TEACHER EVALUATIONS. REVIEW OF POLICY Classroom teaching must be observed using one of the four piloted observation tools: Charlotte Danielson’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Advertisements

New Jersey School Districts Teachscape Reflect. Leona Jamison Teachscape Service Provider.
Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation The Ins and Outs of Our Classroom Instructor Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Teachscape - Teacher Effectiveness Platform Pennsylvania Schools Conewago Valley School District 1.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.
What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
NY Migration Planning Meeting APPR Requirements with Teachscape.
Teacher and Administrator Evaluation Update Before The Board of Education By Ms. Christine Sipperley, Mr. Brian Whiston, and Dr. Glenn Maleyko. February.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda: PARCC vs Marzano Configuration Discussion Marzano Moving Forward: Administrator/Supervisor/Teacher.
A New Approach to Assessment Based on extensive research that has identified teaching and instructional practices that are most effective in impacting.
Student Teaching Orientation January 15, Important Dates January 23 – First schedule and reflection due to University Supervisor February 11 – Deadline.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
District In-Service October 14, The principal reason for releasing the 2013 edition of The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument was to respond.
Teacher Evaluations Swartz Creek Community Schools.
Teacher Appraisal System Updates by: Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
School System Improvement (SSI) Project Online Portal Training School System Improvement (SSI) Project Online Portal Training Portal Training for the CSS.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
Holland Central School District Opening Day September 3, 2013.
 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
2011 – 2012 School Year. * Walk-Throughs * Observation(s) * Pre-/Post-Evaluation Form * Year-End Evaluation * Summative Score Report.
WL Department OCTOBER 2014 IN-SERVICE. Reviewing Baseline  Preparedness group = l,m,h ranges (see spreadsheet)
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
New Teacher Induction.
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Teacher Evaluation System
APPR Update School Year.
ABE Instructional Strategies: Getting Teachers Off to the Right Start
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
FACULTY MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 2017.
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
TeachNJ By Heather Perruso.
APPR Update School Year.
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Georgia Department of Education
Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
HEYWORTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
Evaluation Cycle At-A-Glance
Presentation transcript:

TEACHER EVALUATIONS

REVIEW OF POLICY Classroom teaching must be observed using one of the four piloted observation tools: Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching, Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model, The Thoughtful Classroom, or 5 Dimensions of Teaching and Learning. Student growth will count for 25% of the final evaluation. Pending legislation: 25% , %

Target Dates

STUDENT GROWTH Student growth will count for 25% of the final evaluation

TEACHER SMART/STUDENT GROWTH PLAN Completed within Teachscape Same as last year K-5 teachers will have the goal and explanation of goal given to them to copy and paste in template K-5 teachers will then complete the remainder of the template (i.e. strategies)

*Same as

EVALUATION PROCESS USING TEACHSCAPE Announced Observation: Evaluator s teacher to set up date/time Teacher completes Pre-Observation Form and Component of Effective Lesson Plan Checklist Observation takes place Teacher completes self review Evaluator scores observation Post-Observation meeting takes place with Teacher completing Post--Observation Form if needed

EVALUATION PROCESS USING TEACHSCAPE Unannounced Observation: Evaluator observes in classroom Teacher completes Component of Effective Lesson Plan Checklist Teacher completes self review Evaluator scores observation Post observation meeting takes place with Teacher completing Post--Observation Form if needed

Components of an Effective Lesson Plan-Checklist Complete BEFORE the Announced observation -Complete AFTER an Unannounced observation -Form is within the Teachscape system

DOMAIN 4 It is encouraged to upload and archive evidence on a consistent basis throughout the year. Once the teacher presses submit, the evaluator will see what evidence is within Teachscape. The evaluator then will request revision which allows teachers to submit more evidence.

FINAL EVALUATION FORM

*Same Form as %

I.D.P. FOR NON- TENURED AND TENURED THAT ARE ME AND IE

STUDENT GROWTH TOOLS K- Math Assessments (Pre and Post) 1 st -5 th Grade S.T.A.R. Math Assessments 6 th -12 th Agreed upon by Teacher and Evaluator

S.T.A.R. Assessment for Student Growth Measurement 1 st -5 th Grade Only 1 st – 5 th Grade will use S.T.A.R. Math as the growth measurement tool