Commercial Aviation Safety Team (TEAM) Mode Awareness and Energy State Management Aspects of Flight Deck Automation Mode Awareness and Energy State Management.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Human Factors in Flight Operations A CAA Perspective

Advertisements

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration FAASTeam & North Florida Flight Standards District Office FAA Safety Team Safety Presentation Seminar.

RVSM AIRWORTHINESS PRESENTED BY COSCAP-SA.

Performance Requirements – Dynamic Density & Dynamic Resectorization Concepts Rich Jehlen Manager, Air Traffic Planning Division Toulouse June, 2002.

Mission Aircrew Course Chapter 14: Crew Resources Management (Feb 2005)

1 INAC First Nation Education Policy Framework Regional Dialogues Coordinated by AFN and INAC Education Policy Framework - Joint Steering Committee (EPF-JSC)

The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.

Miami International Airport Runway Incursion Action Team Recommendations for Incursion Mitigation Presented to: ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM Runway Safety/Runway Incursion.

Aircraft Security: Beyond the Flight Deck Door

Cairo 2 November Agenda  Guidebook overview  Supporting and explanatory materials  Guidebook Module detail  Probable timelines 2.

Authored by M. Moyer 01-Mar-2011 Modified by Lt Colonel Fred Blundell TX-129 Fort Worth Senior Squadron For Local Training Rev Jan-2014.

P-2028 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P-2028 Crew Resource Management.

G-1000 Tools for Enhanced SRM/CRM and Aeronautical Decision Making (ADM) SM Dan Fernandez NM SQ II 10 Mar 2010.

1 American Society of Military Comptrollers Theodore J. Williams Air Force Auditor General 3 June 2010 Auditing: It’s Not Just About the Dollars.

ICAO TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECTS IN INDONESIA 1973 to 2004.

1 Enhancing Flight Crew Management of Unexpected Events This presentation is intended to enhance the reader's understanding, but it shall not supersede.

Human Factors and the Automated Flight Deck Feb 2015 What monitoring and intervention skills do pilots need?

1 Presentation to OST 3 MARCH 2004 OST WP on Loss of Control Action Plans O.S. Nordland, Operations Div.

Trademark Fee Cost Analysis Status Update for TPAC November 2009.

Altitude Deviations STEADES High-level analysis Gordon Margison Assistant Manager, Global Aviation Data Management.

Air Traffic Control Communication © 2000, 2001 Flight Safety Foundation.

Federal Aviation Administration Beyond Pilot Error: Aviation Safety and Training Kathy H Abbott, PhD, FRAeS Federal Aviation Administration Capt. John.

Performing Missions For America Civil Air Patrol Crew Resource Management.

What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]

Mission Aircrew School Chapter 14: Crew Resources Management (March 2011)

Will we ever automate the tasks of the ATCO? Job Brüggen Safety Manager LVNL Will we ever automate the tasks of the ATCO? Ir. Job Brüggen.

Office of Aviation Safety Customs and Border Protection Predator B Accident Nogales, Arizona April 25, 2006.

Crew Resource Management LT Andre Towner U.S. Coast Guard.

1 Report of the Controller and Auditor-General Civil Aviation Authority: Certification and Surveillance Functions CAA Progress Report To Select Committee.

1 Runway Incursion Causal Analysis Section 3. 2 PILOTS and VEHICLE OPERATORS must taxi and maneuver their aircraft/vehicles on taxiways and runways in.

Runway Incursions and Prevention Initiatives in Canada Alyre Boudreau Aerodrome Safety (613)

Computerised Air Traffic Management Tools - Benefits and Limitations OMAR BASHIR (March 2005)

Human Factors (HF) - Assessment Method Agenda What is Human Factors? Why do we need HF-Assessment Method ? What is the HF-Assessment Method ? Why.

Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 8 – Communications and Commanding Best.

Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program Operational Trials in Domestic Airspace Presented to:Data Comm Implementation Team (DCIT) By:Jerry.

KLM - Operations at Schiphol: how does ASAS fit? ASAS TN2: final seminar, April, Paris E. Kleiboer Sr. Manager Strategy ATM.

Altitude Deviations STEADES In-depth analysis Giancarlo Buono Regional Director, Safety and Flight Operations, Europe.

Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems (EAPAS) Presented by: Massoud Sadeghi FAA - Aging Systems Program Manager EAPAS Workshop November 2002.

Trademark Fee Cost Analysis TPAC Status Briefing #2 – Public August 28, 2009.

Sun-n-Fun 2001 Steve Shaffer National Runway Safety Program Steve Shaffer National Runway Safety Program April 13, 2001.

Gretchen Haskins Chief Exec. Safety Through Collaboration What is HeliOffshore? An alliance of global Helicopter Operators & their stakeholders. Committed.

Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) Update Kyle L. Olsen COSCAP-South East Asia, Macau October, 2008.

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Human Spaceflight Guidelines Update COMSTAC, Systems.

CABIN SINGLE CABIN NO ZONES CLEAR VISIBILITY LOW PHYSICAL ENERGY REQUIREMENTS GOOD ERGONOMICS.

Flight Operations Research Centre of Excellence Dr. Hazel Courteney Head of Research & Strategic Analysis.

Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon #2 – FAA Oversight September 18th, 2012.

~ RPAS use and regulation of civil Air Traffic Control point of view Acceptable and reasonable rules are needed Mr. Kornél Szepessy CEO 3-4th of November.

Cooperative Development of Operational Safety and Continuing Airworthiness Programme COSCAP South East Asia Program Progress Report Discussion Paper 2.

ICAO TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECTS IN INDONESIA

Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology

Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology

C-2 Departs Runway CRM CASE STUDY.

Spectrum issues and challenges, not on the specific agenda for WRC-19

Maintenance Component of the Regional Aviation Safety

Safeguarding flight data and locating/recovering on-board recorders

Runway Incursions and Prevention Initiatives in Canada

Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology

Karim Zeghal EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre

Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology

Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.

Runway Incursions and Prevention Initiatives in Canada

The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.

Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.

Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.

Situational Awareness

Triggering Mechanisms as Barriers to PM Effectiveness

The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.

The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.

Briefing to the 5th NARAST Meeting May 2006

Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.

Presentation transcript:

Commercial Aviation Safety Team (TEAM) Mode Awareness and Energy State Management Aspects of Flight Deck Automation Mode Awareness and Energy State Management Aspects of Flight Deck Automation 20 November Bangkok Kyle L. Olsen SE-30

Mode Awareness and Energy State Management Aspects of Flight Deck Automation Automation has contributed to sustained improvement in safety. Automation has a limit in complex and highly automated aircraft.

Mode Awareness and Energy State Management Aspects of Flight Deck Automation Situational awareness can be lost if the following is not well understood: –Automation mode in which the aircraft is operating –Interaction between the mode of automation and a phase of flight or pilot input. Mode confusion can lead to: –Mismanaging the energy state of the aircraft. –Deviating from the intended flight path.

Loss of Control Joint Safety Analysis Team Identified automation mode confusion as a contributing factor. A sub-team was chartered to study and address mode confusion. Objective to minimize the frequency which pilots experience mode confusion and undesirable energy states.

Sub-team Report Final version, Revision 5 of the report was issued in August Part One: Methodology and Central Findings Part Two: SE-30 Recommended Automation Policy Exemplar. Appendices A through E, contain background.

Part Two: SE-30 Recommended Automation Policy Exemplar 1.Philosophy & Approach to the Use of Automation 2.Choice of Systems or “Levels” of Automation 3.Situation Awareness 4.Communication and Coordination 5.Verification 6.System and Crew Monitoring 7.Workload and System Use 8.Summary

Proposal Operators to use the report to review and revise, if necessary their automation policy. COSCAP to prepare an Advisory Circular covering the essential points of the Sub- team Report.

Kyle L. Olsen Discussion