Teresa Krenning, P.E. St. Louis District. National Rank WWD Fatal Crashes StateAverage FrequencyPercent of U.S. Total Texas3814% California2610% Florida218%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Traffic Control Devices Consortium Pooled Fund Study June 2007 Co-Chairs: Scott Wainwright (FHWA) Scott Thorson (Nevada DOT) Technical Liaisons: Thomas.
Advertisements

Chapter 12 Freeway Driving.
Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
57 th Traffic Conference. The National Problem — ,200 Fatalities 2.68M Injuries $230.6B / year $820 per person 3.3 Million Deaths Since 1928.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
“ Pavement markings can enhance safety since centerlines have been shown to cut crash frequency by 29% compared to roads without them ” Wisconsin Transportation.
Pedestrian Safety Master Plan. This Presentation Similarities and Differences with Other Areas No Magic Bullet Site, Corridor Specific Multiple, Complementary.
Signs, Signals and Roadway Markings
Preventing Runovers and Backovers
Unit 2 Ch 2 Drive Right/Ch 7&8 Rules of the Road
INTERSTATE DRIVING Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
Freeway Signing Plan Design April 29, 2008
Part 3 – Markings. Dotted (not broken) lane lines shall be used for non-continuing lanes:  Lane drops  Auxiliary lanes  Deceleration lanes  Acceleration.
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David Rayburn.
MODULE 6 Objectives: Students will learn about using risk reducing strategies to manage multiple-lane roads at speeds up to 65 mph in complex risk environments.
Chapter 2 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
CHAPTER 3 SIGNS, SIGNALS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
Chapter 2 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
Chapter 2 Notes Traffic Signs.
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
PAVEMENT MARKINGS, TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHTS,
Characteristics of an Expressway Brandon Dye Wednesday October 24, 2007.
Driving on Expressways
Expressway Driving. Characteristics of Expressway Driving Roadway Speed Interchanges No cross traffic Median Tollbooths Entrance/exit ramps Limited access.
Office of Traffic, Safety, and Operations Application Guidelines Warning Signs Signing Plan Design (At-Grade) June 20, 2012.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
Interstate 435 and Front Street Interchange Improvements This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
Chapter 11 Driving on Expressways
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Improving Safety For Incident Responders Illinois Department of Transportation Update: June 2010 MODULE 5 INCIDENT.
INTERSECTION SAFETY PERFORMANCE AND AUDIT Andy Loonan Basak Aldemir-Bektas Intersection: Welch Avenue & Lincoln Way.
Traffic Engineering Division Traffic Operations Traffic Administration Construction and maintenance of traffic control devices. Engineering design Signal.
Expressway Driving Some of the East / West interstate expressways.
Traffic Control Devices, Traffic Laws, Signs, Signals and Markings.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Speed Limits, Speed Control and Stopping Regulations.
Statewide Analysis Strategies Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways.
Highways and Airports Engineering Project Lecture 2 Highway Signs and Markings Cairo University Faculty of Engineering Public Works Department Dr. Dalia.
lesson 2.3 ROADWAY MARKINGS
Chapter 2 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
Ch 11 Driving on Expressways Characteristics of Expressway Driving.
How would a truck get through? Any suggestions?. No parking allows access.
MICHIGAN’s INITIATIVES FOR REDUCING HIGHWAY FATALITIES.
Signs Signals and Pavement Markings
Office of Traffic, Safety, and Operations 1 Signing by Type of Interchange –Figures 2E-25 through 2E-30 show applications of guide signs for common types.
Understanding Work Zones
Successes in Reducing Highway Fatalities Kathy Harvey, MoDOT State Design Engineer July 16, 2008 Albuquerque, N.M.
Intersections.
INTERSECTION WARNING SYSTEMS Jon Jackels Mn/DOT ITS Program Engineer Traffic Topics April 7, 2011.
Unit 2: Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
ROADWAY MARKINGS A roadway marking gives a warning or direction. Roadway markings are usually lines, words, or symbols painted on the roadway. Some markings.
IDS Project Update on Human Factors and Simulation (Geometry Completed)
Road Safety Audits Road School, 2011 Rick Drumm, P.E. Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration.
Lesson Plan For Day Two Power point presentation 30 min Video– AAA- signs, signals, etc. 20 min Quiz- Signs Etc 10 min Correct 10 min H/O- Signs 10 min.
Indiana MUTCD: for Operations & Maintenance Issues/Solutions – Part II.
UNIT 3 Foundations of Effective Driving
Pedestrian Safety.
FDOT Research concerning the detection, mitigation, and prevention of wrong way crashes Darryll Dockstader Florida Department of Transportation.
CTDOT Traffic Safety Engineering
Signs, Signals, and Markings
Signs, Signals, and Markings
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
Principal Investigator: Melisa D. Finley, P.E.
Signs, Signals, and Road Markings
Infrastructure Strategy 1: Implement roadway improvements that compensate for impacts of aging on safe driving Strategy 2: Implement improvements to.
CHAPTER 4 SAFE DRIVING RULES & REGULATIONS
lesson 2.3 ROADWAY MARKINGS
Chapter 2 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
2019 NOCoE TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY TOURNAMENT
Presentation transcript:

Teresa Krenning, P.E. St. Louis District

National Rank WWD Fatal Crashes StateAverage FrequencyPercent of U.S. Total Texas3814% California2610% Florida218% Pennsylvania114% Missouri104% Mississippi93%

WWD National Findings Obviously a more severe crash type 57% Urban Over 2/3 occur at night 58% Impaired Driver Younger drivers (<65) more likely impaired Male drivers twice as likely as a female driver Older drivers are overrepresented Interchange Types (exit ramps) Partial Clover Diamond (esp. when closely spaced outer roads are present)

WWD Crashes on Missouri Interstates

Challenges Where are the High Risk Locations How Do You Get Attention of Drivers Staying MUTCD Compliant Spike Strips – Not MUTCD Compliant Determining Points of Entry Lots and Lots of Ramps

High Risk Locations - Partial Clover

High Risk Locations - Diamond

Getting Drivers Attention

MUTCD Compliance

STRATEGIES Existing Standards

Geometric Improvements Separate Entrance & Exit Ramps Install Raised Curb Median Install Longitudinal Channelizers Change Ramp Geometrics (Less Inviting): Obtuse Angle Sharp Corner Radii

Signing Implement Standard Sign Package Signs are in Place and Visible Double Up of “WRONG WAY” and “DO NOT ENTER” Signs Additional Measures (Supplemental): Reflective Tape on Sign Posts Increase Size of Signs (Oversize) Lower Sign Heights Add Freeway Entrance Sign (D13-3a)

Pavement Marking STOP Lines Paint Arrows on Ramps Turn/Through-Lane-Only Arrow Red Raised Pavement Markers Paint Short Dashed Lane Delineation Through Turns

Combo Strategies

Emerging Strategies Lower Warning Signs Picture from TxDOT Dynamic Warning Systems - ITS Technologies

PILOT WWD PROJECT St. Louis

Pilot Project – data analysis Wrong Way Crash data reviewed for Crash locations plotted Law Enforcement counseled on where drivers were entering the freeway I-44 Corridor selected crashes reviewed 5 fatal 4 disabling injury 7 minor injury 9 property damage only 22 crashes at night Possibly 3 out of the 25 involved drug and alcohol

Pilot Project – Site Conditions

Pilot Project – Scoping & Site Designs Specific field conditions reviewed: Limited sight distance Utility issues Existing signing Retaining walls Project funding availability Sequential ramps or close proximity desired

Pilot Project – Final Ramp Selections Eastbound: Off Ramp to Hampton Ave, Exit 286 Off Ramp to Lafayette Ave, Exit 290B Off Ramp to S. Jefferson Ave, Exit 289 Westbound: Off Ramp to Arsenal St., Exit 284B Off Ramp to Grand/Louisiana, Exit 288 Off Ramp to Hampton Ave, Exit 286 Off Ramp to S. Jefferson Ave, Exit 289 Off Ramp to Vandeventer Ave, Exit 287B

Pilot Project – Dynamic Warning System Flashing LED signs solar-powered radar activated 2 yr BlinkLink™ webbased traffic device monitor and control through TAPCO

Pilot Project – Installation Testing jefferson_EB.MTS

Pilot Project – Early Results System activated November Wrong Way Drivers confirmed No documented crashes linked to these 3 confirmed Wrong Way drivers Too early to tell if it works

SAN ANTONIO PILOT PROJECT

San Antonio Pilot Project ITS Technologies LED Illuminated Signs Use Dynamic Signs to Warn Other Drivers Use Existing GPS Navigation Technologies to Provide Alerts to Driver Provide Alerts to Law Enforcement Use Consistent and Intuitive Messages Picture from TxDOT

Does It Work? Freeway Wrong-Way Detection in San Antonio Combine with Ramp Systems (Flashing Signs) Utilize ITS Efforts to Provide Driver Alerts on DMS Alerts Law Enforcement TxDOT is Seeing a 29% Reduction from San Antonio Pilot Project Since July 2012

QUESTIONS ?

When all else fails…