Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: 2015-05-10 Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail Reza.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0354r1 March 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation Date: Authors:
Preamble Structure in ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /0621r2 May 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Design Principles for HE Preamble Date: Authors:
DL OFDMA Performance and ACK Multiplexing
Doc.: IEEE /1448r0 Submission November 2014 Considerations for Adaptive CCA Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1232r1 Submission September 2014 Reza Hedayat, NEWRACOM On MU Aggregation Mechanisms for 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1211r0 Submission September 2014 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Ack Procedure for OFDMA Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Doc.: IEEE /1233r2 Submission Adaptive CCA for 11ax September 2014 Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0567r0 May 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 Multi-STA BA for SU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1448r1 Submission November 2014 Considerations for Adaptive CCA Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1313r1 Submission November 2015 Considerations for Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /86r0 Submission January 2015 Uplink MU Transmission and Legacy Coexistence Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r0 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Reza Hedayat, Newracom doc.: IEEE /829r0 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat Young.
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0586r1 Slide 1 Frequency Diversity Options in OFDMA Date: Authors: Reza Hedayat, Newracom NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Diversity Mode in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0066r0 Submission January 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Downlink OFDMA Protocol Design Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1098r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 ACK/BA frame for UL MU under cascading structure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r0 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
HE Trigger Frame Format
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
MCS, NSS, BW and PPDU selection for 11ax
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Regarding UL MU protection
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Considerations for Spatial Reuse
Regarding HE fragmentation
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
Multiplexing of Acknowledgements for Multicast Transmission
Recipient-aware Spatial Reuse
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat Young Hoon Kwon Yongho Seok Vida Ferdowsi Newracom9008 Research Drive, Irvine, CA reza.hedayat at newracom.com younghoon.kwon at newracom.com yongho.seok at newracom.com vida.ferdowsi at newracom.com Reza Hedayat, Newracom

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission Background Slide 2 TGax adopted DL OFDMA and along with DL MU MIMO, there are now two DL MU mechanisms The efficiency of DL OFDMA is enhanced significantly if multiple ACK/BAs are multiplexed in response to a DL OFDMA PPDU –ACK/BA multiplexing also enhances DL MU MIMO efficiency Based on this 11ax SFD has adopted that “The amendment shall include a mechanism to multiplex BA/ACK responses to DL MU transmission. ” In this contribution some details on how ACK/BA frames could be multiplexed in response to a DL MU MIMO are presented

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission ACK/BA Frame Attributes in Legacy Designs Slide 3 Content of L-SIG, SIG-A and SIG-B –In legacy amendments, these fields are decided by each STA as specified by the spec ACK/BA frame size –ACK: 14B –Compressed BA: 32B –Multi-TID BA: 22B + 12B per each TID MCS and NSS –Under current rules and designs MCS and NSS are selected by the STA Guard Interval (GI) –Under current rules and designs GI is selected by the STA: 0.8us or 0.4us

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission UL ACK/BA Multiplexing Slide 4 PHY/MAC attributes of each ACK/BA frame in an UL OFDMA frame Content of L-SIG, SIG-A and SIG-B –Need to be set by all STAs with the same values; either by AP’s explicit indication in the preceding DL MU PPDU, or as spec defines. Sub-band assignment –Assignments for the sub-band of each ACK/BA frame need to be given (next slide) MCS and NSS –Could be decided by each STA as currently done, or –AP could require all STAs to use robust MCS and NSS choices GI, LTF compression, … –AP need to mandate that all STAs use the same values for these parameters

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission Sub-band Assignment for ACK/BA Multiplexing Slide 5 It is expected that the transmission bandwidth of the multiplexed ACK/BA to be the same or less than the transmission bandwidth of the preceding DL MU frame and AP need to indicate this to the STAs –If the bandwidth of the multiplexed ACK/BA frame is less that the bandwidth of the preceding DL MU MIMO, then the bandwidth of possible subsequent frames in a TXOP would be same or les than the bandwidth of the last frame Depending on the bandwidth of the preceding DL MU frame bandwidth, the number of available sub-bands for multiplexing ACK/BA frames vary Considering 2MHz and 4MHz sub-bands, possibly up to nine ACK and BA frames could be multiplexed in a 20MHz PPDU

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission Sub-band Assignment for ACK/BA Multiplexing Slide 6 Bandwidth of assigned sub-band for each ACK/BA –DL payloads in a DL OFDMA could vary a lot, therefore assigned sub-bands in a DL OFDMA PPDU could vary a lot –But ACK/BA sizes do not vary as much, hence less variance in assigned sub-bands for each ACK/BA frame is expected, and an more equal assignments might be more fitting Depending on the bandwidth of the preceding DL MU frame bandwidth, the number of available sub-bands vary Considering 2 and 4MHz sub-bands, possibly up to nine ACK and BA frames could be multiplexed in a 20MHz PPDU

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission Sub-band Assignment for ACK/BA Multiplexing Slide 7 Explicit sub-band assignment –In each DL OFDMA PPDU, AP can explicitly indicate what sub-band to be used by the STA for placing the ACK/BA –If the ACK Policy subfield of QoS Control is set to “No ACK”, then the AP does not assign any sub-band to the STA –Explicit assignment allows the AP to assign best/better sub-bands for each STA Implicit sub-band assignment –STAs might pick up a sub-band (from the set of the sub-bands) based on some order –For instance, based on the same order that their DL assignment appears in the preceding DL OFDMA PPDU, or the same order as in the GID of the preceding DL MU MIMO PPDU –For this case, the bandwidth of sub-bands used for ACK/BA need to be known to STAs e.g. be pre-announced in the preceding DL OFDMA frame etc

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission Trigger Frame for UL MU Transmission Slide 8 For UL MU operation, TGax has adopted a new frame called Trigger frame where it triggers the simultaneous transmission of individual frames by several STAs Trigger frame may appear in several forms. For instance: –New frame type of Trigger frame sent to specific STAs where it includes the necessary scheduling details for the STAs –New frame type of Trigger frame broadcasted to a set of STAs or all STAs, where a STA can grab a sub-band to send a data, control, or management frame in a scheduled or non- scheduled (random access) manner –DL MU PPDU where the AP expects two or more ACK or BA frames from the STAs addressed in the DL MU PPDU –Or a DL MU PPDU where it triggers a combination of above items such as ACK/BA frames from the addressed STAs and other frames from other/all STAs

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission Conclusion Slide 9 This contribution discusses some details regarding how ACK and BA frames should be multiplex in response to a DL MU PPDU Along with the TGax SFD inclusion of Trigger frame, a DL MU PPDU may act as a Trigger frame for the ACK and BA frames that follow after the DL MU PPDU There are implicit and explicit options for the AP to specify the sub-bands that each STA uses to place its ACK/BA frame

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission Strawpoll 1 Slide 10 Do you agree to add the following to 11ax SFD: “ DL MU PPDU may act as Trigger frame for the multiplexed AC/BA frame that follows the DL MU frame.” –Y/N/A:

doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission Strawpoll 2 Slide 11 Do you agree to add the following to 11ax SFD: “A DL MU PPDU shall not signal explicitly the resource assignment for ACK or BA frames that follow the DL MU frame.” –Y/N/A: