A study on the design/development time of E-learning projects in New Zealand. Kumar Laxman, Phd Associate Professor Faculty of Education University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED TRAINING Bradford S. Bell and Steve W. J. Kozlowski.
Advertisements

E-Learning in Project Mikhail N. Morozov, Head of Multimedia System Laboratory.
1 Investment Appraisal Geoff Leese Sept 1999 revised Sept 2001, Jan 2003, Jan 2006, Jan 2007, Jan 2008, Dec 2008 (special thanks to Geoff Leese)
New Models for Sustainability Directed Care environment Australian Multicultural Community Services approach to financial tracking in a Client Directed.
Study on the outcomes of teaching and learning about ‘race’ and racism Kish Bhatti-Sinclair (Division of Social Work Studies) Claire Bailey (Division of.
Chapter 3 – Evaluation of Performance
Discounting Future Cash Flows
Development Times for Instructor- Led Learning (ILT) A Chapman Alliance, Learning Brief November 2007 By Bryan Chapman, Chief Learning Strategist
IVETTE:Implementation of virtual environments in training and in education Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme Mario Barajas University of Barcelona.
1 Doing Statistics for Business Doing Statistics for Business Data, Inference, and Decision Making Marilyn K. Pelosi Theresa M. Sandifer Chapter 7 Sampling.
1 Review “Conducted a review of C&IT in learning and teaching and shown an understanding of the educational processes” u Review a type of learning technology.
Using networked technologies to support staff development 1.Some definitions. 2.Where are we now? 3.Some potential benefits/applications. 4.Issues to consider.
Online self-study for the many, autonomy for the few Costs and profits of e-languages: the London Metropolitan E-packs experience SCHML, 26 January 2005.
Chapter 2 Strategic Training
IT Job Roles Task 20. Software Engineer Job Description Software engineers are responsible for creating and maintaining software of various different.
Our Commitment to Your Success: Global eTraining.
Developing a Systematic Approach for Faculty Enrichment Using Detailed Assessments as a Basis Presented for Global Learn 2015 by Linda Merillat, PhD Monica.
MBA/MIS Class #3 September 2, 2008 IT Business Value Financial Justification 1.
Assessing Organisational Readiness for e-Learning Presented by: Keithea Beckford. November 22, 2013.
Welcome Assessment Centres David Phillips Senior Assessment Partner DfT Resourcing Group.
ICEE 2005 July 25-29, Gliwice, Poland Implementation of E-Learning in Engineering Education: Evaluation of Students Skills and Learning Approaches James.
Term 2, 2011 Week 1. CONTENTS Types and purposes of graphic representations Spreadsheet software – Producing graphs from numerical data Mathematical functions.
©2014 MFMER | slide-1 How Long Will It Take To Develop My eLearning? Theresa Freese ICELW Conference – New York City, NY June 2014.
Campaign Readiness Project Overview Enabling a structured, scalable approach to customer-centric campaigns.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Lecture 31. Chapter 8 Budgetary Planning and Control.
Computer-Based Training Methods
Survey tools, focus groups and video as a means of capturing student experience and expectations of e-learning Dave.
What is e-Learning e-Learning is the use of technology to enable people to learn anytime and anywhere. e-Learning can include training, the delivery of.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Tastle, W., White, B., Shackleton, P.(2005) E-Learning in higher education: the challenge, effort, and return on investment International Journal on ELearning,4(2),
Qualifications Update: Higher Accounting Crowne Plaza Glasgow 10 December 2013 Qualifications Update: Higher Accounting Crowne Plaza Glasgow 10 December.
Assessing Organizational Communication: Strategic Communication Audits Chapter 1 Communication Audits as Organizational Development.
Information commitments, evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning evnironments Ying-Tien Wu & Chin-Chung Tsai Institute.
Amity School of Business ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED TRAINING.
Dr. Engr. Sami ur Rahman Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science University of Malakand Research Methods in Computer Science Lecture: Data Generation.
CEDR TD Management PG2 Planning the Road Network Performance Indicators for the TERN: Implementation Options.
1© 2010 by Nelson Education Ltd. Chapter Five Training Design.
1© 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd. CHAPTER FIVE Training Design.
Consultancy and Training Trends and Service Offer
Financial Capability and Psychosocial Well-Being James Kunz, PhD, Associate Professor, McDaniel College, and Christine Callahan, PhD, LCSW-C, Research.
10 Localization Tips for e-Learning. Page Localization Tips for e-Learning Hello. Buenos Dias. Ciao. Konichiwa. Zdravstvuite.
Lynn Schmidt, PhD ATD Puget Sound October 21, 2014.
State Administration Staffing a report by the Office of Program Evaluation & Government Accountability FINAL REPORT May 2008 FISCAL OPPORTUNIT Y STUDY.
Faculty of Engineering INTRODUCTION TO DATA ANALYSIS IE 204.
Introduction to E-Learning
Blended Value Accounting & Social Enterprise Success John Anner, PhD SIERC Annual Conference Auckland, New Zealand 12 February, 2016.
Research data collected: September 2010, by Chapman Alliance How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? A Chapman Alliance, Research Study September 2010.
CMPD 434 MULTIMEDIA AUTHORING Chapter 05 Part B Multimedia Authoring Process III.
INTRODUCTION TO E-LEARNING. Objectives This chapter contains information on understanding the fundamental concepts of e-learning. In this chapter, e-learning.
Multimedia Industry Knowledge CUFGEN01A Develop And Apply Industry Knowledge CUFMEM08A Apply Principles Of Instructional Design To A Multimedia Product.
Strategic and Business Planning for Ensuring of Cooperatives Sustainability Dr. Hakkı Çetin TARIS Union of Olive and Olive Oil Agricultural Sale Cooperatives.
How to Demonstrate the Value of Contract Education Jack J. Phillips, Ph.D. Chairman ROI Institute, Inc. May 11, :00 AM- 12:00 PM 5 Levels of Evaluation.
New Hire Packet Automation Factors for Decision Making.
How Long Does it Take to Create Learning?
How can understanding the Civics EOC Item Specification Document impact teaching and increase student achievement? The Item Specifications is a resource.
ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED TRAINING
Effective Training: Systems, Strategies and Practices
BUS 308 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
BUS 308 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
BUS 308 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Lecture # 4 Software Development Project Management
How can understanding the Civics EOC Item Specification Document impact teaching and increase student achievement? The Item Specifications is a resource.
Analysis 2: Task Analysis
CHAPTER 14 SETTING A DIRECTION FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES
CHAPTER 14 SETTING A DIRECTION FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES
How can understanding the Civics EOC Item Specification Document impact teaching and increase student achievement? The Item Specifications is a resource.
How Faculty Can Achieve Learning Objectives With Online Tools
How can understanding the Civics EOC Item Specification Document impact teaching and increase student achievement? The Item Specifications is a resource.
Presentation transcript:

A study on the design/development time of E-learning projects in New Zealand. Kumar Laxman, Phd Associate Professor Faculty of Education University of Auckland

Background to Study In 2011, technology enabled training accounted for 40 per cent of Fortune Global 500 company employees’ formal learning hours, and this percentage is growing (Yacovelli, 2012) This growth is primarily due to the multiple advantages e- learning technology has over traditional training methods in both delivery and management.

However, e-learning also requires considerable investment in time, money and creative thought to effectively exploit its potential (Pachler, 2011). Rather than cost and time saving, e-learning setup costs can be inhibitive and often the organisation is unable to reframe the learning to an online environment (Schechter, 2009).

Therefore estimating the cost of online learning is an essential component in the decision whether moving training to an online format (Bartley & Golek, 2004). The calculation of ROI as justification for a training intervention is very important although few studies have attempted to estimate the cost side of the equation.

Aims of Study Survey commercial e-learning practitioners regarding current and typical online learning development time. Assist L&D practitioners to estimate a budget before undertaking e-learning projects or compare their current expenditure against industry norms. This study will be significant as it is the first of its kind to be conducted within a New Zealand. The findings of this study will be of beneficial help to L&D and E-learning leaders and practioners in New Zealand.

Bounds of Study The question of how much e-learning costs are involved to produce an E-learning product is complex for a number of reasons : Infrastructure (software and hardware) costs vary vastly across organisations - this study will only consider the average development time and cost to create e-learning, noy technology costs.

Skills required to create online learning can vary considerably – this study will assess the average e-learning product generation time and costs Strategic decisions around e-learning are likely to be effected by contingent factors such as L&D department size, budget and learner numbers. This study will statistically account for the impact of these factors.

Method Survey instrument developed based on the adaption of the original Chapman (2010) and administered online Participants will include professionals in New Zealand who are involved in developing e-learning projects - Distributed across small private companies, L&D consultants, and HR/L&D etc

Sample Questions

The data contained in this research was collected from 249 organizations, representing 3,947 learning development professionals, who have created learning content (ILT and eLearning) that is consumed by 19,875,946 Learners.

Level 1 - eLearning Development Benchmark

Development of Level 1 - eLearning How is Level 1 eLearning Defined? LevelDefinition Level 1 eLearning (Basic) Content pages, text, graphics, perhaps simple audio, perhaps simple video, test questions. NOTE: PowerPoint-to-eLearning often falls into this category. Basically pages with assessment. Level 2 eLearning (Interactive) Level 1 plus 25% (or more) interactive exercises (allowing learners to perform virtual "try it" exercises), liberal use of multimedia (audio, video, animations) Level 3 eLearning (Advanced) Highly interactive, possibly simulation or serious game based, use of avatars, custom interactions, award winning caliber courseware The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT: It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results, especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.

Development of Level 1 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 79:1 125:1 49:1

Development of Level 1 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 1 eLearning? $10,054 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning. The cost shown is the average

Tasks % of time spent on each task Time spent on each task (per finished hour) 1-hour Level 1 eLearning 5-hours Level 1 eLearning 10-hours Level 1 eLearning Front End Analysis 10% 7.87$ 1,002 $ 5,009$ 10,018 Instructional Design 14% 10.88$ 1,384 $ 6,922$ 13,845 Storyboarding 11% 9.03$ 1,149 $ 5,745$ 11,490 Graphic Production 11% 8.66$ 1,102 $ 5,512 $ 11,023 Video Production 4% 3.49$ 445 $ 2,224 $ 4,447 Audio Production 7% 5.47 $ 696 $ 3,478$ 6,956 Authoring/ Programming 17% 13.42$ 1,708 $ 8,541$ 17,082 QA Testing 6% 5.12 $ 651 $ 3,257$ 6,515 Project Management 6% 5.08 $ 646 $ 3,232$ 6,463 SME/ Stakeholder Reviews 7% 5.59$ 711 $ 3,557$ 7,115 Pilot Test 4% 3.43 $ 437 $ 2,185$ 4,370 Other 1% 0.96$ 122 $ 608$ 1,216 Totals 100% 79 $ 10,054 $ 50,270$ 100,540 Development of Level 1 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task. Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: 79 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: $10,054

Level 2 - eLearning Development Benchmark

Development of Level 2 - eLearning How is Level 2 eLearning Defined? LevelDefinition Level 1 eLearning (Basic) Content pages, text, graphics, perhaps simple audio, perhaps simple video, test questions. NOTE: PowerPoint-to-eLearning often falls into this category. Basically pages with assessment. Level 2 eLearning (Interactive) Level 1… plus 25% (or more) interactive exercises (allowing learners to perform virtual "try it" exercises), liberal use of multimedia (audio, video, animations) Level 3 eLearning (Advanced) Highly interactive, possibly simulation or serious game based, use of avatars, custom interactions, award winning caliber courseware The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT: It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results, especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.

Development of Level 2 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 184:1 267:1 127:1

$18,583 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning. The cost shown is the average

Tasks % of time spent on each task Time spent on each task (per finished hour) 1-hour Level 2 eLearning 5-hours Level 2 eLearning 10-hours Level 2 eLearning Front End Analysis 9%17.36 $ 1,753 $ 8,767 $ 17,535 Instructional Design 13%24.69 $ 2,493$ 12,466 $ 24,932 Storyboarding 11%20.88 $ 2,108 $ 10,542 $ 21,085 Graphic Production 12%22.39 $ 2,261 $ 11,305 $ 22,609 Video Production 6%11.29 $ 1,140 $ 5,700 $ 11,400 Audio Production 6%11.59 $ 1,171 $ 5,855 $ 11,710 Authoring/ Programming 18%32.20 $ 3,252 $ 16,260 $ 32,520 QA Testing 6%11.88 $ 1,200 $ 5,998 $ 11,996 Project Management 6%11.74 $ 1,185 $ 5,926 $ 11,853 SME/ Stakeholder Reviews 6%10.96 $ 1,107 $ 5,533 $ 11,066 Pilot Test 4%7.41 $ 748 $ 3,740 $ 7,481 Other 1%1.63 $ 164 $ 822 $ 1,644 Totals100% 184 $ 18,583 $ 92,915 $ 185,830 Development of Level 2 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task. Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: 184 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: $18,583

Level 3 - eLearning Development Benchmark

Development of Level 3 - eLearning How is Level 3 eLearning Defined? LevelDefinition Level 1 eLearning (Basic) Content pages, text, graphics, perhaps simple audio, perhaps simple video, test questions. NOTE: PowerPoint-to-eLearning often falls into this category. Basically pages with assessment. Level 2 eLearning (Interactive) Level 1… plus 25% (or more) interactive exercises (allowing learners to perform virtual "try it" exercises), liberal use of multimedia (audio, video, animations) Level 3 eLearning (Advanced) Highly interactive, possibly simulation or serious game-based, use of avatars, custom interactions, award-winning caliber courseware The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT: It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results, especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.

Development of Level 3 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 490:1 716:1 217:1 NOTE: Several respondents listed times greater than hours of development per finished hour (very advanced learning simulations and games)

Development of Level 3 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 3 eLearning? $50,371 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning. The cost shown is the average

Tasks % of time spent on each task Time spent on each task (per finished hour) 1-hour Level 3 eLearning 5-hours Level 3 eLearning 10-hours Level 3 eLearning Front End Analysis 9%42.97 $ 4,417 $ 22,086 $ 44,171 Instructional Design 13%61.97 $ 6,370 $ 31,850 $ 63,700 Storyboarding 11%53.22 $ 5,471 $ 27,355 $ 54,711 Graphic Production 13%64.53 $ 6,633 $ 33,167 $ 66,335 Video Production 6%30.46 $ 3,131 $ 15,654 $ 31,308 Audio Production 5%26.61 $ 2,736 $ 13,678 $ 27,355 Authoring/ Programming 18%86.39 $ 8,881 $ 44,404 $ 88,808 QA Testing 6%31.51 $ 3,239 $ 16,196 $ 32,392 Project Management 7%32.19 $ 3,309 $ 16,545 $ 33,090 SME/ Stakeholder Reviews 6%30.61 $ 3,146 $ 15,731 $ 31,463 Pilot Test 4%20.96 $ 2,154 $ 10,772 $ 21,543 Other 2%8.59 $ 883 $ 4,417 $ 8,834 Totals100% 490 $ 50,371 $ 251,855 $ 503,710 Development of Level 3 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task. Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: 490 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: $50,371