By Meredith Hawkins Deborah Fajuyigbe Robert McArdle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
Advertisements

PRESENTED BY: RICHARD LAWRENCE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TITLE II, SCHOOL AND SCHOOL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT JAN STANLEY, STATE TITLE I DIRECTOR WEST VIRGINIA.
Implementation of NCLBs Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements November 2003.
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Newport News Public Schools First Step Preschool Program
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
The Evolution of the Virginia School Report Card Board of Education School & Division Accountability Committee February 25, 2015.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
Parents’ Right to Know Their Child’s and School’s Achievement.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
No Child Left Behind Teacher Qualification. NCLB: Three Main Parts All teachers to meet new federal standards –New hires to meet standards now –Existing.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
Djole Hinic Danielle Stokes Achievement and Behavior Data for Elementary Schools.
Implementation of NCLB’s Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements Secondary Presented by Kate Fenton September 2004.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
Examples of New Partially Accredited School Ratings Division of Student Assessment & School Improvement Virginia Department of Education.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Profile of Virginia’s Instructional School Personnel Presented to the Special Education Advisory Committee on September 29, 2011 Mrs. Patty S. Pitts Assistant.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, Title 1 Part A and the Oakland Unified School District Presented By Wilhelmena Sims, Director Department of State and.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
Drewry Mason Elementary Annual Title I Meeting 12:00-1:00, 3:00-4:00, 6:00-7:00 August 8, 2013.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Title I What Parents Need to Know!. What is Title I? Title I is a program that provides funds from the federal government to improve student learning.
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS No Child Left Behind 11/23/09.
Title I Ozark East Ozark North Ozark South Ozark West.
NCLB: The Trojan Horse of the 21 st Century Opinions and Thoughts of Robert C. McCracken.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Highly Qualified Teachers & Paraprofessionals
Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know!
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary
What Parents Need to Know
No Child Left Behind.
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
Annual Parent Meeting October 10, 2018 Lamar Elementary
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
What Parents Need to Know
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

By Meredith Hawkins Deborah Fajuyigbe Robert McArdle

 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA), initiated and signed by President George W. Bush in 2002 was a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) which was first enacted 1965 as the central federal law concerning pre- collegiate education  The NCLB set into place requirements of every public school in America, in an attempt to drive student achievement and hold states and schools more accountable for student success  The requirements include the following:  Annual Testing - Implementation of standardized tests measuring/tracking students progress at every grade level  Academic Progress - Overall progress of schools meeting "proficiency" and the Annual Yearly Progress or AYP standards which were implemented by the state  Report Cards - Required schools to provide annual report cards showing data on student- achievement, teacher quality, drop-out rates, etc.  Teacher Qualification - Required teachers to be "highly qualified" in the subject(s) he/she taught  Funding - Through Title I funding, NCLBA would grant funds and resources toward school districts with high concentrations of poor children

 Schools that fail to meet NCLB requirements are in jeopardy of losing accreditation. The Virginia Department of Education defines accreditation as this:  "A school’s state accreditation rating reflects overall achievement in the four core academic areas of English, history/social science, mathematics and science. High schools must meet an additional minimum benchmark for graduation and completion. Schools in which students meet or exceed all achievement objectives established by the Virginia Board of Education are rated as Fully Accredited.“  Virginia's system for holding teachers and school accountability is based on the Standards of Learning (SOL) standardized test.

 Provisionally Accredited-Graduation Rate: A high school or combined school is granted Provisionally Accredited-Graduation rate if the students "achieve adjusted pass rates of 75% or more in English and 70% or more in mathematics, science, and history  Accreditation with Warning: A school receives an Accredited with Warning rate if its "adjusted pass rates for the four core subjects are below the achievement levels required for full accreditation. Schools that receive this rating undergo academic reviews and are required to adopt and implement school improvement plans..A school may hold this rating for no more than three consecutive years." Schools who have a low graduation rate are also rated as Accredited with Warning.Accreditation Denied: A school is rated  Accreditation Denied if it "fails to meet the requirements for full accreditation for four consecutive years." Schools who receive this rating are required to notify parents of the accreditation rating within 30 days notice, a copy of the schools proposed corrective action plan, and an opportunity to comment on such proposed plan before it goes to the Board of Education for approval  Conditionally Accredited:  Conditionally Accredited-New  Conditionally Accredited-Reconstituted

 Elementary Schools:  Overby-Sheppard Elementary School  Fairfield Court Elementary School  Woodville Elementary School  Middle Schools:  Thomas H. Henderson Middle School  Martin Luther King, Jr. Middle School  High Schools:  John Marshall High School  Armstrong High School  Thomas Jefferson High School

Richmond City Schools:  Accreditation report, out of the 46 schools in the City of Richmond:  32 schools received full accreditation rates  14 schools received accreditation with warning rates  4 of those schools serve the HP area Henrico County Schools  Accreditation Report, out of the 68 schools in Henrico County:  62 schools received full accreditation rates  2 schools received accreditation with warning rates Goochland County Schools  Accreditation Report:  All 5 schools received full accreditation rates Hanover County Schools  Accreditation Report:  All 23 schools received full accreditation rates Chesterfield County Schools  Accreditation Report:  All 61 schools received full accreditation rates

 Percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers teaching outside of their areaof endorsement: 0%  Percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special educationcredentials: 3% Provisional 0% Special Education Provisional  Percentage of teachers with bachelor’s degree: 55%  Percentage of teachers with master’s degree: 45%  Percentage of teachers with doctoral degree: 0%

*3YR= Met objective with 3 year average result SubjectBenchmarkResultsMet Benchmark? English75793YR Mathematics7069NO History7082YES Science70803YR

Percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers teaching outside of their area of endorsement: 0% Percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials: 7% Provisional 5% Special Education Provisional Percentage of teachers with bachelor’s degree: 59% Percentage of teachers with master’s degree: 41% Percentage of teachers with doctoral degree: 0%

SubjectBenchmarkResultsMet Benchmark? English7562NO Mathematics7044NO History7063NO Science7066NO

Percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers teaching outside of their area of endorsement: 2% Percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials: 10% Provisional 0% Special Education Provisional Percentage of teachers with bachelor’s degree: 39% Percentage of teachers with master’s degree: 55% Percentage of teachers with doctoral degree: 0%

SubjectBenchmarkResultsMet Benchmark? English7591YES Mathematics70 YES History7081YES Science7087YES Graduation/C ompletion Index 8578NO

Percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers teaching outside of their area of endorsement: 0% Percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials: 6% Provisional 2% Special Education Provisional Percentage of teachers with bachelor’s degree: 42% Percentage of teachers with master’s degree: 58% Percentage of teachers with doctoral degree: 0%

SubjectBenchmarkResultsMet Benchmark? English7592YES Mathematics7086YES History7094YES Science7093YES

Percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers teaching outside of their area of endorsement: 4% Percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials: 5% Provisional 3% Special Education Provisional Percentage of teachers with bachelor’s degree: 45% Percentage of teachers with master’s degree: 50% Percentage of teachers with doctoral degree: 5%

SubjectBenchmarkResultsMet Benchmark? English75833YR Mathematics70 3YR History7092YES Science7093YES

Percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers teaching outside of their area of endorsement: 0% Percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials: 8% Provisional 2% Special Education Provisional Percentage of teachers with bachelor’s degree: 43% Percentage of teachers with master’s degree: 53% Percentage of teachers with doctoral degree: 3%

SubjectBenchmarkResultsMet Benchmark? English7591YES Mathematics7063NO History7078YES Science70783YR Graduation/C ompletion Index 8586YES

Deep Run High School (Ranked #12 in Virginia) Percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers teaching outside of their area of endorsement: 1% Percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials: 2% Provisional/ 1% Special Education Provisional Percentage of teachers with bachelor’s degree: 49% Percentage of teachers with master’s degree: 50% Percentage of teachers with doctoral degree: 1%

Deep Run High School Accreditation Results Fully Accredited SubjectBenchmarkResultsMet Benchmark? English7599YES Mathematics7092YES History7098YES Science7099YES Graduation/ Completion Index 8599YES

Tuckahoe Middle School Percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers teaching outside of their area of endorsement: 0% Percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials: 6% Provisional/ 0% Special Education Provisional Percentage of teachers with bachelor’s degree: 35% Percentage of teachers with master’s degree: 64% Percentage of teachers with doctoral degree: 1%

Tuckahoe Middle School Accreditation Results Fully Accredited SubjectBenchmarkResultsMet Benchmark? English7590YES Mathematics7078YES History7094YES Science7095YES

Short Pump Elementary School Percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers teaching outside of their area of endorsement: 0% Percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials: 3% Provisional/ 0% Special Education Provisional Percentage of teachers with bachelor’s degree: 42% Percentage of teachers with master’s degree: 58% Percentage of teachers with doctoral degree: 0%

Short Pump Elementary School Accreditation Results Fully Accredited SubjectBenchmarkResultsMet Benchmark? English7599YES Mathematics7093YES History7099YES Science7099YES