Virginia Migrant Education Program Allocations to School Divisions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Advertisements

ARRA-Funded Voucher Initiative: Summer Summer Only Voucher Extension Proposal Extend the period for using the $2.25 million of CCDBG ARRA Funds.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I, Part A District Budget Planning The “Small” Stuff Julie McGuire, MEd Federal Funds Coordinator Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title I, Part A Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance.
Children Aged 5 to
Benefits for Private School Students and Teachers from Federal Education Programs Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement U.S.
Excess Cost Debra Jennings Lynne Fairfax Slide Presentation by Anthony White A UGUST 2012 P ART B E XCESS C OST 1.
Understanding & Complying with the Idaho Migrant Education Program Mary Lou Wells & Merced Flores Idaho Title I Conference April 2013.
July 17, Changes in EFA Weights CategoryFY 14 WeightFY 15 Weight Kindergarten Primary Elementary1.00 High School Trainable.
 Census Data  Non-Census Data  State per-pupil expenditures  Amount appropriated  Hold-harmless guarantee  School Improvement allocations.
Using Title I, Part A, and Title III, Part A, Funds to Support Students Experiencing Homelessness Lynn Sodat, Ph.D. Judy Radford Office of Program Administration.
Title I Services in Non-Public Schools Equitable Services Requirements and Funding Basics.
Kelsey School Division Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures.
Test 1 & 2 information Econ 130 Spring Information about Test 1 Number of students taking test: 41 Points possible: 50 Highest score: 47 (2 students)
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
Calculating Your Per Pupil Expenditure (PPE )….. General Selection Requirements 1.An LEA must rank all of its schools (from which the LEA draws its children)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. Title I - Part A In a nutshell….a primer.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
Louisiana’s Title I Part C Migrant Education Program
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Educational Standards Cabinet January Early Years Performance  The percentage of pupils achieving the target expectations in the Early Years Foundation.
1 Determining Title IA School Allocations Title IA Online Training
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
ESEA APPLICATION TRAINING 2013 Equitable Participation Rules for Title I Private School Students Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 1.
WELCOME Reporting Florida’s Migratory Children in the Student Data Base.
(c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 School District Budgeting.
Homeless Students and the Expenditure of Title I Part A Funds Rebecca Derenge, N&D Coordinator.
First Interim Budget Review Major Revenue Sources.
EXTENDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP) for High Schools EXTENDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP) for High Schools.
Developing a Title I Budget Title I Directors Budget and Planning Workshop June 18, 2012 Embassy Suites.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Spring N or D Application.
No Child Left Behind Application Title I, Part A Part 2.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat July 30,
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Webinar September 15,  Priority for Service Definition  State Service Delivery Plan  Tips and Reminders  Summer School 2012.
CR Programs Details Section GME System. In the table that follows, Budget Amounts are populated based on the last approved FY14 ESEA Consolidated application.
Title I, Part C Education of Migratory Children Equitable Services to Private Schools: Program Specifics.
Opening of Schools Report Information Services October 15, 2007.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
McKinney Vento Jeopardy. McKinney Vento 101 Potpourri True/False Show Me the Money!
Consortium 101: Basic Consortium Information These materials have been created to explain the premise, design and set up of a Consortium Incentive Grant(CIG).
ESS G RANT M ANAGEMENT IDEA Charter School Expansion Act (CSEA), Basic Entitlement and supplemental grants New Charter Operator Training 2015.
WIOA Youth Guidance  TEGL published on March 26, 2015  Includes the following: ▪OSY Expenditure Requirement ▪Youth Committees ▪Transitioning ISY.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Education in the United States. Table of contents Education in the United StatesEducation in the United States Compulsory education What does ‘grade’mean?
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
Special Education Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Michael Brooks Division of School Finance Special Education.
Title I: Ranking, Serving, and Allocating Funds to Schools 2016 ESEA Directors Institute August 23, 2016.
Challenges and TA Solutions for Allocating Part B Subgrants to LEAs
Louisiana's Title I, Part C, Migrant Education Program (MEP)
Title I A Comparability Report
( Annual Financial Report) Updated
Migrant Education Program New State Directors’ Orientation Tutorial Module 4: Migrant Education Program Subgrant Procedures U.S. Department of Education.
Session Overview Requirements for collaboration between Title IA and McKinney-Vento (Title X) Comparable services and serving homeless students using Title.
Maintenance of Effort Virginia Department of Education
Migrant Education Program
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Migrant Program Overview
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Counting to 100 Counting by ones
Findley Oaks Elementary Data Overview
Module 2: Placement Codes and Tuition Paid Codes
Virginia Board of Education’s
Life as A Title I, Part C Coordinator August 20, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Virginia Migrant Education Program Allocations to School Divisions

How is the USED allocation distributed between the state and school divisions? Breakdown of Allocation from USED – 99% allocated to school divisions – 1% set-aside for state administration

How are the funds divided between school divisions? The 99% allocated to school divisions is distributed based on the subgranting formula. There are five factors by which the subgranting formula is governed.

Subgranting Factors 40% Priority 1 – Priority for Service/At-Risk 24% Priority 2 - Eligible 3-21 Not include in Priority 1 20% Priority 3 – Total Served Prior Year 15% Priority 4 – Summer School Intercession 1% Priority 5 – Below 10% of Average State Per Pupil Expenditure

Priority 1 – 40 percent Priority for Service/At-Risk – The number of eligible migratory children who have moved most recently (within 1 year) and who are classified as “priority-for-service.” Priority-for-service children are defined as school age migrant students whose education has been interrupted during the regular school year and who are failing, or most at risk of failing to meet the state standards.

Priority 2 – 24 percent Eligible 3-21 – The number of eligible migratory children who are in need of and/or eligible for services and are not included in Priority One. This number includes the total number of migrant children who are counted in each category below: eligible migratory children between the ages of 3-21 who did not make a move during the last 12 months but are failing in school or are most at risk of failing to meet the state standards [Performance below grade level in reading, language arts, and mathematics; absenteeism; and non-age appropriate placement;] or are now out-of-school; all elementary and secondary migrant students identified as Continuation of Service (COS) students; and all eligible migratory students between (birth to 3).

Priority 3 – 20 percent Total Serviced Prior Year – The number of children served in the prior year.

Priority 4 – 15 percent Summer School/Intersession – The number of migrant students served in the prior year's summer/intersession program.

Priority 5 – 1 percent Below 10% of Average State Per Pupil Expenditure – The division’s overall per-pupil expenditure is ten percent (10%) below the state average per pupil expenditure. [These funds will be allocated to each division based on the number of children counted in priority 3 above (i.e., children served).]