Nuclear Meltdown at Chernobyl Austin Conn. Pripyat, Chernobyl, and Kiev Ukraine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONTROLS OF SUPER CRITICAL BOILERS
Advertisements

Three Mile Island (TMI-2)
Chernobyl Disaster. Chernobyl Built in Built in Chernobyl Chernobyl.
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history Czech Technical University In Prague 23 May 2007.
Chapter All matter is made up of atoms. Parts of an atom: 1. Nucleus – the center of an atom. Proton – Positively charged. ( + ) Neutron – have.
Nuclear Power.
Nuclear Power Station Lecture No 5. A generating station in which nuclear energy is converted into electrical energy is known as a Nuclear power station.
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine SS6G9 The student will discuss environmental issues in Europe a. Explain the major concerns of Europeans regarding.
Nuclear Disaster in Chernobyl, Ukraine CRCT Coach Pages
Nuclear Fission & Fusion Nuclear Fusion - Energy released when two light nuclei combine or fuse However, a large amount of energy is required to start.
23.4 Nuclear energy NUCLEARNUCLEAR POWERPOWER Millstone Station.
23.4 Nuclear energy NUCLEARNUCLEAR POWERPOWER Millstone Station.
Nuclear Power Dylan Waybright Kendall Caminiti Gina Raimondo Susan Ellington Paige Urbanovsky.
How they work and what happened at Fukushima Daiichi Plant.
Nuclear Reactors and Nuclear Energy Conversion of mass-energy to electrical energy mass-energy  thermal  kinetic  electric Produces large amounts of.
Nuclear Energy. The Fuel: Uranium Present nuclear power plants consume U- 235 as fuel Uranium has 92 protons Two isotopes are important. U-235 has an.
19.5 NUCLEAR POWER ZACH ANDERSON ADAM CORE CH.19 CONVENTIONAL ENERGY.
Nuclear Energy Chapter 12. Nuclear Fuel Cycle Uranium mines and mills U-235 enrichment Fabrication of fuel assemblies Nuclear power plant Uranium tailings.
Nuclear Disasters A Historical Look.
Daniel Stewart.  Accidents in a nuclear plant can range from minor emissions of radioactivity to catastrophic releases such as: - widespread radiation.
1. - Condensate pump and feed pump trip! -Turbine trips! 2.
A Tale of Scorched Earth-: Chernobyl
Kevin Burgee Janiqua Melton Alexander Basterash
THE CHERNOBYL DISASTER AND ETHICS West Virginia University EE 481 Group #10 Spring 2014 Floyd Baker - Matt Logue - Stuart Christie.
Worldwide Commercial Energy Production. Nuclear Power Countries.
Nuclear Power Generation In The United States. 103 Nuclear Power Reactors.
Chernobyl
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history.
Chernobyl Before dawn on April 26, 1986, less than two miles south of what was then a city of 50,000, the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant's number four reactor.
5Ws Activity Features of Nuclear Reactors. The nuclear reactor Control rods Moderator and coolant (water) Steel vessel Fuel pins Pump Concrete shield.
Chernobyl: Nuclear Core Reactor Meltdown. Background of Chernobyl Chernobyl is a city located in Ukraine. (Near the border of Belarus.) Largely abandoned.
Nuclear Power Plant Meltdown Zach, Luke, and Nick.
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
Chernobyl Sydney Curley.
Chapter 12 Nuclear Energy.
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Natural Convection as a Passive Safety Design in Nuclear Reactors
Safety Aspects Nuclear Energy. Physics Workshop Every Wednesday 3.40pm-4.40pm in O8 Every Wednesday 3.40pm-4.40pm in O8 Is this time good for most people?
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident April
BY: Zach Alexander JT Bagwell Bobby Dini Nixy Osorio Darren Ringer Trent Roling CHERNOBYL.
Environmental Issues in Europe III SS6G9 The students will discuss environmental issues in Europe…
Chapter 17, Section 2: Nuclear Energy Standards: SEV4a, e.
С hernobyl nuclear power plant accident in Ukraine. С hernobyl nuclear power plant accident in Ukraine.
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine. Meltdown At Chernobyl Video Clip: m?guidAssetId=D B06-462A-889D-
Nonrenewable Energy - Fossil Fuels Lecture: Nonrenewable Energy Unit Student Notes.
Nuclear Power. Nuclear Fuel  Primarily involve nuclear fission  Fuel: typically is uranium-235 Must be enriched, as the most abundant isotope of uranium.
Short how nuclear plant works how nuclear power works.
FUKUSHIMA Nuclear Disaster By Miss Dammarell & Mrs. Schwartz.
Coal-Fired Plant Coal is conveyed to boiler In primary water loop, water is boiled into steam Steam is sent through turbine Turbine spins the generator,
LOW PRESSURE REACTORS. Muhammad Umair Bukhari
BY ALEX DONAHUE, CAROLINE BARLOW, AND JACQUELYN O’REILLY Nuclear Power.
Nuclear Energy A presentation by Kyle Piper, Alex Guthrie, Kaj Harvey, Henry Lembeck.
Nuclear Power Plants A Brief Overview.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XV In-plant accident management Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by.
 II THE ADVANTAGES OF ELECTRICITY
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history
-Abigail rios December 1, rd pd.
Czech Technical University in Prague
Based on Actual Events K-19 Submarine The “Widowmaker”
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
Chapter 5 Energy Resources
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine
Chapter 20: Nuclear Energy
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history
Good Afternoon! #1. Please take out your agenda and write down your homework for tonight. #2. Write down the EQ in your EQ section of your binder. SPONGE:
West Kazakhstan State University of M. Utemisov Natural and geographical faculty Department of biology and ecology Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade.
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine
Nuclear disaster in ukraine
Presentation transcript:

Nuclear Meltdown at Chernobyl Austin Conn

Pripyat, Chernobyl, and Kiev Ukraine

Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant 4 RBMK-1000 Nuclear Reactors capable of providing 1,000 Megawatts per reactor. Reactor 1 was commissioned in 1977, with Reactors 2, 3, and 4 commissioned in 1978, 1981, and 1983, respectively. Two additional reactors, 5 and 6, were planned an reactor 5 was 70% completed at the time of the accident. Reactors 1 and 2 were first generation reactors, while 3 and 4 were second generation, equipped with more secure accident localization systems. These additional systems actually thwarted what could have been much more detrimental in a generation 1 reactor.

Pripyat City built to house the workers for the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. At the time of the accident: Population: 49, Schools 1 Hospital

Plant and Reactor Design Under normal operation, the plant is fed by the power grid. In the event of a loss of power, such as an emergency shut down or external loss of power, each reactor had 3 diesel backup generators to power the cooling pumps and other essential systems. These generators were to be started within 15 seconds of power loss. However, they took an additional seconds to reach operating speed. To bridge the 1 minute gap without power, it was theorized that the 220 ton turbine would have enough rotational energy to “coast” through the gap, providing power for the cooling pump.

Reactor Diagram

Testing Procedure Before beginning the test, the reactor’s thermal power output should be no less than 700MW. Upon starting the test, the steam turbine, weighing 220 tons, was to be run up to full speed, around 3000 RPM. Upon reaching full speed, the steam supply from the reactor was to be cut off. The emergency generators were to be started and run up to full power, about 5MW. The turbine’s performance was also to be recorded, albeit for testing. Upon reaching operating speed, the generators were to power the cooling pumps, and the turbine would be allowed to “freewheel” down.

Preparations Scheduled to take place during the day shift on April 25, 1986: Workers were to gradually reduce the reactor’s thermal output power, beginning at 1:06am. By the beginning of the day shift, the reactor was at 50% capacity. At some point in the beginning of the day shift, the power plant in Kiev unexpectedly went offline, and in order to maintain power for the coming evening demand, the test was postponed. At 11:04pm, the Kiev power plant went back online and the test was permitted to proceed.

Timeline of Events 12:05am – The thermal output of Reactor 4 reached 700MW. Sometime between 12:05am and 1:05 am: The reactor’s output, unknown to the operator, fell below 700MW due to a phenomenon known as reactor poisoning. Reactor poisoning is the build up of xenon-135, a neutron absorber. For an unknown reason, the operators inserted the control rods too far, further reducing the reactor’s output to approximately 500MW. This rendered the reactor in an unintended near-shutdown state. In this state, the reactor went “prompt supercritical,” a condition where power spikes exponentially in seconds. To prevent supercritical instances, 28 control rods were to remain inserted in the reactor as a means of control over the reactor’s output power.

Timeline of Events (Cont.) Upon reaching only 5% of the minimum initial power laid out in the testing procedure, the control room operators attempted to restore power to the reactor by means of disabling the automatic system responsible for keeping the reactor stable. This system was also in charge of the 28 control rods intended to remain inserted to prevent supercritical situations. Within several minutes of extracting the majority of the control rods, the reactor’s output rose and stabilized between 160 and 200MW. Due to operating at such low power, the poisoning of the reactor core restricted any further rise in reactor power. To counteract the poisoning of the reactor, the operators extracted additional control rods.

Timeline of Events (Cont.) 1:05am – A power level of 200MW was achieved. At this time, preparations for the test resumed and as per the test, additional coolant pumps were to be activated. 1:19am – The flow rate of coolant exceeds the limit, lowering the overall core temperature and raised alarms in the control room. To counter the core cooling, two coolant pumps were turned off and additional control rods were extracted.

Reactor State at Beginning of Test The reactor was in a highly unstable state, with numerous automated and passive safety features disabled. Of the 211 total control rods, including the 28 “fail-safe” rods, 193 controls rods were extracted, leaving only 18 left in the reactor. Of the eight total cooling pumps, six of which are to be operating under normal conditions, only four are operating.

The Emergency SCRAM System In the event of the reactor going supercritical, an Emergency SCRAM, or Emergency Shutoff, system is in place which manually inserts all 211 control rods into the reactor and is activated via the “AZ-5” protocol (Pronounced “A Zed Five”). To prevent the necessity of utilizing the AZ-5 protocol, the automated system was designed to control all 211 control rods and regulate the reactor from ever reaching such a state. However, the operators disabled this system. The two systems essentially do the same thing, however, the automated system shuts down the reactor in a more controlled and safe manner, where the AZ-5 protocol does not regulate the shutdown procedure.

The Test At 1:23:04am, the test began. The steam supply from the reactor to the turbine was shut off, initiating the run-down of the turbine generator. The diesel generators started and sequentially picked up loads. By design, the generator was to have satisfied the MCP’s power needs by 1:23:42am. However, as the momentum in the turbine decreased, so did the amount of power it supplied. This reduction in power caused the coolant flow to decrease and caused further poisoning in the reactor. One of the automated systems that was not disabled was able to control this poisoning by inserting control rods. This system, however, only had control of 12 of the 211 control rods, the majority of which were still fully extracted.

1:23:40 am, April 26 th, 1986 The SKALA Central Control System registered a manual emergency shutdown command (the AZ-5 protocol) and began the insertion of all control rods. The control rods are 7 meters tall, and move at 0.4 m/s. Within 18 to 20 seconds, all control rods should have been inserted. The control rods themselves are flawed, being constructed with graphite tips, the control rods displace the neutron-absorbing coolant with graphite, a material which does not absorb neutrons. This process actually increased the power at the top of the reactor. As the rods entered the reactor core, a power spike was recorded, and the core overheated, causing fuel rods to fracture and jammed the control rods at only 1/3 insertion, with the non-neutron absorbing graphite in the middle of the core.

1:23:40 am, April 26 th, 1986 (Cont.) Within three seconds, the reactor’s power output rose above 530MW. The last reading registered on any instrumentation shows the reactor’s output reaching 33,000MW, more than ten times its normal operational output. This surge in power caused any remaining coolant in the core to flash to steam, increasing the pressure within the reactor. The pressure generated was enough to life the 2000 ton upper plate off the reactor, which the entire reactor was fastened to. This is generally thought to be the first explosion.. The second explosion, occurring two to three seconds after the first is what terminated the nuclear reactor and exposed the core to air. Upon exposure to air, the graphite and other materials ignited, spewing radioactive material into the atmosphere.

The Aftermath As a result of the disaster, the nearby town of Pripyat was evacuated and an exclusion zone was established. The town of Pripyat, still to this day, is a moment, frozen in time. Teachings still written in classrooms, tables set for meals, toys left in the beds of children in orphanages. The area is expected to be uninhabitable until

Works Cited actor.jpg actor.jpg