The Importance of Coaching in Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon www.pbis.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Providing State-Wide Leadership Rob HornerBarbara Kelley University of OregonRoger Titgemeyer Orange County George.
Advertisements

Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
1 Implementing a Three-Tiered State Evaluation Structure Bob Putnam The May Institute Karen Childs University of South Florida 2009 National PBIS Leadership.
Welcome! October VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Rob Horner and Steve Goodman. Goals Logic for investing in Trainer development For state leadership teams developing action plan For individuals identified.
San Jose Unified School District School-wide PBS Initiative Leadership Team Rob Horner Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Pbis.org.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2011
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2010
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Keys to Sustaining School-wide PBIS Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
Building Trainer Competency for Coaches
Support systems and sustained implementation of a data-driven, problem-solving model Margie McGlinchey MAASE Summer Institute August 11, 2009 Steve Goodman.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Current assumptions/research about coaching Define the experience with coaching in SWPBS implementation.
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
Sustaining School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Support
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS AUGUST Introduction to Coaching.
Scaling up and sustaining an integrated behavior and reading schoolwide model of supports November 18, 2008.
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Strengthening Positive Classroom Management in Elementary Schools Judy Arthur, First Steps to Success Coordinator, Tigard Tualatin School District Sally.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March Congratulations – your work has made a difference Cohort 8.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
Providing Technical Assistance for Evidence-based Practices Rob Horner OSEP TA-Center on PBIS
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Evidence-based Practices: A Technical Assistance Perspective Lou Danielson, Chair Brian Cobb, Susan Sanchez, Kathleen Lane, Rob Horner
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Coaches Corner: Kathryn Schallmo MiBLSi Director.
Sustaining and Improving Implementation of SWPBS Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on Positive Behavior Support
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Workshop Presented by VTPBiS State Team.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Coaching Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Steve Goodman miblsi.cenmi.org December 6, 2010.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports – Coaching School/AEA Month, 20xx.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
Iowa Behavior Alliance: School-wide PBS Third Annual State Conference October 2-3, 2007.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Introduction to Coaching
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Presentation transcript:

The Importance of Coaching in Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon

Goals Current assumptions/research about coaching Define our experience with coaching in PBS implementation Implications for building district capacity

Coaching Defined Coaching is the active and iterative delivery of: ◦ (a) prompts that increase successful behavior, and ◦ (b) corrections that decrease unsuccessful behavior. ◦ Coaching is done by someone with credibility and experience with the target skill(s) ◦ Coaching is done on-site, in real time ◦ Coaching is done after initial training ◦ Coaching is done repeatedly (e.g. monthly) ◦ Coaching intensity is adjusted to need

Outcomes of Coaching Fluency with trained skills Adaptation of trained concepts/skills to local contexts and challenges  And new challenges that arise Rapid redirection from miss-applications Increased fidelity of overall implementation Improved sustainability  Most often due to ability to increase coaching intensity at critical points in time.

Training Outcomes Related to Training Components Training Outcomes Training Components Knowledge of Content Skill Implementation Classroom Application Presentation/ Lecture Plus Demonstration Plus Practice Plus Coaching/ Admin Support Data Feedback 10% 5% 0% 30% 20% 0% 60% 60% 5% 95% 95% 95% Joyce & Showers, 2002

Coaching within SWPBS Implementation Context: ◦ 9000 schools implementing SWPBS nationally Defining the Role  Internal vs External Selecting Coaches Training and support for coaches Assessing Impact

Leadership Team Funding Visibility Political Support TrainingCoachingEvaluation Local Demonstration Schools Active Coordination Behavioral Expertise

Coaching vs. Training Coaching involves active collaboration and participation, but not group instruction. ◦ Small group ◦ Build from local competence ◦ Sustainable

Who should be a coach? Internal vs External  Internal coaches are employed in the school where they provide support  External coaches are employed outside the schools where they provide support (e.g. by district, region, state).

Who should be a coach? Internal CoachExternal Coach AdvantagesKnowledge of school Staff relationships Regular access Independent Outside perspective Multiple schools experience DisadvantagesConflicting roles Narrow range of experiences Limited knowledge of school Limited relationships Less frequent access

Who should be a coach Coaching Competencies NecessaryPreferred Participate in team training Able to attend team meetings at least monthly Effective working with adults Knowledgeable about school operating systems Professional Commitment Knowledge about SWPBS Knowledge about behavior support practices (targeted, individual) Skilled in collection and use of data for decision-making.

What Coaches Do Work with team during initial SW-PBS training Meet with new teams monthly on-site Telephone/ contact as needed “Positive” nag  Self-assessment (EBS Survey, Team Checklist)  Action planning  Activity implementation  On-going evaluation  School self-evaluation efforts  State-wide Initiative evaluation efforts (SET) Guide State-wide initiative  Feedback to Taskforce

What Coaches Do Dissemination of outcomes and effects SWIS Facilitation ◦ Implement and support use of data-based decision making.

Commitment of Coaches Team Support ◦ First Year ( 1-2 teams) (participate in training and planning) ◦ Second Year ( Maintain initial teams, start 3-5 teams) ◦ Future Years ( teams total ) FTE commitment ◦ 20-50% Roles/Background ◦ Behavior Specialists, Special Education Teachers ◦ Consultants, Administrators ◦ School Psychologists, Counselors, Social Workers

Guiding Principles for Effective Coaching Build local capacity  Become unnecessary…but remain available Maximize current competence  Never change things that are working  Always make the smallest change that will have the biggest impact Focus on valued outcomes  Tie all efforts to the benefits for children Emphasize Accountability  Measure and report; measure and report; measure and report. Build credibility through:  (a) consistency, (b) competence with behavioral principles/practices, (c) relationships, (d) time investment. Precorrect for success

Specific Expectations ◦ Attend and participate in team training ◦ Meet with your team(s) at least monthly  Provide technical assistance as needed ◦ Monitor and report on team efforts  Team Checklist  EBS Survey/ SET/ ISSET  Annual Profile/Summary Data ◦ Present on School-wide PBS at district, state, national forums. ◦ Assist district to build capacity for sustained implementation (re-define your role over time) ◦ Meetings with Coordinator and Taskforce for purposes of state-wide planning

Assist Teams in Using Data for Decision-making Using Team-Checklist and EBS Survey data for Team Action Planning Using SET/ TIC data for evaluation Using ODR/ Academic (ORF) data for assessment, planning and reporting. Keeping faculty involved through regular data reporting.

Examples Illinois North Carolina Michigan

PBIS in Illinois July 17, 2008 Developing Local Systems of Care for Children and Adolescents with Mental Health Needs and their Families Training Institutes Nashville, TN Lucille Eber Ed.D. IL PBIS Network

PBIS Schools Over Ten Years: Trained & Partially or Fully Implementing

# IL PBIS Schools & # External Coaches June 30, 2008

The Organization of PBIS in Illinois 900 schools implementing SWPBS ISBE Coordination Chicago Coordinators North Coordinators Central Coordinators South Coordinators 46 Coaches (10) 33 Schools 495 Coaches (84) 525 Schools 193 Coaches (20) 203 Schools 105 Coaches (29) 127 Schools

Elementary Middle

Capacity Schools per Coach per Region

Illinois Suspension Rates per 100 PBS slope = Non PBS slope = -.37

Illinois Suspension Rates per 100 for Black and Hispanic Students PBS Slope = Non PBS Slope = -,34

North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative Partners’ Update February 2009 Heather R. Reynolds NC Department of Public Instruction Bob Algozzine Behavior and Reading Improvement Center

State PBS Coordinator Heather R Reynolds North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative

Office discipline referral data (majors) from schools implementing PBS in North Carolina [07-08] compare favorably with national averages.

North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative Levels of behavior risk in schools implementing PBS were comparable to widely-accepted expectations and better than those in comparison schools not systematically implementing PBS.

North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative [A]chievement causes [B]ehavior? [B]ehavior causes [A]chievement? [Context causes [A]chievement and [B]ehavior?.

Steve Goodman

Goals 1. Share information about Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Support Initiative (MiBLSi) 2. Provide examples of improving the quality and quantity of the data collected 3. Provide examples of acting upon project data to improve outcomes

Participating Schools 2004 Schools (21) 2005 Schools (31) 2006 Schools (50) 2000 Model Demonstration Schools (5)

Project Data: Outcomes, Process and System Development

Major Discipline Referrals per 100 Students per Year (Schools implementing > 80% on Team Implementation Checklist)

DIBELS Instructional Recommendations and Major Discipline Referral per Cohort per Year DIBELS Benchmark Major Discipline Referrals

Participating School Example: Fourth Grade Reading MEAP Results Began MiBLSi Implementation

Improving the quality and quantity of project data

Percent of Process and System Data Collected by Cohort

Improving the accuracy and Consistency of Recording Office Discipline Referrals

Developing Fluency with Discipline Referral Categories Example Exercise 2: Match the example situation below to the correct problem behavior on the discipline categories answer sheet. Write the letter in the column for Exercise 2.

Acting on the Data to Improve Classroom Management

Major Discipline Referrals by Location Began focusing on classroom management support

MEAP- 4 th grade Reading Assessment 29 Elementary Schools In Michigan Schoolwide: Over 55% of major discipline referrals from classroom Schoolwide: Under 55% of major discipline referrals from classroom Probability of scoring below 75% proficiency on 4 th grade MEAP (Reading):.78 Probability of scoring above 75% proficiency on 4 th grade MEAP (Reading):.75

Improving Targeted Student Intervention Interviews with staff and self assessment indicate a need to develop targeted support systems

Checklist for Individual Student Support Systems (CISS) Results from Cohort 4 (n=34 schools)

Improving Targeted Student Intervention Strategies Building Leadership Teams: ◦ “Quick Sort” process for identifying students and linking to interventions Focused training for practitioners: ◦ Using Behavior Education Program (check in- checkout)

Supporting Coaches Conducting Self-Assessment to identify needs Providing support based on results ◦ Coach training 2 – 4 time per year ◦ Coach manual ◦ Coach website ◦ Coach conference (March 13-14)

Coaches Self-Assessment adapted from: Sugai, Todd and Horner, 2006

Example of the Impact of Coaching on Student Outcomes: Average Major Discipline Referrals per Day per Month Coach returns from leave

Working with School Teams to use data Data Review/Action planning with building leadership teams Pre-training coaches/principals in the data review content Providing worksheets to guide data review process

Team Evaluation of Outcome, Process and Systems Data

EBS Team Implementation Checklist by Feature

Lesson Learned Implementation cannot be faster than your school staff capacity to implement Teams need to be taught how to analyze and use data Emphasis on directing resources to need and removing competing activities

Building Capacity Statewide Districts need capacity to: ◦ Deliver regular training on core content  Annual orientation  Staff development ◦ Incorporate expectations in regular staff evaluations ◦ Provide expertise for more intense support need requirements.  Regular meetings with building personnel around “emerging challenges.”

Avoid passing the planning buck State asks districts to build a plan Districts ask schools to build a plan Schools ask teachers to build a plan

“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there” - Will Rogers