Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 Panagiotis Koudoumakis Head of Programming and Evaluation Unit Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Developing Tools for Measuring Performance, the GfD Contribution Working Group on Civil Service and Integrity IV Regional Meeting École Nationale dAdministration.

Advertisements

Ireland Stat Fiachra Kennedy Central Expenditure Evaluation Unit Department of Public Expenditure & Reform.

Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.

1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.

Advanced Monitoring and Coordination of EU R&D Policies at Regional Level (AMCER) INNOVA Europe ESPON Seminar 2013 Krakow, Poland.

Accountability in the EU Accounting for performance – How to account for policy and regulatory impact EU Accountability Conference 14 October 2014 Manfred.

OECD/INFE High-level Principles for the evaluation of financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD.

Parallel Workshop Session 2: Workshop 5 Research, Innovation and Competitiveness Advanced Monitoring and Coordination of EU R&D Policies at Regional Level.

1 S3 Platform: Achievements and outlook on activities for 2014 Moritz Haller JRC, Unit for International, Interinstitutional and Stakeholder Relations.

Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.

Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.

BLACK SEA CBC 2013 Annual Conference 5th Decemeber 2013, İ stanbul Mehmet Bozdo ğ an Eastern Black Sea Development Agency.

A brief overview What is program evaluation? How is an evaluation conducted? When should it be used? When can it be used? Used with Permission of: John.

Association for the Education of Adults EAEA European AE Research – Look towards the future ERDI General Assembly, 2004.

Implementing RIS3: from Strategy to Action Plan Panagiotis Koudoumakis Head of Programming and Evaluation Unit Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia.

Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.

Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.

Innovation in the Rural Development Networks Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development Matthias Langemeyer & Iman Boot.

OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.

SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FP INCO-MPC-1 MEditerranean Development of Innovative Technologies for integrAted waTer managEment.

EP Preparatory Action for Eastern Macedonia & Thrace "Actual and desired state of the economic potential in regions outside the Greek capital Athens" European.

Evaluation of Programmes Targeting Higher Education Károly Mike Hétfa Research Institute 30 April 2013.

DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Fiscal Domain Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.

MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?

LOGICAL FRAMEWORK STRENGTHENING INTEGRITY and ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRAM 2 Ext. Implementor : SEKNAS FITRA Improved civil society involvement in controlling.

1 Second Regional Workshop on gender and Poverty Reduction Strategies, September 2003, Siem Reap Gender responsive costing and budgeting Nalini Burn.

Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”

Sinthesis of European documents pertaining to the initial training of the future teachers of the countries belonging to the European Union.

Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.

1 Monitoring & evaluation 2013+: concepts and ideas (ERDF & CF) CMEF meeting, 17 th June 2011, Kai Stryczynski, DG REGIO Evaluation Unit.

Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.

Innovation Indicators across Innovation Agencies TAFTIE Policy Forum, 25 November 2014.

1 Joint Research Centre (JRC) Annual Meeting of the EGTC Platform The EGTC-ready to use - Beyond cohesion policy Ulla Engelmann Interinstitutional and.

Lessons from Programme Evaluation in Romania First Annual Conference on Evaluation Bucharest 18 February 2008.

The RDI Governance System Vasileios Pitsinigkos Head of Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia - Thrace Region.

NUTRITION CLUSTER ADVOCACY TOOLKIT

Human Resources Mobility & Training Needs Petros P. Soukoulias Head of the Regional Council for Innovation & Entrepreneurship Eastern Macedonia – Thrace.

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.

Swedish Bilateral Development Cooperation (in essence Reform Cooperation) introducing the Partnership Programme Annika Palo, Policy Specialist EU Department.

ECENA Workshop on Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring in Environmental Enforcement and Compliance Szentendre, March 29-30, 2007 Assessment Tools and Methods.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

Péter Felcsuti Policy Implications for the Use of Structural Funds for Developing Microcredit and Self- employment for Roma Communities With support from.

Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 3: Mid-Term Evaluation.

AUDIT COMMITTEES’ PERSPECTIVE ON PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND INSIGHTS INTO THEIR OVERSIGHT ROLE.

Universität Kaiserslautern Institut für Technologie und Arbeit / Institute of Technology and Work Evaluation: Timetable & Approach October 2001: –Internal.

"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.

IPSP Outcomes Reporting Framework What you need to know and what you need to do.

The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.

Prague, 19 – 22 April 2006 OneStopGov 4 th Eastern European e-Gov Days 2006 A life-event oriented framework and platform for one-stop government: The OneStopGov.

EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.

Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,

1 Towards Excellence: Research, Development and Innovation Policy Measures of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports Dalibor Štys Minister of Education,

Lagging Regions – Introducing Monitoring and Governance

SIESTA Experiences Parallel Workshop Session: Workshop 1.3

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Employment and Social Affairs Jerome Vignon

Lithuanian Standards for Evaluation of EU Structural Funds

Ex post evaluation of ERDF and Cohesion Fund

State Aid, Rules and Legislation, Opportunities and Restrictions

THE APPROACH BY: KIMANI RACHEL WAITHERA September 8th, 2011.

– potential relevant financial allocations

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.

مديريت كارورزي پزشكي اجتماعي.

By Carlos Conde, programme coordinator. OECD-MENA Governance Programme

I3U Work Package 6 Commitments 24/25, 26, 27 and 28 WIIW, WERI and ZSI

Third meeting of the monitoring working group – progress and outline of the day Elisabetta Marinelli Barcelona,

Involving the community: sharing the information

Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network, Brussels,14th April 2011

Monitoring and evaluation

DG REGIO Evaluation-Related Activities State of play

Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges

Presentation transcript:

Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 Panagiotis Koudoumakis Head of Programming and Evaluation Unit Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia - Thrace

The Theory: (according to the RIS3 Guide) Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3

The Theory: (according to the JRC Scientific and Policy Report (No.01/2013) “The Goals of Smart Specialization”) Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3

The Theory: (according to the JRC Scientific and Policy Report (No.01/2013) “The Goals of Smart Specialization”) Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3

The Theory: (according to the Frequently Asked Question (FAQs) of S3 platform”) Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3

Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 A very useful approach

Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3

How to estimate the progress ?

Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 The influence of RIS3 Strategy may be less important than other parameters. How can we separate the effects?

Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 An other very useful approach

Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3

Our Balanced Scorecard-inspired approach for the monitoring system:

Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 Our approach

Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 Our approach

Question 2: How to design a set of result indicators for monitoring the RIS3 strategy ( examples from other EU regions output indicators ) ? Question 1: How to select a set of appropriate indicators for monitoring the RIS3 strategy ( examples from other EU regions output indicators ) ? Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 Question 3: How to co-ordinate the monitoring and verification system on national and regional level? How to provide synergies? Actually there is one Main Question: Taking into consideration all the above facts, which indicators should be used?

Question 4: Which is the maximum number of indicators ( input, output, result ), that an efficient and functional monitoring system should have? Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 Question 6: Is it possible for the Regional Authorities to set valid result targets, in a region with no direct influence on framework conditions ( i.e. tax, labour or education policy) and 90% of the regional budget for R&D&I managed by the national authorities? How can you strike the best possible balance between the national targets and the regional specificities? Question 5: Should the RIS3 monitoring system focus on Thematic Objectives 1-3 or it should try to provide a more holistic description (& monitoring ) of the regional development strategy?

Region of Eastern Macedonia – Thrace Managing Authority Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 Thank you for your patience… … now let us search for answers! Panagiotis Koudoumakis Head of Programming and Evaluation Unit Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia – Thrace