EngageNY.org Scoring the Regents Examination in Algebra I (Common Core)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scoring Training Guide. Goals of Assessment We must ensure that tests measure what is of value, not just what is easy to test. If we want students to.
Advertisements

Regents Examination in Geometry (Common Core)
College Algebra Exam 2 Material.
Warm-up : Copy and answer the following questions: Define a variable and write an equation to model the situation: 1. The total price is the number of.
8/8/ Inequalities. 8/8/ Bumper Cars You must be at least 130cm tall to ride the bumper cars. This can be represented by the inequality.
Information on Grades 3-8 Testing Steven Katz Director Office of State Assessment.
Information on New Regents Examinations for SCDN Presentation September 19, 2007 Steven Katz, Director Candace Shyer, Bureau Chief Office of Standards,
Welcome Math Leaders Mac Scoring Training Year 17 …analyzing student thinking and improving instruction.
Algebraic and Symbolic Reasoning
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Site Training.
Extended Assessments Elementary Mathematics Oregon Department of Education and Behavioral Research and Teaching January 2007.
4 th Grade WASL Practice Taken from 2007 Released Items Use During 10 Min. Math Six items in this slideshow Six items in this slideshow.
College Algebra Sixth Edition James Stewart Lothar Redlin Saleem Watson.
DCA Consortium Group Session 2 Erie 1 BOCES. Agenda  State Updates from Network Team Institutes  Testing information  Upgrading Sample Tasks  Goals.
What is the HSPA???. HSPA - Overview The HSPA is the High School Proficiency Assessment that is given to juniors in New Jersey’s public schools. States.
InequalitiesInequalities. An inequality is like an equation, but instead of an equal sign (=) it has one of these signs: Inequalities work like equations,
Solving Inequalities and their Graphs
Graphing a Linear Inequality
Summer Scoring Training Smarter Balanced Mathematics Deborah J. Bryant September 18, 2015.
CONFIDENTIAL1 Good Afternoon! Today we will be learning about Review of Expressions, Variables, equations & Functions Let’s warm up : 1) Simplify: 4 x.
ALGEBRA READINESS LESSON 9-2 Warm Up Lesson 9-2 Warm-Up.
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training Video 7: Guide Papers for 8 th Grade Two Point Question.
Final Exam Review of Inequalities
Welcome to Principles of Algebra (6 th grade math) Ms. Sunday.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 2 Equations and Inequalities.
Solve an “and” compound inequality
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 5 Solving for the Unknown: A How-to Approach for Solving Equations.
Solving Inequalities Using Addition and Subtraction
EXAMPLE 1 Solve a system graphically Graph the linear system and estimate the solution. Then check the solution algebraically. 4x + y = 8 2x – 3y = 18.
Relations And Functions © 2002 by Shawna Haider. A relation is a set of ordered pairs. {(2,3), (-1,5), (4,-2), (9,9), (0,-6)} This is a relation The domain.
WARM UP Solve: 1. 3x – 5 = (3x -5) = x – 3 + 4x = (2x – 4) = 6.
Characteristics of HSAP Standards based Standards based 62 Multiple Choice items (1 point each for a total of 62 points) 62 Multiple Choice items (1 point.
Algebra 2 Two-Variable Inequalities Lesson 2-8. Goals Goal To graph Two-Variable Inequalities. Rubric Level 1 – Know the goals. Level 2 – Fully understand.
April 2011 Division of Academics, Performance and Support Office of Assessment High School Testing – Scoring Best Practices May 24, 2011 CFN 201.
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training Video 5: Guide Papers for 6 th Grade Two Point Question.
Algebra 1 Keystones Eligible Content Test Design Performance Level Indicators.
1.4 Solving Equations.
Splash Screen.
< > < < < < < > Solving Inequalities
10.8 Systems of Second-Degree Equations and Inequalities
Inequalities – Learning Outcomes
Math Field Day Meeting #2 October 28, 2015
Properties of Functions
Video 3: Scoring Policies and
Video 4: 2-Point Holistic Rubric
Math-Curriculum Based Measurement (M-CBM)
Video 2: Holistic Scoring
Video 8: Practice Papers for
Solving for the Unknown: A How-to Approach for Solving Equations
< > < < Solving Inequalities < < < >.
Splash Screen.
Video 6: Practice Papers for
Video 11: Practice Papers for 4th Grade
Inequalities 12/3/2018.
6.5 Inequalities 12/3/2018.
3x + 2y = 36 Ordered Pairs Part 2
Common Core #11 Ordered Part 2 Pairs
Terms On The AP Physics 1 Test
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
What is a Performance Task
Solving Logarithmic Equations and Inequalities
Inequalities in One Variable
Do Now 10/13/11 In your notebook, simplify the expressions below.
< > < < Solving Inequalities < < < >.
Solve an inequality using subtraction
Inequalities Some problems in algebra lead to inequalities instead of equations. An inequality looks just like an equation, except that in the place of.
Equations Chapter 7.1.
Example 1: Solving Rational Equations
Definition of logarithm
Presentation transcript:

EngageNY.org Scoring the Regents Examination in Algebra I (Common Core)

What To Expect Scoring Procedures What is new to the Algebra I (CC) Exam? General Rules for Applying Mathematics Rubrics Sample Agenda for Scorer Training Practice Scoring Questions EngageNY.org2

Scoring Overview Scoring procedures for rating the Algebra I (CC) Regents Examination have not changed from the past procedures. Constructed-response (CR) questions on the Algebra I (CC) Regents Exam will be scored the same way with a rubric similar to the ones that were used for the 2005 standards based Regents Exams. Rubrics will be similar in format to those for the Integrated Algebra, Geometry, and Algebra 2 / Trigonometry Exams. EngageNY.org3

How does the Algebra I (CC) exam compare to the Integrated Algebra Exam? Integrated AlgebraExam 3- 2 pt CR questions 3- 3 pt CR questions 3- 4 pt CR questions Algebra I (CC Exam) 8- 2 pt CR questions 4- 4 pt CR questions 1- 6 pt CR question EngageNY.org4

General Rules for Applying Mathematics Rubrics EngageNY.org5

General Principles for Rating Raters should follow the general rating guidelines except for specific cases addressed in the rubrics and/or Model Responses. Rubrics are designed to provide a systematic and consistent method for awarding credit. EngageNY.org6

General Principles for Rating Rubrics should not be considered all- inclusive; it is impossible to anticipate all of the different methods that students might use to solve a given problem. The specific rubrics for each question must be applied consistently to all responses. EngageNY.org7

Full-Credit Responses Includes complete and correct answers to all parts of the question. Sufficient work is shown to enable the rater to determine how the student arrived at the correct answer. Award credit for mathematically correct alternative solutions.  The only exceptions are for those questions that specify the type of solution, e.g., algebraic solution, graphic solution, etc. EngageNY.org8

Appropriate Work Full Credit Responses Include correct answer AND work to support how the answer was found Responses with Errors Can include computational, rounding, graphing, or conceptual errors Incomplete Work EngageNY.org9

Multiple Errors Computational Errors, Graphing Errors, and Rounding Errors  Count as 1-credit deductions each  Any combination of two types of these errors result in a 2-credit deduction  No more than 2 credits deducted for a 4-credit question  No more than 3 credits deducted for a 6-credit question Conceptual Errors:  Repeated occurrences of the same error should not be penalized twice. EngageNY.org10

Training Raters to Score Constructed Response Items on the Common Core Regents Examinations EngageNY.org11

Purpose of Training Ensuring consistent scoring supports the reliability, validity, and fairness of interpretations of the test results. Students should receive the appropriate score according to the rubric regardless of where their test is scored or who scores it. EngageNY.org12

Sample Agenda for Scorer Training 1.Select which constructed response questions each rater in the group will be responsible for scoring. 2.Raters read and complete (i.e., do the math for) the first question that they will be scoring. 3.Raters review rubrics associated with the questions that they will be scoring. 4.Raters review the first question they will be scoring in the Model Response Set. EngageNY.org13

Sample Agenda for Scorer Training (cont.) 5.Raters score each model response to the first question they have been assigned according to the rating guide (i.e., rubric). 6.Raters check the number of credits they assigned against the number of credits awarded for the model response. 7.If there are questions or concerns, raters should consult with the scoring leader to investigate why their ratings differ from the training materials. EngageNY.org14

Sample Agenda for Scorer Training (cont.) 8.The process is repeated for each question that raters will be scoring. 9.Raters may begin scoring the first question that they have been assigned on the student examinations. EngageNY.org15

Let’s Practice… EngageNY.org16

Practice Scoring Look at Question #1 and complete it as you would expect your students to, in order to receive full credit. EngageNY.org17

EngageNY.org18 1 Solve 8m m = 12 for m by factoring.

Practice Scoring We will review the rubric for Question #1. EngageNY.org19

EngageNY.org20

Practice Scoring Review the model responses for Question #1. Score each model response to Question #1 according to the rubric. We will review the scores for each of the responses. EngageNY.org21

EngageNY.org22 1 Solve 8m m = 12 for m by factoring.

EngageNY.org23 1 Solve 8m m = 12 for m by factoring. Score 1: The student did not set the equation equal to zero. An expression, which is what the student has written, can’t be solved.

EngageNY.org24 1 Solve 8m m = 12 for m by factoring.

EngageNY.org25 1 Solve 8m m = 12 for m by factoring. Score 2: The student has a complete and correct answer.

EngageNY.org26 1 Solve 8m m = 12 for m by factoring.

EngageNY.org27 1 Solve 8m m = 12 for m by factoring. Score 0: The student made a conceptual error by not subtracting 3 from both sides of the equation so that the equation is equal to 0. The student also made an error by not showing both factors equal to zero.

Practice Scoring Look at Question #2 and complete it as you would expect your students to, in order to receive full credit. EngageNY.org28

EngageNY.org29 2

Practice Scoring We will review the rubric for Question #2. EngageNY.org30

EngageNY.org31

Practice Scoring Review the model responses for Question #2. Score each model response to Question #2 according to the rating guide. We will review the scores for each of the responses. EngageNY.org32

EngageNY.org33 2

EngageNY.org34 2 Score 2: The student made two errors. The student wrote an equation instead of an inequality and the student rounded their final answer down which was incorrect due to the context of the question.

EngageNY.org35 2

EngageNY.org36 2 Score 2: The student used the wrong inequality sign and then made another error by substituting in 15 for the x value instead of for the y value.

EngageNY.org37 2

EngageNY.org38 2 Score 1: The student made a conceptual error by not writing an inequality that correctly modeled the situation. The student didn’t answer the question by stating the number of full hours.

Practice Scoring Look at Question #3 and complete it as you would expect your students to, in order to receive full credit. EngageNY.org39

EngageNY.org40 3 On the set of axes below, graph the function y = |x + 1|. State the range of the function. State the domain over which the function is increasing.

Practice Scoring We will review the rubric for Question #3. EngageNY.org41

EngageNY.org42

Practice Scoring Review the model responses for Question #3. Score each model response to Question #3 according to the rubric. We will review the scores for each of the responses. EngageNY.org43

EngageNY.org44 3 On the set of axes below, graph the function y = |x + 1|. State the range of the function. State the domain over which the function is increasing.

EngageNY.org45 3 On the set of axes below, graph the function y = |x + 1|. State the range of the function. State the domain over which the function is increasing. Score 3: The student made a graphing error by not including arrows on the graph.

EngageNY.org46 3 On the set of axes below, graph the function y = |x + 1|. State the range of the function. State the domain over which the function is increasing.

EngageNY.org47 3 On the set of axes below, graph the function y = |x + 1|. State the range of the function. State the domain over which the function is increasing. Score 1: The student made an error by incorrectly translating the graph one unit to the right instead of one unit to the left. The student stated an incorrect range and domain.

EngageNY.org48 3 On the set of axes below, graph the function y = |x + 1|. State the range of the function. State the domain over which the function is increasing.

EngageNY.org49 3 On the set of axes below, graph the function y = |x + 1|. State the range of the function. State the domain over which the function is increasing. Score 2: The student made an error by incorrectly translating the graph one unit up instead of one unit to the left. The student stated the domain over which the function is increasing incorrectly.

Practice Scoring If this was a Regents Scoring Session, the raters in a scoring session would now begin scoring their assigned questions. EngageNY.org50

Thank You Questions regarding scoring policies or procedures may be directed to the Office of State Assessment at: EngageNY.org51