2015/8/91 FIPA Communicative Acts (CA). 2015/8/92 Introduction to FIPA FIPA is an IEEE Computer Society standards organization that promotes agent-based.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian epistemology
Advertisements

Peer-to-peer and agent-based computing Agent communication.
Design by Contract.
8-1 LECTURE 8: Agent Communication An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems
FIPA Interaction Protocol. Request Interaction Protocol Summary –Request Interaction Protocol allows one agent to request another to perform some action.
Chapter 16: Multiagent Systems Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents – Munindar P. Singh and Michael N. Huhns, Wiley, 2005.
Use Case & Use Case Diagram
Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved AEU Ariba Direct Material Suppliers training Offline version May 2011.
Overview UML Extensions for Agents UML UML Agent UML (AUML) Agent UML (AUML) Agent Interaction Protocols Agent Interaction Protocols Richer Role Specification.
M.P. Singh - Agent Communication Languages: Rethinking the Principles Alessandro Giusti March,
CPSC 322, Lecture 19Slide 1 Propositional Logic Intro, Syntax Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 19 (Textbook Chpt ) February, 23, 2009.
Specifying Agent Interaction Protocols with AUML and OCL COSC 6341 Project Presentation Alexei Lapouchnian November 29, 2000.
Software Agent -communication-. Outline Overview Speech act theory Agent communication languages Summary 1/35.
Agent UML Stefano Lorenzelli
INTERACTION AND COMMUNICATION. Coordination A property of interaction among a set of agents performing some activity in a shared state. The degree of.
Multiagent Systems and Societies of Agents
Agent Communication Languages CSE5610- Intelligent Software Systems Agent Communication Languages.
Four Dark Corners of Requirements Engineering
Presentation on Formalising Speech Acts (Course: Formal Logic)
Luís Moniz Pereira Centro de Inteligência Artificial - CENTRIA Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal Pierangelo Dell’Acqua Dept. of Science and Technology.
Developing Ideas for Research and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Agents Communication Languages (ACL) Dumitru Roman Digital Enterprise Research Institute
An Intelligent Broker Architecture for Context-Aware Systems A PhD. Dissertation Proposal in Computer Science at the University of Maryland Baltimore County.
Computer Science 30/08/20151 Agent Communication BDI Communication CPSC /CPSC Rob Kremer Department of Computer Science University of Calgary.
Timed UML State Machines Ognyana Hristova Tutor: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Thomas Noll June, 2007.
* SRA Division CoopIS- September Extending Multi-Agent Cooperation by Overhearing Floriano Zini SRA Division - ITC-irst, Povo (Trento) - Italy Joint.
Topic 5: Communication and Negotiation Protocols
Sweetening Regulated Open Multi-Agent Systems with a Formal Support for Agents to Reason About Laws Carolina Howard Felicíssimo Key points of my paper.
Applying Belief Change to Ontology Evolution PhD Student Computer Science Department University of Crete Giorgos Flouris Research Assistant.
Interaction Modeling Interaction model describes how objects interact to produce useful results. Interactions can be modeled at different levels of abstraction:
Modeling  Conversation  Policies using Permissions  and  Obligations Lalana Kagal and Tim Finin University of Maryland, Baltimore County AAMAS Workshop.
EEL 5937 Agent communication EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lecture 10, Feb. 6, 2003 Lotzi Bölöni.
Chapter 18: Communication Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents – Munindar P. Singh and Michael N. Huhns, Wiley, 2005.
Introduction to AgentSpeak and Jason for Programming Multi-agent Systems (1) Dr Fuhua (Oscar) Lin SCIS Athabasca University June 19, 2009.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [INTELLIGENT AGENTS PARADIGM] Professor Janis Grundspenkis Riga Technical University Faculty of Computer Science and Information.
Distributed Information Retrieval Using a Multi-Agent System and The Role of Logic Programming.
Black Box Testing Techniques Chapter 7. Black Box Testing Techniques Prepared by: Kris C. Calpotura, CoE, MSME, MIT  Introduction Introduction  Equivalence.
LOGIC AND ONTOLOGY Both logic and ontology are important areas of philosophy covering large, diverse, and active research projects. These two areas overlap.
An Ontological Framework for Web Service Processes By Claus Pahl and Ronan Barrett.
Design of Multi-Agent Systems Teacher Bart Verheij Student assistants Albert Hankel Elske van der Vaart Web site
AOSE Multi-Agent Interaction. Agents and Interaction Interaction forms the basis of an agents collaborative problem solving capabilities. –Agents are.
Introduction to Semantic Web Service Architecture ► The vision of the Semantic Web ► Ontologies as the basic building block ► Semantic Web Service Architecture.
3.2 Semantics. 2 Semantics Attribute Grammars The Meanings of Programs: Semantics Sebesta Chapter 3.
Ontology Mapping in Pervasive Computing Environment C.Y. Kong, C.L. Wang, F.C.M. Lau The University of Hong Kong.
Reasoning about Knowledge 1 INF02511: Knowledge Engineering Reasoning about Knowledge (a very short introduction) Iyad Rahwan.
Computer Science CPSC /CPSC Rob Kremer Department of Computer Science University of Calgary 07/12/20151 Agent Communications.
L. M. Pereira, J. J. Alferes, J. A. Leite Centro de Inteligência Artificial - CENTRIA Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal P. Dell’Acqua Dept. of Science.
EEL 5937 Agent communication EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lotzi Bölöni.
Agent Overview. Topics Agent and its characteristics Architectures Agent Management.
Intelligent Agents: Technology and Applications Agent Communications IST 597B Spring 2003 John Yen.
Software Systems Verification and Validation Laboratory Assignment 4 Model checking Assignment date: Lab 4 Delivery date: Lab 4, 5.
Agent Communication Languages Speech act theory Speech act theory Semantics of languages Semantics of languages KQML KQML FIPA ACL FIPA ACL Comparison.
Computer Science 24/02/20161 Agent Communication FIPA Performatives CPSC /CPSC Rob Kremer Department of Computer Science University of Calgary.
EEL 5937 Content languages EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lecture 10, Feb. 6, 2003 Lotzi Bölöni.
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing See R. Nofsinger, Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991.
CSC3315 (Spring 2009)1 CSC 3315 Languages & Compilers Hamid Harroud School of Science and Engineering, Akhawayn University
AOSE Managing Agent Communication with ACRE. Agents and Interaction Interaction between agents is normally done by way of Agent Communication Languages.
Agents Transacting in Open Environments Two phases: Locating appropriate agents –through different kinds of middle agents Performing the transaction –with.
Agent-Based Dialogue Management Discourse & Dialogue CMSC November 10, 2006.
Requirements. Outline Definition Requirements Process Requirements Documentation Next Steps 1.
Agent Communication Michael Floyd SYSC 5103 – Software Agents November 13, 2008.
Change Request Management
LECTURE 9: Agent Communication
Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents
Software Configuration Management
Processes Chapter 3.
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Processes Chapter 3.
Processes Chapter 3.
Presentation transcript:

2015/8/91 FIPA Communicative Acts (CA)

2015/8/92 Introduction to FIPA FIPA is an IEEE Computer Society standards organization that promotes agent-based technology and the interoperability of its standards with other technologies. FIPA, the standards organization for agents and multi-agent systems was officially accepted by the IEEE as its eleventh standards committee on 8 June 2005.

2015/8/93 FIPA was originally formed as a Swiss based organization in 1996 to produce software standards specifications for heterogeneous and interacting agents and agent based systems.

2015/8/94 Since its foundations, FIPA has played a crucial role in the development of agents standards and has promoted a number of initiatives and events that contributed to the development and uptake of agent technology.

2015/8/95 Furthermore, many of the ideas originated and developed in FIPA are now coming into sharp focus in new generations of Web/Internet technology and related specifications.

2015/8/96 In March 2005, the FIPA Board of Directors presented this opportunity to the entire FIPA membership, who unanimously voted to join the IEEE computer Society. Now, it is time to move standards for agents and agent-based systems into the wider context of software development.

2015/8/97 In short, agent technology needs to work and integrate with non-agent technologies. To this end, the IEEE Computer Society has formally accepted FIPA to become part of its family of standards committees.

2015/8/98 Speech act (communicative act) Speech act theory has been influential in computer science since the early 1980s, particularly in the design of artificial languages for communication between software entities ("agents").artificial languages [wikipedia]

2015/8/99 The theory was used, for example, to give a semantics to Agent Communication Language (ACL), an agent language developed by FIPA. The FIPA ACL speech act semantics, expressed semi-formally using epistemic modal logic, defines utterances in ACL in terms of the:semanticsAgent Communication Languageagent languageepistemic modal logic certain beliefs, uncertain beliefs, desires and intentions of the speaker.

2015/8/910 In principle, therefore, it enables agents using FIPA ACL to be sure that other agents will understand the meaning of utterances in the same way as the speaker. However, the FIPA ACL language syntax and semantics, although now widely used in agent systems, have been heavily criticized on theoretical and practical grounds.

2015/8/911 Semantic Language (SL) Formalism Components of the formalism: p, p1,... are taken to be closed formulas denoting propositions, φ and ψ are formula schemas, which stand for any closed proposition, i and j are schematic variables which denote agents | = φ means that φ is valid.

2015/8/912 Modal operators: –Belief (B) B i p: i believes (that) p (for a proposition) holds –Uncertainty (U) U i p: i is uncertain about p, but thinks that p is more likely than ¬ p –Choice (C) C i p: i desires that p currently holds

2015/8/913 Action expressions: –a1 ; a2 sequence in which a2 follows a1 –a1 | a2 nondeterministic choice, in which either a1 happens or a2, but not both.

2015/8/914 Notation A CA model will be presented as follows: FP (Feasibility Precondition): φ1 RE (Rational Effect): φ2 Translation of the above example: (act :sender i :receiver j :content C )

2015/8/915 Underlying Semantic Model Rational Effect (RE) –reasons for which the act is selected Feasibility Preconditions (FPs) –conditions that have to be satisfied for the act to be planned (qualifications of the act).

2015/8/916 Accept Proposal Summary –The action of accepting a previously submitted proposal to perform an action. Content –A tuple consisting of an action expression denoting the action to be done, and a proposition giving the conditions of the agreement.

2015/8/917 Formal Model –, φ))> Example –Agent i informs j that it accepts an offer from j to stream a given multimedia title to channel 19 when the customer is ready. –(accept-proposal :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :in-reply-to bid089 :content "((action (agent-identifier :name j) (stream-content movie )) (B (agent-identifier :name j) (ready customer78)))" :language fipa-sl ) act φ

2015/8/918 Agree Summary –The action of agreeing to perform some action, possibly in the future. Content –A tuple, consisting of an action expression denoting the action to be done, and a proposition giving the conditions of the agreement.

2015/8/919 Formal Model –, φ))> Example –Agent i requests j to deliver a box to a certain location; j answers that it agrees to the request but it has low priority. –(agree :sender (agent-identifier :name j) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name i)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name j) (deliver box017 (loc 12 19))) (priority order567 low))" :in-reply-to order567 :protocol fipa-request :language fipa-sl ) act φ

2015/8/920 Cancel Summary –The action of one agent informing another agent that the first agent no longer has the intention that the second agent perform some action. Content –An action expression denoting the action that is no longer intended.

2015/8/921 Formal Model – Example –Agent i asks j to cancel a previous request-whenever act by quoting the action. –(cancel :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name i) (request-whenever :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set(agent-identifier :name j)) :content2 \"((action (agent-identifier :name j) (inform-ref … :langage fipa-sl …) act

2015/8/922 Call for Proposal Summary –The action of calling for proposals to perform a given action. Content –A tuple containing an action expression denoting the action to be done, and a referential expression defining a single-parameter proposition which gives the preconditions on the action.

2015/8/923 Formal Model –, Ref x φ(x))> Example –Agent i asks j to submit its proposal to sell 50 boxes of plums to i. –(cfp :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name j) (sell plum 50)) (any ?x (and (= (price plum) ?x) (< ?x 10))))" :ontology fruit-market :language fipa-sl ) act Ref x φ(x)

2015/8/924 ?x ?x denotes the value referred to by the reference X

2015/8/925 Confirm Summary –The sender informs the receiver that a given proposition is true, where the receiver is known to be uncertain about the proposition. Content –A proposition.

2015/8/926 Formal Model – Examples –Agent i confirms to agent j that it is, in fact, true that it is shining today. –(confirm :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "weather (today, shining)" :language Prolog ) φ

2015/8/927 Disconfirm Summary –The sender informs the receiver that a given proposition is false, where the receiver is known to believe, or believe it likely that, the proposition is true. Content –A proposition.

2015/8/928 Formal Model – Example –Agent i, believing that agent j thinks that a shark is a mammal and attempts to change j’s belief. –(disconfirm :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((mammal shark))" :language fipa-sl ) φ

2015/8/929 Failure Summary –The action of telling another agent that an action was attempted but the attempt failed. Content –A tuple, consisting of an action expression and a proposition giving the reason for the failure.

2015/8/930 Formal Model – Example –Agent i informs j that it has failed to open a file. –(failure :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name i) (open \"foo.txt\")) (error-message \"No such file: foo.txt\"))" :language fipa-sl ) a φ

2015/8/931 Inform Summary –The sender informs the receiver that a given proposition is true. Content –A proposition.

2015/8/932 Formal Model – Examples –Agent i informs agent j that (it is true that) it is raining today. –(inform :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "weather (today, raining)" :language Prolog ) φ

2015/8/933 Inform If Summary –A macro action for the agent of the action to inform the recipient whether or not a proposition is true. Content –A proposition.

2015/8/934 Formal Model – Examples –Agent i requests j to inform it whether Lannion is in Normandy. –(request :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name j) (inform-if :sender (agent-identifier :name j) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name i)) :content \"in( lannion, normandy)\" :language Prolog)) )" :language fipa-sl ) φ

2015/8/935 Inform Ref Summary –A macro action for sender to inform the receiver the object which corresponds to a reference, for example, a name. Content –An object description (a referential expression).

2015/8/936 Formal Model – Example –Agent i requests j to tell it the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. –(request :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name j) (inform-ref :sender (agent-identifier :name j) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name i)) :content \"((iota ?x (UKPrimeMinister ?x)))\" :ontology world-politics :language fipa-sl)))" :reply-with query0 :language fipa-sl ) Ref x δ(x)

2015/8/937 iota ( ι ninth Greek character) When using the definite descriptor in a formal logical context, it is common to denote it by the symbol iota: logicaliota ψ(ιx(φx)) ≔ ∃ x( ∀ y(φy ↔ y = x) ∧ ψx) Ref: Wikipedia

2015/8/938 Not Understood Summary –The sender of the act (for example, i) informs the receiver (for example, j) that it perceived that j performed some action, but that i did not understand what j just did. A particular common case is that i tells j that i did not understand the message that j has just sent to i. Content –A tuple consisting of an action or event, for example, a communicative act, and an explanatory reason.

2015/8/939 Formal Model – Examples –Agent i did not understand a query-if message because it did not recognize the ontology. –(not-understood :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name j) (query-if :sender (agent-identifier :name j) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name i)) :content \" :ontology www :language fipa-ccl)) (unknown (ontology \"www\")))" :language fipa-sl) a φ

2015/8/940 Propagate Summary –The sender intends that the receiver treat the embedded message as sent directly to the receiver, and wants the receiver to identify the agents denoted by the given descriptor and send the received propagate message to them. Content –A tuple of a descriptor, that is, a referential expression, denoting 1) an agent or agents to be forwarded the propagate message, 2) an embedded ACL communicative act, that is, an ACL message, performed by the sender to the receiver of the propagate message and 3) a constraint condition for propagation, for example, a timeout.

2015/8/941 Formal Model –, φ)> Example –Agent i requests agent j and its federating other brokerage agents to do brokering server. –(propagate :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((any ?x (registered (agent-description :name ?x :services (set (service-description :name agent-brokerage)))) (action (agent-identifier :name i) (proxy :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content … )) (< (hop-count) 5))“ :ontology brokerage-agent-ontology …) Ref x δ(x) cact φ

2015/8/942 Propose Summary –The action of submitting a proposal to perform a certain action, given certain preconditions. Content –A tuple containing an action description, representing the action that the sender is proposing to perform, and a proposition representing the preconditions on the performance of the action.

2015/8/943 Formal Model –, φ)> Example –Agent i proposes to j to sell 50 boxes of plums for $5 –(propose :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action i (sell plum 50)) (= (any ?x (and (= (price plum) ?x) (< ?x 10))) 5)" :ontology fruit-market :in-reply-to proposal2 :language fipa-sl ) act φ

2015/8/944 Proxy Summary –The sender wants the receiver to select target agents denoted by a given description and to send an embedded message to them. Content –A tuple of a descriptor, that is, a referential expression, that denotes 1) the target agents, 2) an ACL communicative act, that is, an ACL message, to be performed to the agents, and 3) a constraint condition for performing the embedded communicative act, for example, the maximum number of agents to be forwarded, etc.

2015/8/945 Formal Model –, φ)> Example –Agent i requests agent j to do recruiting and request a server. –(proxy :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((all ?x (registered(agent-description :name ?x :services (set (service-description :name video-on-demand))))) (action (agent-identifier :name j) (request … :ontology vod-server-ontology :language FIPA-SL true)“ :ontology brokerage-agent :protocol fipa-recruiting …) Ref x δ(x) cact φ

2015/8/946 Query If Summary –The action of asking another agent whether or not a given proposition is true. Content –A proposition.

2015/8/947 Formal Model – Example –Agent i asks agent j if j is registered with domain server d1. –(query-if :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identitfier :name j)) :content "((registered (server d1) (agent j)))" :reply-with r09 … ) φ

2015/8/948 Query Ref Summary –The action of asking another agent for the object referred to by a referential expression. Content –A descriptor (a referential expression).

2015/8/949 Formal Model – Example –Agent i asks agent j for its available services. –(query-ref :sender (agent-identinfier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((all ?x (available-service j ?x)))" … ) Ref x δ(x)

2015/8/950 Refuse Summary –The action of refusing to perform a given action, and explaining the reason for the refusal. Content –A tuple, consisting of an action expression and a proposition giving the reason for the refusal.

2015/8/951 Formal Model –, φ)> Example –Agent i refuses to j reserve a ticket for j, since there are insufficient funds in j’s account. –(refuse :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name i) (reserve-ticket LHR MUC 27-sept-97)) (insufficient-funds ac12345))" :language fipa-sl ) act φ

2015/8/952 Reject Proposal Summary –The action of rejecting a proposal to perform some action during a negotiation. Content –A tuple consisting of an action description and a proposition which formed the original proposal being rejected, and a further proposition which denotes the reason for the rejection.

2015/8/953 Formal Model –, φ, ψ)> Example –Agent i informs j that it rejects an offer from j to sell. –(reject-proposal :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name j) (sell plum 50)) (cost 200) (price-too-high 50))" :in-reply-to proposal13 ) act φ ψ

2015/8/954 Request Summary –The sender requests the receiver to perform some action. –One important class of uses of the request act is to request the receiver to perform another communicative act. Content –An action expression.

2015/8/955 Formal Model – Examples –Agent i requests j to open a file. –(request :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "open \"db.txt\" for input" :language vb ) a

2015/8/956 Request When Summary –The sender wants the receiver to perform some action when some given proposition becomes true. Content –A tuple of an action description and a proposition.

2015/8/957 Formal Model –, φ)> Examples –Agent i tells agent j to notify it as soon as an alarm occurs. –(request-when :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name j) (inform :sender (agent-identifier :name j) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name i)) :content \"((alarm \"something alarming!\"))\")) (Done( alarm )))" … ) φ act

2015/8/958 Request Whenever Summary –The sender wants the receiver to perform some action as soon as some proposition becomes true and thereafter each time the proposition becomes true again. Content –A tuple of an action description and a proposition.

2015/8/959 Formal Model –, φ)> Examples –Agent i tells agent j to notify it whenever the price of widgets rises from less than 50 to more than –50. –(request-whenever :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((action (agent-identifier :name j) (inform-ref :sender (agent-identifier :name j) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name i)) :content \"((iota ?x (= (price widget) ?x)))\")) (> (price widget) 50))" … ) φ act

2015/8/960 Subscribe Summary –The act of requesting a persistent intention to notify the sender of the value of a reference, and to notify again whenever the object identified by the reference (its value) changes. Content –A descriptor (a referential expression).

2015/8/961 Formal Model – Examples –Agent i wishes to be updated on the exchange rate of Francs to Dollars and makes a subscription agreement with j. –(subscribe :sender (agent-identifier :name i) :receiver (set (agent-identifier :name j)) :content "((iota ?x (= ?x (xch-rate FFR USD))))” ) Ref x δ(x)