Today’s Lesson Recount of Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Arguments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists A Ratification Debate.
Advertisements

Fed Up – Debating the Constitution
Ratification of the Constitution US History Standards: SSUSH5 The student will explain specific events and key ideas that brought about the adoption and.
Federalists and Anti-Federalists Essential Question Debate: Should we ratify the U.S. Constitution?
Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Today’s Objective: Students will be able to identify the opposing sides in the fight for ratification and describe the.
Federalists and Anti-Federalists
The Federalist and Anti-Federalist
Following the Constitutional Convention, the 55 delegates returned to their home states Their job was to convince the people (the state legislatures) that.
Anti-Federalists vs Federalists. Alexander Hamilton James Madison John Jay.
Ratifying the Constitution States Constitutional Conventions would vote on ratification for each state. Ratification or ratify means to accept. Voters.
American Government Chapter 2: Origins of American Government Section 5: Ratifying the Constitution.
SSUSH5 The student will explain specific events and key ideas that brought about the adoption and implementation of the United States Constitution. b.
Ratifying the Constitution
How was the Bill of Rights added to the Constitution? Process of Amendment, Article V Debates in Congress Ratification How would life be different today.
Cato’s Letters Brutus Centinel Federal Farmer Thomas Jefferson Patrick Henry.
Chapter 8 Confederation to Constitution Sorry guys… you pretty much have to have ALL this information so get ready! WRITE EVERYTHING THAT IS IN ORANGE!!!!!
RATIFYING THE CONSTITUTIONRATIFYING THE CONSTITUTION Chapter 8 Section 3Chapter 8 Section 3.
Ratifying the Constitution
Chapter 3, Section 3 Debating the Constitution p The states approve the Constitution, but many of the states insist that it include a bill of rights.
Creating the Constitution. Fair Representation in the Legislature Virginia Plan two house legislature (bi-cameral) number of representatives based upon.
U.S. History 5.3 Ratifying the Constitution Exactly what will it take? MAIN IDEA: During the debate on the Constitution, the Federalists promised to add.
Debating the Constitution Our Constitution. A New Constitution After many weeks of debate, the Constitutional Convention agreed on a new Constitution.
Confederation and the Constitution. In 1776, the Articles of Confederation was formed ► Under the Articles of Confederation:  Each state would have one.
RATIFYING THE CONSTITUTION CHAPTER 5 SECTION 3.
Federalists and Anti-Federalists Identiying the opposing sides in the fight for ratification. What is the difference between Federalism & Anti-Federalism?
FEDERALIST VS. ANTI- FEDERALIST DEBATE.  Constitution completed in September 1787  After realizing the failure of a unanimous vote under the Articles.
7 Principles of Government What big ideas were the founding fathers thinking about when they made the Constitution?
FEDERALIST & ANTI-FEDERALIST AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS Ratifying the Constitution.
Focus Question How did Americans ratify the Constitution, and what are the basic principles? In each state, approved the Constitution Needed 9 of 13 to.
C.1.5 BELLRINGER 12/1 What are the 6 weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation? (Look back at #1 and #2 for help)
End of Course Exam Review. The purpose of a government is to create and enforce the public policies of a society. Every government has 3 types of power:
Ratifying the Constitution US History Chapter 8, Section 3.
Ch. 8, section 2: Creating the Constitution *Main Idea: The states sent delegates to a convention to solve the problems of the Articles of Conf. *Why It.
The Constitutional Convention Philadelphia, 1787 Federalist versus Anti-Federalist: The Debate over the Bill of Rights.
A More Perfect Union 7.4 Ratifying the Constitution.
Both Sides: Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists CICERO History Beyond The Textbook CICERO © 2007.
The Philosophies, Arguments, and the Men Who Achieved It Ratifying the US Constitution Ratifying the US Constitution.
Federalists, Anti- Federalists, and Papers. A New Government  Articles of Confederation are simply not working  The new constitution would address some.
Ratification of The Constitution ■Ratify- to approve ■Federalists vs. Antifederalists ■Antifederalists- were against the Constitution because they thought.
Federalism and Ratification. Ratification  After the Constitution was written by the members of the Constitutional Convention, it still needed to be.
SSUSH5 The student will explain specific events and key ideas that brought about the adoption and implementation of the United States Constitution. b.
3.) Analyze major features of the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights for purposes, organization, functions, and principles, including.
Road Map to Success #4 Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights Federalists, Antifederalists, and the Bill of Rights.
Chapter 2 Ovidio Galvan, MLA.   The Supreme Law of the United States of America  Establishes framework for the United States Government  Adopted on.
Constitution.  First national government of the United States  Had many problems  One main problem was the national government was to weak and the.
Federalists vs. Antifederalists
Federalists and Anti-Federalists
Ratifying the Constitution
Ratifying the Constitution
DO NOW What arguments did Federalists make about ratifying the Constitution? How about Antifederalists?
SSCG:3a Day 15 Explain the main ideas over ratification
Ratifying the Constitution
Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists
The Constitutional Convention
Constitutional Principles and Characteristics
Ratifying the Constitution
DO NOW: W2W Review for Quiz
The Federalist and Anti-Federalist
Federalists Washington John Adams James Madison
Lesson 8.3: Ratifying the Constitution
The Federalist and Anti-Federalist
Debating the Constitution
DEBATING THE CONSTITUTION
Federalism.
Federalists v. Anti-Federalists
A New Government.
Federalists Vs. Antifederalists
5.3 Creating the Constitution
The Federalist and Anti-Federalist
The Federalist and Anti-Federalist
Presentation transcript:

Today’s Lesson Recount of Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Arguments Introduction to the Bill of Rights Bill of rights group presentations (5 pts of class credit) Preview of tomorrow’s activity

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists A debate for the Bill of Rights

Battle for ratification Constitutional convention: May to September 1787 Federalist Papers: October of 1787 through 1788 Concerning a bill of rights Constitution not ratified by all of the states until 1790

A 200 year old debate Began as a battle for public opinion about whether or not the States should adopt the constitution. During the period of debate, numerous local speeches and articles were published in newspapers all across the country. Federalist papers under the pseudonym “Publius” Anti-Federalist papers under the pseudonyms such as “Cato,” “Brutus,” “Centinel,” and “Federal Farmer”

Federalist argument “It is evident that…they have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants…the people surrender nothing, and as they retain every thing, they have no need of particular reservations.” –Alexander Hamilton

Anti- Federalist Argument “If you give up these powers, without a bill of rights, you will exhibit the most absurd thing to mankind that ever the world saw — government that has abandoned all its powers — the powers of direct taxation, the sword, and the purse. You have disposed of them to Congress, without a bill of rights — without check, limitation, or control. And still you have checks and guards; still you keep barriers — pointed where? Pointed against your weakened, prostrated, enervated state government!” –Patrick Henry

Issue #1: Size Anti-Federalists: If a government is too big, it will have too much power, and consolidate, eventually leading to the government being ruled by a powerful elite Federalist Response: If there is a large government, the diverse populations will ensure that a small group of people, a ‘dangerous minority’ with radical ideas does not gain power.

Issue #2: Individual Rights Anti-Federalists: The rights guaranteed to the people should be included in the Constitution or else they are not guaranteed. Federalist Response: The checks and balances are enough to keep the government from taking the rights of the people away.

Issue #3: Representation Anti-Federalists: This new government will encourage only the well educated elite to be representatives who are using this as an opportunity to gain power Federalist Response: These are the men that are best educated and will be able to make the best decisions.

Issue #4: Accountability Anti-Federalists: The new government would be so large that people would not be involved. Federalist Response: The central government cannot take the rights of the people because of the many checks and balances.

Issue #5: Power Anti-Federalists: The limits of the power given to the federal government are not clear. Federalist Response: The checks and balances in the Constitution will be effective in restraining the power of the federal government.

Take a moment to discuss at your table… Do the Anti-Federalists of Federalists care more about protecting individual rights or promoting the common good?

The Bill of Rights First ten amendments to the constitution Why are they more than what Madison simply referred to as a “parchment barrier”? Why should YOU care?

Presentation Activity Each table group is going to prepare a 3 minute presentation on 2-3 amendments (depending on the amount of table groups). Presentation needs to address three points: What does the amendment mean? (Put it into your own words) Why is the amendment significant in addressing one of the 5 issues that the anti-federalists were concerned about with government? (Size, individual rights, representation, accountability, power)

Sink or Swim TOGETHER: You will be graded on… Participation(1 pt): Every one contributes equally to the presentation. Form (1 pt): The presentation has a strong introduction and conclusion and you are NOT reading notes. Content (3 pts): The content presented is informative and well thought out and provides a better understanding of the bill of rights. Take notes! Bill of Rights Quiz tomorrow

Take notes! Bill of Rights quiz tomorrow! (5 pts) Bill of rights REAL LIFE application activity. You will be given a scenario and asked in groups to acknowledge which amendments are at play.