McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Risk and Risk Aversion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 11 Optimal Portfolio Choice
Advertisements

Introduction The relationship between risk and return is fundamental to finance theory You can invest very safely in a bank or in Treasury bills. Why.
Diversification and Risky Asset Allocation
Chapter 8 Principles of Corporate Finance Eighth Edition Risk and Return Slides by Matthew Will Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All.
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter.
Risk and Return: Past and Prologue CHAPTER 5. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Holding Period Return.
Today Risk and Return Reading Portfolio Theory
AN INTRODUCTION TO PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
1 Fin 2802, Spring 10 - Tang Chapter 6: Asset Allocation Fina2802: Investments and Portfolio Analysis Spring, 2010 Dragon Tang Lecture 9 Capital Allocation.
Fall-02 Investments Zvi Wiener tel: Risk and Risk Aversion BKM Ch.
Combining Individual Securities Into Portfolios (Chapter 4)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2001 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-1 Capital Allocation Between the Risky Asset and the Risk-Free.
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Chapter 6 An Introduction to Portfolio Management.
Risk and Risk Aversion Chapter6. W = 100 W 1 = 150 Profit = 50 W 2 = 80 Profit = -20 p =.6 1-p =.4 E(W) = pW 1 + (1-p)W 2 = 6 (150) +.4(80) = 122  2.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Efficient Diversification CHAPTER 6.
1 Chapter 09 Characterizing Risk and Return McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS ©2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets.
Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk-Free Asset
AN INTRODUCTION TO PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
11-1 Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Risk and Risk Aversion.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 6-1 Risk and Risk Aversion Chapter 6.
Measuring Returns Converting Dollar Returns to Percentage Returns
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Chapter.
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Risk Premiums and Risk Aversion
Optimal Risky Portfolios
Portfolio Management-Learning Objective
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 7.
Finding the Efficient Set
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 11 Diversification and Risky Asset Allocation.
Some Background Assumptions Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Chapter 7.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 21 A Basic Look at Portfolio Management and Capital.
Risks and Rates of Return
Risk and Capital Budgeting Chapter 13. Chapter 13 - Outline What is Risk? Risk Related Measurements Coefficient of Correlation The Efficient Frontier.
0 Portfolio Managment Albert Lee Chun Construction of Portfolios: Introduction to Modern Portfolio Theory Lecture 3 16 Sept 2008.
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation Risk Tolerance Asset Allocation Capital Allocation Line.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk-Free.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Portfolio risk and return measurement Module 5.2.
1 Risk Learning Module. 2 Measures of Risk Risk reflects the chance that the actual return on an investment may be different than the expected return.
Chapter 13 Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line Copyright © 2012 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management First Canadian Edition By Reilly, Brown, Hedges, Chang 6.
Risk and Return: Portfolio Theory and Assets Pricing Models
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Efficient Diversification CHAPTER 6.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Seventh Edition.
1 THE FUTURE: RISK AND RETURN. 2 RISK AND RETURN If the future is known with certainty, all investors will hold assets offering the highest rate of return.
5-1 CHAPTER 5 Risk and Rates of Return Rates of Return Holding Period Return: Rates of Return over a given period Suppose the price of a share.
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Understanding Risk.
Bodie Kane Marcus Perrakis RyanINVESTMENTS, Fourth Canadian Edition Copyright © McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 2003 Slide 6-1 Chapter 6.
Bodie Kane Marcus Perrakis RyanINVESTMENTS, Fourth Canadian Edition Copyright © McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 2003 Slide 5-1 Chapter 5.
Chapter 6 Efficient Diversification. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. r p = W 1 r 1 + W 2 r 2 W 1 = Proportion.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Risk and Return: Capital Market Theory Chapter 8.
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Risk and Risk Aversion Chapter 6.
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk-Free Asset
2. Building efficient portfolios
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Global Equity Markets.
Presentation transcript:

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Risk and Risk Aversion

6-2 Suppose that your initial wealth is $100. Assume two possible outcome exists, final wealth is is $150 with probability of Otherwise it is $80 with probability of 0.40 a less favorable outcome.

6-3 W = 100 W 1 = 150 Profit = 50 W 2 = 80 Profit = -20 p =.6 1-p =.4 E(W) = pW 1 + (1-p)W 2 = 6 (150) +.4(80) = 122  2 = p[W 1 - E(W)] 2 + (1-p) [W 2 - E(W)] 2 =.6 ( )2 +.4(80-122)2 = 1,176,000   Risk - Uncertain Outcomes

6-4 This is risky because std dev (34.293)  22 ( ) T-bills are one alternative to the risky portfolio, 1 year t-bill offers a rate of return 5%. There is a certain $5 profit. Exp profit: 22 Exp marginal or incremental profit of the risky portfolio over investing in safe t-bills is 22-5=17 (risk premium)

6-5 W 1 = 150 Profit = 50 W 2 = 80 Profit = -20 p =.6 1-p = Risky Inv. Risk Free T-billsProfit = 5 Risk Premium = 17 Risky Investments with Risk-Free

6-6 Investor’s view of risk Risk Averse Risk Neutral Risk Seeking Risk Aversion & Utility

6-7 Risk averse investors are willing to consider only risk-free assets or speculative prospects with only positive risk premiums. Risk neutral investors judge risky prospects just by their expected returns.

6-8 Utility Function Investor’s preferences toward the exp. return and risk may be expressed by the utility function that is higher for higher exp. returns and lower for higher risks. More risk-averse investors will apply greater penalties for risk. The greater the risk, the larger the penalty. We can formalize the risk-penalty system. We will assume that each investor can assign a utility score. Portfolios receive higher utility scores for higher exp. returns and lower score for higher risk (volatility). Utility Function U = E ( r ) A  2 A measures the degree of risk aversion

6-9 Risk Aversion and Value: U = E ( r ) A  2 = A (34%) 2 Risk AversionAValue High Low T-bill = 5%

6-10 Problem 1 A portfolio has an expected rate of return of 20% and standard deviation of 20%. Bills offer a sure rate of return of 7%. Which investment alternative will be chosen by an investor A = 4? What if A=8

6-11 Solution 1 For A=4 Utility of Risky portfolio; U = 20 – (.005x4x20 2 )=12% Utility for bills; U = 7 – (.005x4x0) = 7% The investors will prefer the risky portfolio to bills.

6-12 For A=8 Utility of Risky portfolio; U = 20 – (.005x8x20 2 )=4% Utility for bills; U = 7 – (.005x8x0) = 7% The more risk averse investor prefers the risk free alternative.

6-13 Dominance Principle Expected Return Variance or Standard Deviation 2 dominates 1; has a higher return 2 dominates 3; has a lower risk 4 dominates 3; has a higher return

6-14 Utility and Indifference Curves Represent an investor’s willingness to trade-off return and risk. Example Exp RetSt Deviation U=E ( r ) -.005A  x4x400 = x4x650 = x4x900 = x4x1150=2

6-15 Indifference Curves Expected Return Standard Deviation Increasing Utility

6-16 A review of Portfolio Mathematics Example: Suppose that the value of the Best Candy stock is sensitive to the price of sugar. In years when world sugar crops are low, the price of sugar increases and Best Candy suffers considerable losses. Normal Year for SugarAbnormal Year Bullish Bearish Stock Mrk Stock MrkSugar Crisis Probability Rate of Return 25% 10% -25%

6-17 Expected Return Rule 1 : The return for an asset is the probability weighted average return in all scenarios.

6-18 Variance of Return Rule 2: The variance of an asset’s return is the expected value of the squared deviations from the expected return. =357

6-19 Return on a Portfolio Rule 3: The rate of return on a portfolio is a weighted average of the rates of return of each asset comprising the portfolio, with the portfolio proportions as weights. r p = W 1 r 1 + W 2 r 2 W 1 = Proportion of funds in Security 1 W 2 = Proportion of funds in Security 2 r 1 = Expected return on Security 1 r 2 = Expected return on Security 2

6-20 Suppose you are going to invest 50% of your money into Best Candy stock and remainder in T-bills, which yield 5% rate of return. E(rp)=.5 E(rbest) +.5 rbills =.5 x x 5= 7.75%

6-21 Portfolio Risk with Risk-Free Asset Rule 4: When a risky asset is combined with a risk-free asset, the portfolio standard deviation equals the risky asset’s standard deviation multiplied by the portfolio proportion invested in the risky asset. σp=.5 σBest =.5 x 18.9 = 9.45%

6-22 Our portfolio analyst discovers that during years of sugar shortage, Sugarcane Co reaps unusual profits and its stock price increases (soars). A scenario analysis of Sugarcane’s stock; Normal Year for SugarAbnormal Year Bullish Bearish Stock Mrk Stock MrkSugar Crisis Probability Rate of Return 1% -5% 35% E(rcane)= 6% σcane= 14.73%

6-23 Sugarcane offers excellent hedging potential for holders of Best because its stock return is highest when Best’s return is lowest-during a sugar crisis. Suppose you split your investment between Best and Sugarcane. The rate of return for each scenario is the average rate of return on Best and Sugarcane.

6-24 Normal Year for SugarAbnormal Year Bullish Bearish Sugar Stock Mrk Stock Mrk Crisis Probability ROR 13% 2,5% 5% E(rhedged)= 8.35% σhedged= 4.83%

Alternatives Portfolio:E(r)σ 1. All in Best Candy 10.5% 18.50% 2. Half in T-bills Half in Sugarcane Third alternative has higher expected return and lower risk than the second one

6-26 Rule 5: When two risky assets with variances  1 2 and  2 2, respectively, are combined into a portfolio with portfolio weights w 1 and w 2, respectively, the portfolio variance is given by:  p 2 = w 1 2  w 2 2  W 1 W 2 Cov(r 1 r 2 ) Cov(r 1 r 2 ) = Covariance of returns for Security 1 and Security 2 Portfolio Risk

6-27 Covariance measures how much the return on two risky assets move in tandem. A positive covariance means that assets move together. A negative covariance means that they vary inversely. E(rbest)= 10.5%E(rcane)=6% Cov(rbase, rcane) =.5 ( ) (1-6) +.3 ( ) (-5-6) +.2 ( ) (35-6) = Sugarcane’s returns move inversely with Best’s.

6-28 Correlation coefficient: scales the covariance between to a value between -1 (perfectly negative correlation) and +1(perfectly positive correlation). Risk of portfolio consists of two assets. σp2= (0.54)2(-18.5)2+ (.50)2 (-14.73) x.5 x (-240.5)= 23.3 σp= 4.83%

6-29 Problem Suppose that the distribution of the Sugurcane stock were as follows; Bullish Bearish Sugar Stock Mrk Stock Mrk Crisis Probability ROR 7% -5% 20%

6-30 A. What would be its correlation with Best? B. Is Sugarcane stock a useful hedge asset now? C. Calculate the portfolio rate of return for each scenario and the standard deviation of the portfolio from the scenario returns. The evaluate standard deviation using Rule 5. D. Are the two methods of computing portfolio standard deviation consistent?

6-31 MIDTERM QUESTION 2 Calculate the correlation coefficients and covariances between each of your stocks in your portfolio.