US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flood Profile Modeling with Split Flows and Weirs
Advertisements

Megan Kaun San Francisco District (415) US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District Sediment.
Bankfull / Effective / Dominant
15 March 2012 WATERSHED Science & Engineering WEST Consultants.
Use of a hydrodynamic model to
Streamflow and Runoff The character, amount, and timing of discharge from a basin tells a lot about flow paths within the basin Therefore, important to.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® RIVER RESOURCES ACTION TEAM BOAT TRIP Upper Mississippi River (Pools 24, 25, and Mel Price) St. Louis District.
BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Support to Gulf Coast Recovery U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal.
1 Sediment Management for Dam Removal: An HEC-6 Approach.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Sediment Diversion Work Plan Task 1 : Data Collection and Analysis December.
TIDAL INLETS Natural of man-made cut through barrier island Allows for bay flushing Provides access for maritime traffic Normally migrate unless restrained.
Floodplain Delineation of Indiana Streams Allison Craddock Tom Gormley Jessica Tempest Erin Wenger.
1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS with applications to RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS © Gary Parker November, CHAPTER 13: THE QUASI-STEADY APPROXIMATION.
CVEN 689 Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Estimating Salt Concentration at Ungaged Locations from Parameters derived using GIS Ganesh Krishnamurthy Water.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Stage – Discharge Rating Numerical relationship between water elevation (stage) and discharge at a location in a flowing system. Expressed as an equation,
WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR BRANCHED RIVER SYSTEMS.
HEC-RAS.
U.S. EPA: NCEA/Global Change Research Program Jim Pizzuto and students University of Delaware Changing Climate and Land Use in the Mid-Atlantic: Modeling.
Modeling River Ice and River Ice Jams with HEC-RAS
Model Simulation Studies of Hurricane Isabel in Chesapeake Bay Jian Shen Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences College of William and Mary.
Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology December 11, 2013.
HYDRAULICS AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT: RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS
Sediment transport in wadi systems
Lower Saluda River Instream Flow Study TWC Study Team Workshop December 11, 2007.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Two.
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
LCA Mississippi River Hydrodynamic and Delta Management Study (MRHDMS) Carol Parsons Richards River Studies Manager Governor’s Advisory Commission on Coastal.
Sediment Transport in Wadi Systems Part 1: Overview
Sediment transport in wadi systems Part 3 - Sediment management structures and canal design
MA BF REFERENCE CURVES Objective Develop bankfull regional curves and equations for estimating bankfull width, mean depth, cross-sectional area, and discharge.
Big Horn Lake Sediment Management Study. US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Study Background Bureau of Reclamation and Omaha District Interagency.
1 Application of Surface-water Modeling System (SMS) on River Stream: A Case Study in Brantas River Mohammad Sholichin (1), Faridah Othman (2) (1) Lecturer,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Modeling sand transport and sandbar evolution along the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam.
Water Quality Modeling of Bonnet Carré Freshwater Flows in the Pontchartrain Estuary Rachel Roblin Alex McCorquodale Ioannis Georgiou.
Outline of the training. 6 October 2005, TNMC, Bangkok.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
Review of DWSC Modeling- what should we do next? Russ Brown, Jones & Stokes DO-TMDL Technical Work Group May 16,2006.
Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic model to morphological changes and changes in flood inundation extent J.S. Wong 1, J. Freer 1, P.D. Bates 1, & D.A. Sear.
Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme. Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme unconditionally stable for  >=0.5 second-order accurate if 
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Hydrodynamic, Water Quality, and Ecological Modeling to Assess System-wide Impacts.
Design Guidance for Low-water Crossing in Gravel Rivers Xing Fang Lamar University.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
Expected Long Term Site Evolution of Alameda Creek and former Salt Ponds following Tidal Marsh Restoration Matt Wickland Philip.
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
Development, Testing and Application of the Multi-Block LTFATE Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Model Earl J. Hayter See instructions for customizing.
ONE-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS ON BEDEVOLUTION ACCOMPANING BANK EROSION Satoru Nakanishi Hokkaido University Graduate School Kazuyoshi Hasegawa Hokkaido University.
Interill Erosion. Interill Detachment and Sediment Delivery to Rills.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation Integration of Results 6 Month Progress ERDC West Bay.
1 INTRODUCTION TO “Stratigrafia” The code in the workbook “stratigrafia” computes - longitudinal profiles; - water surface elevation; - sediment transport.
Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology November 13, 2015.
Technical Support in Engineering Construction Phase of Craney Island Eastward Expansion Mac Sisson, Harry Wang, Jian Shen, Albert Kuo, and Wenping Gong.
Hydraulic and Sediment Handling Performance Assessment of Rani Jamara Kulariya Irrigation Project (RJKIP) by Conjunctive Use of 1D and 3D Simulation Models.
Change in Flood Risk across Canada under Changing Climate
Better Characterizing Uncertainty in Geologic Paleoflood Analyses
Morphodynamic and Sediment Tracers in One-Dimension
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
A SURFACE WATER MODEL OF THE MIAMI RIVER
Louisiana Coastal Area
Hydrologic River Routing
Mississippi River Hydrodynamic and Delta Management Study
Hydrology.
6.1 BASIC ENGINEERING New ‘modernised’ diversion structures have promoted larger inequity in the distribution of irrigation water between upstream and.
The shapes of stream channels
The Flow of Freshwater.
Instituto Superior Técnico instituto superior técnico
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and Peer Review Team Presentation 2 December 2009 Freddie Pinkard ERDC - CHL

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling Purpose Model Capabilities, Limitations, & Requirements Modeling Approach MVK Regional HEC-6T Base Model ERDC HEC-6T Model Results and Conclusions Sensitivity Analyses

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling Purpose ● The 1-dimensional modeling provides the means of assessing the long term impacts (50 year simulations) of the diversion as well as providing upstream sediment boundary conditions for the multi dimensional models. ● The results of the 1-dimensional modeling will be integrated with the results of the geomorphic assessment and the multi dimensional models in order to provide a complete evaluation of the impacts of the West Bay Diversion.

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling Model Capabilities, Limitations, and Requirements HEC-6T Sedimentation In Steam Networks ● is a 1-dimensional movable boundary open channel flow numerical model designed to simulate and predict changes in river bed profiles resulting from scour and/or deposition over moderate time periods ● provides computed total sediment discharge passing each cross section and the volume of deposits or scour accumulated at each cross section from the beginning of the simulation

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling Model Capabilities, Limitations, and Requirements HEC-6T Advantages ● Allows for long term simulations ● Ability to simulate dredging activities ● Allows for the diversion of both water and sediment and calculates that impact on downstream sediment transport HEC-6T Disadvantage ● Uses average hydraulic and sediment parameters to simulate 3-dimensional processes in 1 dimension

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling Model Capabilities, Limitations, and Requirements Input Requirements ● Channel Geometry ● Upstream Boundary Conditions ● Flow ● Sediment Loads ● Bed Material Gradations ● Distributary / Diversion Outflow and Sediment Concentrations ● Water Temperature ● Downstream Boundary Conditions Water Surface Elevations ● User Defined Sediment Transport Function

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling Model Capabilities, Limitations, and Requirements Two Phased Calibration ● Water Surface Profiles ● Sediment Observed Deposition and/or Erosion Measured Loads Dredging Records

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling - Modeling Approach ● Utilize MVK developed regional HEC-6T model ● Add cross sections through study reach to better define channel geometry ● Compare ERDC collected diverted flow, sediment concentration, and bed material gradation data to model values ● As model input parameters are modified, check model calibration ● Determine subsidence and sea level rise rates

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling Modeling Approach ● Develop typical discharge hydrograph ● Develop downstream water surface elevations to match the discharge hydrograph ● Develop composite dredge template ● Run hydrograph for 4 alternative scenarios West Bay Diversion Closed + No PAA Dredging West Bay Diversion Closed + PAA Dredging West Bay Diversion Open + No PAA Dredging West Bay Diversion Open + PAA Dredging

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling Modeling Approach ● Compare sediment deposition locations and quantities and dredging locations and quantities through the PAA for the 4 50-year simulation scenarios to determine the impact that the West Bay Diversion has on the PAA

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling MVK Regional HEC-6T Model ● Model Limits - Vicksburg, MS (RM ) to Pilots’ Station in Southwest Pass (RM -18) ● Channel Geometry Comprehensive Hydrographic Survey ● Cross Section Distribution

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling MVK Regional HEC-6T Model ● Bed Material Gradations ● Nordin and Queen samples collected in 1989 ● 2 year frequency discharge run for 30 days to rework bed material gradations. ● Water Temperature – monthly averages from measured values at Tarbert Landing ● Downstream Water Surface Elevations – monthly average stages for the NOAA gage at Grand Isle East Point

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling MVK Regional HEC-6T Model ● Diversion / Distributary Locations

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling MVK Regional HEC-6T Model ● Diversion Flow Distributions – percentage of Mississippi River flow upstream of diversion estimated from measured data or calculated ● Sediment Concentration Diversion Ratios – ratio of sediment concentration in the diverted flow compared to sediment concentration in the Mississippi River derived by grain size for a range of flows from measured data or estimated using the Rouse equation ● Sediment Transport Function – Toffaleti / Meyer-Peter Muller

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling MVK Regional HEC-6T Model ● Impact of Salinity – approximated by varying the silt and clay shear threshold deposition coefficients ● Water Surface Profile Calibration – gage stations

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling MVK Regional HEC-6T Model ● Sediment Calibration ● observed deposition downstream of the Old River Complex ● observed erosion at Smithland Crossing ● measured sediment transport at Tarbert Landing and at Belle Chasse ● reported dredge volumes in Southwest Pass and Above Head of Passes

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model ● Model Limits - Vicksburg, MS (RM ) to Pilots’ Station in Southwest Pass (RM -18) ● Cross Section Distribution

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center ● Analyze ERDC Collected Data / Compare With MVK Model Input / Revise Input As Required ● Flow Distribution At Diversions / Distributaries ● Sediment Concentration Ratios Between Diversions / Distributaries And The River ● Bed Material Gradations From RM 19.6 to RM Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling - ERDC HEC-6T Model Flow Distribution – Baptiste Collette Bayou, Grand Pass, West Bay Diversion, and Cubits Gap

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling - ERDC HEC-6T Model Flow Distribution – West Bay Diversion

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling - ERDC HEC-6T Model West Bay Diversion Sediment Concentration Diversion Ratios Derived From ADH 2-D Model

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model West Bay Diversion Sediment Concentration Diversion Ratios

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Bed Sample Locations Grand Pass West Bay Diversion

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center River Mile 5.5 ERDC Bed Sample Locations BSS-18 BSS-17 Looking Downstream

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model Bed Material Gradations At Site BSS-17

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model Bed Material Gradations At Site BSS-18

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Bed Sample Locations West Bay Diversion Cubits Gap Head Of Passes

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center River Mile 2.5 ERDC Bed Sample Locations BSS - 23 BSS - 26 Looking Downstream

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model Bed Material Gradations At Site BSS-23

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model Bed Material Gradations At Site BSS-26

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 1-Dimensional Modeling ERDC HEC-6T Model Subsidence Rates Derived From NOAA Technical Report NOS/NGS 50

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Typical Hydrograph At Vicksburg BSS Dimensional Modeling - ERDC HEC-6T Model

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center ● Develop Downstream Boundary Condition ● Daily 8:00 AM Stage At Grand Isle, East Point Gage ● Rectify Datum Issues ● Sediment Transport Function – Toffaleti ● Extended the moveable bed limits and utilized a realistic dredging template (750 feet wide at -50 feet, MLG minus 1 foot overdepth / advance maintenance dredging) 1-Dimensional Modeling - ERDC HEC-6T Model

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center ● Composite Dredge Template – extended dredging width to add an end area equivalent to match the PAA dredging. Width varied from 940 to 970 feet depending upon PAA dredging elevation (-41, -44, or -48 feet) at -50 feet, MLG ● Model under estimates reported dredging quantities in Southwest Pass but responds well in other reaches. Computational analysis instead of computational model. 1-Dimensional Modeling - ERDC HEC-6T Model

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center River Mile 2.46 – West Bay Diversion Open 1-Dimensional Modeling – ERDC HEC-6T Model Navigation Dredge Template vs. Composite Dredge Template Utilized Option Of Filling Dredge Cut First, Then Deposits Equally Across The Cross Section

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Total Sediment Load for the Ms River Between RM 80 and RM -20 Relative to Total Sediment Load at RM Dimensional Modeling – Results

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Total Sediment Load for the Ms River Between RM15 and RM -5 Relative to Total Sediment Load at RM Dimensional Modeling – Results Baptiste Collette Bayou Grand Pass West Bay Diversion Cubits Gap Head Of Passes

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center River Mile 2.46 – West Bay Diversion Closed 1-Dimensional Modeling – Results

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center River Mile 2.46 – West Bay Diversion Open 1-Dimensional Modeling – ERDC HEC-6T Model

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center River Mile 2.46 West Bay Diversion Open / No PAA Dredging 1-Dimensional Modeling – Results

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center River Mile 2.46 West Bay Diversion Open / With PAA Dredging 1-Dimensional Modeling – Results

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center BSS - 23 Average Dredging Per Cycle Upstream of Head of Passes During 10 Year Periods 1-Dimensional Modeling – Results

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center BSS - 23 Percentage of Dredging Due to Opening West Bay Diversion 1-Dimensional Modeling – Results

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Sensitivity of Model Modifications ● Dredging Template Dimensions and Moveable Bed Width ● Sediment Concentration Diversion Ratios ● Subsidence Rates ● Daily Downstream Stages ● Increased Cross Sections to Better Define Channel Geometry

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Sensitivity Analyses (Recommended For 12 Month Effort) ● Future Flows (Typical Hydrograph) ● Future Development of West Bay Diversion ● Different Transport Functions ● Impact of Different Diversions / Distributaries

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center BSS - 23 ● West Bay Diversion can not be analyzed in isolation. ● Approximately 40% - 50% of the total sediment load at RM 12.5 is diverted and/or deposits upstream of Head of Passes. ● The 1-D model performs well in reproduction of deposition and dredging locations but under estimates the best available estimates of dredging quantities in Southwest Pass. ● From Cubits Gap downstream to Head of Passes, the channel functions as an efficient sediment trap. 1-Dimensional Modeling – Conclusions

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center BSS - 23 ● Although the West Bay Diversion diverts only 7% of the total flow, the computed impact on dredging is disproportionably large. The 1-D model indicates that the West Bay Diversion accounts for 20% – 25% of the dredging required above Head of Passes including the PAA. ● Due to the influence of salinity and tides, a 3-D or laterally averaged hydrodynamic / salinity / sedimentation model may be required to resolve the sedimentation processes in Southwest Pass. 1-Dimensional Modeling – Conclusions

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling Questions / Comments