Boosting Recycling in Tennessee August 13, 14, & 15, 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board Ramsey County Commissioner Victoria Reinhardt SWMCB Chair November.
Advertisements

SERDC 120: A New Effort January 23, SERDC SPONSOR LEVEL MEMBERS 2.
RECYCLING A Rough Guide.
Adapted from the original presentation for the AOR Fall Forum, 2013.
INSERT LOGO HERE User Pay Insert Presenter Information Here.
Pay-As-You-Throw Boiler Green Initiative (BGI) EPICS.
Eliot’s PAYT Program July 16 th, 2013 August 13 th, 2013 September 3 rd, 2013.
Kekaha, Kauai What a Waste!. We live in a finite environment … Can we continue to WASTE it?
WAUKESHA COUNTY RECYCLING Waukesha County Department of Parks & Land Use.
Waste Reduction at its best!. Why PAYT? Single most effective tool to reduce waste and increase recycling Equitable – like utilities, you pay for what.
Environmental Impacts of Single Use Plastic Bags  Consumed in extremely high volumes (>23 million per year in SM)  Produced from non-renewable resources.
Presented to SWAC February 16, 2012 City of Cleveland Automated Waste Collection And Curbside Recycling Program.
Hub and Spoke Recycling Systems in North Carolina NC SWANA Fall Conference Rob Taylor NC Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service.
Increasing Aluminum Can Recycling Rates in Tennessee Recycling in Tennessee: SERDC Workshops; August 13-15,
Formation of tariff policy of household waste management in Flanders ETT – Kiev, Ukraine Christof Delatter Association of Flemish Cities.
Resource Recovery Legislation Dave Gordon MWA Spring Workshop May 2015.
1 Bringing Curbside Recycling to Delaware A Proposal by: The Recycling Public Advisory Council (RPAC) The Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) The Department.
EXPANDING THE HUB AND SPOKE IN TENNESSEE TDEC & SERDC Workshops August 2012 "Enhancing the quality of life for citizens of Tennessee and to be stewards.
Extensive usage of non-biodegradable plastic shopping bags in retail outlets Szilvia Hosser – November 29, 2007 ESPM 4242.
City of Loveland Solid Waste Division Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs.
Funding Discussion State of Vermont Solid Waste Management Districts and State Programs.
The Potential for Increased Cooperation on Offshore Wind among the Northeast States Warren Leon, Executive Director.
Northwest Regional Glass Meeting November 13, 2013 Hosted by North Central Solid Waste Management District.
Changing the Way South Carolina Values Trash Kristen Brown – Green Waste Solutions April 10, 2013 Turning waste into new products that can be sold to consumers.
Findings and Next Steps Donna S. Dempsey November 12,
Sustainable Materials Recovery Program Municipal Grant Program Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Pay As You Throw – An Incentive Based System Town of West Boylston, MA.
Florida Waste Reduction and Recycling Initiative Surfrider Foundation Presented by Phil Leary, AICP.
The Nebraska Remanufacturing Pilot Project LB731 Strengthening the state’s economy and environment one ton of resources at a time.
Recycling.
The Pay-As-You-Throw Solution – Increasing Local Recovery of Materials and Recycling Rates Carolina Recycling Association April 10, 2013.
LBA ASSOCIATES 2003 Colorado SWANA Annual Mtg CO SOLID WASTE SURVEY  By LBA Associates (with CAFR)  Collected 2002 program data  Disclaimer – quality.
WASTE TAXES Past Taxes and Projected Changes. Solid Waste Operators of Solid Waste facilities and Transfer facilities pay a $6 per ton tipping fee. Vermonters.
Presented by: Pechanga Environmental Department Designing and Managing a Recycling Program Source Reduction Strategies for Tribal Solid Waste Programs.
Eleven states united to develop and promote sustainable recycling programs. Together we can boost recycling in the Southeast.
1 An Overview of EPR Jim Frey, CEO of Resource Recycling Systems What it Means for North Carolina, and What are Viable Alternatives NC SWANA Fall Conference.
Economic Components of Recycling Obstacles to a Free Market April 11, 2013.
Let’s Talk Trash Reducing Solid Waste and Increasing Recycling LVW Public Forum November 20, 2008 Presented by Brooke Nash, MassDEP.
Mapping Demand for Recycled Content Material A profile of the Southeast June 30, 2011 Will Sagar Policy Director.
California Integrated Waste Management Board March 16, 2004 San Jose, CA City of San Jose Diversion Programs.
1 Organics Composting Forum: Building Infrastructure and Markets Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Washington, CD May 21, 2009 The Metropolitan.
The Carton Council Recycling Access Campaign in Georgia Georgia Recycling Coalition August 2015.
State Policy and Procedure Regional Recycling Support 1 April 10, 2013.
Growing and Sustaining Markets: Paper Recycling Brian Hawkinson, AF&PA 16 th Annual Texas Recycling & Sustainability Summit October 14, 2013 Houston, Texas.
Tom Brady City of Glendale ZERO WASTE BEYOND RECYCLING Rethink, Reduce, Reuse.
California Roundtable May 23, 2005 Sacramento, California Donna Perala City of San Jose Single Stream & Beyond.
The Role of Local Government in Improving the Environment Bruce Walker City of Portland Office of Sustainable Development October 20, 2005.
DSM E NVIRONMENTAL S ERVICES, I NC. Analysis of Enhanced Residential Recycling System for New Castle County Prepared for the Delaware Recycling Public.
The Future of HHW: How Collection, Education and Product Stewardship Can Work Together Jim Quinn Metro Solid Waste and Recycling Department Portland, Oregon.
Solid and Hazardous Waste. Solid waste : any unwanted or discarded material we produce that is not a liquid or gas. Municipal solid waste (MSW): produced.
for Environmental Health
Modeling Health Reform in Massachusetts John Holahan June 4, 2008 THE URBAN INSTITUTE.
9/15/031 Fort Collins, Colorado “ Pay as You Throw” Trash Rates
What happens to the rubbish we throw away? Landfilled Recycled CombustedComposed.
Single Stream Recycling Material Recovery Facilities
Advancing Recycling June 12, SERDC SPONSOR LEVEL MEMBERS 2.
Chapter 18.2 Solutions to the Solid Waste Problem source reduction defined by EPA as “the practice of designing, manufacturing, purchasing, or using materials.
Mapping Demand for Recycled Content Material A profile of the Southeast March 22, 2011 Will Sagar Policy Director.
TRIBAL ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMIT MARCH 30, 2012 Rapidly Changing Recycling Michael Patton Executive Director Metropolitan Environmental Trust
State Perspective on Recycling Trends NC APWA, September 2012 Scott Mouw NC DEAO.
Recycling of Solid Waste February 10, 2016 Russell Schreiber, P.E. Director of Public Works.
G enesee County: Material Recovery Facility Feasibility Study Michigan State University UP 494: Planning Practicum April 29th, 2016 Vincent Chen Hank Hong.
Glass Packaging Institute West Coast Protective League Meeting National Update Lynn Bragg President Glass Packaging Institute Glass is ENDLESSLY Recyclable.
Curbside Recycling: Home. Work. Play. Kate Bailey, June 2016.
Glass Markets Brainstorming Virginia Recycling Association.
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
Zero Waste Economics Student Learning Outcomes By the end of this lesson, learners will be able to: Identify 3 incentives that communities can adopt.
Portsmouth Solid Waste Disposal Critical Decisions
Pay-as-You-Throw for Kingston MA
Material Disposal Bans North Carolina’s Experience
Presentation transcript:

Boosting Recycling in Tennessee August 13, 14, & 15,

SERDC.org SERDC Sponsor members 2

SERDC.org What is recycling? 3

SERDC.org How Does Recycling Work? a.Generator separation i.We have tried the dirty MRF method, doesn’t work. b.Public collection i.Here the material is at its lowest point in the value chain. ii.Today we will discuss how to keep these programs efficient c.Initial processing, the MRF d.Marketing i.Intermediate processor ii.End user e.End user f.Retailer g.Consumer/generator 4

SERDC.org Part of the manufacturing process Step one in material management. 1.In the mines we separate the ore from the overburden 2.In recycling we separate the material from the waste Only those items that we truly need get recycled If there is a market, someone is willing to pay. They wouldn’t pay unless they had a real reason to do so. Meaning, they intend to sell it at a profit. This may be after improving it or working with it, but the point is that it has value because it has a/many use(s). 5

SERDC.org Recycling Provides the Manufacturer Energy savings Transportation savings Competitive edge 6

SERDC.org Recycling Saves Energy Aluminum95% Paper64% Plastic50% Steel75% Glass50% What do we expect energy prices to do in the next twenty years? 7

SERDC.org Regional Collaboration = Increased Access to Markets Summary of Region Wide Findings: 206 manufacturers 47,525 employees $29.4 Billion sales revenue 8

SERDC.org Tennessee Manufacturing 9

SERDC.org Tennessee 30 Manufacturing Facilities $4.3 Billion in yearly sales 6,500 Tennessee Jobs 10

SERDC.org Material Recovery Facilities MRFs 11

SERDC.org Recycling Provides the Community 12 Jobs Personal income Tax revenue

13

SERDC.org Jobs 4 TN Current capture 1.9 million tons Potential 5.7 million tons Potential increase 6,384 jobs $300,200,000 Personal income $13,680,000 State Tax Revenue 14

SERDC.org How do we do it? Resources Real Estate Resolve 15

SERDC.org Possible Steps to Take Declare commodity status Disposal restrictions Tip fee surcharges Mandate waste metering (PAYT) Hub and spoke infrastructure development Required participation Select industries (ABC permits) General 16

SERDC.org NC Plastic Bottle Recovery (tons)

SERDC.org NC Plastic Bottle Recycling Rate

SERDC.org States with Tip Fee Surcharges

“Pay-as-you-throw (PAYT) programs, also called unit-based or variable rate pricing, provide a direct economic incentive for residents to reduce waste. Under PAYT, households are charged for waste collection based on the amount of waste they throw away, in the same way they are charged for electricity, gas, and other utilities.” Pay-As-You-Throw What Is PAYT? According to the EPA,

SERDC.org Possible Steps to Take Declare commodity status Disposal restrictions Tip fee surcharges Mandate waste metering (PAYT) Hub and spoke infrastructure development Required participation Select industries (ABC permits) General 21

SERDC.org Today’s agenda a.Hear from Industry b.Have lunch c.Look as cost efficiencies and some effective Tenn programs d.Discuss next steps 22

23

Afternoon Session Design for Success 24

SERDC.org What is recycling? 25

SERDC.org Efficiency/Cost Effectiveness Participation PAYT Total cost accounting. Avoided disposal cost. 27

SERDC.org Participation Key element in cost effectiveness How much outreach is enough? Voluntary vs mandatory Incentives EPA Toolkit Earth

SERDC.org Outreach by Design Design the program – Multifaceted – Targeted audiences Measure results – Radio Frequency Identification, RFID tags – What sectors perform? Web Site – Keep it current 29

SERDC.org Strategies for Behavior Change Mandatory Recycling Disposal Ban Disposal Surcharge Grants Bottle Bills Recycling Goals PAYT (Unit-Based Pricing) Product Stewardship (e.g. Producer/Manufacturer Takeback) Advance Disposal Fees Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Programs 30

SERDC.org Mandatory Recycling Effectiveness: Good to Great Cost: Varies with enforcement methods Pros: Communicates a strong message Cons: Requires an infrastructure and can be difficult to enforce. 31

SERDC.org Disposal Bans Effectiveness: Good Cost: Low to medium Pros: Proven results Cons: Difficult to enforce 32

SERDC.org Disposal Surcharge Effectiveness: Good Cost: Low to implement Pros: Provides funding for infrastructure development, negligible impact on households. Cons: Opposition from waste industry 33

SERDC.org Grants Effectiveness: Varies Cost: Requires funding source, ie disposal surcharge Pros: Can provide infrastructure development, also can target certain state wide initiatives Cons: Requires indirect funding source 34

SERDC.org Bottle Bills Effectiveness: Good to Great Cost: Low for local government Pros: High recovery of included containers Cons: Costs transferred to different groups, can result in reduced recycling of other materials, very difficult to implement 35

SERDC.org Recycling Goals Effectiveness: Low Cost: Low Pros: States a clear mission Cons: Generally ineffective 36

SERDC.org Advance Disposal Fees Effectiveness: Good Cost: Low administration expense Pros: Provides program funding Cons: Limited materials effected 37

SERDC.org Preferred Purchasing Policy Effectiveness: Fair Cost: Low Pros: Increases market demand for recycling materials, increases awareness for recycling participation Cons: Little impact on diversion, markets have matured leaving lower need for development 38

SERDC.org Extended Producer Responsibility Effectiveness: Varies Cost: Born by Manufacturers Pros: Removes burden from local government Cons: Free riders. Unlikely to happen on the state or local level 39

SERDC.org PATY Effectiveness: Good to very good, depends on unit of measurement Cost: Low for select systems, high for subscription programs Pros: Strong results, more material recycled, less waste to dispose, equitable and fair, easy to enforce Cons: Resistance to change, theft of service, single stream contamination 40

SERDC.org PAYT WasteZero, a company that provides support for PAYT programs has recorded recycling increases from 40% to 400% after implementation. 41

Pay-As-You-Throw Program Variations Measuring via:  Variable rate carts  Overflow containers  Tag affixed to bag  Specialized bag PAYT Options Collection at curbside or convenience center by:  Municipalities  Private waste haulers  Recycling companies Across Different Systems Employing:  Differing pricing methods  Differing approaches to measuring results  Various means of sharing benefits with residents Pricing and Benefit-Sharing Options

SERDC.org Feedback

SERDC.org Contact Information Will Sagar Executive Director (828) Jenn Cooper Communications Coordinator (864)