Project topics due today. Next HW due in one week

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemistry 2 Lecture 2 Particle in a box approximation.
Advertisements

© 2013 Eric Pop, UIUCECE 340: Semiconductor Electronics ECE 340 Lecture 3 Crystals and Lattices Online reference:
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP Periodic.
Lectures Solid state materials
CHAPTER 3 Introduction to the Quantum Theory of Solids
§5.6 §5.6 Tight-binding Tight-binding is first proposed in 1929 by Bloch. The primary idea is to use a linear combination of atomic orbitals as a set of.
P461 - Solids1 Solids - types MOLECULAR. Set of single atoms or molecules bound to adjacent due to weak electric force between neutral objects (van der.
P461 - Solids1 Solids - types MOLECULAR. Set of single atoms or molecules bound to adjacent due to weak electric force between neutral objects (van der.
PH 401 Dr. Cecilia Vogel. Atoms in a Crystal  On Monday, we modeled electrons in a crystal as experiencing an array of wells, one for each atom in the.
1 Motivation (Why is this course required?) Computers –Human based –Tube based –Solid state based Why do we need computers? –Modeling Analytical- great.
A return to density of states & how to calculate energy bands
For review/introduction of Schrodinger equation: monroecc
SEMICONDUCTORS Semiconductors Semiconductor devices
Physics 355. Consider the available energies for electrons in the materials. As two atoms are brought close together, electrons must occupy different.
Microscopic Ohm’s Law Outline Semiconductor Review Electron Scattering and Effective Mass Microscopic Derivation of Ohm’s Law.
Vibrational Spectroscopy
Solids and Bandstructure
Computational Solid State Physics 計算物性学特論 5回
Computational Solid State Physics 計算物性学特論 第4回 4. Electronic structure of crystals.
ENE 311 Lecture 2. Diffusion Process The drift current is the transport of carriers when an electric field is applied. There is another important carrier.
The Ig Nobel Prizes are  “Booby Prizes”!
P301 Lecture 19 “Fourier Decomposition/analysis”
The Bandstructure Problem A one-dimensional model (“easily generalized” to 3D!)
EEE 3394 Electronic Materials
EEE 3394 Electronic Materials Chris Ferekides Fall 2014 Week 6.
Electronic Band Structures electrons in solids: in a periodic potential due to the periodic arrays of atoms electronic band structure: electron states.
Potential Step Quantum Physics 2002 Recommended Reading: Harris Chapter 5, Section 1.
Physics 361 Principles of Modern Physics Lecture 14.
Electronic Bandstructures Information from Kittel’s book (Ch. 7) + many outside sources. Some lectures on energy bands will be based on those prepared.
More Bandstructure Discussion. Model Bandstructure Problem One-dimensional, “almost free” electron model (easily generalized to 3D!) (BW, Ch. 2 & Kittel’s.
1 Lecture VIII Band theory dr hab. Ewa Popko. 2 Band Theory The calculation of the allowed electron states in a solid is referred to as band theory or.
Bandstructures: Real materials. Due my interests & knowledge, we’ll mostly focus on bands in semiconductors. But, much of what we say will be equally valid.
Quantum Mechanics Tirtho Biswas Cal Poly Pomona 10 th February.
Model Bandstructure Problem One-dimensional, “almost free” electron model (easily generalized to 3D!) (Kittel’s book, Ch. 7 & MANY other references)
Physics 2170 – Spring Infinite square well (particle in a box) Homework set 9 is due Wednesday. There will.
Last Time The# of allowed k states (dots) is equal to the number of primitive cells in the crystal.
The Bandstructure Problem A One-dimensional model (“easily generalized” to 3D!)
For review of Schrodinger equation: monroecc
Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012PHYS , Fall 2012 Dr. Amir Farbin 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #16 Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012 Dr. Amir Farbin Reflection.
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم العالي - جامعة أم القرى كلية الهندسة و العمارة الإسلامية قسم الهندسة الكهربائية ELECTRONIC DEVICES K INGDOM.
LECTURE 17 THE PARTICLE IN A BOX PHYSICS 420 SPRING 2006 Dennis Papadopoulos.
2. Time Independent Schrodinger Equation
Nanoelectronics Chapter 5 Electrons Subjected to a Periodic Potential – Band Theory of Solids
Origin of energy band formation:
Solid State Physics Lecture 15 HW 8 Due March 29 Kittel Chapter 7: 3,4,6 The free electron standing wave and the traveling wave are not eigenstates.
Kronig-Penney model and Free electron (or empty lattice) band structure Outline: Last class: Bloch theorem, energy bands and band gaps – result of conduction.
TITLE” ENERGY BANDS OM INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Energy Bands and Charge Carriers in Semiconductors
1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford
Electrical Engineering Materials
Metallic Solids Metallic bond: The valence electrons are loosely bound. Free valence electrons may be shared by the lattice. The common structures for.
Materials Considerations in Semiconductor Detectors
Band Theory of Electronic Structure in Solids
By the end of this section you should be able to:
Energy Bands in Crystals
SEMICONDUCTORS Semiconductors Semiconductor devices
Band Theory of Solids So far we have neglected the lattice of positively charged ions Moreover, we have ignored the Coulomb repulsion between the electrons.
The Ig Nobel Prizes are  “Booby Prizes”!
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Condensed Matter Physics: review
Band Theory The other approach to band theory solves the Schrodinger equation using a periodic potential to represent the Coulomb attraction of the positive.
Physics 342 Lecture 28 Band Theory of Electronic Structure in Solids
Free Electron Model The free electron model (Fermi gas) can also be used to calculate a pressure called the degeneracy pressure As the Fermi gas is compressed,
Band Theory of Solids 1.
A One-Dimensional Bandstructure Model
Bandstructure Problem: A One Dimensional Model
Even if the potential is not a well, similar gaps occur
Solids and Bandstructure
Energy Band 7 In free electron model, electrons occupy positive energy levels from E=0 to higher values of energy. They are valence electron so called.
Presentation transcript:

Project topics due today. Next HW due in one week Project topics due today! Next HW due in one week. Test corrections due in 9 days. Discuss Drude and Sommerfield and said we have to consider periodicity. So, we looked at several crystal types, but actually we can learn a lot from just knowing there is periodicity, regardless of its exact form. Chapter 8 and 9 lectures run together a little Krönig-Penney Model and the Origin of Bands and Band Gaps For review of Schrodinger equation: http://web.monroecc.edu/manila/webfiles/spiral/6schrodingereqn.pdf

Learning Objectives for Today After today’s class you should be able to: Explain the meaning and origin of energy bands and “forbidden band gaps” Finally understand difference between metals, semiconductors and insulators! (If time) Relate DOS to energy bands Another source on today’s topics, see Ch. 7 of Kittel or search Kronig-Penney model Gaps may happen in the next lecture

Using Bloch’s Theorem: The Krönig-Penney Model Bloch’s theorem allows us to calculate the energy bands of electrons in a crystal if we know the potential energy function. Each atom is represented by a finite square well of width a and depth V0. The atomic spacing is a+b. V x a a+b 2a+b 2(a+b) V0 -b Last time we would have used sine and cosines in region 0 to a. What is an alternative approach? Exponents will be easier for derivatives as we already have exponents using our Bloch approach. In a past class, I tried switching one of these letters to Q, but students complained about it being too confusing, so I’m sticking with the book. We can solve the SE in each region of space: 0 < x < a -b < x < 0

Boundary Conditions and Bloch’s Theorem The solutions of the SE require that the wavefunction and its derivative be continuous across the potential boundaries. Thus, at the two boundaries (which are infinitely repeated): Boundary Conditions and Bloch’s Theorem (2) x = 0 (1) x = a Now using Bloch’s theorem for a periodic potential with period a+b: Don’t get enough info on K and kappa if don’t use bloch’s theorem. Doesn’t matter if use Bloch’s theorem on si1 or si2 for equation 3 On equation 4, we use bloch’s theorem on both si’s Have A, B, C and D in each equation, so use matrix form Have them figure out first two lines of matrix. k = Bloch wavevector Now we can write the boundary conditions at x = a: The four simultaneous equations (1-4) can be written compactly in matrix form  Let’s start it! (3) (4)

Results of the Krönig-Penney Model Since the values of a and b are inputs to the model, and  depends on V0 and the energy E, we can solve this system of equations to find the energy E at any specified value of the Bloch wavevector k. What is the easiest way to do this? Taking the determinant, setting it equal to zero and lots of algebra gives: By reducing the barrier width b (small b), this can be simplified to:

Problems occur at Ka=N or K=N/a Graphical Approach small b Right hand side cannot exceed 1, so values exceeding will mean that there is no wavelike solutions of the Schrodinger eq. (forbidden band gap) Problems occur at Ka=N or K=N/a Ka Plotting left side of equation

Turning the last graph on it’s side This equation determines the energy bands. For values of K where the left side of the equation has a magnitude < 1, then k is real and energy bands are allowed. BAND 2 Forbidden band gap Energy in terms of E0 BAND 1 ka/

Greek Theater Analogy: Energy Gaps There are certain radial distances away from the stage where there are no seats

Energy Levels of Single vs Multiple Atoms Single Atom Multiple Atoms So, instead of having single atomic energy levels, we get bands were many energy levels exist. Let’s see how these bands develop as we go from one atom to multiple atoms.

Ideal Double Quantum Wells How do we start? Didn’t need the derivative for the single well, redundant information What’s the difference between these two wavefunctions? Energy. Talk about probably of being found in between and that’s relation to bonding. Can you see mathematically, why energy would be different (fourier theorem of adding sine waves, quick changes require higher frequency terms)

The two solutions have different energies http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~eenph/QWWAD/ The two solutions have different energies Symmetric (Bonding) and Antisymmetric (Antibonding) It depends on the shape of the orbital as to which is lower energy. An s orbital will prefer symmetric alignment. You can imagine this by overlapping to circles. They share the electrons to some degree. It will be easier if the spin doesn’t have to change.

Energy vs. Barrier Width What happens as make b go to 0? Energy vs. Barrier Width Spins not coupled What would 3 wells look like?

Which has the lowest energy? Any relation between nodes and energy? Triple Quantum Wells Which has the lowest energy? Any relation between nodes and energy?

Quadruple Quantum Wells

Five Quantum Wells

Figure 1.7: Coupled Well Energies What happens to these levels as the atoms get closer (b smaller)? How would the energy levels look for multiple wells?

Band Overlap Often the higher energy bands become so wide that they overlap with the lower bands Many materials are conductors (metals) due to the “band overlap” phenomenon Also partly allows hybridization, like in carbon Reminder: Why do bands get wider? Bring atoms closer together. For reminder of hybridization from energy level perspective: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/organic-chemistry/gen-chem-review/hybrid-orbitals-jay/v/sp3-hybridized-orbitals-and-sigma-bonds

Energy Band Overlap 14Si: 3s23p2 Mixing of bands known as hybridization (Si=sp3) Conduction Band The bottom unfilled energy band Valence Band Typically the last filled energy band 4 states to bond with 14Si: 3s23p2 Out of 8 possible n=3 electrons (2s and 6p)

This is at T=0. What happens at higher T? Energy Band Formation Diagram (flat or with momentum k) showing energy levels is a band diagram. This is at T=0. What happens at higher T? Conduction Band bottom unfilled Valence Band last filled Semiconductor Small gap (<~1eV) Insulator Big gap (>~1eV) Metal No gap

Semiconductor Flat Band Diagram (Quantum Well) 1.43 eV InAs bandgap is .36 at room temp, 1.43 is room temp for GaAs In What do I mean by flat? Before any movement of charge, could cause bands to bend At a single point in the crystal (changes with momentum)

What happens as you approach the gap? Classically E = ½ m v2 What happens to v as k gets close to Brillouin zone edge? BAND 2 Forbidden band gap Energy in terms of E0 It’s stalling at the BZ edges. Why might it do that? BAND 1 Find v for the free electron energy. ka/

Compare to the free-electron model Free electron dispersion –/a /a Let’s slowly turn on the periodic potential

Electron Wavefunctions in a Periodic Potential (Another way to understand the energy gap) Consider the following cases: Wavefunctions are plane waves and energy bands are parabolic: –/a /a Electrons wavelengths much larger than atomic spacing a, so wavefunctions and energy bands are nearly the same as above V x a a+b 2a+b 2(a+b) V1 -b

Wavelength much greater than atomic spacing Energy of wave What happens as I lower this energy? Similar to how radio waves pass through us without affecting

Electron Wavefunctions in a Periodic Potential U=barrier potential Consider the following cases: Wavefunctions are plane waves and energy bands are parabolic: –/a /a Electrons wavelengths much larger than a, so wavefunctions and energy bands are nearly the same as above Electrons wavelengths approach a, so waves begin to be strongly back-scattered by the potential: Electrons waves are strongly back-scattered (Bragg scattering) so standing waves are formed:

The nearly-free-electron model (Standing Waves) Due to the ±, there are two such standing waves possible: These two approximate solutions to the S. E. at have very different potential energies. has its peaks at x = a, 2a, 3a, …at the positions of the atoms, where V is at its minimum (low energy wavefunction). The other solution, has its peaks at x = a/2, 3a/2, 5a/2,… at positions in between atoms, where V is at its maximum (high energy wavefunction). Either: Nodes at ions Or: Nodes midway between ions a

Symmetric and Antisymmetric Solutions The nearly-free-electron model Strictly speaking we should have looked at the probabilities before coming to this conclusion: Symmetric and Antisymmetric Solutions Different energies for electron standing waves a

Summary: The nearly-free-electron model BAND GAPS APPEAR AT EACH BRILLOUIN ZONE EDGE The periodic potential V(x) splits the free-electron E(k) into “energy bands” separated by gaps at each BZ boundary. -2π/a –π/a π/a 2π/a In between the two energies there are no allowed energies; i.e., wavelike solutions of the Schrodinger equation do not exist. Forbidden energy bands form called band gaps. E- Eg E+

BAND GAPS APPEAR AT EACH BRILLOUIN ZONE EDGE Approximating the Band Gap BAND GAPS APPEAR AT EACH BRILLOUIN ZONE EDGE -2π/a –π/a π/a 2π/a E- Eg E+ For square potential: V(x) =Vo for specific values of x (changes integration limits)