Relations between Copyright, Cultural Heritage Protection Regulations and Cultural Diversity Romana Matanovac Vučković Faculty of Law, Zagreb ALAI Conference,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fourth Global Congress on Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy WIPO Development Agenda: a New Global Initiative Dubai February 3 to 5, 2008 Pushpendra Rai.
Advertisements

ROUND TABLE 1 Accesibility and Reasonable Accommodation Ana Peláez Narváez UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
The Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress State Obligations Yvonne Donders Amsterdam Center for International Law.
A Human Rights Approach to the Benefits of Scientific Progress Audrey R. Chapman, Ph.D. University of Connecticut School of Medicine July 26, 2010 AAAS.
4 th Meeting of the EC International Dialogue on Bioethics Copenhagen, June 19 th, 2012 Large research and medical databases in clinical and research multi-centred.
Access to and Use of Traditional Knowledge A view from industry Bo Hammer Jensen.
1 Cultural diversity and the global economic crisis: a cultural economics perspective David Throsby Professor of Economics Macquarie University, Sydney.
Agrobiodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights: Selected Issues under the FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
UNESCO and the status of the artist: Convention on the promotion and protection of the diversity of cultural expressions by Kwame Boafo Director Presented.
186 National Socities.
UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Section Introducing the Intangible Heritage Convention NOM PPT 5.2.
1 “Introduction to EU Trade Policy” – July 2008 How We Make Trade Policy n Contents n Part I: EU Trade Powers n Part II: The evolving scope of Trade Policy.
Interface between patent and sui generis systems of protection of plant varieties The 1978 UPOV Act does not allow both systems to be applied to the same.
Sources Of Human Rights
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Convention on Biological Diversity, Traditional Knowledge and the TRIPS Agreement Yovana Reyes Tagle University of Helsinki.
Cultural Heritage Protection Laws and Their Principles: The first step to achieving protection.
Dynamic Planet- Sub unit 3 Battle for the Biosphere 3.2b Management measures are being used to conserve the biosphere and make human use of it more sustainable?
Intangible Cultural Heritage Section
References to Economic Instruments in Selected MEAs Matthew Stilwell Matthew Stilwell.
The 2001 UCH Convention in the Context of the Law of the Sea.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Access, Ownership and Copyright Issues in Preserving and Managing Cultural Heritage Resources International Conference on Challenges in Preserving and.
Raising awareness IMP 5.5 UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Section.
EU Culture By Eurogems aps. Framework Convention on the Value of CulturalHeritage for Society (CoE) The member States of the Council of Europe Considering.
Exception to rules on free trade Need to strike a balance between free trade and other values. Member can justify measures incompatible with WTO Agreements.
‘Approaches to programme planning and budgeting’ Experience of Regional Centre for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in South-Eastern Europe.
IFLA/UNESCO Multicultural Library Manifesto Understanding the Manifesto: A Workshop.
Intangible Cultural Heritage Section
ACCESSIBILITY IN POLICIES DOCUMENTS WORKING GROUP1 WP: 3 Author: Sashka Parvanova Place and date: Budapest 29 March 2012 Project partner: REGVRATSA BG.
Legal Instruments to Promote and Protect Linguistic Rights.
THE UNEASY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LANGUAGE ISSUES AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC PARTICIPATION: LINGUISTICALLY SENSITIVE APPROACHES TO PARTICIPATION Prof. Robert Dunbar.
Architecture Architecture is recognised as an important element of European culture and of the environment in which Europeans live. The European Union's.
The WIPO Development Agenda: An Overview Geneva May, 2009 Esteban Burrone World Intellectual Property Organization.
Definitions have consequences: Taking seriously the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Frank Proschan Smithsonian.
Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation, Beijing July 14 – Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation Chinese-European Workshop.
UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Section Key concepts NOM PPT 5.3.
Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions Adopted 20 October 2005 Entry into force 18 March 2007.
Session 4: The Convention on Biological Diversity Making Access Decisions.
[Workshop]. UNESCO’s Legally-binding Instruments on Culture.
UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Section Basic Challenges of Sustaining Intangible Cultural Heritage.
International Preservation Conventions: UNESCO: The World Heritage Convention,1972 UNESCO: Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event.
UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Section Introducing the Intangible Heritage Convention IMP 5.2.
Indigenous and Tribal Peoples | | Convention No.169 on indigenous and tribal peoples.
ICH International heritage beyond borders: safeguarding through international cooperation Cécile Duvelle Secretary, Convention for the Safeguarding of.
COPYRIGHT, CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND THE WTO Professor Fiona Macmillan Birkbeck, University of London.
Session 9: Cross-Cutting Issues. Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources  To describe the key cross-cutting.
Vienna Music Business Research Days The Proposal of the EU Commission for a Directive on Collecting Societies and Cultural Diversity – a Missed Opportunity.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
International Protection of Traditional Wisdom on Bio-diversity and Sacred Landscapes Lyndel V. Prott and Patrick.J. O’Keefe.
ICH Intangible Cultural Heritage Keywords Cécile Duvelle Chief, Intangible Cultural Heritage Section Secretary of the 2003 Convention UNESCO Capacity-building.
Sasha Rubel 4 November 2015 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Article 19, 21and 22 chapter 111 of ICCPR Right to freedom of expression Right to Peaceful assembly Right to freedom of association.
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
SPANISH LAW on SOCIAL ECONOMY 5/2011 Miguel Ángel Cabra de Luna, PhD Member of the European Economic and Social Committee, Spanish Enterprise Confederation.
African Training Workshop on Community Protocols, Indicators on Traditional Knowledge and Customary Sustainable Use under the Convention on Biological.
SUSTAINABLE TOURISM A paper to be presented at the sustainable Tourism course at Ngurndoto Lodge in Arusha, February 19th – 26th, By Antiquities.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.
Overview of the Department of Arts and Culture
DEVELOPMENT, CULTURAL SELF-DETERMINATION AND THE WTO
Exception to rules on free trade
Package of agreements annexed to the WTO Agreement
World Heritage List Procedure for inscription
Putting Cultural Diversity into Practice: Some Innovative Tools Training for Asia Pacific Field Personnel Bangkok, Thailand, December 2004 The Universal.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Site and Artefact Protection under the 2001 Convention
Faculty of Law Cultural Human Rights Prof. Dr. Yvonne Donders.
The Convention for Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
The Global Landscape of IP/TK
FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL RIGHTS IN EU
Presentation transcript:

Relations between Copyright, Cultural Heritage Protection Regulations and Cultural Diversity Romana Matanovac Vučković Faculty of Law, Zagreb ALAI Conference, Dubrovnik, 6-8/10/08

INTERNATIONAL LEVEL - principles cultural heritage cultural diversity intellectual property rights

TANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE universal concept - it belongs to all the peoples of the world, irrespective of the territory on which it is located UNESCO seeks to encourage the identification, protection and preservation of the cultural and natural heritage around the world considered to be of outstanding value to humanity. - Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage

INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE “living” cultural heritage, reflects new approaches to the understanding, protection and respect for the cultural heritage of humanity “driving force” of cultural diversity, its maintenance is a guarantee for continuing creativity UNESCO has one of the leading roles in safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage - Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 2003

“OTHER TYPES” OF PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE Other international instruments: on the protection of the cultural heritage in the event of armed conflict special instruments on the protection of the underwater, archaeological, audiovisual, architectual cultural heritage... protection of the cultural heritage against the illict export / import, transfer of ownership UNESCO, UNIDROIT, COUNCIL OF EUROPE...

COMPARISON I CULTURAL HERITAGE according to international treaties TANGIBLE monuments, groups of buildings, sites other immoveables and moveables INTANGIBLE practices, representations, expressions, knowledge, skills, instruments, objects, artefacts and cultural spaces associated therewith - that communities, groups and, in some cases, individuals recognize as part of their cultural heritage manifested inter alia in the following domains: oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage; performing arts; social practices, rituals and festive events; knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe; traditional craftsmanship.

COMPARISON II CULTURAL HERITAGE according to international treaties TANGIBLE increasingly threatened by destruction causes: traditional causes of decay change of social and economic conditions is of outstanding interest and therefore needs to be preserved as part of the world heritage of mankind as a whole INTANGIBLE threats of deterioration, disappearance and destruction causes: lack of resources for safeguarding processes of globalization and social transformation, alongside the conditions they create for renewed dialogue among communities phenomenon of intolerance it is a mainspring of cultural diversity and a guarantee of sustainable development the need to build greater awareness, especially among the younger generations, of the importance of the intangible cultural heritage and of its safeguarding

COMPARISON III CULTURAL HERITAGE according to international treaties TANGIBLE to identify, protect, conserve, present, transmit to future generations to adopt a general policy which aims to give the cultural and natural heritage a function in the life of the community and to integrate the protection of that heritage into comprehensive planning programmes to take the appropriate legal, scientific, technical, administrative and financial measures necessary for the identification, protection, conservation, presentation and rehabilitation of this heritage; INTANGIBLE to safeguard to identify and define to adopt a general policy aimed at promoting the function of the intangible cultural heritage in society, and at integrating the safeguarding of such heritage into planning programmes to adopt appropriate legal, technical, administrative and financial measures aimed at: (ii) ensuring access to the intangible cultural heritage while respecting customary practices governing access to specific aspects of such heritage; (iii) establishing documentation institutions for the intangible cultural heritage and facilitating access to them.

RELATION CH – IP according to international treaties CH tangible – no prejudice to national property rights intangible – no prejudice to international IP treaties IP no regulation on its relation to CH

RELATION tangible CH – IP according to international treaties PROPERTY RIGHTS without prejudice to national property rights - a general rule proclaimed in CH Convention according to the national legislations, property (ownership) is limited by CH rules because of the general obligation of PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, PRESENTATION and REHABILITATION of objects protected as tangible cultural heritage COPYRIGHT without prejudice to IP rights - a general rule, not expressly proclaimed in CH Convention but because of the general obligation of PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, PRESENTATION and REHABILITATION of objects protected as tangible cultural heritage, rights deriving from the copyright protection could be limited alterations, destruction, reproduction...?

RELATION intangible CH – IP according to international treaties PROPERTY RIGHTS no regulation on the relation between the intangible cultural heritage and property rights (ownership) COPYRIGHT without prejudice to the obligations and rights deriving from international IP treaties - a general obligation to follow the rules provided for in international IP treaties does it mean that national rules on intangible CH should never affect national rules on copyright? Could the rights deriving from the copyright protection be limited because of the general obligation to SAFEGUARD (identify and define) the objects protected as intangible cultural heritage? is it possible to limit copyright in respect of a work / performance which is at the same time protected as an intangible cultural heritage?

CULTURAL DIVERSITY cultural expressions of groups and societies, whatever the means and technologies used represents common heritage of humanity and full realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms UNESCO has one of the leading roles in protecting and promoting cultural diversity – Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, 2005

COMPARISON I IP – CD according to international treaties IP private rights protects works, performances, etc. economic and moral rights CULTURAL DIVERSITY common heritage of humanity protects cultural expressions promotes both a cultural and an economic value of cultural expressions because they convey identities, values and meanings, and must therefore not be treated as solely having commercial value

COMPARISON II IP – CD according to international treaties IP obligation of the states to unify the rules for the protection and enforcement + obligation of effective enforcement (TRIPS) effective system is an incentive for literary and artistic creation (WCT) + IP rights should not themselves become barriers to legitimate trade (TRIPS) CULTURAL DIVERSITY sovereign right of the states to formulate and implement cultural policies and to adopt measures to protect and promote the cultural diversity + urgent protection IP important for those involved in cultural creativity

RELATION IP – CD according to international treaties IP no regulation on CD aim (proclaimed in WCT and TRIPS only): protection of private rights public policy objectives: incentive for creativity (WCT) + developmental and technological objectives (TRIPS) trade-related aspects of IP (proclaimed in TRIPS only) promotion of the applicability of the basic principles of GATT 1994 and of relevant international intellectual property agreements and conventions (TRIPS) CULTURAL DIVERSITY explicit relation to IP as important for those involved in cultural creativity aim: public policy objective to protect and safeguard CD CD is corrective to multilateral and bilateral agreements on international trade: principles of mutual supportiveness, complementarity and non- subordination to other international treaties

RELATIONSHIP OF CD CONVENTION TO OTHER TREATIES: Article 20 of the CD Convention: 1. Parties recognize that they shall perform in good faith their obligations under this Convention and all other treaties to which they are parties. Accordingly, without subordinating this Convention to any other treaty, (a) they shall foster mutual supportiveness between this Convention and the other treaties to which they are parties; and (b) when interpreting and applying the other treaties to which they are parties or when entering into other international obligations, Parties shall take into account the relevant provisions of this Convention. 2. Nothing in this Convention shall be interpreted as modifying rights and obligations of the Parties under any other treaties to which they are parties.

RELATION CH – CD according to international treaties CULTURAL HERITAGE public interest importance of the intangible cultural heritage as a mainspring of cultural diversity and a guarantee of sustainable development (UNESCO Convention) protection and safeguarding of cultural heritage is prerequisite for the protection and development of cultural diversity CULTURAL DIVERSITY public interest cultural diversity forms a common heritage of humanity and should be cherished and preserved for the benefit of all Cultural diversity is made manifest not only through the varied ways in which the cultural heritage of humanity is expressed, augmented and transmitted through the variety of cultural expressions, but also through diverse modes of artistic creation, production, dissemination, distribution and enjoyment, whatever the means and technologies used.

RELATIONS: IP – CH – CD according to international treaties - complementarity artistic creation copyright cultural heritage cultural diversity

RELATIONS: IP – CH – CD in practice - mutual impregnation cultural heritage cultural diversity copyright

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!