CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety FIRE PROTECTON FUNCTIONAL AREA CDNS BIENNIAL REVIEWS May 15, 2012 Carl Sykes.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.

Advertisements

Contract and Project Management: A Field Perspective Moderator Michael Peek, PE CCE CFM Office of Engineering and Construction Management.

Quality Assurance Update Presented byRay Hardwick Presented by: Ray Hardwick.

Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.

Contractor Safety Management

IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.

Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.

SLAC ES&H Overview Craig Ferguson March Operating Model ES&H Mission Critical Issues Challenges Path forward Topics October 2008.

1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.

Responsible CarE® Employee health and Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.

TRAINING AND DRILLS. Training and Drills Ensure A comprehensive, coordinated, and documented program as an integral part of the emergency management program.

Departmental Initiative to Enhance Activity-level Work Planning and Control DOE and DOE Contractors Industrial Hygiene Meeting in Conjunction with the.

Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.

Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

EHS Management System Elements

Office of Nuclear Safety and Operations (NA-17) Defense Programs QUALITY ASSURANCE Status Briefing August, 25, 2009 Defense Programs QUALITY ASSURANCE.

Occupational Health and Safety

Unit I Module 2 - NAVAIR RCM Policy and Organization

ISM Workshop 1 Independent Oversight Perspectives Michael A. Kilpatrick Deputy Director Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance.

Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.

Company duties under the ISM Code

Nov Readiness Review Course Implementation Plan - Mod 8 Screening or Scoping Meeting (ORR vs RA, Authorization Authority (AA) Defined, Startup Notification.

E nvironmental P erformance R eview - A udit. 2 DELPHI CONFIDENCIAL/CONFIDENTIAL Agenda u Introductions and Plant Safety Orientation u Organization Chart.

NIST Special Publication Revision 1

1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury

1. Objectives  Describe the responsibilities and procedures for reporting and investigating ◦ incidents / near-miss incidents ◦ spills, releases, ◦ injuries,

ISMS Best Practices Workshop Initial Steps to Integrate HPI into ISMS Continuous Improvement CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. September 12-13, 2006.

Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.

08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.

The Expectation Triad Healthcare Engineering Consultants Regulatory Compliance: “Ensuring that all of the required standards are being met”

School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.

PERT Overview Federal Perspective Annual PERT Workshop February 7-9, 2012 Nevada Site Office Evelyn Landini, Contracting Officer Brookhaven Site Office.

Important informations

Safety Auditors Conference 2005 A Practical Approach…….

TQP Accreditation Program September 13, Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Accreditation ISMS Champions Meeting Aurora, CO September 13, 2006.

Disaster Recover Planning & Federal Information Systems Management Act Requirements December 2007 Central Maryland ISACA Chapter.

Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.

QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT CONTROLS Chapter 9. Quality Assurance (QA) Management is concerned with ensuring: 1) The information system produced by the.

Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.

Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.

DOE Order 413.3A Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets Catherine Santana Deputy Director, Project Management Systems, OECM.

REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE ON USING OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE Thomas E. Murley Former Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation USNRC Conference on Improving Nuclear.

DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Conference Knoxville, TN August 24-27, 2009 Colette Broussard, DOE-HQ Office of Quality Assurance Policy.

ISM at the Savannah River Site Department of Energy Best Practices Workshop Facility Evaluation Board Steve Johnson, Manager Operations Evaluation Department.

Presented by: Rick Kendall, NA-17 Integrated Safety Management Best Practices Workshop September 2006; Denver Co. Assessment Criteria and Guidelines for.

QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

Model Contract Implementation at Sandia National Laboratories Risk Based Oversight Dan Pellegrino Sandia Site Office November, 2007.

ISO MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be.

Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.

ISM at the Savannah River Site Department of Energy Best Practices Workshop Work Planning and Control Tim Flake, Principle Technical Advisor Maintenance.

Integrating EM QA Performance Metrics with Performance Analysis Processes August 26, 2009 Robert Hinds, Manager, Quality Assurance Engineering & Greg Peterson,

ISM at the Savannah River Site

ISM WORKSHOP April 24-27, 2006 Albuquerque, NM Feedback and Improvement Assessment Results and Path Forward Michael N. Worley Office of Nuclear Energy.

Office of the Under Secretary 1 CENTRAL TECHNICAL AUTHORITY A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO NUCLEAR SAFETY Dr. Tim Arcano Deputy Chief of Nuclear Safety Office.

Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.

Presented to ISM Workshop, Aurora, Colorado September 12, 2006 Bob Brandhuber Senior Manager, ES&H Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia.

Monitoring the Long-Term Effectiveness of Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Implementation Through Use of a Performance Dash Board Process Mike.

Independent Oversight Status Report on Workplace Exposure Monitoring ISM Workshop 2007.

Qualification & Training of Work Planners Steven K. Little Work Control Department Manager.

Click to edit Master title 1 1 Raymond W. Blowitski, Office of Analysis, HS-32 Phone: (301) Strategy for Implementing DOE O 210.2, DOE Corporate.

Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.

Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.

GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)

Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness

EFCOG STARTUP AND COMMISSIONING TASK TEAM INTRODUCTION

The EM/HQ Perspective on Readiness Review

DOE NNSA CAS EFCOG/DOE CAS Effectiveness Task Team Sharon Steele Office of the Chief Defense Nuclear Safety (NA-511) November 16, 2016.

Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).

Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland

Aerodrome Certification Workshop

Presentation transcript:

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety FIRE PROTECTON FUNCTIONAL AREA CDNS BIENNIAL REVIEWS May 15, 2012 Carl Sykes

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Topics Biennial Review Purpose Summary of Fire Protection Results Fire Protection CRAD Fire Protection Issues 2

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Biennial Review Purpose Provide objective, value-added information for NNSA managers –Site Office oversight capability –Contractor implementation of nuclear safety requirements Focus is on Site Office (fed) Promote continuous improvement where deficiencies are identified Encourage consistent application of nuclear safety requirements across NNSA 33

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Functional Areas Conduct of Engineering ISMS (Contracts) Conduct of Operations Maintenance Contractor Training and QualificationNuclear Explosives Safety Criticality SafetyPackaging & Transportation Emergency PreparednessQuality Assurance Facility RepresentativeRadiation Protection Federal Training and QualificationRadioactive Waste Feedback and ImprovementSafety Basis Fire ProtectionStartup and Restart ISMS (FRAM) 4

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Definitions Management Concern- A significant issue, or collection of similar issues, that indicates a systemic problem. Noteworthy Practice- A condition, practice, or situation identified that is highlighted for the attention of management for possible expanded implementation at the site or communication to other NNSA sites. Noteworthy Practices are disseminated in the NNSA Technical Bulletins 5

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Summary of Results Seventeen noteworthy practices in second and third round reviews thus far. –PXSO had six in 2011, with three being in Conduct of Engineering. –NSO had two in 2008 and three in

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Grades 7

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Site Office Results 8

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Fire Protection 9

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Fire Protection CRAD OBJECTIVE The Site Office has documented and implemented a fire protection program that complies with DOE requirements and the Site Office oversight processes and procedures have ensured that an effective fire protection safety management program has been implemented by the Site Contractor. CRITERIA: 1.The Site Office has documented and implemented a fire protection program (DOE O 420.1B). 10

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Fire Protection CRAD CRITERIA: 2. The Site Office has documented and implemented processes and procedures to effectively oversee contractor performance in this functional area. The Fire Protection Program Manager reviews and validates performance data from various sources including the Annual Fire Protection Summary Report, corporate performance evaluation reports, and performance based incentives (DOE O 226.1A; NA-1 SD 226.1A; DOE O 420.1B). 3. Site Office procedures and mechanisms ensure that the Site Contractor’s fire protection program is defined in accordance with contract requirements and that the implementing mechanisms comply with DOE expectations. The Contractor is staffed with adequate numbers of technically competent, experienced, fully qualified personnel, including fire protection engineers, technicians, and firefighting personnel (DOE O 420.1B). 11

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Fire Protection CRAD CRITERIA: 4. Site Office procedures and mechanisms ensure that Fire Hazard Analyses (FHAs) have been prepared for each nuclear facility and that the results have been integrated into the Documented Safety Analysis (DSA) and Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs) (DOE O 420.1B). 5. Site Office procedures and mechanisms ensure that a baseline needs assessment has been completed that establishes the minimum required capabilities of site firefighting forces. The assessment includes staffing, apparatus and equipment, and pre–fire plans. Required information is incorporated into the site Emergency Plan, FHAs and DSAs (DOE O 420.1B). 12

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Fire Protection CRAD CRITERIA: 6. Site Office procedures and mechanisms ensure that fire protection systems are designed, installed, and maintained to ensure reliable operation. Design requirements per DOE O 420.1B are observed. Qualified fire protection staff review plans and specifications for all new facilities and for significant modifications to existing facilities (DOE O 420.1B). 7. Site Office procedures and mechanisms ensure that the Site Office and Site Contractor have a process for developing, reviewing, recommending approval, tracking, and maintenance of fire safety equivalencies and exemptions. (DOE O 420.1B). 13

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Fire Protection Issues Two noteworthy practices –PXSO Fire Protection (FP) Engineer is cross-qualified to other Safety System Oversight positions. –NSO and contractor established a joint Fire Safety Committee. Functional area of FP had significantly higher number of identified issues than other functional areas. –Many findings were minor regulatory infractions which were easily corrected. 14

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Fire Protection Issues Numerous issues identified at SRSO, NSO, LSO, LASO and SSO for inadequate handling or processing of exemptions or equivalencies. NSO, LSO, LASO and SSO were not completing required FP assessments. 15

CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety Questions? 16