JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE 651-282-3972 Achieving Timely.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
Advertisements

 Federal Dollars for Assurances Which Protect Children Who are in Foster Care.
1 During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training. You will answer questions based upon information.
Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence CFWS In-Service.
Dallas CASA Court Appointed Special Advocates. Allegations of abuse and neglect Investigation by DFPS DFPS has arranged for a residence for the child.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
Working Across Systems to Improve Outcomes for Young Children Sheryl Dicker, J.D. Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Family and Social Medicine, Albert.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Judy Nord Staff Attorney & CJI Manager Judy Nord Staff Attorney & CJI Manager Lois Pirsig Data Quality Coordinator Lois Pirsig Data Quality Coordinator.
Juvenile Justice system
Brain Development EDU 221 Spring Understanding Brain Development Parents, teachers, and others who closely observe children have long recognized.
Defining the Role of the Guardian ad Litem
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
CJI Reducing Trauma in Children by Ensuring Involvement of Fathers Nancy K. Jones, Hennepin County Attorney’s Office Kevin McTigue, Hennepin County Human.
Duty to Report Child Abuse, Neglect, and Dependency in North Carolina Janet Mason Institute of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Contents n Definitions n Goals n Target Populations n Categories n Activities.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Jennifer Renne Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues ABA Center on Children and the Law Permanency Goal: Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Pennsylvania Indian Child Welfare Handbook Developed By The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program University of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
September Module 6 What have we learned? Informing child welfare.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
1 AB12: Legal Process for Social Workers Version 2.0, November 28, 2012.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
1 Concurrent Planning: Multiple Pathways to Permanence Version 2.0, 2010 Module A.
What does the Safe Haven Law provide? The law protects a parent who leaves their baby at a “Safe Haven” location. The parent will not face criminal prosecution.
Welcome to the Quarterly FTM Facilitator Advanced Training  Please make sure you have signed in.  In order to receive PE training hours you must be registered.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
Foster Care Eligibility Determination Training System Century College MFWCAA Conference Title IV-E Workshop October 9, 2008 Deborah Trotter NW Region Paula.
 SW Ability to prepare children and families for child removal in a manner that reduces trauma, minimizes stress, and enhances partnership 
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
PARENTING BEYOND BARS Lillian Hewko, Incarcerated Parents Project, Washington Defender Association.
P RESENTED BY : T RACY S HEEHAN, C IRCUIT C OURT J UDGE & J ON J OHNSON, G ENERAL M AGISTRATE T HE T HIRTEENTH J UDICIAL C IRCUIT T AMPA, F LORIDA I N.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl.
September Module 6 What have we learned? Informing child welfare.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Permanency Planning From Day One. Every child is born with the beautiful potential to become wonderful human beings who experience love, joy, growth and.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
Child In Need of Care (CINC) Code Guardians ad litem Nuts and Bolts October 2015.
Permanency.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
Hon. Carlos Villalon, Jr.. TODAYS FOCUS What is a Foster Care Case? Aren’t All Courts the Same? What is the Judge’s Role? What are the Educational Issues.
21 st Century Caregiving : Foster VC Kids Resource Family Training Session 1.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
Kinship 101: Information for Relatives and “Suitable Others”
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Maintaining Child and Family Connections
Ohio CASA Celebrate Kids Conference September 19, 2019
Presentation transcript:

JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Achieving Timely Permanency for Children in Out-of-Home Placement

Training Overview Foundation of the 12-Month Permanency Timeline 12-Month Permanency Timeline Required Judicial Findings Your Responsibilities Regarding Permanency Your County’s Data Related to Permanency Timeline

The 12-Month Permanency Timeline – It’s Based on the Healthy Development of Children

How the Brain Develops Our brains function on an incredibly complex network of connections that often is referred to as the brain's "circuitry" or "wiring." Most of the brain's cells are formed before birth, but most of the connections or between the cells are made during infancy and early childhood.

How the Brain Develops A child’s daily experiences shape the way the connections and pathways are made in the child’s brain. Experiences that are repeated, either good or bad, have a permanent effect on brain development.

How the Brain Develops Learning continues throughout life. However, "prime times" or "windows of opportunity" exist when the brain is a kind of "supersponge," absorbing new information more easily than at other times and developing in major leaps.

How the Brain Develops A key “prime time” with a remarkable increase in connections occurs during the first few years of life. By the time a child is age 3, a baby's brain has formed about 1,000 trillion connections — about twice as many as adults have. A baby's brain is superdense and will stay that way throughout the first decade of life.

Impact of Abuse and Neglect on Healthy Development of Child The experiences of infancy and early childhood provide the organizing framework for children's intelligence, emotions, and personalities. When those experiences are primarily negative, children may develop emotional, behavioral, and learning problems that persist throughout their lifetime, especially in the absence of targeted interventions.

Impact of Abuse and Neglect on Healthy Development of Child Child maltreatment during infancy and early childhood has been shown to negatively affect child development, including brain and cognitive development, attachment, and academic achievement. Child abuse and neglect at anytime during a child’s life can have enduring physical, intellectual, and psychological repercussions into adolescence and adulthood.

Impact of Abuse and Neglect on Healthy Development of Child A child’s health development can be impaired by: Instability, including entry and re-entry into foster care and moves between foster homes. Lack of timely permanency, including safe, permanent caregivers – a “forever family.”

12-Month Permanency Timeline

 Mother’s and father’s name and address  Foster parent’s name and address  Child’s name and current address in foster care  County must immediately notify court and parties of child’s return home or change of foster care Petition Content

 Personal service on mother AND father (except alleged fathers)  Service by publication, if parent’s name or address unknown  County pays for cost of service of process Service of Summons and Petition

 ICWA requires the petitioner to notify the tribe of state court action  Notice must be by registered mail, return receipt requested or personal service  Green “receipt” or copy must be filed in court file County’s Notice to Tribe

 Child’s guardian ad litem  Attorney for child  Attorney for parents (law changing August 1 - one attorney for both parents unless exceptional circumstance)  Child  Foster parent EPC Hearing Critical Attendees Often Missing

 Prima Facie Case Established (PFCE)  Endangerment - child or others endangered if child returns home  Best interests – out of home placement is in child’s best interests  Reasonable or Active Efforts  To prevent removal  To reunify child (later stages of case) EPC Hearing Findings

 Commenced within 60 days of EPC or ADH, whichever is earlier  Held over consecutive days  Completed within 30 days  Findings issued within 15 days of last person who testified (court may add 15 days, for total of 30) Trial

 Adjudication may be withheld for up to 90 days  Orders distributed to parties  Recommend also distributed to participants (at least parents) Adjudication and Withholding Adjudication

 Dismissed  Termination of Jurisdiction  Reunified Dismissed, Termination of Jurisdiction, Reunified

 OHPP must be prepared for each parent, including incarcerated unless court finds that reasonable efforts are not required  OHPP must be filed within 30 days of child’s court-ordered placement (ex parte order or EPC order) Out-of-Home Placement Plan

 Safety risk for this child in this case  Parent’s “task list”  Behavioral change that parent must demonstrate and sustain  Agency’s responsibilities (efforts) Out-of-Home Placement Plan Critical Components

 Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) findings  High foster care re-entry rate  Caused when reunification is not yet safe?? Out-of-Home Placement Plan Critical Components

 For children under age 8 (August 1 – for all children regardless of age)  Parent making progress on case plan – demonstrating behavioral change?  Parent maintaining regular contact with child? Permanency Progress Review Hearing

 If making progress and maintaining contact – court can continue case for up to 6 months  If not making progress OR not maintaining contact, court may direct county to file a permanency petition within 30 days Permanency Progress Review Hearing

 Child is on Trial Home Visit – court may continue permanency proceeding for time child is in THV (6 months)  Prior CHIPS petition(s) during last 5 years for which child in OHP for 365 days or more – upon showing of compelling reasons, court may extend permanency proceeding up to 6 months Exceptions to Filing of Permanency Petition

Reunification Options Trial Home Visit Return only to custodial parent Permanency clock continues Legal custody retained by county County may remove child without court order Maximum 6 months Protective Supervision Return to custodial or noncustodial parent Permanency clock continues if noncustodial but stops if custodial Legal custody returned to parent County may remove child only with court order Indefinite

Your County’s Data Related to Permanency

Questions and Wrap Up Judy Nord Staff Attorney and Manager, Children’s Justice Initiative