of the mathematics being studied. Opens the S/L to considerations of the human values and assumptions made in developing and using mathematics. Alerts the S/L to the use of authority and the value of different approaches to mathematics.

Exploring Examples Following are few examples of topics that can be used to introduce and explore some philosophical issues in mathematic subjects at a variety of levels. Consider how these examples can be expanded or transformed to other aspects of the philosophy of mathematics. Consider how these examples can be expanded or transformed to other mathematics topics and/or courses.

The Square Root of Two Questions for Open Discussion Ontological: Definition? Does it exist? What is the nature of this object? Epistemological How do we know it exists? How do we know it is “between 1 and 2” How do we know it is not a rational number?

Squares, Diagonals, and Square Roots Learning Objectives   Students will: Measure the sides and diagonals of squares. Make predictions about, and explore the relationship between, side lengths and diagonals. Formulate a rule for finding the length of a diagonal based on the side length.

Teacher Reflection As the students were measuring the sides and diagonals of their squares, what did you observe about accuracy and precision? If students had trouble measuring their shapes, what can you do in the future to improve this skill? What alternative patterns or methods did students discover that you did not anticipate? If the students did not discover alternate patterns, do you think there are any? Could you have led the students in another direction? How did the students demonstrate understanding of the materials presented? Were concepts presented too abstractly? Too concretely? How will you change the lesson if you teach it in the future?

2005 Curriculum Expectations Grade 6-8 Measurement Select and apply techniques and tools to accurately find length, area, volume, and angle measures to appropriate levels of precision. Understand, select, and use units of appropriate size and type to measure angles, perimeter, area, surface area, and volume.

2005 Curriculum Expectations Grade 6-8 Geometry Understand relationships among the angles, side lengths, perimeters, areas, and volumes of similar objects. Use geometric models to represent and explain numerical and algebraic relationships.

The End Thank you  Questions? Comments? Discussion?