Spatial modeling in transportation (lock improvements and sequential congestion) Simon P. Anderson University of Virginia and Wesley W. Wilson University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Choice Models and Planning Models by Kenneth Train And Wesley W. Wilson.
Advertisements

A Conceptual Model for Demands at the Pool Level Kenneth D. Boyer Michigan State University Wesley W. Wilson University of Oregon.
A Study of Pricing over Space in Railroad Markets
NETS Future Research By Wesley W. Wilson University of Oregon and IWR.
Navigation Economic Technologies Symposium 9-10 May 2003 Generic Characteristics of Corps Waterway Models.
Spatial Modeling in Transportation: Railroad Pricing, Alternative Markets and Capacity Constraints by Simon P. Anderson University of Virginia and Wesley.
US Army Corps of Engineers Institute For Water Resources - IWR Navigation Economic Technologies NETS 17-March-2005.
Regional Routing Model Review: C) Model Formulation and Scenario Analysis Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program.
Navigation Economic Technologies NETS Wesley W
Regional Routing Model Review: A) Data Fusion Efforts and Issues Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program Review.
Supply and Demand.
The Money Market.
Domestic Water Carriers. Significance of the Industry Transport roughly 14% of total national freight 26.5% of total domestic ton-miles Employ close to.
Mark Koetse Department of Spatial Economics Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Project A8 Consequences of climate change and weather conditions for the transport.
US Army Corps of Engineers Institute For Water Resources - IWR Navigation Economic Technologies NETS Keith Hofseth 16-May-2006.
Module 4: Market Equilibrium
Business Logistics Management 6. Transport Fundementals.
Review of the labour market In last week’s lecture, we introduced into our system two new endogenous variables (wages W, price level P) and four new exogenous.
Chapter 3. Supply and Demand Link to syllabus Skip discussions of substitutes and complements (p. 71), and of normal and inferior goods (p. 72).
Transportation in a Supply Chain
Supply, Demand, and Equilibrium Today: An introduction to supply and demand, and how they relate to equilibrium.
Lec 3, Ch. 2 Transp Systems & Organization Understand the nation’s transportation system is the result of independent actions (through reading) Understand.
Chapter 9 Transportation and Communications Understanding modern transportation and communications systems Point out historically specific nature of these.
Demand and Supply: Basics September 9, Demand  In a market economy, the price of a good is determined by the interaction of demand and supply.
Supply, Demand, and Equilibrium Today: An Introduction to supply and demand, and how they relate to equilibrium.
3 DEMAND AND SUPPLY. © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley Equilibrium is a situation in which opposing forces balance each other. Equilibrium in a market occurs.
Supply and Demand Intertwined
US Crop Production, 2007 GrainMil. AcMil. bu Corn86.513,074 Soybeans62.82,585 Wheat52.12,067 Sorghum Barley Oats1.592.
Transportation Costs and Pricing Transportation Costs FOB vs Delivered Pricing Value of Service/Differential Pricing Optimal Pricing Factors that Affect.
ECONOMICS 211 CLICKER QUESTIONS Chapter 4 – Question Set #3.
What happens to supply when demand increases? Expansion ALONG the supply curve (E to E 1 ) Equilibrium re-established at E1 Higher price (P 1 )
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
Market for U.S. Grain Barge Services
Von Thunen. Some Assumptions made by farmers on what they are going to farm: A farmer is worried about two costs: 1. Cost of the land and 2. Cost of transporting.
Module Supply and Demand: Supply and Equilibrium
Macroeconomics CHAPTER 3 Supply and Demand PowerPoint® Slides by Can Erbil © 2004 Worth Publishers, all rights reserved.
Logistics Management CHAPTER ELEVEN McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICES Update of the Freight Rail Bottom Line Report: Continuing Study of Freight Rail Supply Meeting Demand Briefing.
Pump Primer : What do you believe is the opportunity cost of holding money? 28.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
ENVR 210 CLICKER QUESTIONS Chapter 4 – Question Set #3.
Chapter 6 Combining Supply and Demand. Equilibrium- where the supply and demand curves cross. Equilibrium determines the price and the quantity to be.
Demand.  Demand can be defined as the quantity of a particular good or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase at any given time.
Stated Preference Modeling of the Demand for Ohio River Shipments By Nino Sitchinava & Wesley Wilson University of Oregon & Mark Burton University of Tennessee.
Logistics Management CHAPTER ELEVEN McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Quick summary One-dimensional vertical (quality) differentiation model is extended to two dimensions Use to analyze product and price competition Two.
Economics 2010 Lecture 12 Competition (II). Competition  Output, Price, and Profit in the Short Run  Output, Price, and Profit in the Long Run  Changing.
Chapter 13 Transportation in the Supply Chain
Multi Modal Containerized transport through Western India – A Supply Chain Perspective Presented By: Kumar Abhishek Rahul Rathi Tusar Pal.
Module Supply and Demand: Supply and Equilibrium KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 6 Margaret Ray and David Anderson.
Chapter 12. Moving Freight 1. Describe the role of freight movement in the economy 2. Explain why certain commodity tend to move on specific transport.
IE 8580 Module 2: Transportation in the Supply Chain
Chapter 13 Transportation in a Supply Chain
Module 7 Changes in Equilibrium
The Basics of Supply and Demand
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
Module 28 The Money Market KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP*
Module 28 The Money Market KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP*
Changes in quantity demanded
Consumer Choice Indifference Curve Theory
Transportation in the Supply Chain
Utility Functions, Budget Lines and Consumer Demand
Module 28 The Money Market KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP*
Economic Organisation Transport It provides the initial key for then spatial understanding of Economic activity and also reflects the territorial differentiation.
The Money Market AP Macro Mr. Warner.
The Importance of Transportation Economics
EQUATION 2.1 Demand Function.
The Importance of Transportation Economics
Physical Distribution Definition
Presentation transcript:

Spatial modeling in transportation (lock improvements and sequential congestion) Simon P. Anderson University of Virginia and Wesley W. Wilson University of Oregon and Institute for Water Resources Urbino, July 13, 2007

Background Navigation and Economics Technologies Program (NETS) Cost-benefit Analysis of improving locks Need for spatial economic models to underpin transportation demand and congestion on the waterway (and other modes, like railroads) Transportation complements and substitutes Simple congestion in sequence of bottlenecks: effects of lock improvements

Theoretical Background Farmers geographically dispersed Truck-barge or rail (or truck) Lock system and congestion Lock by-pass Endogenous price of transportation services

Basic model Terminal market at 0 River runs NS along y-axis Transport metric is Manhattan River rate: b Truck rate: t Rail rate: r b < r < t

Figure 1-The Network Terminal Market River Source (0,0) Shipper (y,x) T B R River Source (l,0)

Truck-barge catchment area rx + ry > tx + by y hat = x(t-r)/(r-b) Transport rates depend on crops etc.

Figure 2-Modal catchment areas Rail Truck-Barge

Fixed costs Now add fixed costs to shipment costs: For mode m: F m + md, m = b, r, t F t < F r < F b

Shipment Costs (if single mode!) Rail Movements Not Dominated $/unit e TB R B T Miles FbFb FrFr FtFt m=t m=r m=b

Figure 4-Rail Rate Tapers $/Unit TB R B T Miles $/Unit/Mile T R B Miles FbFb FrFr FtFt m=t m=r m=b

Mode complementarities To use barge, must truck to river first Else could truck directly to final market Rail is a substitute to both of these options

Figures 5 and 6 Catchment areas with fixed costs Rail Not Dominated Rail Dominated TERM RAIL TRUCK RAIL TRUCK- BARGE TRUCK TRUCK- BARGE x TERM RAIL TRUCK TRUCK- BARGE RAIL TRUCK- BARGE TRUCK

Locks Passing lock j costs C j, j = 1, …, n (cost will depend below on volume of shipping) Truck-barge used from (y,x) if: F r + rx + ry > F t + F b + tx + by + Σ j C i Barge mode takes a hit at lock levels

Lock by-pass Possible to by-pass one or several locks Use truck down to below the lock (enter at a river terminal) Now advantage of rail falls closer to lock

Continuity of lock demands Note catchment areas are continuous functions of congestion costs Hence shipping levels through locks are continuous The same holds when we allow for multiple lock by-pass (there is no zap price/indifference plateau where all demand suddenly shifts)

Congestion Depends on all shipping through lock, i.e., from all points up-river More traffic at locks lower down Single lock case: traffic depends on cost Cost depends on traffic. Equilibrium as FP Multi-lock case follows similar logic

Congestion with multiple locks Cost at Lock n depends on traffic emanating above it Traffic above Lock n depends on costs at all lower locks Cost at Lock n-1 depends on traffic from above n and between n-1 and n; traffic entering between n-1 and n depends on C 1 …C n- 1 Cost depends on traffic above; traffic depends on costs lower down

Existence Brouwer: cts mapping from a compact, convex set has a Fixed Point Assume Ds and Cs are cts and finite Ds determine Cs determine Ds … i.e., maps old Ds into new Ds in a cts fashion. Hence a fixed point exists (hence equilibrium)

Equilibrium uniqueness Suppose there were another. Suppose D n C n < C n Then ΣC j > Σ C j for j < n (to have D n < D n ) Then D n-1 C n-1 < C n-1 etc. Hence a contradiction. There exists a unique solution

Improving a lock j 1.D 1 must go up Suppose not: D 1 => C 1 D 1 - D 2 (more entering between locks 1 and 2) D 2 (to have the original => D 1 ) D 2 => C 2 Hence all costs below j would decrease, so a contradiction C 1 < C n-1 etc

Improving a lock j Hence D 1 must go up Then D 1 => C 1 D 1 - D 2 (less entering between locks 1 and 2) D 2 (to have the original => D 1 ) D 2 => C 2 All costs below j increase … new demands decrease j doesnt overshoot: its costs still lower All costs above j increase (locally) but totals fall so there is more traffic from all points above j

Comparative static properties Improve locks Suppose a lock in the middle is improved More traffic coming through from above: more congestion at higher locks. More development higher (larger catchment). More traffic lower down (more congestion) Less new traffic joining the river lower down Hence: more traffic at all other locks More production upstream, less production downstream

Barge shipping rates Suppose the number of barges is fixed The model above determines the equilibrium demand price for barge services Hence, with supply, can determine the equilibrium price

Conclusions Spatial Equilibrium with modal choice Series of congested points – existence and uniqueness of solution Improving a lock improves overall flow, but increases congestion downstream from the improvement while decreasing it upstream. More development further out, contraction of activity further in Analogy to commuter traffic Endogenous price of transport mode Basis for cost-benefit analysis Model can be readily calibrated

Future research directions bi-directional barge movements and backhauling Timing of shipments; speed/reliability of modes (risk); equilibrium price in final market and mode choice