Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview Supporting School and District Improvement in Massachusetts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructional Coaching at Westminster
Advertisements

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Continuous Improvement Update The Integration of Continuous Improvement and Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment & Technology October 13 th, 2008.
The Integration of Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment and Continuous Improvement Board of Education Update October 13 th, 2008.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Getting CONNECT-ED in Montgomery Township Presentation of Learning Amy Wish Kari McGann JoAnn Zisa June 30, 2011.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Teacher Leadership Initiative Trainings
“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Redmond School District 2J School Improvement Presentation April 2010.
Addressing Disproportionality through Technical Assistance: A Case Study of New York Project 405 Team Metropolitan Center for Urban Education New York.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Partners in Support of Student Achievement: California Department.
LW Version 1.0 August Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instruction.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
“O N THE R OAD TO S UCCESS ” Implementing the Common Core and Essential Standards Randolph County Schools Common Core and Essential Standards Implementation.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Webcast April 22, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement December 11, 2012.
Professional Learning Communities Making Written Curriculum an Instructional Reality “The professional learning community model is a grand design - a powerful.
Necessary Conditions. Washington Education Association Educational Service Districts Association of Washington School Principals Washington Association.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Moodling in Ontario: A Professional Learning Approach Anita Drossis Nathalie Rudner ABEL Professional Learning Lead ABEL School Lead Science and Math Teacher.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A working team of professionals that are committed to ensure student achievement as life-long learners of the 21 st Century.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
A Look at Learning: A Comprehensive System for Improving English Learners’ Academic Achievement Irma Bravo Lawrence Stanislaus County Office of Education.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Educator Performance Assessments ESE Spring Convening May 27 and 28, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
NC Department of Public Instruction Instructional Services- English as a Second Language and Learn NC – UNC Chapel Hill School of Education Joy McLaughlin,
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview August 4, 2015 and August 10, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
 Algebra Preparedness for Higher Achievement Beyond the MSP: Project ALPHA’s Strategies for Institutional Change CAMSP Learning Network Meeting April.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
Formative Assessment Project Webinar #2 - May 29, pm Welcome Focus: Field Test.
Focus on Professional Learning Communities State Personnel Development Grant D. Ahrens 5/10/2013.
Coherence Through Aligned Goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Florin High School Professional Learning Communities Rationale Flexibility Effectiveness Sustainability.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Three year implementation plan Consultation Implementation Planning Ongoing Support and Progress Monitoring Partnership for Sustainability.
LW Version 1.0 August Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instruction.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
HCS Elementary Education Department
Introduction Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview Supporting School and District Improvement in Massachusetts Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview

LW Version 1.0 August Project Goal and Key Questions Goal:  To promote strong professional learning communities in districts and schools to drive instructional improvement and increase student learning and achievement. Guiding Questions:  What role do professional learning communities play in improving instruction and student achievement?  How can we leverage change in our schools and build capacity by implementing professional learning communities?

LW Version 1.0 August Project Overview  The Center for Collaborative Education (CCE) has partnered with the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (ESE) to promote the building of strong professional learning communities (PLC) in districts and schools in order to drive instructional improvement and ultimately increase student learning and achievement.  During the pilot phase of this project, CCE has worked with two cohorts: One cohort of districts from Western Mass and the other Cohort from Eastern Mass.  In order to facilitate the work and the training, CCE has also created PLC guidance documents made up of six modules that address the what and how of PLCs and provide a library of best practice toolkits that can be used to continue the work in schools.

LW Version 1.0 August What PLC Work Do We Engage In?  Looking at student and teacher work  Classroom observations  Creating common assessments & rubrics  Data-based inquiry groups to identify causes and find solutions to instructional dilemmas  Lesson study  Text-based discussions on education research

LW Version 1.0 August Experience with PLCs  CCE has been engaged in PLC resource development, training, and coaching since its inception over 18 years ago have produced multiple training guides and chapters in guides on PLCs.  We believe that building strong PLCs - focused on improving instruction, curriculum, and assessment – will result in (1) increased teacher collaboration and (2) increased use of effective instructional practices in classrooms, which will lead to (3) improved student achievement.  We have provided PLC training to multiple schools inside and outside Massachusetts.

LW Version 1.0 August Project Work  Create a set of professional development modules, facilitator guides, and Power Points that MA districts can use to launch and strengthen PLCs. Each module is focused on tools and resources for application.  Work with cohorts of districts to strengthen PLCs while field testing and gaining feedback on draft professional development resources that will be available statewide.  By June 2014, there will be a robust PLC website housed by ESE of modules, facilitator guides, Power Points, case studies, readings, and other resources for all districts and schools to access.

LW Version 1.0 August PLC Modules The project includes six professional development modules, along with tools (articles, protocols, videos, etc..), and facilitator’s guides to assist schools/districts in implementing PLCs. The modules are:  Module 1 “Why PLCs?”  Module 2 “Structures of PLCs”  Module 3 “How to Build Effective Teams”  Module 4 “Cycle of Inquiry”  Module 5 “Non-Evaluative Classroom Observations”  Module 6 “District -Level Professional Learning Communities”

LW Version 1.0 August PLC Resources Additional resources in development during the initial stage include:  Facilitator Guides for Modules 1-6 designed for trainers  Accompanying PowerPoint presentations for Modules 1-6  Weebly website to view resources  Videos of school/district teams during PLC meetings

LW Version 1.0 August District and School Support  Five days of school-year cohort Professional Development in structuring and facilitating PLCs  2-day Summer Institute 2013  Virtual network discussion site  Network meetings for district PLC leads  On-site coaching in a ‘train the trainer’ model and work with both District and School PLCs

LW Version 1.0 August District Commitments Demonstrated District Leadership Support (Walk the Walk) Common Planning Time 2-3 times a week (minimum once) for Teacher Teams ID of lead district liaison person Formation of active and engaged Superintendent’s PLC Leadership Team Participation in full scope of training District-school team for side by side DSAC training Commitment to provide feedback to CCE on training and resource materials