Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2012 Roger C. Schonfeld April 23, 2013 | ASERL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

Capturing Academic Grey Literature: Starting at Home Gretta E.Siegel, Science Librarian Portland State University, Portland, OR USA GL5: 5th International.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J How can a Repository Contribute to University Success? APSR - The Successful Repository June 29,
PubMed Central ANCHASL Spring Meeting April 1, 2005 Robert James Associate Director of Public Services Duke University.
The Future Ain’t What It Used To Be UKSG Conference 2004 and Exhibition Manchester, UK 29 March 2004.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Introduction Information literacy for postgraduate students The Internet and research Using the library for research Accessing quality information Managing.
Getting published (and how the Library can help) Catherine Robertson, Library Services 30 th September 2009.
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program.
Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.
Hudson Valley Community College Marvin Library GOOGLE SCHOLAR
Library Instruction in North America Library Orientation (before 1980) –Tour of library, instruction in using card catalog, print indexes, reference works.
Thinking the unthinkable: a library without a catalogue Reconsidering the future of our discovery tools.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J Scholarship of teaching and learning Dr Margaret Lloyd Faculty of Education
The model of consistent teaching of information literacy in online courses Faculty liaision librarians tutoring researchers and research students Vilve.
Our Format Transitions Roger C.
TAMU 2012 Enrollment Undergrads40,100 Graduates9,600 Professional527 Faculty3,810 TAMU HSC 2012 Enrollment Undergrads206 Graduates959 Professional1,121.
SFU Library services, resources, and research tips for SIAT researchers (or: How libraries are still useful in the age of the Digital Revolution and Breaking.
Perceptions Of Library Support For Formal Undergraduate Research Programs Sarah L. Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign March 31, 2014 CNI.
Fifth Annual NSF Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Conference July 7-9, 2010 Enrique Ortiz University of Central Florida Using a Teaching Goals.
Using the H-index to Measure Czech Economic Research and Czech Researchers’ Habits Related to Research Papers T. Cahlík, H. Pessrová.
Your Key to Success Library Skills Seminar 2008 ED 1499 Gisella Scalese, Education Librarian.
Findings from the US Faculty Survey 2012 Deanna Marcum New Jersey Library Association | June 5, 2013.
IL Step 1: Sources of Information Information Literacy 1.
What Do Faculty Favor?: Local Implementation of the Ithaka Faculty Survey in Illinois Susan Searing, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Terry Taylor,
Secondary School Councils and Effective Communication YRDSB Fall School Council Orientation Forum 2009.
Vendor services for current awareness services Laila jarkhi.
Librarian Perceptions of the Function of the Academic Library: Summer-Fall 2006 Kevin Guthrie Roger C. Schonfeld December 4, 2006.
What Do Faculty Think of the Changing Environment? Kevin Guthrie Roger C. Schonfeld April 17, 2007.
What Faculty Want Roger C. Schonfeld Ithaka Research ICOLC Montreal, Quebec April 24,
International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications (INASP) Health Information Forum, London, 15th May Programme for the Enhancement.
Discovering Resources at Friedsam Memorial Library.
Finding Credible Sources
What Do Faculty Favor?: Local Implementation of the Ithaka Faculty Survey in Illinois Paula Dempsey, DePaul University Susan Searing, University of Illinois.
Amy Jackson UNM Technology Days July 22,  An institutional repository (IR) is a web-based database of scholarly material which is institutionally.
Guide: DR. R. BALASUBRAMANI Assistant Professor Department of LIS Bharathidasan University Tiruchirappalli.
Welcome Back! Day Two. Homework Our next challenge to discuss—outreach. Before we meet tomorrow, be ready to share: –A program you would like to reach.
Faculty Survey 2009: The Format Transition for Scholarly Works Ross Housewright ALA Annual /26/2010.
Vision Library Media Center serves as an integral part of the school ’ s educational program and is the information hub of the school. All students will.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
Please answer the following questions before the session on the notepad at your table and turn in to the presenter (Mark) 1. How familiar are you with.
Tackling the Complexities of Source Evaluation: Active Learning Exercises That Foster Students’ Critical Thinking Juliet Rumble & Toni Carter Auburn University.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Shaping the Future of Scholarly Communication Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee (Visiting University.
CH 42 DEVELOPING A RESEARCH PLAN CH 43 FINDING SOURCES CH 44 EVALUATING SOURCES CH 45 SYNTHESIZING IDEAS Research!
PPT 下载: What Is this? Promotion and Tenure: Exploring the Guidelines of Journalism, Mass Communication and PR Departments in a Digital.
RSU #4 Library Media Program Preparing Students for the 21st Century.
Digital repositories and scientific communication challenge Radovan Vrana Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
The Liaison Librarian Program – Meeting Faculty Needs? Daphne Flanagan, AUS University Librarian, Alanna Ross, AUS Associate University.
+ The Use of Databases in the Instructional Program Increasing Rigor and Inquiry Throughout the Curriculum Donna Dick, Jacob Gerding, and Michelle Phillips.
Research Methods School of Economic Information Engineering Dr. Xu Yun :
USE PATTERN OF ELECTRONIC JOURNALS BY FACULTY MEMEBRS IN K.L.UNIVERSITY LIBRARY: A STUDY Smt. K. Usha Rani Librarian K L University, Vaddeswaram Guntur,
Daniel G. Tracy and Susan E. Searing University Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Perception and Use of Academic Library Services by.
Library presentation, 28 September 2010T. Basaglia, A. Gentil-Beccot - GS-SI What can CERN Library do for TE department?
Reference Department Kamilya Assylbekova
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Background for the Library-IT Task Force #2 – Ithaka Faculty Survey Pat Burns Interim Dean, CSU libraries and VP for IT 10/2/ Library-IT Task Force.
Scholarly works, research, reports, publications What is an Institutional Repository? Focus on Research Groups Promoting Physics Faculty, Students and.
1 Taking the pulse of the reader of the ABA Section of Real Property  Trust & Estate Law’s Probate & Property.
Redefining the Library’s Role through an Institutional Repository Sharon Mader, Dean Jeanne Pavy, Scholarly Communications Librarian Earl K. Long Library.
Information literacy instruction and assessment : a collaborate design
Promoting and Preserving FIU Research and Scholarship
Creating an Academic Presence
Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration
How does your research reach an audience?
ITHAKA S + R Faculty Survey:
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
What Are Institutional Repositories?
Expanding Knowledge: Introduction to Scholarly Communication
The Group Within: Analyzing a Large-Scale User Survey to Focus on a User Subpopulation of Interest Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe University of Illinois (Urbana)
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
Presentation transcript:

Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2012 Roger C. Schonfeld April 23, 2013 | ASERL

1.Discovery & Access 2.Dissemination 3.The Role of the Library 4.Format Transitions Not covered today: 1.Research Topics and Practices 2.Teaching 3.Scholarly Societies Outline of Today’s Presentation

Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2012 Available at: research-publications/ faculty-survey-2012-us

D. Russell Bailey, Providence College Linda Downs, College Art Association Peter Dougherty, Princeton University Press Al Bertrand, Princeton University Press Brinley Franklin, University of Connecticut Judith Coffey Russell, University of Florida Peggy Seiden, Swarthmore College Carla Stoffle, University of Arizona Charles Watkinson, Purdue University US Faculty Survey: Advisory Committee

Sponsors – Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2012

Claremont University Consortium Community College of Rhode Island DePaul University Lafayette College Providence College Roger Williams University State University of New York – Potsdam Swarthmore College Texas A&M University University of Florida University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Local Faculty Survey: Pilot Partners

Population included faculty members at US higher education institutions granting a bachelor’s degree or higher, covering all key fields except agriculture and health. Carefully planned transition from paper to digital distribution and response In September 2012, a randomly selected group of 160,008 were invited and then reminded to participate via By October, 5,261 responses were received (response rate: 3.5%), overall representative of the population with some disciplinary weighting Dataset has been submitted to ICPSR for preservation and access Methodology

Discovery & Access

Below are four possible starting points for research in academic literature. Typically, when you are conducting academic research, which of these four starting points do you use to begin locating information for your research? A specific electronic research resource/computer database A general purpose search engine on the internet or world wide web Your online library catalog The library building Discovery: Starting Point

Specific electronic research resource General purpose search engine Library catalog Library building

Discovery: A Variety of Sources 81% of faculty members strongly agree with the statement, “When I am looking for journal articles and monographs in the course of my research, I often use a variety of different sources, including the library, scholarly databases, and mainstream search engines.”

Discovery: Known Items vs. Exploration Known Items: “When you try to locate a specific piece of secondary scholarly literature that you already know about but do not have in hand, how do you most often begin your process?” Exploration: “When you explore the scholarly literature to find new journal articles and monographs relevant to your research interests, how do you most often begin your process?” Visit my college or university library’s website or online catalog Search on a specific scholarly database or search engine Search on a general purpose search engine Ask a colleague Ask a librarian Other

Discovery: Known Items vs. Exploration Library website Scholarly database or search engine General purpose search engine Other Ask a colleague Ask a librarian

How do you “keep up” with current scholarship in your field? Discovery: Keeping up with Scholarship 71% Attending conferences or workshops 67% Reading materials suggested by other scholars 65% Regularly skimming new issues of key journals 58% Regularly skimming table of contents alerts of key journals 54% Following the work of key scholars 35% Reading or skimming book reviews 35% Reading materials rated highly by a relevant repository 30% Reviewing catalogs or announcements from scholarly publishers 23% Setting alerts for specific keywords 12% Following other researchers through Peer Sources blogs/social media

Discovery: A Variety of Sources 26% of respondents said they find it “very frustrating” to use a variety of different tools and databases to find and access the materials they need.

Access: Freely Available Materials Journals and books you routinely useMaterial not immediately available My college or university library’s collections or subscriptions 78% Materials that are freely available online 65% My own personal collection or subscriptions 40% Collections or subscriptions at other institutions 36% My academic department’s collections or subscriptions 14% Search for a freely available version online 86% Use ILL or document delivery services provided 81% Give up and look for a different resource 50% Purchase it myself33% Ask a friend at another institution 29% Contact the author26%

Dissemination

Dissemination: Audience and Journal Priorities “How important is it to you that your research reaches each of the following possible audiences?” Scholars in my specific subdiscipline or field of research Scholars in my discipline but outside of my specific subdiscipline or field of research Professionals outside of academia in areas related to my research interests Scholars outside my discipline The general public beyond the scholarly and associated professional community Undergraduate students

Audiences for your research My subdiscipline My discipline Professionals outside academia Scholars outside my discipline The general public Undergraduates

Dissemination: Audience and Journal Priorities “When it comes to influencing your decisions about journals in which to publish an article of yours, how important to you is each of the following characteristics?” The journal’s area of coverage is close to my immediate area of research The journal has a high impact factor The current issues of the journal are circulated widely, and are well read by scholars in your field The journal permits scholars to publish for free If accepted, the journal will publish my article quickly The journal is highly selective Measures have been taken to ensure the protection and safeguarding of content for the long term The journal makes its articles freely available online The journal is accessible to developing nations

Selecting a journal for your article Close to my area of research High impact factor Circulated widely / well read Publish for free Will publish quickly Highly selective Protection and safeguarding for the long term Articles freely available online Accessible to developing nations

Dissemination: Publishing services “Thinking back to the last scholarly article or monograph that you published, how valuable to you were the activities performed by your publisher in each of the following aspects of this process?” Managing the peer review process to provide high-quality feedback to vet and improve your work Associating your work with a reputable brand that signals its quality Placing your article in a high-visibility publication or channel Managing the peer review process to ensure your scholarship is released as quickly as possible Providing professional copy-editing and lay-out of your work

Importance of publisher activities Peer review / vet and improve your work Brand that signals quality High-visibility publication or channel Peer review / as quickly as possible Copy editing and lay-out

Dissemination: Publishing services “How valuable do you find support from your college or university library, scholarly society, university press, or another service provider for each of the following aspects of the publication process, or how valuable would you find it if this support was offered to you?” Managing a public webpage for me that lists links to my recent scholarly outputs, provides information on my areas of research and teaching, and provides contact information for me Helping me to assess the impact of my work following its publication Helping me determine where to publish a given work to maximize its impact Making a version of my research outputs freely available online in addition to the formally published version Helping me understand and negotiate favorable publication contracts

Publishing support activities Managing my public web presence Helping me assess the impact of my work Helping me determine where to publish

Publishing support activities Making a version of my research outputs freely available Helping me understand and negotiate favorable publication contracts

The Role of the Library

How important to you is it that your college or university library provide each of the functions below? Gateway: “The library serves as a starting point or “gateway” for locating information for my research” Buyer: “The library pays for resources I need, from academic journals to books to electronic databases” Repository: “The library serves as a repository of resources; in other words, it archives, preserves, and keeps track of resources” Teaching Facilitator: “The library supports and facilitates my teaching activities” Research Supporter: “The library provides active support that helps to increase the productivity of my research and scholarship” Undergraduate Information Literacy Teacher: “The library helps undergraduates develop research, critical analysis, and information literacy skills” The Role of the Library

Developing student research skills 44% of faculty members strongly agree with the statement: “My undergraduate students have poor skills relating to locating and evaluating scholarly information.”

Developing student research skills “Developing the research skills of my undergraduate students related to locating and evaluating scholarly information is principally…” …my responsibility42% …my academic library’s responsibility24%

Perceptions of librarians with content online “Because faculty have easy access to academic content online, the role librarians play at this institution is becoming much less important.” “Because scholarly material is available electronically, universities should redirect the money spent on library buildings and staff to other needs.”

Format Transition: Monographs

A print to electronic transition for monographs? “You may have had the opportunity to read scholarly monographs in electronic format, either through a library subscription database or standalone e-books. How often have you used scholarly monographs in digital form in the past six months – often, occasionally, rarely, or never?”

How often have you used scholarly monographs in digital form?

A print to electronic transition for monographs? “Below is a list of ways you may use a scholarly monograph. Please think about doing each of these things with a scholarly monograph in print format or in digital format and… indicate how much easier or harder it is to perform each activity in print or digital format.” Reading cover to cover in depth Reading a section in depth Comparing treatment of ideas between monographs Skimming in whole or in part Exploring references Searching for a particular topic

Reading cover to cover Reading a section Comparing monographs Skimming Exploring references Searching for a topic Monograph use cases

A print to electronic transition for monographs? “Within the next five years, the use of e-books will be so prevalent among faculty and students that it will not be necessary to maintain library collections of hard-copy books.” % % %

1.Discovery services objectives and needs 2.Your library’s collecting and content provision role 3.Role of digital formats and print collections 4.Needs for library support of student learning 5.Changing pedagogies and needed teaching support 6.Research methods and practices and needed research support 7.Greater alignment between your library’s vision and faculty members’ perceptions What you can learn locally

Some Reflections

Discussion and Questions: US Faculty Survey 2012 & Local Faculty Survey For more information