Institutional Settings for Evaluation, at the example of the German Institute for Development Evaluation (DEval) – Something to benefit from ? Global Dialogue.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Mutual accountability and aid transparency Mutual accountability and aid transparency Republic of Moldova 1IATI meeting, OECD Conference center.

Advertisements

Key challenges in mutual accountability - citizens and csos imperative in accountability Antonio Tujan Jr.

The Regional Capacity Building Project for Public Service Training Institutions in Post-Conflict Countries Prof Anne Mc Lennan on behalf of PALAMA Graduate.

Enhancing the Effectiveness of School Feeding/Nutrition Programmes through Rights-based Approaches A Project Note SCN – Working Group on Nutrition, Ethics.

Structured dialogue within Globale Verantwortung (former EU-Plattform) Danijela Janosevic Regional Partnership Programme.

Review of different stakeholders needs in relation to Joint Assessment of National Strategies and Plans (JANS) Preliminary Findings IHP+ Country Teams.

Sabelo Mbokazi Senior Policy Officer HIV/AIDS, TB, Malaria & OID

ORGANISED LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA (SALGA) PRESENTATION TO CNM Scope of the relationships between local governments of IBSA July 2009.

STATUS OF DELEGATED COOPERATION

9-10/4/03AK1 Workshop on enabling environments for technology transfer Ghent, Belgium 9-10 April 2003 Andrej Kranjc Ministry of the Environment, Spatial.

Country-led Evaluation Capacity Development Marco Segone, Regional Monitoring & Evaluation Advisor, UNICEF Regional Office for Central and Eastern Europe.

EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director

EIA & SEA: a short state of the art Adaptation Fund 19 June 2011 Rob Verheem 2011.

TORINO PROCESS. TORINO PROCESS 2014 THE TORINO PROCESS 2 THE TORINO PROCESS IS a participatory process leading to an evidence-based analysis of VET policies.

Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon

Global Dialogue of Agencies and Ministries for International Cooperation and Development Lima, Peru April 11-12, 2013 Avenida Juárez núm. 20, Col. Centro,

Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006

Results of the Fact-Finding Survey on ECD in Partner Countries ECD Task Force, Evalunet 15 November 2006.

ATHA Specialized Training on Child Protection in Emergencies November 2009.

Implementation of Global Action Plan for Peatlands and Ramsar CC GAP future Wise Use of Peatlands Schiphol February, 2009.

Monitoring :Thailand’s Experiences Session 2: Monitoring: Processes, Potentials, Tools and Instruments Global Dialogue of Agencies and Ministries for International.

Shaida Badiee, Director Development Data Group The World Bank International Forum on Monitoring Economic Development Beijing, China Sept 28, 2011.

Development Cooperation and Partnerships Strategy ( ) October 2014 KIM Lumang Bopata Policy Department.

Identifying Data Needs: Workshop on Household Surveys and Measurement of Labour Force with Focus on Informal Economy Maseru, Lesotho, April 2008.

Peter Hansen Perspectives on Development Aid Health Impact Assessment ASPHER/EAGHA Consultative Workshop Brussels, 6 February 2012.

Capacity Self-Assessment as a management tool for organisational development planning u A model used for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration,

GLOBAL COMPACT NETWORK VIETNAM, THE GC PRINCIPLES AND ITBI Mr. Nguyễn Quang Vinh General Director of SD4B, VCCI DNPD, CBC-CSR Project 8/ 27/2010.

PARIS21/CARICOM Workshop on NSDS, Trinidad and Tobago, July 2009 NSDS Overview Presentation by PARIS21 Secretariat.

Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.

The Future Approach to EU Budget Support Structured Dialogue Meeting 9 th /10 th November 2011 Lars Wilke, DG DEVCO A2 Economic Analysis, Public Finance,

Session Overview Introduction course structure Introduction participants Declarations and guidelines on (support to) DLG Decentralisation and aid effectivenss.

United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Dissemination and Spatial Analysis for Arabic Speaking Countries, Amman, Jordan May 2011 Identification.

PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.

1 EU Strategy for the Danube Region A new challenge - new opportunities Belgrade 29 April 2010 Nathalie Verschelde DG Regional Policy.

Developing Consensus Principles and Standards for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs (GRPPs) Progress Report to the Fifth Meeting of the.

NSDS DESIGN PROCESS: ROAD MAPS & OTHER PRELIMINARIES Prof. Ben Kiregyera NSDS Workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 9 August 2005.

ECENA Workshop on Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring in Environmental Enforcement and Compliance Szentendre, March 29-30, 2007 Assessment Tools and Methods.

Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.

Co-operative Compliance & BEPS Sustaining the model-next steps.

United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Dissemination and Spatial Analysis for Arabic Speaking Countries, Amman, Jordan May 2011 Identification.

Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments

TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.

Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.

Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.

Seite 1 Page th ANNUAL MEETING May 18 th -20 th Brussels Hosted by EuropeAid and SDC.

The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.

Capacity Building for the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety by the German Development Co-operation: German Federal Ministry for Economic.

Rooting evaluation independence in the context of multilateral development organizations Oscar A. Garcia Director, Independent Office of Evaluation of.

THE PARIS DECLARATION and DAC EVALUATION QUALITY STANDARDS Task Team on New Context for Development Evaluation DAC EQS Workshop, Auckland, 10 February.

CARIBBEAN WORKSHOP ON E-GOVERNMENT BEST PRACTICES Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, July 26-28, 2005.

Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.

TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.

Country-led Joint Evaluation Dutch ORET/MILIEV Programme in China NCSTE Country-led Joint Evaluation Dutch ORET/MILIEV Programme in China Chen Zhaoying.

Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.

Seite 1 Martina Vahlhaus GTZ Evaluation Unit Monitoring & Evaluation Efforts: How do they influence resource allocation? GMF-IFC-GTZ Meeting.

GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.

The BMBF Danube Region call - a pillar of the German research cooperation with Central Eastern and South Eastern European Countries Dr Matthias Hack Federal.

13th Governing Council of SIAP 4-5th December,2017 Chiba, Japan

Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments

Eurostat approach to international statistical cooperation – ENP East

11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.

Dr. Thania Paffenholz Oslo 14 February 2011

A Human rights based approach for evaluating disability issues: Evaluation of an action plan for the inclusion of persons with disabilities in German development.

12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.

Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture

Identifying Data Needs:

Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments

2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.

Kateřina Fialková, Director,

Formulation and Development of National IP Strategy

Presentation transcript:

Institutional Settings for Evaluation, at the example of the German Institute for Development Evaluation (DEval) – Something to benefit from ? Global Dialogue | Lima, April 10-11, 2013 Prof Helmut Asche

Framework Questions with Deval as example Legal framework and division of labour in the German aid evaluation system as in BMZ presentation (session 1) Political framework / institutional setting: On the one hand narrow (initial) setting. DEval evaluates: aid only: = less than what nr of evaluation departments/agencies in MICs do bilateral aid only: multilateral cooperation mostly covered still by BMZ BMZ aid only: other ministries delivering German aid not (yet) covered: Foreign Affairs, Environment, …. On the other hand broad and courageous politico-institutional setup: Broad consultations for evaluation programme (planned) DEval to cover all German aid institutions – public agencies, NGOs (faith-based included), political foundations Free to address issues all across hierarchy, incl quality of political steering by the ministry Contribution to evaluation culture at large awaited, hence high media attention Free to cooperate world-wide with other agencies on evaluations and capacity dev. 1/22/2013 Page 2

M&E System of DEval: The Context Page 3

Three Pillars of DEval`s Work Conduct high quality impact evaluations or performance reviews of development programmes, institutions and instruments Contribute to refinement of evaluation methods and standards Evaluation Capacity Development (ECD) in partner countries Seite 4 Learning from evaluation DEval German Institute for Development Evaluation

M&E System of DEval (Baseline Study) Page 5

Seven Guiding Principles of DEval Evaluation 1.Independent: No interference by ministry or agencies in report coverage and wording 2.Transparent: All reports submitted to ministry and parliament, and fully published. Appropriate communication strategy, including report formats, under consideration 3.Highest quality: Reference to all relevant international standards and mix of methods 4.Participatory: Involves all stakeholders, to the extent possible 5.Demand-driven: Replies to effective demand for scrutiny from ministry, parliament, aid agencies or public, based on 8 criteria 6.Partnership with country institutions: Evaluations jointly carried out with national evaluation agencies or research institutes, wherever possible. Hence, international cooperation in M&E and ECD crucial for DEval work 7.Efficient: Evaluations based on internal assessment of evaluation cost and benefits Page 6 strategic decisions ahead, political relevance, risks, coverage, volume of aid, innovation potential, learning potential, methodological relevance.

Meeting RG Workshop Stakeholder Quality Check by DEval KMZ Internal Knowledge Management Roadmap of Evaluations by DEval Page 7

MEP Multi-annual Evaluation Programme Page 8

Thank you for your kind attention! Prof. Dr. Helmut Asche