Proposed Code of Practice for Inspections 3 rd Edition David Capon JAG UK Manager Keith O’Brien Cable & Wireless Worldwide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRAFT GUIDANCE NOTE FOR MEMBER STATES ON FRAUD RISK ASSESSMENT
Advertisements

PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT RULES COMMITTEE 15 MARCH 2012 ON THE PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PANEL ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED.
Street Works Inspection of Street works Sites
ASHINGTON ASSOCIATES Diversionary Works Code of Practice - Update ‘Back to the STREET WORKS 2005 NEW RULES, NEW TECHNOLOGY, A NEW TOMORROW? 18.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
Newsletter 18 January 2013 Inside this Issue: Building Code 2013 Latest CPI Index Bullying and Harassment Building and Construction Code Improve your Workplace.
LexisNexis Pacific 1 Marcus Beveridge / Tina Hwang (Principal/ Solicitor) Queen City Law Better Building Blueprint : Build it right first time.
1 Licensing in the Energy Sector Georgian National Energy And Water Supply Regulation Commission Nugzar Beridze June 27 – July 3, 2008.
Moving existing CFI projects to the ERF. What will be covered in this webinar Main changes in moving from the CFI to the ERF Preparing to participate.
UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.
Eddie Owen Network Technical Manager Veolia Water Graham Barnwell Street Works Manager Wokingham Borough Council Proposed New Charges for Unreasonably.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Sickness Absence Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE SCRUTINY OF 20MPH SPEED LIMITS Rupert Thacker Team Leader – Forward Planning and Rail Liaison.
Regulatory Assessment Fees 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
CSS Compliance Testing Project Presented by Chris Walker CSS 18 May 2005.
Compliance Update for California Hedge Funds April 11, 2011 Presented by Bart Mallon Mallon P.C.
Financial Matters Ron Ferrill, District Treasurer 2011 PETS.
The Tax Credit Process (Once credit has been awarded) Reservation and Carryover Gross Rent Floor Election Form Commitment 10% Certification Quarterly Progress.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
Sickness Absence Procedures
PENSIONS AUTO-ENROLMENT Neil Bhan DAC Beachcroft LLP 5 March 2013.
John Stem 7 th Annual Summit on VR PEQA Louisville, Kentucky.
Penalty Tax and Tax Offences © National Core Accounting Publications1 Chapter 26.
André Imich, SEN and Disability Professional Adviser, DfE.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
DM v8J These slides remain the property of The Pensions Regulator and their content should not be altered on reproduction. Industry liaison team.
© Russell Kennedy Pty Ltd 2012 Accommodation Bonds: Use and Governance Requirements Rosemary Southgate Principal 20 June
SEPA Compliance Assessment Scheme. Aims and Benefits 1.Proportionate 2.Consistent, fair and legally correct 3.Transparent and accountable 4.Targeted,
ROAD ADOPTION PROCESS TOPIC GROUP OVERVIEW OF HCC ROAD ADOPTION PROCESS DAVID HUMBY 24 TH & 25 TH FEBRUARY 2010.
Roger Williams Traffic Manager East Sussex County Council Traffic Management Act 2004 A highway authority view.
Presentation Audit Committee Institute Ireland Conrad Hotel, Dublin 2 7 September 2004.
Leadership Pay Conference Changes to Teachers Pay 2014 Wednesday 4th June 2014 Facilitators: Mark Nelson – Schools HR Hans Formella – Ealing NAHT.
Presented By: Allen Cummings, California Jay Starling, Alabama IFTA/IRP Audit Workshop Impact of Plan Rewrite on Auditors January 2008.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
DM v2 This presentation remains the property of The Pensions Regulator. The content of these slides should not be altered in any way. Understanding.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Property Factors (Scotland) Act 2011 Grant Hunter 21 March 2013.
National Landlords Association NLA NEWS and UPDATE Joanne Dron.
1 中央大學營管所學分班 工程契約與文件管理 CHAPTER 16 TEST AFTER COMPLETION Silver Book, 2002 Clause 12. 授課教授 : 謝定亞 博士 學員 : 陳忠正 ( 研發中心管線組 )
Legislation Update: The Packaging Regulations, the WEEE Regulations and the Batteries Directive Tessa Bowering Environment Officer (Waste)
R EGISTERED A DMINISTRATORS T HE P ENSIONS B OARD 11 TH AND 12 TH J UNE
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson MAV Rate Capping Forum 26 November 2015.
Financial Management of Rural Development Programmes DG AGRI, October 2005.
CIVIL PARKING ENFORCEMENT Environment & Regeneration Scrutiny Committee 24 January 2007.
NRA HD 16 Inspections of Temporary Safety Measures Alastair de Beer, Chartered Engineer, MIEI NRA Project Manager (Safety) April 2012.
ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (RISM) Harry Cullen SPM Road Safety, National Roads Authority, Ireland Chairman of CEDR Technical Group.
- 1 - Noticing the Work Julie Payne – SSE Street works Manager.
Savills.com CIL Latest Research & Findings Emily Harvey, Associate.
The Repairing Standard ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS AND APPLIANCES.
1 Display Screen Equipment amendments in accordance with the Health and Safety (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2002.
Pat Nestor MSCSI MRICS Head of Building Control Dublin City Council
The Apprenticeship Levy and the Construction Sector
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Project Control
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
2016 IPWEAvic Public Works Conference
Distribution Workgroup 24/11/16
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT, No 55, 1998 (EEA)
Procedures for dealing with Defective Safety Measures
Schools Causing Concern – DfE Statutory Guidance
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Multijurisdictional Agreements
Overview of the Children and Families Act 2014
Transmission Workstream 2nd December 2010
Modification Proposal 136
A GUIDE TO MAKING TAX DIGITAL (MTD) FOR VAT
Joint Office UNC Elections
Joint Office UNC Elections
The UK Trade Remedies Regime: Review of Existing EU Trade Orders
Joint Office UNC Elections
Statutory induction briefing
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Code of Practice for Inspections 3 rd Edition David Capon JAG UK Manager Keith O’Brien Cable & Wireless Worldwide

Why change the existing Code?  To introduce regulations for a Statutory Code  The need to incorporate the extra 10% inspections proposed by the Section 74 and Permits Working Groups  To include options for a more targeted regime  A move to electronic means of reporting  Due to come into operation on the 6th April 2011

The Code details Inspections that an Authority may carry out to ensure compliance with legal obligations. It provides guidance on: Procedures for Inspections Investigatory works New performance monitoring arrangements It also identifies actions to address issues on non compliance relating to: Reinstatements Safety Measures Section 74 Permit conditions NB: The Inspections Working Group are still deliberating the consultation responses and the current draft code may be subject to change. The Inspection Code of Practice The Inspections Code of Practice

Inspection Co – Inspection Stages Inspection Categories Standard Sample Inspections Inspections are now called ‘Standard Inspections’ and sample inspections are now called ‘Standard Sample Inspections’ There are 5 Standard Sample Inspections: Category A – Safety measures (these do not include reinstatements) Category B – Quality of reinstatement (within 6 months) Category C - Quality of reinstatement (3 months prior to end of guarantee period) Category D – Section 74 compliance Category E – Permit condition compliance

Category F – Third party inspections An inspection that occurs as a result of a street works related complaint from a third party. If a defect is identified the undertaker will be obliged to pay the prescribed fee. Category G – Defective reinstatement follow-up inspections. These occur after a reinstatement defect has been identified and consists of: Joint inspection (Stage 1) – A joint Inspection to determine the nature of the failure and what remedial works need to be undertaken NB: Joint inspections may not be required if agreed by both parties Remedial works in progress (Stage 2) – An inspection by the authority whilst works are in progress Remedial works complete (Stage 3) – An inspection by the authority when the remedial works are complete Inspection Categories Cont’d

Category H – Non-compliance follow-up inspection This inspection category will occur after an earlier instance of a street works unreasonably prolonged occupation of the highway or non-compliance with permit conditions of which there are two types: Section 74 follow-up Following an earlier instance of there being unreasonably prolonged occupation of the highway. An inspection carried out as a result of a previous section 74 non-compliance Permit follow-up An inspection carried out as a result of a previous instance of non-compliance with a permit condition NB: It is proposed to introduce an additional defective reinstatement non-compliance inspection This category of inspection may result in the undertaker being obliged to pay the authority the prescribed fee

Inspection Categories Cont’d Category I and J – Performance monitoring inspections Inspections carried out by an authority as part of the performance monitoring regime. These in practice focus on the same obligations as category A, B and C inspections. Category I Inspection of street works in progress checking for compliance with safety measures as defined in the ‘Street Works and Road Works C.O.P. Category J Performance reinstatement inspections of interim/permanent reinstatements to check for compliance with the SROH. These inspections are carried out during the six months following the reinstatement completion date. All performance monitoring inspections carried out are capable of attracting a fee. They are not considered standard inspections and are not counted as part of the calculation used to work out the sample of standard inspection for which there will be an obligation to pay a prescribed fee.

Chargeable Sample Standard Inspections Duty of Undertaker to pay relevant Fee The number of inspections that may be undertaken in a given year will be no more than 30% of the reckonable total calculated for each utility An authority can apportion the 30% sample across any of the five standard inspection categories, i.e. Cats A to E as it sees fit to suit its priorities These may be varied by the authority as necessary at any time during the year taking account of inspections already taken If sample standard inspections do not take place within the timescales then they may only be considered as standard inspections and WILL NOT incur a fee Third party and follow up inspections are not standard inspections. Inspection Categories Cont’d

Performance Monitoring The performance monitoring scheme becomes operational where an undertaker fails to meet the quality threshold and takes into account issues on non-compliance in relation to section 65 (safety measures and/or section 71 (material, workmanship and standard of reinstatement) Performance criteria: The quality threshold is that no more than 10% of either category A, B or C sample standard inspections reveal a defect over a given quarter. A quarter is considered to be one of the following time periods: April to June, July to September, October to December and January to March. An authority may give a performance notification if: a) More than 10% of the standard sample category A inspections undertaken in a quarter reveal a defect; or b) More than 10% of the standard sample cat B inspections undertaken in a quarter reveal a defect: or c) More than 10% of the standard sample category C inspections undertaken in a quarter reveal a defect All of the above exclude abortive visits.

Performance Monitoring cont’d Performance Notification: Only one performance notification per utility shall be given for each quarter but in may contain more than one category of failure. The performance monitoring scheme cannot be started in relation to a category of inspection which is already under the scheme. Prior to giving a performance notification, the authority should review all the instances of non- compliance to see if mitigating circumstances apply. The above criteria does not apply where the utility carries out 50 or fewer works in a quarter or where there are 15 or fewer inspections of a specific category Performance Monitoring period: Starts on the commencement date given in the performance monitoring notification: the commencement date will be between 15 days and 20 days after notification has been given. The initial performance monitoring period shall be for 12 consecutive weeks and shall be extended in 4 week increments and will continue until the criteria has been met over the most recent 12 consecutive weeks. Provided that the performance monitoring criteria has been met (when there is a pass rate of 90% or greater) the authority shall give a performance end notification to the undertaker within 5 days.

Inspection Percentages for Sample Failure Rates Percentage sample failure rate for the previous quarter Performance Inspection percentage “P” Multiplier P/52 Up to and including 10% 0%0 More than 10% and up to and including 30% 50% More than 30% and up to and including 50% 70% More than 50% and up to and including 70% 90% More than 70% Up to 100% Note: The formula gives a weekly figure The annually agreed number of sample inspections times the multiplier and times by the number of weeks in the monitoring period usually 12 weeks Inspections a year at 11 % failure would generate 5 extra inspection a week for a further 12 weeks = 60 extra inspections.

Inspection Fees Fees are only payable when supported by a Works Inspection Report, if an inspection does not take place there will be no fee. Standard Sample Inspections (cat A – D) to check compliance - £50 Standard Sample Inspection (cat E) permit conditions - £56.50 Third Party Inspection (cat F) - £68.00 Defective Reinstatement Follow-up Inspections (cat G) - £47.50 NB: No fee if a joint inspection does not take place Non-Compliance Follow-up Inspections (cat H) – £47.50 Performance Monitoring Inspections (cat I & J) – £47.50

THANK YOU THANK YOU