Topics = Domain-Specific Concepts Online Physics Encyclopedia ‘Eric Weisstein's World of Physics’ Contains total 3040 terms including multi-word concepts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
Advertisements

Physical Science Mr. Bunt Room R-201. Classroom Guidelines 1. Use Common Sense at all times 2. Do not give me any more gray hairs 3. Golden Rule Other.
Uncertainty Corpus: Resource to Study User Affect in Complex Spoken Dialogue Systems Kate Forbes-Riley, Diane Litman, Scott Silliman, Amruta Purandare.
Student simulation and evaluation DOD meeting Hua Ai 03/03/2006.
The C++ Tracing Tutor: Visualizing Computer Program Behavior for Beginning Programming Courses Rika Yoshii Alastair Milne Computer Science Department California.
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Numerical Analysis ECIV 3306 Introduction.
Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching The Simple Pendulum Learning Sequence Dr. Carl J. Wenning Department of Physics Illinois State University.
Advanced Research Methodology
1 Classroom-Based Research: How to Be a Researcher in Your Classroom Basic Skills Initiative Teaching and Learning Workshop October 2009 Darla M. Cooper.
What is Science? PHYSICAL SCIENCE DR. CARPENTER. What is science?  A way of learning more about the natural world  Scientists want to know why, how,
How does an interactive learning environment affect the students’ learning? Marina Issakova University of Tartu, Institute of Computer Science Estonia.
Moving to LDC in Chemistry. What is LDC? An Instructional Framework that builds in the instructional shifts that move us toward common Core Implementation.
Modeling User Satisfaction and Student Learning in a Spoken Dialogue Tutoring System with Generic, Tutoring, and User Affect Parameters Kate Forbes-Riley.
To Think Or Not To Think: That Is The Question Abstract Year after year, teachers recognize that many of their students lack critical thinking skills or.
Interactive Dialogue Systems Professor Diane Litman Computer Science Department & Learning Research and Development Center University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh,
1 Seminar and Report Writing PhD (Business Administration) Dr Fred Mugambi Mwirigi.
circle A Comparison of Tutor and Student Behavior in Speech Versus Text Based Tutoring Carolyn P. Rosé, Diane Litman, Dumisizwe Bhembe, Kate Forbes, Scott.
1.3: Scientific Thinking & Processes Key concept: Science is a way of thinking, questioning, and gathering evidence.
Relationship between Physics Understanding and Paragraph Coherence Reva Freedman November 15, 2012.
INTRODUCTION TO SCIENCE Chapter 1 Physical Science.
1 Politeness Effect: Pedagogical Agents and Learning Gains 報 告 人:張純瑋 Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Mayer, R.E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., and Collins, H. (2005).
Kate’s Ongoing Work on Uncertainty Adaptation in ITSPOKE.
circle Adding Spoken Dialogue to a Text-Based Tutorial Dialogue System Diane J. Litman Learning Research and Development Center & Computer Science Department.
Comparing Synthesized versus Pre-Recorded Tutor Speech in an Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System Kate Forbes-Riley and Diane Litman and Scott Silliman.
Dynamics – Newton’s 2nd Law
INTRODUCTION TO FORCES. Basic forces of GRAVITY and APPLIED FORCE.
Correlations with Learning in Spoken Tutoring Dialogues Diane Litman Learning Research and Development Center and Computer Science Department University.
Introductio ns to Research Methods Pongsa Pornchaiwiseskul Faculty of Economics Chulalongkorn University.
Supporting Students in Science Thinking and Writing Workshop #3: Teaching Strategies & Assessment Kate McNeill & Mandy Knight Boston College.
Predicting Student Emotions in Computer-Human Tutoring Dialogues Diane J. Litman&Kate Forbes-Riley University of Pittsburgh Department of Computer Science.
Why predict emotions? Feature granularity levels [1] uses pitch features computed at the word-level Offers a better approximation of the pitch contour.
Using Word-level Features to Better Predict Student Emotions during Spoken Tutoring Dialogues Mihai Rotaru Diane J. Litman Graduate Research Competition.
Speech and Language Processing for Educational Applications Professor Diane Litman Computer Science Department & Intelligent Systems Program & Learning.
Lecture # 19 SCIENCE 1 ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN EDUCATION Force and motion continue ………
Welcome to Physics--Jump in!
ICP TCHS “Motion”. Students who demonstrate understanding can: HS- PS2-1. Analyze data to support the claim that Newton’s second law of motion describes.
Spoken Dialog Systems Diane J. Litman Professor, Computer Science Department.
Characteristics of Effective Teachers presented by Paul R. Vaughn, Associate Dean UMC College of Agriculture.
Analyze  Study a topic closely, break a topic down into smaller parts.
Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities Adviser: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter:
Proudly Present WELCOME TO OUR PRESENTATION 3 21 GROUP5GROUP5 G R O U P 5.
INFOMGP Student names and numbers Papers’ references Title.
(Speech and Affect in Intelligent Tutoring) Spoken Dialogue Systems Diane Litman Computer Science Department and Learning Research and Development Center.
Metacognition and Learning in Spoken Dialogue Computer Tutoring Kate Forbes-Riley and Diane Litman Learning Research and Development Center University.
Developing a Metric for Evaluating Discussion Boards Dr. Robin Kay University of Ontario Institute of Technology 2 November 2004.
Questioning as Formative Assessment: GRECC Math Alliance February 4 th - 7 th, 2008.
Modeling Student Benefits from Illustrations and Graphs Michael Lipschultz Diane Litman Computer Science Department University of Pittsburgh.
A Tutorial Dialogue System that Adapts to Student Uncertainty Diane Litman Computer Science Department & Intelligent Systems Program & Learning Research.
Improving (Meta)cognitive Tutoring by Detecting and Responding to Uncertainty Diane Litman & Kate Forbes-Riley University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA.
Experiments with ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System Diane Litman Computer Science Department and Learning Research and Development.
Using Natural Language Processing to Analyze Tutorial Dialogue Corpora Across Domains and Modalities Diane Litman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh,
Cedric D. Murry APT Instructor of Applied Technology in research and development.
Prosodic Cues to Disengagement and Uncertainty in Physics Tutorial Dialogues Diane Litman, Heather Friedberg, Kate Forbes-Riley University of Pittsburgh.
What is Physics? The study of matter, energy, and the interaction between them Physics is about asking fundamental questions and trying to answer them.
Copyright © by Holt, Rinehart and Winston. All rights reserved. Section 1 The Nature of Science Objectives  Describe the main branches of natural science.
Ahmedabad Institute of Technology
Changing Student Conceptions of Newton’s Laws Using Interactive Video Vignettes Jonathan Engelman & Kathleen Koenig Contact Information:
Towards Emotion Prediction in Spoken Tutoring Dialogues
Levels of Inquiry The Simple Pendulum Learning Sequence
Dialogue-Learning Correlations in Spoken Dialogue Tutoring
Welcome to Physics Forces.
The science subject knowledge
Chapter 1 - General Principles
Which one would be easier to accelerate by pushing?
Introduction.
ISTE Workshop Research Methods in Educational Technology
General Principles 4/10/2019.
Deconstructing the Standard
Activator Write these words in your notebook (and skip a line)
Acceleration - Newton’s
Presentation transcript:

Topics = Domain-Specific Concepts Online Physics Encyclopedia ‘Eric Weisstein's World of Physics’ Contains total 3040 terms including multi-word concepts such as “Frictional Force”, “Newton’s second law” etc. Present analysis limited to single-word concepts Ambiguity: “current problem” Vs “electric current” 36 physics concepts observed in our data 10 concepts appear in ideal answers are marked as ‘Critical’ Analyze number of times each concept is repeated per student Tutor: You need to show even more of your reasoning in your essay. What is the name of the principle of physics that you could apply to determine the difference in acceleration between the car and truck given that they both experience the same force? Student: I don’t know Tutor: Newton's Second Law. We know that Newton's Second Law expresses a relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. What is the equation for that relationship? Student: Force equals mass times acceleration Tutor: Fine. Applying this principle, if you apply equal force to two objects of differing masses, you can use the relative accelerations of the two objects to determine the relationship between the respective masses of the two objects. In this case, which vehicle will have a smaller acceleration? Student: Truck Tutor: Uh huh. So then you know that during the impact, the magnitude of the acceleration of the truck is less than the magnitude of the acceleration of the car for every time instance. Try to add something about this to your essay. Students take tests before (pre) and after (post) tutoring We study partial correlations (R) between post-test scores and concept-metrics, controlled for pre-test scores Intelligent Tutoring SPOKEn dialog-based system Interactive Dialog Sessions teaching Qualitative Physics Backend: Why-2 text-based physics tutoring [VanLehn et.al.] Tutor’s Role: Present a problem Clarify missing points, Correct misconceptions Ask Q’s to check understanding Request to revise answer Student’s Role: -Write Essays -Answer Q’s Include Multi-Word Concepts e.g. “Newton’s Second Law” Do non-physics words have any role in learning? Analyze Discourse-Level Topic Structures and Segments Concept-Level Topic Analysis of Tutoring Dialogs Amruta Purandare, Intelligent Systems Program Dr. Diane Litman, Department of Computer Science Shallow Metrics (Automatic) [Litman et. al. ITS04] Dialog Length (#turns, #words, words/turn) Distinguish Student and Tutor Contributions Deep Metrics (Manually Labeled) Student and Tutor Actions [Forbes-Riley et. al. AIED05] Misses the central theme of discussion: “Topics” or “Content” Show: Topics correlate to Learning Automatically identify Topic Structures in Dialogs Granularity Simple, Complex, Abstract Topics? 1 topic per turn/sentence? No Manual Annotations 1. Solve this problem 3. You need more details 4. What are the forces acting on the pumpkin? 5. Gravity? 2. Done! 6. Good! Revise your essay now ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^ S+T+ES+TS+ESTE #WORDSR=0.44R=0.297R=0.516R=0.393R=0.287R=0.504 #PHY CONCEPTSR=0.488R=0.389R=0.557R=0.576R=0.355R=0.519 CONCEPTS / WORDS R=0.473R=0.505R=0.429R=0.396R=0.485R=0.329 #CRITICALR=0.52R=0.393R=0.55R=0.511R=0.364R=0.515 #CONCEPTS / TURN S+T+ES+TS+ESTE ZEROR=0.028R=0.027R=0.057R=0.055R=-0.05R=0.033 ONER=0.439R=0.466R=0.508R=0.584R=0.243R= TWOR=0.462R=0.489R=0.217R=0.303R=0.465R=-0.04 THREE and MORER=0.326R=0.252R=0.358R=0.445R=0.222R=0.314 AT LEAST ONER=0.443R=0.445R=0.582R=0.607R=0.347R=0.238 AVERAGER=0.323R=0.367R=0.261R=0.505R=0.287R=0.328 Word Level Correlations Turn Level Correlations Bold indicates correlations significant at 0.05 level Bold and Italics indicates correlations significant at 0.01 level S = Student (spoken), T = Tutor (spoken), E = Essay (written) Physics concepts show better correlations than all words #Dialog turns with 0 and 3+ concepts show no impact Student contributions matter! #physics-concepts, #critical-concepts discussed per student #dialog turns that discuss n concepts (where n = 0,1,2,3+,1+) Average #physics-concepts per turn Previous Work Our work Challenges 1. Background: ITSPOKE 2. Motivation: What Affects Learning? 3. Methodology 4. Preliminary Results 5. Current Directions Evaluation Example Automatic Topic Extraction Metrics Conclusions