1 Quantifying Demand Reduction for Load Control Measures Kyle Hemmi Frontier Associates LLC February 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simplified VO M&V Protocols Approved May 4 th, Simplified VO M&V Protocol can be applied to distribution systems with Residential and Small Commercial.
Advertisements

BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Institute of Energy & Sustainable Development De Montfort University
Aggregating Small Loads to provide Ancillary Services
COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTION TO REDUCING YOUR ENERGY BILL’S POWER MASTER Power Master, LLC, 2040 E. Ridge Rd, Rochester, NY, 14622,
Keystone Energy Efficiency Conference 2011 September 20, 2011.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
Energy Efficiency Resource Standards. / February states have Energy Efficiency Resource Standards. (7 states have goals). 20 states.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
PECO Smart Ideas Energy Efficiency Programs
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
Demand Response Task Force February 2008 Update. Bridge Solution Short Term Only: Use as “bridge” to long term solution Standardize Energy Impacts: Utilize.
1 What is DEER?  Database for Energy Efficient Resources -A listing of residential and non-residential energy efficiency measures located at:
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
SINTEF Energy Research 1 Remodece meeting January 2007 Nicolai Feilberg.
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
SEEM Tool Overview Regional Technical Forum Member Orientation January 22, 2013.
+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.
Lighting Savings Calculations for Northwest Energy Star ® Homes David Baylon.
Capacity Impacts of Energy Efficiency What We Know and What We Don’t Know March 11, 2014.
Impact of 8760 Analysis on Value of Energy Council & RTF use 48 time segments per Year – 12 Months – Four Hourly Time Bins each month Considering move.
Smart Grid Research Consortium November 9, DM Goals/Objectives User adoption & consumer engagement Prove consumer behavioral change Prove consumer.
Demand Response Robert Balzar Conservation Resources Director.
Demand Response and the California Information Display Pilot 2005 AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, South Carolina July 11, 2005 Mark S. Martinez,
9/12/20071 CCET at Two Years Presentation to Demand Side Working Group Meeting of ERCOT Austin, Texas October 12, 2007 Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
© 2012 CLEAResult │ All rights reserved. 1 Overview of New Deemed Refrigeration, Food Service and Controls Measures EEIP MeetingNovember 27, 2012.
ERCOT ELTF – Overview and Brief Proposal Dr. Eric Woychik – Strategy Integration LLC representing Comverge, Inc. 8 November 2006.
March 1, 2011 Load Analysis Update Calvin Opheim Manager, Load Forecasting and Analysis.
1 Analysis of Cost and Savings Values for Revised Energy Star Dishwasher Specifications June 6, 2006.
1 ACT 61 INCREASED INVESTMENT AND SAVINGS SCENARIOS Summary Of Methods Used To Develop Inputs For Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness and Rate Impact John Plunkett.
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
Residential New SF Energy Star Homes UES Measure Update December 17th, 2013.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop March 14-15, 2006.
1 Updates to Deemed Impacts for Load Control Measures Kyle Hemmi Frontier Associates LLC January 30, 2008.
Regional Technical Forum Future Funding Discussion March 19, 2014 RTF PAC Presentation.
© 2004 San Diego Gas and Electric. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Demand Response Programs Backup Material.
South Texas Electric Cooperative Load Forecasting Methodology ROS Meeting, 6/10/10.
Large-Scale Renewable Energy: The Top Challenges Dick Kelly Chairman, President and CEO EPRI 2008 Summer Session August 4, 2008 Dick Kelly Chairman, President.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
One size does not fit all..  25,000 accounts  81% accounts - residential, residential/farm  13.5% accounts – small commercial/ utilities/farm no residence.
Variable Load on Power Stations
Overview Review results Statewide Pricing Pilot Review results Anaheim Rebate Pilot Compare performance of models used to estimate demand response peak.
Metering and Measuring of Multi-Family Pool Pumps, Phase 1 March 10, 2016 Presented by Dan Mort & Sasha Baroiant ADM Associates, Inc.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
Customer Concerns with Implementing Demand Rates NASUCA and NARUC Conferences Austin, Texas November 2015 David Springe Consumer Counsel Kansas Citizens’
NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT HCDE, Facilitator and DRF Industries, LLC Consultants Energy Education, Energy Cost, TDU Charges, & Demand Reduction.
Commercial Customer Demand Response Program Pilot
NW Demand Response Symposium
Conserving electricity For a better tomorrow
Hourly vs TOU Avoided Costs
SMUD - Whole Foods Energy Storage System
National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
From: The Use of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles for Peak Shaving
Date of download: 3/6/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
P20 Thermal energy storage with PCM for energy systems in buildings
Rose Drive Friends Church Solar Project Proposal
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
آشنایی با توربین انبساطی و کاربرد آن‌ در نیروگاه‌های تولید برق
Demand Response and Kootenai Electric Shawn Dolan, P.E
What you Pay to Utilities?
Objectives Learn about Electricity Pricing Electric systems.
Objectives Revie Capacitors and Inductors Learn about Transformers
Fleet Electrification
Program Design Demand shifting program designed to reduce peak loads on summer weekdays Program produces substantive and measurable impacts on peak demand.
Objectives Finish Transformers Introduce HW5 (Pricing)
Heat Pump Water Heaters: Evolution to a “California Essential”
Demand Response & RTP Ivo Steklac, Director of Marketing Advanced Services
Presentation transcript:

1 Quantifying Demand Reduction for Load Control Measures Kyle Hemmi Frontier Associates LLC February 2008

2 Proposed Bridge Solution Programs  Program 1: Res, Single Family, AC, 33% cycling  Program 2: Res, Multifamily, AC, 33% cycling  Program 3: Res, Single Family, Pool Pump, 100% cycling  Program 4: Res, Single Family, Electric Water Heater, 100% cycling  Program 5: Commercial, Removed

3 Demand Reduction: Program 1 Program 1: Res, Single Family, AC, 33% cycling UtilitykW Savings 1 Austin Energy1.0 HL&P ESPRE Simulation PSCO (Xcel Colorado) ESPRE Load Control Simulation, Texas All kW savings numbers presented for proposed programs account for diversity and assume control during summer system peak periods (Avg. of Hours ending 16 through 19). 2 +/ kW; Based upon 50% cycling strategy 3 EPRI Simplified Energy Analysis for Residential Buildings (ESPRE) modeling calibrated to PSCO Metering data and Building Characteristics 4 Calibrated to Texas Metering data and Building Characteristics

4 AC Load Curve: Peak Day PSCO (Xcel Energy)

5 Demand Reduction: Program 2 Program 2: Res, Multifamily, AC, 33% cycling UtilitykW Savings ESPRE Load Control Simulation, Texas Calibrated to Texas Metering data and Building Characteristics

6 Demand Reduction: Program 3 Program 3: Res, Single Family, Pool Pump, 100% cycling UtilitykW Savings* 2001 PG&E Pool Pump Program Evaluation by ADM0.33

7 Pool Pump Load Curve: 2001 PG&E Study is the average kW of pool pumps in PG&E service territory: Adjusted for Diversity

8 Demand Reduction: Program 4 Program 4: Res, Single Family, Electric Water Heater, 100% cycling UtilitykW Savings* ESPRE Load Control Simulation, Texas Calibrated to Texas Metering data and Building Characteristics

9 Water Heater Curves by Month

10 Summary of Deemed Savings Deemed Savings Program 1: Res, Single Family, AC, 33% cycling 1.0 Program 2: Res, Multifamily, AC, 33% cycling0.65 Program 3: Res, Single Family, Pool Pump, 100% cycling 0.33 Program 4: Res, Single Family, Electric Water Heater, 100% cycling 0.35